- This topic has 565 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 28, 2008 at 5:35 PM #162614February 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM #162236CricketOnTheHearthParticipant
Granted, the statement that it was “a group of mostly Filipino nurses in Temecula” was neutral enough, and served for purposes of identifying the particular players in question.
However, the way in which “Pinoy”, “Pinay”, and “jeepney” were used seemed a bit harsh and condescending to me. Not that the words themselves are condescending, but it was the tone of voice… even an innocuous word like “Boy” can be grossly insulting in certain contexts.
I heartily agree with others who state that if the return is greater than normal, so must be the risk, despite what anyone tells you. Unfortunately, greed is a powerful impulse, especially when you are feeling “on the financial edge”– I’ve felt its twinges myself.
And sure, we are told ad infinitum from a plethora of sources that identity theft is out there and how to recognize someone attempting it.
But Conned By Crooks raises a good (and scary) point with his/her story: what if the outfit in question looks like a full-on, respectable bank or investment firm? We all give our personal information to banks– it’s part of doing business with them.
For this reason, and also for memories of the Savings and Loan Crisis etc, I don’t do business with any banking entity I haven’t been hearing about for years and years. There are some banks that have appeared in the buildings in downtown Rancho Bernardo that I’ve never heard of before. Fly by night? Maybe not but I wouldn’t be surprised.
And the sad part is, even the been-known-for-years names will con you too. I see stories about that in the financial news occasionally.
The very best present any bank ever gave me was, my employer’s credit union gave me a pamphlet containing a chart of the payment size per month for a full range of interest rates and loan periods. It covers everything from 2% interest for a year up to 22% interest for 40 years.
Thanks to this chart I know what a “sane” monthly payment looks like for a fixed 30-year mortgage (it is roughly $600/month for every $100,000 of loan, give or take $50 depending on interest rates). So of course I knew I couldn’t really afford these houses and didn’t even go out there where the wolves were fleecing the suckers. JBR for the past 10 years? You betcha! But I’m not getting foreclosed upon either, thank goodness.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM #162533CricketOnTheHearthParticipantGranted, the statement that it was “a group of mostly Filipino nurses in Temecula” was neutral enough, and served for purposes of identifying the particular players in question.
However, the way in which “Pinoy”, “Pinay”, and “jeepney” were used seemed a bit harsh and condescending to me. Not that the words themselves are condescending, but it was the tone of voice… even an innocuous word like “Boy” can be grossly insulting in certain contexts.
I heartily agree with others who state that if the return is greater than normal, so must be the risk, despite what anyone tells you. Unfortunately, greed is a powerful impulse, especially when you are feeling “on the financial edge”– I’ve felt its twinges myself.
And sure, we are told ad infinitum from a plethora of sources that identity theft is out there and how to recognize someone attempting it.
But Conned By Crooks raises a good (and scary) point with his/her story: what if the outfit in question looks like a full-on, respectable bank or investment firm? We all give our personal information to banks– it’s part of doing business with them.
For this reason, and also for memories of the Savings and Loan Crisis etc, I don’t do business with any banking entity I haven’t been hearing about for years and years. There are some banks that have appeared in the buildings in downtown Rancho Bernardo that I’ve never heard of before. Fly by night? Maybe not but I wouldn’t be surprised.
And the sad part is, even the been-known-for-years names will con you too. I see stories about that in the financial news occasionally.
The very best present any bank ever gave me was, my employer’s credit union gave me a pamphlet containing a chart of the payment size per month for a full range of interest rates and loan periods. It covers everything from 2% interest for a year up to 22% interest for 40 years.
Thanks to this chart I know what a “sane” monthly payment looks like for a fixed 30-year mortgage (it is roughly $600/month for every $100,000 of loan, give or take $50 depending on interest rates). So of course I knew I couldn’t really afford these houses and didn’t even go out there where the wolves were fleecing the suckers. JBR for the past 10 years? You betcha! But I’m not getting foreclosed upon either, thank goodness.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM #162547CricketOnTheHearthParticipantGranted, the statement that it was “a group of mostly Filipino nurses in Temecula” was neutral enough, and served for purposes of identifying the particular players in question.
However, the way in which “Pinoy”, “Pinay”, and “jeepney” were used seemed a bit harsh and condescending to me. Not that the words themselves are condescending, but it was the tone of voice… even an innocuous word like “Boy” can be grossly insulting in certain contexts.
I heartily agree with others who state that if the return is greater than normal, so must be the risk, despite what anyone tells you. Unfortunately, greed is a powerful impulse, especially when you are feeling “on the financial edge”– I’ve felt its twinges myself.
And sure, we are told ad infinitum from a plethora of sources that identity theft is out there and how to recognize someone attempting it.
But Conned By Crooks raises a good (and scary) point with his/her story: what if the outfit in question looks like a full-on, respectable bank or investment firm? We all give our personal information to banks– it’s part of doing business with them.
For this reason, and also for memories of the Savings and Loan Crisis etc, I don’t do business with any banking entity I haven’t been hearing about for years and years. There are some banks that have appeared in the buildings in downtown Rancho Bernardo that I’ve never heard of before. Fly by night? Maybe not but I wouldn’t be surprised.
And the sad part is, even the been-known-for-years names will con you too. I see stories about that in the financial news occasionally.
The very best present any bank ever gave me was, my employer’s credit union gave me a pamphlet containing a chart of the payment size per month for a full range of interest rates and loan periods. It covers everything from 2% interest for a year up to 22% interest for 40 years.
Thanks to this chart I know what a “sane” monthly payment looks like for a fixed 30-year mortgage (it is roughly $600/month for every $100,000 of loan, give or take $50 depending on interest rates). So of course I knew I couldn’t really afford these houses and didn’t even go out there where the wolves were fleecing the suckers. JBR for the past 10 years? You betcha! But I’m not getting foreclosed upon either, thank goodness.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM #162566CricketOnTheHearthParticipantGranted, the statement that it was “a group of mostly Filipino nurses in Temecula” was neutral enough, and served for purposes of identifying the particular players in question.
However, the way in which “Pinoy”, “Pinay”, and “jeepney” were used seemed a bit harsh and condescending to me. Not that the words themselves are condescending, but it was the tone of voice… even an innocuous word like “Boy” can be grossly insulting in certain contexts.
I heartily agree with others who state that if the return is greater than normal, so must be the risk, despite what anyone tells you. Unfortunately, greed is a powerful impulse, especially when you are feeling “on the financial edge”– I’ve felt its twinges myself.
And sure, we are told ad infinitum from a plethora of sources that identity theft is out there and how to recognize someone attempting it.
But Conned By Crooks raises a good (and scary) point with his/her story: what if the outfit in question looks like a full-on, respectable bank or investment firm? We all give our personal information to banks– it’s part of doing business with them.
For this reason, and also for memories of the Savings and Loan Crisis etc, I don’t do business with any banking entity I haven’t been hearing about for years and years. There are some banks that have appeared in the buildings in downtown Rancho Bernardo that I’ve never heard of before. Fly by night? Maybe not but I wouldn’t be surprised.
And the sad part is, even the been-known-for-years names will con you too. I see stories about that in the financial news occasionally.
The very best present any bank ever gave me was, my employer’s credit union gave me a pamphlet containing a chart of the payment size per month for a full range of interest rates and loan periods. It covers everything from 2% interest for a year up to 22% interest for 40 years.
Thanks to this chart I know what a “sane” monthly payment looks like for a fixed 30-year mortgage (it is roughly $600/month for every $100,000 of loan, give or take $50 depending on interest rates). So of course I knew I couldn’t really afford these houses and didn’t even go out there where the wolves were fleecing the suckers. JBR for the past 10 years? You betcha! But I’m not getting foreclosed upon either, thank goodness.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM #162635CricketOnTheHearthParticipantGranted, the statement that it was “a group of mostly Filipino nurses in Temecula” was neutral enough, and served for purposes of identifying the particular players in question.
However, the way in which “Pinoy”, “Pinay”, and “jeepney” were used seemed a bit harsh and condescending to me. Not that the words themselves are condescending, but it was the tone of voice… even an innocuous word like “Boy” can be grossly insulting in certain contexts.
I heartily agree with others who state that if the return is greater than normal, so must be the risk, despite what anyone tells you. Unfortunately, greed is a powerful impulse, especially when you are feeling “on the financial edge”– I’ve felt its twinges myself.
And sure, we are told ad infinitum from a plethora of sources that identity theft is out there and how to recognize someone attempting it.
But Conned By Crooks raises a good (and scary) point with his/her story: what if the outfit in question looks like a full-on, respectable bank or investment firm? We all give our personal information to banks– it’s part of doing business with them.
For this reason, and also for memories of the Savings and Loan Crisis etc, I don’t do business with any banking entity I haven’t been hearing about for years and years. There are some banks that have appeared in the buildings in downtown Rancho Bernardo that I’ve never heard of before. Fly by night? Maybe not but I wouldn’t be surprised.
And the sad part is, even the been-known-for-years names will con you too. I see stories about that in the financial news occasionally.
The very best present any bank ever gave me was, my employer’s credit union gave me a pamphlet containing a chart of the payment size per month for a full range of interest rates and loan periods. It covers everything from 2% interest for a year up to 22% interest for 40 years.
Thanks to this chart I know what a “sane” monthly payment looks like for a fixed 30-year mortgage (it is roughly $600/month for every $100,000 of loan, give or take $50 depending on interest rates). So of course I knew I couldn’t really afford these houses and didn’t even go out there where the wolves were fleecing the suckers. JBR for the past 10 years? You betcha! But I’m not getting foreclosed upon either, thank goodness.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:48 PM #162240CricketOnTheHearthParticipantJust read Nostradamus’ comment.
Wow, and ow.
That was naiive.And I thought I was a sucker for believing the USPA & IRA salesman who drove a big white Cadillac, and losing $600 on a front-loaded mutual fund that was totally inappropriate for my investment desires.
Never, never, never let anyone but you handle your personal accounts. NEVER.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:48 PM #162538CricketOnTheHearthParticipantJust read Nostradamus’ comment.
Wow, and ow.
That was naiive.And I thought I was a sucker for believing the USPA & IRA salesman who drove a big white Cadillac, and losing $600 on a front-loaded mutual fund that was totally inappropriate for my investment desires.
Never, never, never let anyone but you handle your personal accounts. NEVER.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:48 PM #162552CricketOnTheHearthParticipantJust read Nostradamus’ comment.
Wow, and ow.
That was naiive.And I thought I was a sucker for believing the USPA & IRA salesman who drove a big white Cadillac, and losing $600 on a front-loaded mutual fund that was totally inappropriate for my investment desires.
Never, never, never let anyone but you handle your personal accounts. NEVER.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:48 PM #162570CricketOnTheHearthParticipantJust read Nostradamus’ comment.
Wow, and ow.
That was naiive.And I thought I was a sucker for believing the USPA & IRA salesman who drove a big white Cadillac, and losing $600 on a front-loaded mutual fund that was totally inappropriate for my investment desires.
Never, never, never let anyone but you handle your personal accounts. NEVER.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 5:48 PM #162640CricketOnTheHearthParticipantJust read Nostradamus’ comment.
Wow, and ow.
That was naiive.And I thought I was a sucker for believing the USPA & IRA salesman who drove a big white Cadillac, and losing $600 on a front-loaded mutual fund that was totally inappropriate for my investment desires.
Never, never, never let anyone but you handle your personal accounts. NEVER.
>chirp<
February 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM #162246atrParticipantAhhh, yes. The venerable USPA & IRA. We avoided investing with them, but not for lack of trying on their part. Are those people even still around? The front-load they described to us was $1000 bucks the first year. Ugh. What a crock.
In all things, whether real estate or investments, caveat emptor.
February 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM #162543atrParticipantAhhh, yes. The venerable USPA & IRA. We avoided investing with them, but not for lack of trying on their part. Are those people even still around? The front-load they described to us was $1000 bucks the first year. Ugh. What a crock.
In all things, whether real estate or investments, caveat emptor.
February 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM #162557atrParticipantAhhh, yes. The venerable USPA & IRA. We avoided investing with them, but not for lack of trying on their part. Are those people even still around? The front-load they described to us was $1000 bucks the first year. Ugh. What a crock.
In all things, whether real estate or investments, caveat emptor.
February 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM #162576atrParticipantAhhh, yes. The venerable USPA & IRA. We avoided investing with them, but not for lack of trying on their part. Are those people even still around? The front-load they described to us was $1000 bucks the first year. Ugh. What a crock.
In all things, whether real estate or investments, caveat emptor.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.