- This topic has 40 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by La Jolla Renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 19, 2008 at 8:40 PM #11563January 19, 2008 at 9:14 PM #138883asragovParticipant
I am assuming that you mean an IRA, which was rolled over from a 401k plan, so it is now a self-directed IRA ….
I have always found self-directed IRAs’ fees to be excessive, and compliance a bit of an annoyance, such as:
http://www.penscotrust.com/fees/ira_fees.asp
I have decided personally that it makes more sense to buy large-cap stocks or industry-specific ETF’s (exchange traded funds) because the management fees are low, and it is easy to get in and out.
Everyone’s risk tolerance and investment goals are different, but I would definitely avoid land in the middle of the desert without mineral rights or “regular” water (i.e. not from wells).
Land is so illiquid, and speculative, that it does not seem like it would an investment suitable for almost anyone’s retirement.
January 19, 2008 at 9:14 PM #139190asragovParticipantI am assuming that you mean an IRA, which was rolled over from a 401k plan, so it is now a self-directed IRA ….
I have always found self-directed IRAs’ fees to be excessive, and compliance a bit of an annoyance, such as:
http://www.penscotrust.com/fees/ira_fees.asp
I have decided personally that it makes more sense to buy large-cap stocks or industry-specific ETF’s (exchange traded funds) because the management fees are low, and it is easy to get in and out.
Everyone’s risk tolerance and investment goals are different, but I would definitely avoid land in the middle of the desert without mineral rights or “regular” water (i.e. not from wells).
Land is so illiquid, and speculative, that it does not seem like it would an investment suitable for almost anyone’s retirement.
January 19, 2008 at 9:14 PM #139096asragovParticipantI am assuming that you mean an IRA, which was rolled over from a 401k plan, so it is now a self-directed IRA ….
I have always found self-directed IRAs’ fees to be excessive, and compliance a bit of an annoyance, such as:
http://www.penscotrust.com/fees/ira_fees.asp
I have decided personally that it makes more sense to buy large-cap stocks or industry-specific ETF’s (exchange traded funds) because the management fees are low, and it is easy to get in and out.
Everyone’s risk tolerance and investment goals are different, but I would definitely avoid land in the middle of the desert without mineral rights or “regular” water (i.e. not from wells).
Land is so illiquid, and speculative, that it does not seem like it would an investment suitable for almost anyone’s retirement.
January 19, 2008 at 9:14 PM #139148asragovParticipantI am assuming that you mean an IRA, which was rolled over from a 401k plan, so it is now a self-directed IRA ….
I have always found self-directed IRAs’ fees to be excessive, and compliance a bit of an annoyance, such as:
http://www.penscotrust.com/fees/ira_fees.asp
I have decided personally that it makes more sense to buy large-cap stocks or industry-specific ETF’s (exchange traded funds) because the management fees are low, and it is easy to get in and out.
Everyone’s risk tolerance and investment goals are different, but I would definitely avoid land in the middle of the desert without mineral rights or “regular” water (i.e. not from wells).
Land is so illiquid, and speculative, that it does not seem like it would an investment suitable for almost anyone’s retirement.
January 19, 2008 at 9:14 PM #139118asragovParticipantI am assuming that you mean an IRA, which was rolled over from a 401k plan, so it is now a self-directed IRA ….
I have always found self-directed IRAs’ fees to be excessive, and compliance a bit of an annoyance, such as:
http://www.penscotrust.com/fees/ira_fees.asp
I have decided personally that it makes more sense to buy large-cap stocks or industry-specific ETF’s (exchange traded funds) because the management fees are low, and it is easy to get in and out.
Everyone’s risk tolerance and investment goals are different, but I would definitely avoid land in the middle of the desert without mineral rights or “regular” water (i.e. not from wells).
Land is so illiquid, and speculative, that it does not seem like it would an investment suitable for almost anyone’s retirement.
January 19, 2008 at 9:36 PM #139204PadreBrianParticipantop, a lot of that land has zero power and zero water. Running power to most of those spots will cost 10-20k. I know because my dad did his up near reno. I wouldn’t buy that land unless you LOVE it.
January 19, 2008 at 9:36 PM #139162PadreBrianParticipantop, a lot of that land has zero power and zero water. Running power to most of those spots will cost 10-20k. I know because my dad did his up near reno. I wouldn’t buy that land unless you LOVE it.
January 19, 2008 at 9:36 PM #139135PadreBrianParticipantop, a lot of that land has zero power and zero water. Running power to most of those spots will cost 10-20k. I know because my dad did his up near reno. I wouldn’t buy that land unless you LOVE it.
January 19, 2008 at 9:36 PM #139112PadreBrianParticipantop, a lot of that land has zero power and zero water. Running power to most of those spots will cost 10-20k. I know because my dad did his up near reno. I wouldn’t buy that land unless you LOVE it.
January 19, 2008 at 9:36 PM #138897PadreBrianParticipantop, a lot of that land has zero power and zero water. Running power to most of those spots will cost 10-20k. I know because my dad did his up near reno. I wouldn’t buy that land unless you LOVE it.
January 19, 2008 at 11:17 PM #139244pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
January 19, 2008 at 11:17 PM #139153pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
January 19, 2008 at 11:17 PM #138938pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
January 19, 2008 at 11:17 PM #139178pepsiParticipantAnd water will cost you $1K per yard. Hard to believe, but to meet all the environment standards of putting a pipe under ground, you better believe it….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.