- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by 4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM #224250June 17, 2008 at 7:14 PM #224490oceanParticipant
Vietnam war….shortage of copper ,and aluminum was cheap…..only widely used from 65 to 72…after that they made em use a bigger gauge….
June 17, 2008 at 7:14 PM #224551oceanParticipantVietnam war….shortage of copper ,and aluminum was cheap…..only widely used from 65 to 72…after that they made em use a bigger gauge….
June 17, 2008 at 7:14 PM #224536oceanParticipantVietnam war….shortage of copper ,and aluminum was cheap…..only widely used from 65 to 72…after that they made em use a bigger gauge….
June 17, 2008 at 7:14 PM #224503oceanParticipantVietnam war….shortage of copper ,and aluminum was cheap…..only widely used from 65 to 72…after that they made em use a bigger gauge….
June 17, 2008 at 7:14 PM #224384oceanParticipantVietnam war….shortage of copper ,and aluminum was cheap…..only widely used from 65 to 72…after that they made em use a bigger gauge….
June 17, 2008 at 8:58 PM #224453socalarmParticipantI’m an architect. Dissimilar metals in direct contact with each other result in something called Galvanic Action…In simple terms, two dissimilar metals in the presence of moisture can cause one metal to corrode the other. For the technically minded, it’s the same process as electrolysis, and this tendency in metals is used to galvanize steel for protection.
It’s described in the codes, and is generally not recommended without adequate neutral separation, however specifications can vary.June 17, 2008 at 8:58 PM #224559socalarmParticipantI’m an architect. Dissimilar metals in direct contact with each other result in something called Galvanic Action…In simple terms, two dissimilar metals in the presence of moisture can cause one metal to corrode the other. For the technically minded, it’s the same process as electrolysis, and this tendency in metals is used to galvanize steel for protection.
It’s described in the codes, and is generally not recommended without adequate neutral separation, however specifications can vary.June 17, 2008 at 8:58 PM #224575socalarmParticipantI’m an architect. Dissimilar metals in direct contact with each other result in something called Galvanic Action…In simple terms, two dissimilar metals in the presence of moisture can cause one metal to corrode the other. For the technically minded, it’s the same process as electrolysis, and this tendency in metals is used to galvanize steel for protection.
It’s described in the codes, and is generally not recommended without adequate neutral separation, however specifications can vary.June 17, 2008 at 8:58 PM #224607socalarmParticipantI’m an architect. Dissimilar metals in direct contact with each other result in something called Galvanic Action…In simple terms, two dissimilar metals in the presence of moisture can cause one metal to corrode the other. For the technically minded, it’s the same process as electrolysis, and this tendency in metals is used to galvanize steel for protection.
It’s described in the codes, and is generally not recommended without adequate neutral separation, however specifications can vary.June 17, 2008 at 8:58 PM #224620socalarmParticipantI’m an architect. Dissimilar metals in direct contact with each other result in something called Galvanic Action…In simple terms, two dissimilar metals in the presence of moisture can cause one metal to corrode the other. For the technically minded, it’s the same process as electrolysis, and this tendency in metals is used to galvanize steel for protection.
It’s described in the codes, and is generally not recommended without adequate neutral separation, however specifications can vary.June 18, 2008 at 12:23 AM #224553drunkleParticipantif the code is lenient on the use of al wire, is the incidence of fire due to faulty/corroded al wiring low?
i hadn’t thought about this kind of thing, i’m glad this topic came up. for stuff like r/c cars, al wire was standard, but the life span of a battery pack or such was only a few months. al seat posts ‘sticking’ to steel bike frames is the worse problem. but for a home that you plan on living in, much less paying for for 30 years and not plan on being a fire trap…?
June 18, 2008 at 12:23 AM #224721drunkleParticipantif the code is lenient on the use of al wire, is the incidence of fire due to faulty/corroded al wiring low?
i hadn’t thought about this kind of thing, i’m glad this topic came up. for stuff like r/c cars, al wire was standard, but the life span of a battery pack or such was only a few months. al seat posts ‘sticking’ to steel bike frames is the worse problem. but for a home that you plan on living in, much less paying for for 30 years and not plan on being a fire trap…?
June 18, 2008 at 12:23 AM #224707drunkleParticipantif the code is lenient on the use of al wire, is the incidence of fire due to faulty/corroded al wiring low?
i hadn’t thought about this kind of thing, i’m glad this topic came up. for stuff like r/c cars, al wire was standard, but the life span of a battery pack or such was only a few months. al seat posts ‘sticking’ to steel bike frames is the worse problem. but for a home that you plan on living in, much less paying for for 30 years and not plan on being a fire trap…?
June 18, 2008 at 12:23 AM #224676drunkleParticipantif the code is lenient on the use of al wire, is the incidence of fire due to faulty/corroded al wiring low?
i hadn’t thought about this kind of thing, i’m glad this topic came up. for stuff like r/c cars, al wire was standard, but the life span of a battery pack or such was only a few months. al seat posts ‘sticking’ to steel bike frames is the worse problem. but for a home that you plan on living in, much less paying for for 30 years and not plan on being a fire trap…?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.