- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by cyphire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102332November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102308CoronitaParticipant
Not much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102448CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102420CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102396CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102384CoronitaParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102432ArtyParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102509ArtyParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102521ArtyParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102545ArtyParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102574ArtyParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102437cyphireParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102514cyphireParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102526cyphireParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102550cyphireParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.