- This topic has 235 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 8, 2009 at 12:31 PM #455029September 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM #454239sdcellarParticipant
[quote=AN]Here’s a cookie and gold star. I guess it sucks for all who want rent parity in the high end.[/quote]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.
September 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM #454435sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Here’s a cookie and gold star. I guess it sucks for all who want rent parity in the high end.[/quote]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.
September 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM #454774sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Here’s a cookie and gold star. I guess it sucks for all who want rent parity in the high end.[/quote]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.
September 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM #454847sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Here’s a cookie and gold star. I guess it sucks for all who want rent parity in the high end.[/quote]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.
September 8, 2009 at 12:43 PM #455039sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Here’s a cookie and gold star. I guess it sucks for all who want rent parity in the high end.[/quote]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.
September 8, 2009 at 12:47 PM #454234sdcellarParticipantDefinitely agree on the Mendoza line (and that PPSF generally goes up as feet² goes down).
September 8, 2009 at 12:47 PM #454430sdcellarParticipantDefinitely agree on the Mendoza line (and that PPSF generally goes up as feet² goes down).
September 8, 2009 at 12:47 PM #454769sdcellarParticipantDefinitely agree on the Mendoza line (and that PPSF generally goes up as feet² goes down).
September 8, 2009 at 12:47 PM #454842sdcellarParticipantDefinitely agree on the Mendoza line (and that PPSF generally goes up as feet² goes down).
September 8, 2009 at 12:47 PM #455034sdcellarParticipantDefinitely agree on the Mendoza line (and that PPSF generally goes up as feet² goes down).
September 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM #454244anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.[/quote]
Sorry, was 1 cookie not enough?BTW, you conveniently left out the last sentence of my post:
[quote=AN]So, I think there’s a rent premium for nicer areas too.[/quote]
Stop staring at the tree and you might see the forest, it’s quite beautiful.September 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM #454440anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.[/quote]
Sorry, was 1 cookie not enough?BTW, you conveniently left out the last sentence of my post:
[quote=AN]So, I think there’s a rent premium for nicer areas too.[/quote]
Stop staring at the tree and you might see the forest, it’s quite beautiful.September 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM #454779anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.[/quote]
Sorry, was 1 cookie not enough?BTW, you conveniently left out the last sentence of my post:
[quote=AN]So, I think there’s a rent premium for nicer areas too.[/quote]
Stop staring at the tree and you might see the forest, it’s quite beautiful.September 8, 2009 at 12:59 PM #454852anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]Gracious. And, as always, thanks for changing the subject. Again.[/quote]
Sorry, was 1 cookie not enough?BTW, you conveniently left out the last sentence of my post:
[quote=AN]So, I think there’s a rent premium for nicer areas too.[/quote]
Stop staring at the tree and you might see the forest, it’s quite beautiful. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.