- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by
cyphire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102332November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102308
CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102384
CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102396
CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102420
CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102448
CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102432Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102509Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102521Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102545Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102574Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102437cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102514cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102526cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102550cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
