Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › can’t beat them join them?
- This topic has 330 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM #470255October 15, 2009 at 12:43 PM #469472
joec
ParticipantIs your new home part of the phase 4A release homes of Chanteclair? It’d be interesting to see how prices will be when Cal West releases pricing for Andalucia and Monteluz (more new home supply in 4S). I think they will be in the 700s though with their larger lots.
October 15, 2009 at 12:43 PM #469652ParticipantIs your new home part of the phase 4A release homes of Chanteclair? It’d be interesting to see how prices will be when Cal West releases pricing for Andalucia and Monteluz (more new home supply in 4S). I think they will be in the 700s though with their larger lots.
October 15, 2009 at 12:43 PM #470007ParticipantIs your new home part of the phase 4A release homes of Chanteclair? It’d be interesting to see how prices will be when Cal West releases pricing for Andalucia and Monteluz (more new home supply in 4S). I think they will be in the 700s though with their larger lots.
October 15, 2009 at 12:43 PM #470080ParticipantIs your new home part of the phase 4A release homes of Chanteclair? It’d be interesting to see how prices will be when Cal West releases pricing for Andalucia and Monteluz (more new home supply in 4S). I think they will be in the 700s though with their larger lots.
October 15, 2009 at 12:43 PM #470290ParticipantIs your new home part of the phase 4A release homes of Chanteclair? It’d be interesting to see how prices will be when Cal West releases pricing for Andalucia and Monteluz (more new home supply in 4S). I think they will be in the 700s though with their larger lots.
October 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM #469517IT.MOM
Participant[quote=sdcellar]I’m not really up to date on Obama’s current definition of “rich”, but my best guess is $250K.
I have to say I’m confused by your concern about sustainability of income paired with buying a house to stem that. Unless you’re talking about paying (mostly) cash, that is. If you’ve been saving all that up while you’ve been renting, then good for you![/quote]
I got your point: We should never stretch ourselves thin to just live in a “dreamhouse”.
Bottom line, “if you could comfortablely afford the house, then ‘Good for you’ ;-)”October 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM #469696Participant[quote=sdcellar]I’m not really up to date on Obama’s current definition of “rich”, but my best guess is $250K.
I have to say I’m confused by your concern about sustainability of income paired with buying a house to stem that. Unless you’re talking about paying (mostly) cash, that is. If you’ve been saving all that up while you’ve been renting, then good for you![/quote]
I got your point: We should never stretch ourselves thin to just live in a “dreamhouse”.
Bottom line, “if you could comfortablely afford the house, then ‘Good for you’ ;-)”October 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM #470051Participant[quote=sdcellar]I’m not really up to date on Obama’s current definition of “rich”, but my best guess is $250K.
I have to say I’m confused by your concern about sustainability of income paired with buying a house to stem that. Unless you’re talking about paying (mostly) cash, that is. If you’ve been saving all that up while you’ve been renting, then good for you![/quote]
I got your point: We should never stretch ourselves thin to just live in a “dreamhouse”.
Bottom line, “if you could comfortablely afford the house, then ‘Good for you’ ;-)”October 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM #470123Participant[quote=sdcellar]I’m not really up to date on Obama’s current definition of “rich”, but my best guess is $250K.
I have to say I’m confused by your concern about sustainability of income paired with buying a house to stem that. Unless you’re talking about paying (mostly) cash, that is. If you’ve been saving all that up while you’ve been renting, then good for you![/quote]
I got your point: We should never stretch ourselves thin to just live in a “dreamhouse”.
Bottom line, “if you could comfortablely afford the house, then ‘Good for you’ ;-)”October 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM #470335Participant[quote=sdcellar]I’m not really up to date on Obama’s current definition of “rich”, but my best guess is $250K.
I have to say I’m confused by your concern about sustainability of income paired with buying a house to stem that. Unless you’re talking about paying (mostly) cash, that is. If you’ve been saving all that up while you’ve been renting, then good for you![/quote]
I got your point: We should never stretch ourselves thin to just live in a “dreamhouse”.
Bottom line, “if you could comfortablely afford the house, then ‘Good for you’ ;-)”October 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM #469550ParticipantWhat do you do in a “$40000 vacation”? $4000 is more reasonable for me. If for staycation, $400 is enough.
October 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM #469728ParticipantWhat do you do in a “$40000 vacation”? $4000 is more reasonable for me. If for staycation, $400 is enough.
October 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM #470083ParticipantWhat do you do in a “$40000 vacation”? $4000 is more reasonable for me. If for staycation, $400 is enough.
October 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM #470156ParticipantWhat do you do in a “$40000 vacation”? $4000 is more reasonable for me. If for staycation, $400 is enough.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.