Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Celtic Tiger – Funny & Honest Bit from an Irish
- This topic has 80 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 11, 2010 at 9:31 PM #638576December 11, 2010 at 11:37 PM #639690CA renterParticipant
That was awesome, SD Transplant! Couldn’t agree more with him. The very same thing has been happening over here in the U.S. We are **all** owned by the bankers and corporate elite.
Thanks for posting it.
December 11, 2010 at 11:37 PM #639374CA renterParticipantThat was awesome, SD Transplant! Couldn’t agree more with him. The very same thing has been happening over here in the U.S. We are **all** owned by the bankers and corporate elite.
Thanks for posting it.
December 11, 2010 at 11:37 PM #638658CA renterParticipantThat was awesome, SD Transplant! Couldn’t agree more with him. The very same thing has been happening over here in the U.S. We are **all** owned by the bankers and corporate elite.
Thanks for posting it.
December 11, 2010 at 11:37 PM #638586CA renterParticipantThat was awesome, SD Transplant! Couldn’t agree more with him. The very same thing has been happening over here in the U.S. We are **all** owned by the bankers and corporate elite.
Thanks for posting it.
December 11, 2010 at 11:37 PM #639241CA renterParticipantThat was awesome, SD Transplant! Couldn’t agree more with him. The very same thing has been happening over here in the U.S. We are **all** owned by the bankers and corporate elite.
Thanks for posting it.
December 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM #639700briansd1GuestIt’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.
December 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM #638668briansd1GuestIt’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.
December 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM #639384briansd1GuestIt’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.
December 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM #638596briansd1GuestIt’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.
December 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM #639251briansd1GuestIt’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.
December 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM #639404CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1]It’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.[/quote]
True, but right now, things are at an extreme relative to the period since the Great Depression (the GD was also caused by extreme wealth disparity, IMHO).
I’ve never known of a successful society that had this sort of wealth disparity. It is usually the sign of social and economic decay…and imminent collapse.
December 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM #639271CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1]It’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.[/quote]
True, but right now, things are at an extreme relative to the period since the Great Depression (the GD was also caused by extreme wealth disparity, IMHO).
I’ve never known of a successful society that had this sort of wealth disparity. It is usually the sign of social and economic decay…and imminent collapse.
December 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM #639721CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1]It’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.[/quote]
True, but right now, things are at an extreme relative to the period since the Great Depression (the GD was also caused by extreme wealth disparity, IMHO).
I’ve never known of a successful society that had this sort of wealth disparity. It is usually the sign of social and economic decay…and imminent collapse.
December 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM #638616CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1]It’s all relative, CA renter.
Tell me of a society that is not owned by some form of elite or another. It’s only a degree of how much proportional wealth is concentrated at the top.
The wealthier a society becomes, the more concentration of power there is, it seems.[/quote]
True, but right now, things are at an extreme relative to the period since the Great Depression (the GD was also caused by extreme wealth disparity, IMHO).
I’ve never known of a successful society that had this sort of wealth disparity. It is usually the sign of social and economic decay…and imminent collapse.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.