- This topic has 105 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by
drunkle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 21, 2007 at 5:26 AM #102418November 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #102318
4plexowner
ParticipantMish says rate freeze will fail
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/11/freezing-mortgage-rates-will-fail.html
November 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #1023944plexowner
ParticipantMish says rate freeze will fail
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/11/freezing-mortgage-rates-will-fail.html
November 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #1024064plexowner
ParticipantMish says rate freeze will fail
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/11/freezing-mortgage-rates-will-fail.html
November 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #1024304plexowner
ParticipantMish says rate freeze will fail
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/11/freezing-mortgage-rates-will-fail.html
November 21, 2007 at 7:30 AM #1024584plexowner
ParticipantMish says rate freeze will fail
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/11/freezing-mortgage-rates-will-fail.html
November 21, 2007 at 7:45 AM #102338JWM in SD
ParticipantMost probably, Mish is right. I’m just curious, how is this arrangement even legal??? Isn’t it akin to a freaking cartel and price fixing? So only Californian FBs get to benefit from this??
Damn it, they are messing with my Schadenfreude again!!! Not Cool.
November 21, 2007 at 7:45 AM #102414JWM in SD
ParticipantMost probably, Mish is right. I’m just curious, how is this arrangement even legal??? Isn’t it akin to a freaking cartel and price fixing? So only Californian FBs get to benefit from this??
Damn it, they are messing with my Schadenfreude again!!! Not Cool.
November 21, 2007 at 7:45 AM #102426JWM in SD
ParticipantMost probably, Mish is right. I’m just curious, how is this arrangement even legal??? Isn’t it akin to a freaking cartel and price fixing? So only Californian FBs get to benefit from this??
Damn it, they are messing with my Schadenfreude again!!! Not Cool.
November 21, 2007 at 7:45 AM #102450JWM in SD
ParticipantMost probably, Mish is right. I’m just curious, how is this arrangement even legal??? Isn’t it akin to a freaking cartel and price fixing? So only Californian FBs get to benefit from this??
Damn it, they are messing with my Schadenfreude again!!! Not Cool.
November 21, 2007 at 7:45 AM #102478JWM in SD
ParticipantMost probably, Mish is right. I’m just curious, how is this arrangement even legal??? Isn’t it akin to a freaking cartel and price fixing? So only Californian FBs get to benefit from this??
Damn it, they are messing with my Schadenfreude again!!! Not Cool.
November 21, 2007 at 8:27 AM #102362betting on fall
ParticipantWe are looking at this backwards. These mortgage companies wouldn’t do this unless it was in THEIR interest. They are not charities. They are all on the edge of bankrupcy and need every dime they can get. And their shareholders would sue in a second if they were giving something away.
The companies are agreeing to this because taking a 15% lower monthly payment for the next few years creates a lot smaller loss then foreclosing today and showing an immediate 50% loss on the loan.
What the governator has really is locked a bunch of FBs into debt servitude for a little longer. Folks with bad loans on overprices properties should walk away. Maybe fewer will now.
November 21, 2007 at 8:27 AM #102439betting on fall
ParticipantWe are looking at this backwards. These mortgage companies wouldn’t do this unless it was in THEIR interest. They are not charities. They are all on the edge of bankrupcy and need every dime they can get. And their shareholders would sue in a second if they were giving something away.
The companies are agreeing to this because taking a 15% lower monthly payment for the next few years creates a lot smaller loss then foreclosing today and showing an immediate 50% loss on the loan.
What the governator has really is locked a bunch of FBs into debt servitude for a little longer. Folks with bad loans on overprices properties should walk away. Maybe fewer will now.
November 21, 2007 at 8:27 AM #102451betting on fall
ParticipantWe are looking at this backwards. These mortgage companies wouldn’t do this unless it was in THEIR interest. They are not charities. They are all on the edge of bankrupcy and need every dime they can get. And their shareholders would sue in a second if they were giving something away.
The companies are agreeing to this because taking a 15% lower monthly payment for the next few years creates a lot smaller loss then foreclosing today and showing an immediate 50% loss on the loan.
What the governator has really is locked a bunch of FBs into debt servitude for a little longer. Folks with bad loans on overprices properties should walk away. Maybe fewer will now.
November 21, 2007 at 8:27 AM #102475betting on fall
ParticipantWe are looking at this backwards. These mortgage companies wouldn’t do this unless it was in THEIR interest. They are not charities. They are all on the edge of bankrupcy and need every dime they can get. And their shareholders would sue in a second if they were giving something away.
The companies are agreeing to this because taking a 15% lower monthly payment for the next few years creates a lot smaller loss then foreclosing today and showing an immediate 50% loss on the loan.
What the governator has really is locked a bunch of FBs into debt servitude for a little longer. Folks with bad loans on overprices properties should walk away. Maybe fewer will now.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
