- This topic has 40 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
PadreBrian.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM #245415July 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM #245265
Anonymous
GuestI am a fool.
In 2006, I was certain that the housing market would crash, spectacularly. So, I did what I thought was the prudent thing: I sold my house (I had taken a lower paying job), pocketed my gains, and decided that I would buy a house again in a few years when their prices fell to sane levels, as I was sure they would.
I invested my money in a money market account. Which is now earning a measly 2.75 percent interest — thanks to the Fed’s interest rate cuts (all done to save Wall Street, not Main Street).
And now the U.S. government is bailing out the speculative lenders and borrowers who created this mess — all in an attempt to shore up the “housing market,” as if bolstering a bubble was the responsibility of taxpayers. As if keeping people in houses they cannot afford is my responsibility as a taxpayer.
So, while I predicted this spectacular crash, I was the greater fool than those who bought ARMs and speculated that housing prices would keep rising and rising forever. I was the greater fool because I failed to realize that politicians would, OF COURSE, intervene — too late and in the worst way — in an attempt to mitigate the spectacular implosion of the bubble. I don’t know what effect that the government’s intervention will do for housing prices, but I’m sure of one thing: taxpayers like myself are now financing the speculators who fed this bubble. And I’m outraged.
July 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM #245413Anonymous
GuestI am a fool.
In 2006, I was certain that the housing market would crash, spectacularly. So, I did what I thought was the prudent thing: I sold my house (I had taken a lower paying job), pocketed my gains, and decided that I would buy a house again in a few years when their prices fell to sane levels, as I was sure they would.
I invested my money in a money market account. Which is now earning a measly 2.75 percent interest — thanks to the Fed’s interest rate cuts (all done to save Wall Street, not Main Street).
And now the U.S. government is bailing out the speculative lenders and borrowers who created this mess — all in an attempt to shore up the “housing market,” as if bolstering a bubble was the responsibility of taxpayers. As if keeping people in houses they cannot afford is my responsibility as a taxpayer.
So, while I predicted this spectacular crash, I was the greater fool than those who bought ARMs and speculated that housing prices would keep rising and rising forever. I was the greater fool because I failed to realize that politicians would, OF COURSE, intervene — too late and in the worst way — in an attempt to mitigate the spectacular implosion of the bubble. I don’t know what effect that the government’s intervention will do for housing prices, but I’m sure of one thing: taxpayers like myself are now financing the speculators who fed this bubble. And I’m outraged.
July 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM #245423Anonymous
GuestI am a fool.
In 2006, I was certain that the housing market would crash, spectacularly. So, I did what I thought was the prudent thing: I sold my house (I had taken a lower paying job), pocketed my gains, and decided that I would buy a house again in a few years when their prices fell to sane levels, as I was sure they would.
I invested my money in a money market account. Which is now earning a measly 2.75 percent interest — thanks to the Fed’s interest rate cuts (all done to save Wall Street, not Main Street).
And now the U.S. government is bailing out the speculative lenders and borrowers who created this mess — all in an attempt to shore up the “housing market,” as if bolstering a bubble was the responsibility of taxpayers. As if keeping people in houses they cannot afford is my responsibility as a taxpayer.
So, while I predicted this spectacular crash, I was the greater fool than those who bought ARMs and speculated that housing prices would keep rising and rising forever. I was the greater fool because I failed to realize that politicians would, OF COURSE, intervene — too late and in the worst way — in an attempt to mitigate the spectacular implosion of the bubble. I don’t know what effect that the government’s intervention will do for housing prices, but I’m sure of one thing: taxpayers like myself are now financing the speculators who fed this bubble. And I’m outraged.
July 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM #245478Anonymous
GuestI am a fool.
In 2006, I was certain that the housing market would crash, spectacularly. So, I did what I thought was the prudent thing: I sold my house (I had taken a lower paying job), pocketed my gains, and decided that I would buy a house again in a few years when their prices fell to sane levels, as I was sure they would.
I invested my money in a money market account. Which is now earning a measly 2.75 percent interest — thanks to the Fed’s interest rate cuts (all done to save Wall Street, not Main Street).
And now the U.S. government is bailing out the speculative lenders and borrowers who created this mess — all in an attempt to shore up the “housing market,” as if bolstering a bubble was the responsibility of taxpayers. As if keeping people in houses they cannot afford is my responsibility as a taxpayer.
So, while I predicted this spectacular crash, I was the greater fool than those who bought ARMs and speculated that housing prices would keep rising and rising forever. I was the greater fool because I failed to realize that politicians would, OF COURSE, intervene — too late and in the worst way — in an attempt to mitigate the spectacular implosion of the bubble. I don’t know what effect that the government’s intervention will do for housing prices, but I’m sure of one thing: taxpayers like myself are now financing the speculators who fed this bubble. And I’m outraged.
July 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM #245487Anonymous
GuestI am a fool.
In 2006, I was certain that the housing market would crash, spectacularly. So, I did what I thought was the prudent thing: I sold my house (I had taken a lower paying job), pocketed my gains, and decided that I would buy a house again in a few years when their prices fell to sane levels, as I was sure they would.
I invested my money in a money market account. Which is now earning a measly 2.75 percent interest — thanks to the Fed’s interest rate cuts (all done to save Wall Street, not Main Street).
And now the U.S. government is bailing out the speculative lenders and borrowers who created this mess — all in an attempt to shore up the “housing market,” as if bolstering a bubble was the responsibility of taxpayers. As if keeping people in houses they cannot afford is my responsibility as a taxpayer.
So, while I predicted this spectacular crash, I was the greater fool than those who bought ARMs and speculated that housing prices would keep rising and rising forever. I was the greater fool because I failed to realize that politicians would, OF COURSE, intervene — too late and in the worst way — in an attempt to mitigate the spectacular implosion of the bubble. I don’t know what effect that the government’s intervention will do for housing prices, but I’m sure of one thing: taxpayers like myself are now financing the speculators who fed this bubble. And I’m outraged.
July 23, 2008 at 2:45 PM #245316PadreBrian
Participant[img_assist|nid=8358|title=who pays|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=69]
July 23, 2008 at 2:45 PM #245465PadreBrian
Participant[img_assist|nid=8358|title=who pays|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=69]
July 23, 2008 at 2:45 PM #245474PadreBrian
Participant[img_assist|nid=8358|title=who pays|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=69]
July 23, 2008 at 2:45 PM #245529PadreBrian
Participant[img_assist|nid=8358|title=who pays|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=69]
July 23, 2008 at 2:45 PM #245537PadreBrian
Participant[img_assist|nid=8358|title=who pays|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=69]
July 23, 2008 at 3:16 PM #245331cr
Participant[quote=PadreBrian]LOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons. [/quote]
Right. So what, we should all look the other way too?
If not, then short of posting comics what do you suggest? And actually the taxes from your paycheck pay their salaries.
July 23, 2008 at 3:16 PM #245480cr
Participant[quote=PadreBrian]LOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons. [/quote]
Right. So what, we should all look the other way too?
If not, then short of posting comics what do you suggest? And actually the taxes from your paycheck pay their salaries.
July 23, 2008 at 3:16 PM #245489cr
Participant[quote=PadreBrian]LOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons. [/quote]
Right. So what, we should all look the other way too?
If not, then short of posting comics what do you suggest? And actually the taxes from your paycheck pay their salaries.
July 23, 2008 at 3:16 PM #245543cr
Participant[quote=PadreBrian]LOL! Don’t be so naive. Those congressmen aren’t paid by you, they are paid by lobbyists! They also don’t care where your money goes, whether it be Iraq…or fraudulent home loans, whatever. They are paid by wall-street to look the other way.
Bush is caving for the very same reasons. [/quote]
Right. So what, we should all look the other way too?
If not, then short of posting comics what do you suggest? And actually the taxes from your paycheck pay their salaries.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
