- This topic has 190 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 26, 2007 at 10:34 AM #124608December 26, 2007 at 11:37 AM #124379EugeneParticipant
I’m assuming that it’s not THE Case-Shiller algorithm, as that must be proprietary stuff,
Here’s a good description of their algorithm. It’s missing some implementation details but it’s almost complete.
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/SPCS_MetroArea_HomePrices_Methodology.pdf
if I buy a crummy little house in bird rock, for a million, tear it down and build a much bigger house and sell it for two million, will Case Shiller report a 100% price increase on this house?
They exclude houses with substantial physical changes if they can detect them in deed records. They also try to detect “unusual” price changes and either exclude them or assign lower weights to them.
December 26, 2007 at 11:37 AM #124527EugeneParticipantI’m assuming that it’s not THE Case-Shiller algorithm, as that must be proprietary stuff,
Here’s a good description of their algorithm. It’s missing some implementation details but it’s almost complete.
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/SPCS_MetroArea_HomePrices_Methodology.pdf
if I buy a crummy little house in bird rock, for a million, tear it down and build a much bigger house and sell it for two million, will Case Shiller report a 100% price increase on this house?
They exclude houses with substantial physical changes if they can detect them in deed records. They also try to detect “unusual” price changes and either exclude them or assign lower weights to them.
December 26, 2007 at 11:37 AM #124549EugeneParticipantI’m assuming that it’s not THE Case-Shiller algorithm, as that must be proprietary stuff,
Here’s a good description of their algorithm. It’s missing some implementation details but it’s almost complete.
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/SPCS_MetroArea_HomePrices_Methodology.pdf
if I buy a crummy little house in bird rock, for a million, tear it down and build a much bigger house and sell it for two million, will Case Shiller report a 100% price increase on this house?
They exclude houses with substantial physical changes if they can detect them in deed records. They also try to detect “unusual” price changes and either exclude them or assign lower weights to them.
December 26, 2007 at 11:37 AM #124606EugeneParticipantI’m assuming that it’s not THE Case-Shiller algorithm, as that must be proprietary stuff,
Here’s a good description of their algorithm. It’s missing some implementation details but it’s almost complete.
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/SPCS_MetroArea_HomePrices_Methodology.pdf
if I buy a crummy little house in bird rock, for a million, tear it down and build a much bigger house and sell it for two million, will Case Shiller report a 100% price increase on this house?
They exclude houses with substantial physical changes if they can detect them in deed records. They also try to detect “unusual” price changes and either exclude them or assign lower weights to them.
December 26, 2007 at 11:37 AM #124628EugeneParticipantI’m assuming that it’s not THE Case-Shiller algorithm, as that must be proprietary stuff,
Here’s a good description of their algorithm. It’s missing some implementation details but it’s almost complete.
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/SPCS_MetroArea_HomePrices_Methodology.pdf
if I buy a crummy little house in bird rock, for a million, tear it down and build a much bigger house and sell it for two million, will Case Shiller report a 100% price increase on this house?
They exclude houses with substantial physical changes if they can detect them in deed records. They also try to detect “unusual” price changes and either exclude them or assign lower weights to them.
December 27, 2007 at 2:32 PM #125053EugeneParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kDecember 27, 2007 at 2:32 PM #125204EugeneParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kDecember 27, 2007 at 2:32 PM #125220EugeneParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kDecember 27, 2007 at 2:32 PM #125281EugeneParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kDecember 27, 2007 at 2:32 PM #125305EugeneParticipantChleaned up my data and made some graphs.
First, a consistency check (making sure my numbers are roughly the same as official Case-Shiller).
[img_assist|nid=5965|title=Consistency Check|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=336]
Not a perfect match but good enough. There are too many implementation subtleties and my data is lower quality, so I can’t hope for a perfect match.
Notice that I have two more points. Official Case-Shiller numbers for October are based on sales in August through October. I also have data for November.
Next, regional graphs.
[img_assist|nid=5968|title=Regional HPI – 07/11|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=306]
Coastal areas are almost at the peak levels. November blip is probably seasonal. From Coronado to CV to Carlsbad, bubble denial is still strong.
Affluent north county inland neighborhoods are still holding. Middle-class and Mexican zip codes are in free fall.
Finally a quick look at specific resales, to see what kinds of transactions contibute to apparent 27% decline south of 94.
http://www.sdlookup.com/Property-37101EFF-3242_San_Carlos_Dr_Spring_Valley_CA_91978
Bought in June ’05 for 595k (2% off the peak), sold for 460khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-439233E6-1332_Santa_Cora_Ave_Chula_Vista_CA_91913
Bought in 11/2003 for 442k (31% off the peak), sold for 440khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-27FBE78D-9252_Brookside_Cir_Spring_Valley_CA_91977
Bought in Sep ’05 for 650k (1% off the peak), sold for 422khttp://www.sdlookup.com/Property-A586DFE8-3643_Byrd_St_San_Diego_CA_92154
Bought in Dec ’03 for 351k (28% off the peak), sold for 307kDecember 27, 2007 at 6:07 PM #125186paranoidParticipantesmith,
this is great stuff. For local people watching the local market, this info is really useful.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Aslo please update the graph regularly so that we know what’s going on in real-time.
thanks again.
December 27, 2007 at 6:07 PM #125339paranoidParticipantesmith,
this is great stuff. For local people watching the local market, this info is really useful.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Aslo please update the graph regularly so that we know what’s going on in real-time.
thanks again.
December 27, 2007 at 6:07 PM #125358paranoidParticipantesmith,
this is great stuff. For local people watching the local market, this info is really useful.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Aslo please update the graph regularly so that we know what’s going on in real-time.
thanks again.
December 27, 2007 at 6:07 PM #125416paranoidParticipantesmith,
this is great stuff. For local people watching the local market, this info is really useful.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Aslo please update the graph regularly so that we know what’s going on in real-time.
thanks again.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.