- This topic has 40 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
cielore.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 14, 2008 at 8:35 AM #203821May 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM #204099
raptorduck
ParticipantI should note that RSF has roughly 50 “communities” that have a particular name, many, if not most, of which are gated and Cielo is in my top 5 among the gated communities, behind only Fairbanks Ranch, Diegueno Hills, the Crosby, and The Bridges overall, though, for my needs/tastes, I think I would pick living in Cielo over The Bridges and perhaps, depending on the home, The Crosby. My second favorite overall gated community, Santaluz, is not in RSF.
Of course I also don’t include those gated communities that are out of my $$ league and thus that they won’t even let me visit, like Tuscan Estates, River Estates, and Roxbury Estates.
May 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM #204066raptorduck
ParticipantI should note that RSF has roughly 50 “communities” that have a particular name, many, if not most, of which are gated and Cielo is in my top 5 among the gated communities, behind only Fairbanks Ranch, Diegueno Hills, the Crosby, and The Bridges overall, though, for my needs/tastes, I think I would pick living in Cielo over The Bridges and perhaps, depending on the home, The Crosby. My second favorite overall gated community, Santaluz, is not in RSF.
Of course I also don’t include those gated communities that are out of my $$ league and thus that they won’t even let me visit, like Tuscan Estates, River Estates, and Roxbury Estates.
May 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM #204017raptorduck
ParticipantI should note that RSF has roughly 50 “communities” that have a particular name, many, if not most, of which are gated and Cielo is in my top 5 among the gated communities, behind only Fairbanks Ranch, Diegueno Hills, the Crosby, and The Bridges overall, though, for my needs/tastes, I think I would pick living in Cielo over The Bridges and perhaps, depending on the home, The Crosby. My second favorite overall gated community, Santaluz, is not in RSF.
Of course I also don’t include those gated communities that are out of my $$ league and thus that they won’t even let me visit, like Tuscan Estates, River Estates, and Roxbury Estates.
May 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM #203964raptorduck
ParticipantI should note that RSF has roughly 50 “communities” that have a particular name, many, if not most, of which are gated and Cielo is in my top 5 among the gated communities, behind only Fairbanks Ranch, Diegueno Hills, the Crosby, and The Bridges overall, though, for my needs/tastes, I think I would pick living in Cielo over The Bridges and perhaps, depending on the home, The Crosby. My second favorite overall gated community, Santaluz, is not in RSF.
Of course I also don’t include those gated communities that are out of my $$ league and thus that they won’t even let me visit, like Tuscan Estates, River Estates, and Roxbury Estates.
May 14, 2008 at 1:46 PM #204043raptorduck
ParticipantI should note that RSF has roughly 50 “communities” that have a particular name, many, if not most, of which are gated and Cielo is in my top 5 among the gated communities, behind only Fairbanks Ranch, Diegueno Hills, the Crosby, and The Bridges overall, though, for my needs/tastes, I think I would pick living in Cielo over The Bridges and perhaps, depending on the home, The Crosby. My second favorite overall gated community, Santaluz, is not in RSF.
Of course I also don’t include those gated communities that are out of my $$ league and thus that they won’t even let me visit, like Tuscan Estates, River Estates, and Roxbury Estates.
May 14, 2008 at 9:30 PM #204317privatebanker
ParticipantCielo is a nice development however it is not Rancho Santa Fe. Its truly Rancho Bernardo. The developers were some how able to get the RSF zip code. This occurred at the height of the RE frenzy of course. The lot values will without a doubt drop in value in the coming years.
Be patient… The party is just starting.
May 14, 2008 at 9:30 PM #204365privatebanker
ParticipantCielo is a nice development however it is not Rancho Santa Fe. Its truly Rancho Bernardo. The developers were some how able to get the RSF zip code. This occurred at the height of the RE frenzy of course. The lot values will without a doubt drop in value in the coming years.
Be patient… The party is just starting.
May 14, 2008 at 9:30 PM #204393privatebanker
ParticipantCielo is a nice development however it is not Rancho Santa Fe. Its truly Rancho Bernardo. The developers were some how able to get the RSF zip code. This occurred at the height of the RE frenzy of course. The lot values will without a doubt drop in value in the coming years.
Be patient… The party is just starting.
May 14, 2008 at 9:30 PM #204416privatebanker
ParticipantCielo is a nice development however it is not Rancho Santa Fe. Its truly Rancho Bernardo. The developers were some how able to get the RSF zip code. This occurred at the height of the RE frenzy of course. The lot values will without a doubt drop in value in the coming years.
Be patient… The party is just starting.
May 14, 2008 at 9:30 PM #204449privatebanker
ParticipantCielo is a nice development however it is not Rancho Santa Fe. Its truly Rancho Bernardo. The developers were some how able to get the RSF zip code. This occurred at the height of the RE frenzy of course. The lot values will without a doubt drop in value in the coming years.
Be patient… The party is just starting.
May 15, 2008 at 8:24 AM #204681cielore
ParticipantDoes anyone have a guess as to the percentage increase in land values over the original selling price? I am told that the initial offering sold out in 36 hrs in 2003. I also understand that the parent company either has or is preparing to release another 50+ homesites on higher terrain above the original development. This cant bode well for existing lot owners. Also, the fact that 5yrs after opening the vast majority of this development remains empty dirt is a definite neg IMHO. Even if I bought a lot at fire sale pricing tomorrow my quality of living and resalevalue have got to be significantly lowered by the empty dirt everywhere. I think you need a 5-10 yr horizon and a lot of patience to consider building here IMHO. Thoughts?
May 15, 2008 at 8:24 AM #204713cielore
ParticipantDoes anyone have a guess as to the percentage increase in land values over the original selling price? I am told that the initial offering sold out in 36 hrs in 2003. I also understand that the parent company either has or is preparing to release another 50+ homesites on higher terrain above the original development. This cant bode well for existing lot owners. Also, the fact that 5yrs after opening the vast majority of this development remains empty dirt is a definite neg IMHO. Even if I bought a lot at fire sale pricing tomorrow my quality of living and resalevalue have got to be significantly lowered by the empty dirt everywhere. I think you need a 5-10 yr horizon and a lot of patience to consider building here IMHO. Thoughts?
May 15, 2008 at 8:24 AM #204658cielore
ParticipantDoes anyone have a guess as to the percentage increase in land values over the original selling price? I am told that the initial offering sold out in 36 hrs in 2003. I also understand that the parent company either has or is preparing to release another 50+ homesites on higher terrain above the original development. This cant bode well for existing lot owners. Also, the fact that 5yrs after opening the vast majority of this development remains empty dirt is a definite neg IMHO. Even if I bought a lot at fire sale pricing tomorrow my quality of living and resalevalue have got to be significantly lowered by the empty dirt everywhere. I think you need a 5-10 yr horizon and a lot of patience to consider building here IMHO. Thoughts?
May 15, 2008 at 8:24 AM #204630cielore
ParticipantDoes anyone have a guess as to the percentage increase in land values over the original selling price? I am told that the initial offering sold out in 36 hrs in 2003. I also understand that the parent company either has or is preparing to release another 50+ homesites on higher terrain above the original development. This cant bode well for existing lot owners. Also, the fact that 5yrs after opening the vast majority of this development remains empty dirt is a definite neg IMHO. Even if I bought a lot at fire sale pricing tomorrow my quality of living and resalevalue have got to be significantly lowered by the empty dirt everywhere. I think you need a 5-10 yr horizon and a lot of patience to consider building here IMHO. Thoughts?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.