- This topic has 185 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by
Reality.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 20, 2008 at 9:00 PM #191206April 20, 2008 at 9:43 PM #191111
SDEngineer
ParticipantAgree. I’ve done several back-of-the-napkin calculations using several different measurements (household income to historical house price ratio, FMV rent to house price ratio, and wage inflation applied as house price inflation over the past decade or so), and they all tend to wind up in the 300k-330k region for what a normal trendline median price should be today. That matches very well with what a lot of the housing bears were saying at the peak of the market in ’05 when the bears arguing for a return to trend said the market had to lose about 40% of its value to return to normal. We’ve only seen about 25% of that value lost – less in the more desireable areas (though according to the Case-Shiller index they were less inflated anyway, so the drop will be less severe overall with them).
April 20, 2008 at 9:43 PM #191137SDEngineer
ParticipantAgree. I’ve done several back-of-the-napkin calculations using several different measurements (household income to historical house price ratio, FMV rent to house price ratio, and wage inflation applied as house price inflation over the past decade or so), and they all tend to wind up in the 300k-330k region for what a normal trendline median price should be today. That matches very well with what a lot of the housing bears were saying at the peak of the market in ’05 when the bears arguing for a return to trend said the market had to lose about 40% of its value to return to normal. We’ve only seen about 25% of that value lost – less in the more desireable areas (though according to the Case-Shiller index they were less inflated anyway, so the drop will be less severe overall with them).
April 20, 2008 at 9:43 PM #191164SDEngineer
ParticipantAgree. I’ve done several back-of-the-napkin calculations using several different measurements (household income to historical house price ratio, FMV rent to house price ratio, and wage inflation applied as house price inflation over the past decade or so), and they all tend to wind up in the 300k-330k region for what a normal trendline median price should be today. That matches very well with what a lot of the housing bears were saying at the peak of the market in ’05 when the bears arguing for a return to trend said the market had to lose about 40% of its value to return to normal. We’ve only seen about 25% of that value lost – less in the more desireable areas (though according to the Case-Shiller index they were less inflated anyway, so the drop will be less severe overall with them).
April 20, 2008 at 9:43 PM #191178SDEngineer
ParticipantAgree. I’ve done several back-of-the-napkin calculations using several different measurements (household income to historical house price ratio, FMV rent to house price ratio, and wage inflation applied as house price inflation over the past decade or so), and they all tend to wind up in the 300k-330k region for what a normal trendline median price should be today. That matches very well with what a lot of the housing bears were saying at the peak of the market in ’05 when the bears arguing for a return to trend said the market had to lose about 40% of its value to return to normal. We’ve only seen about 25% of that value lost – less in the more desireable areas (though according to the Case-Shiller index they were less inflated anyway, so the drop will be less severe overall with them).
April 20, 2008 at 9:43 PM #191225SDEngineer
ParticipantAgree. I’ve done several back-of-the-napkin calculations using several different measurements (household income to historical house price ratio, FMV rent to house price ratio, and wage inflation applied as house price inflation over the past decade or so), and they all tend to wind up in the 300k-330k region for what a normal trendline median price should be today. That matches very well with what a lot of the housing bears were saying at the peak of the market in ’05 when the bears arguing for a return to trend said the market had to lose about 40% of its value to return to normal. We’ve only seen about 25% of that value lost – less in the more desireable areas (though according to the Case-Shiller index they were less inflated anyway, so the drop will be less severe overall with them).
April 20, 2008 at 10:19 PM #191121jpinpb
ParticipantSDE – Now you’re making me question Case-Shiller on the more desireable area. I’ve been monitoring PB off and on for almost 20 years, very ferverently in the last 8 years. I’d go out on a limb and say the median SFH in PB in 2000, which I’d say is before the whole subprime thing took off, was about 400-450k. The median home in PB now is about 650-750k. That’s close to double. Maybe I’m wrong. I’m trying to learn. Is that normal appreciation in 8 years? Actually at peak, I remember some places selling for 800k.
April 20, 2008 at 10:19 PM #191147jpinpb
ParticipantSDE – Now you’re making me question Case-Shiller on the more desireable area. I’ve been monitoring PB off and on for almost 20 years, very ferverently in the last 8 years. I’d go out on a limb and say the median SFH in PB in 2000, which I’d say is before the whole subprime thing took off, was about 400-450k. The median home in PB now is about 650-750k. That’s close to double. Maybe I’m wrong. I’m trying to learn. Is that normal appreciation in 8 years? Actually at peak, I remember some places selling for 800k.
April 20, 2008 at 10:19 PM #191173jpinpb
ParticipantSDE – Now you’re making me question Case-Shiller on the more desireable area. I’ve been monitoring PB off and on for almost 20 years, very ferverently in the last 8 years. I’d go out on a limb and say the median SFH in PB in 2000, which I’d say is before the whole subprime thing took off, was about 400-450k. The median home in PB now is about 650-750k. That’s close to double. Maybe I’m wrong. I’m trying to learn. Is that normal appreciation in 8 years? Actually at peak, I remember some places selling for 800k.
April 20, 2008 at 10:19 PM #191189jpinpb
ParticipantSDE – Now you’re making me question Case-Shiller on the more desireable area. I’ve been monitoring PB off and on for almost 20 years, very ferverently in the last 8 years. I’d go out on a limb and say the median SFH in PB in 2000, which I’d say is before the whole subprime thing took off, was about 400-450k. The median home in PB now is about 650-750k. That’s close to double. Maybe I’m wrong. I’m trying to learn. Is that normal appreciation in 8 years? Actually at peak, I remember some places selling for 800k.
April 20, 2008 at 10:19 PM #191236jpinpb
ParticipantSDE – Now you’re making me question Case-Shiller on the more desireable area. I’ve been monitoring PB off and on for almost 20 years, very ferverently in the last 8 years. I’d go out on a limb and say the median SFH in PB in 2000, which I’d say is before the whole subprime thing took off, was about 400-450k. The median home in PB now is about 650-750k. That’s close to double. Maybe I’m wrong. I’m trying to learn. Is that normal appreciation in 8 years? Actually at peak, I remember some places selling for 800k.
April 20, 2008 at 10:48 PM #191150bob2007
ParticipantI scanned this thread quickly, and I don’t yet see a similar post. The SD Union today profiled a family where the wife/nurse and husband/teacher had w2 income of $248k. They were conservative and had cash savings as well.
April 20, 2008 at 10:48 PM #191177bob2007
ParticipantI scanned this thread quickly, and I don’t yet see a similar post. The SD Union today profiled a family where the wife/nurse and husband/teacher had w2 income of $248k. They were conservative and had cash savings as well.
April 20, 2008 at 10:48 PM #191204bob2007
ParticipantI scanned this thread quickly, and I don’t yet see a similar post. The SD Union today profiled a family where the wife/nurse and husband/teacher had w2 income of $248k. They were conservative and had cash savings as well.
April 20, 2008 at 10:48 PM #191218bob2007
ParticipantI scanned this thread quickly, and I don’t yet see a similar post. The SD Union today profiled a family where the wife/nurse and husband/teacher had w2 income of $248k. They were conservative and had cash savings as well.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
