- This topic has 530 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by carlsbadworker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 27, 2009 at 2:58 PM #388973April 27, 2009 at 3:28 PM #388357Rt.66Participant
Russell, I was not reffering to you.
My standpoint is the absolute and complete and totally bizaro world that thinks we may have been near a bottom last spring or this spring when REOs right NOW today, are at GD1 proportions and EVERYONE should know its getting worse by the minute. You can’t hide from this news.
Do I need prices to drop? Like maybe I could qualify if prices fall some more but not at today’s prices? Absolutley not.
My motivation is that I just can’t get my mind around such denial of absolute, in-your-face facts and figures screaming “trouble ahead”, WARNING, WARNING and people are cheerleading RE bottoms.
Maybe its some morbid fancination with having people try to explain the absurd?
April 27, 2009 at 3:28 PM #388622Rt.66ParticipantRussell, I was not reffering to you.
My standpoint is the absolute and complete and totally bizaro world that thinks we may have been near a bottom last spring or this spring when REOs right NOW today, are at GD1 proportions and EVERYONE should know its getting worse by the minute. You can’t hide from this news.
Do I need prices to drop? Like maybe I could qualify if prices fall some more but not at today’s prices? Absolutley not.
My motivation is that I just can’t get my mind around such denial of absolute, in-your-face facts and figures screaming “trouble ahead”, WARNING, WARNING and people are cheerleading RE bottoms.
Maybe its some morbid fancination with having people try to explain the absurd?
April 27, 2009 at 3:28 PM #388820Rt.66ParticipantRussell, I was not reffering to you.
My standpoint is the absolute and complete and totally bizaro world that thinks we may have been near a bottom last spring or this spring when REOs right NOW today, are at GD1 proportions and EVERYONE should know its getting worse by the minute. You can’t hide from this news.
Do I need prices to drop? Like maybe I could qualify if prices fall some more but not at today’s prices? Absolutley not.
My motivation is that I just can’t get my mind around such denial of absolute, in-your-face facts and figures screaming “trouble ahead”, WARNING, WARNING and people are cheerleading RE bottoms.
Maybe its some morbid fancination with having people try to explain the absurd?
April 27, 2009 at 3:28 PM #388871Rt.66ParticipantRussell, I was not reffering to you.
My standpoint is the absolute and complete and totally bizaro world that thinks we may have been near a bottom last spring or this spring when REOs right NOW today, are at GD1 proportions and EVERYONE should know its getting worse by the minute. You can’t hide from this news.
Do I need prices to drop? Like maybe I could qualify if prices fall some more but not at today’s prices? Absolutley not.
My motivation is that I just can’t get my mind around such denial of absolute, in-your-face facts and figures screaming “trouble ahead”, WARNING, WARNING and people are cheerleading RE bottoms.
Maybe its some morbid fancination with having people try to explain the absurd?
April 27, 2009 at 3:28 PM #389009Rt.66ParticipantRussell, I was not reffering to you.
My standpoint is the absolute and complete and totally bizaro world that thinks we may have been near a bottom last spring or this spring when REOs right NOW today, are at GD1 proportions and EVERYONE should know its getting worse by the minute. You can’t hide from this news.
Do I need prices to drop? Like maybe I could qualify if prices fall some more but not at today’s prices? Absolutley not.
My motivation is that I just can’t get my mind around such denial of absolute, in-your-face facts and figures screaming “trouble ahead”, WARNING, WARNING and people are cheerleading RE bottoms.
Maybe its some morbid fancination with having people try to explain the absurd?
April 27, 2009 at 5:21 PM #388387NotCrankyParticipantO.K. fair enough. Good luck.
April 27, 2009 at 5:21 PM #388652NotCrankyParticipantO.K. fair enough. Good luck.
April 27, 2009 at 5:21 PM #388850NotCrankyParticipantO.K. fair enough. Good luck.
April 27, 2009 at 5:21 PM #388900NotCrankyParticipantO.K. fair enough. Good luck.
April 27, 2009 at 5:21 PM #389039NotCrankyParticipantO.K. fair enough. Good luck.
April 27, 2009 at 5:27 PM #388397CoronitaParticipant[quote=Rt.66][quote=sdrealtor]I have follwed RealtyTrac and their data for years. I would have stepped up and said it but as usual TG said it better than I ever could. Here goes anyway.
I am an expert and RealtyTrac blows![/quote]
Please elaborate. Do they blow because they report a huge foreclosure inventory that you say is not really there? [/quote]
Scarlet,
I would recommend you take the time to sort of listen what folks here longer have learned and comment on some folks here have been here a long time, and the common observation about realtytrac is that the data provided has far from accurate. In my area, plenty of things have been listed in various default statii, and upon actually investigating, a good portion of the entries were completely inaccurate, particularly SFH. There’s listings for properties that don’t even exist, or aren’t even part of the area.
One of the issues with all this “information” available to most everyone now is that you really need to figure out what’s its good for or not. Seems like you probably have already made up your own opinion on where you like things be at, and I’m sure there is probably selective data that can be pulled that supports your opinion. Well, to each and everyone’s own. Again, I good luck on finding that 50%+ deal you want.
April 27, 2009 at 5:27 PM #388661CoronitaParticipant[quote=Rt.66][quote=sdrealtor]I have follwed RealtyTrac and their data for years. I would have stepped up and said it but as usual TG said it better than I ever could. Here goes anyway.
I am an expert and RealtyTrac blows![/quote]
Please elaborate. Do they blow because they report a huge foreclosure inventory that you say is not really there? [/quote]
Scarlet,
I would recommend you take the time to sort of listen what folks here longer have learned and comment on some folks here have been here a long time, and the common observation about realtytrac is that the data provided has far from accurate. In my area, plenty of things have been listed in various default statii, and upon actually investigating, a good portion of the entries were completely inaccurate, particularly SFH. There’s listings for properties that don’t even exist, or aren’t even part of the area.
One of the issues with all this “information” available to most everyone now is that you really need to figure out what’s its good for or not. Seems like you probably have already made up your own opinion on where you like things be at, and I’m sure there is probably selective data that can be pulled that supports your opinion. Well, to each and everyone’s own. Again, I good luck on finding that 50%+ deal you want.
April 27, 2009 at 5:27 PM #388860CoronitaParticipant[quote=Rt.66][quote=sdrealtor]I have follwed RealtyTrac and their data for years. I would have stepped up and said it but as usual TG said it better than I ever could. Here goes anyway.
I am an expert and RealtyTrac blows![/quote]
Please elaborate. Do they blow because they report a huge foreclosure inventory that you say is not really there? [/quote]
Scarlet,
I would recommend you take the time to sort of listen what folks here longer have learned and comment on some folks here have been here a long time, and the common observation about realtytrac is that the data provided has far from accurate. In my area, plenty of things have been listed in various default statii, and upon actually investigating, a good portion of the entries were completely inaccurate, particularly SFH. There’s listings for properties that don’t even exist, or aren’t even part of the area.
One of the issues with all this “information” available to most everyone now is that you really need to figure out what’s its good for or not. Seems like you probably have already made up your own opinion on where you like things be at, and I’m sure there is probably selective data that can be pulled that supports your opinion. Well, to each and everyone’s own. Again, I good luck on finding that 50%+ deal you want.
April 27, 2009 at 5:27 PM #388910CoronitaParticipant[quote=Rt.66][quote=sdrealtor]I have follwed RealtyTrac and their data for years. I would have stepped up and said it but as usual TG said it better than I ever could. Here goes anyway.
I am an expert and RealtyTrac blows![/quote]
Please elaborate. Do they blow because they report a huge foreclosure inventory that you say is not really there? [/quote]
Scarlet,
I would recommend you take the time to sort of listen what folks here longer have learned and comment on some folks here have been here a long time, and the common observation about realtytrac is that the data provided has far from accurate. In my area, plenty of things have been listed in various default statii, and upon actually investigating, a good portion of the entries were completely inaccurate, particularly SFH. There’s listings for properties that don’t even exist, or aren’t even part of the area.
One of the issues with all this “information” available to most everyone now is that you really need to figure out what’s its good for or not. Seems like you probably have already made up your own opinion on where you like things be at, and I’m sure there is probably selective data that can be pulled that supports your opinion. Well, to each and everyone’s own. Again, I good luck on finding that 50%+ deal you want.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.