- This topic has 332 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by Veritas.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 4, 2008 at 9:32 PM #217138June 4, 2008 at 9:32 PM #217167CardiffBaseballParticipant
You know the Che flag is a real turn-off and ticks me off. I was leaning towards none of the above, but something tells me every freak crack-pot out there who’s had to sit out most national elections, has finally found a nice smile, and smooth talker to “represent”. At least Bill Clinton could bring back Reagan Democrats.
I would totally support Obama if the GOP had held the white house, but I am a little queasy about the central planners running amok.
June 4, 2008 at 9:32 PM #217189CardiffBaseballParticipantYou know the Che flag is a real turn-off and ticks me off. I was leaning towards none of the above, but something tells me every freak crack-pot out there who’s had to sit out most national elections, has finally found a nice smile, and smooth talker to “represent”. At least Bill Clinton could bring back Reagan Democrats.
I would totally support Obama if the GOP had held the white house, but I am a little queasy about the central planners running amok.
June 5, 2008 at 8:04 AM #217199zkParticipantYou know the Che flag is a real turn-off and ticks me off. I was leaning towards none of the above, but something tells me every freak crack-pot out there who’s had to sit out most national elections, has finally found a nice smile, and smooth talker to “represent”. At least Bill Clinton could bring back Reagan Democrats.
I would totally support Obama if the GOP had held the white house, but I am a little queasy about the central planners running amok.
The che flag is a turn-off in general for you or the fact that a few Obama supporters have che flags bothers you? Does it change your opinion of Obama? If so, why? If not, why are you concerned with it?
You were leaning towards none of the above. Has that changed? If so, why? Is it because “something,” which you apparently can’t name or even identify is telling you something about a candidate’s supporters, not even about the candidate himself?
June 5, 2008 at 8:04 AM #217285zkParticipantYou know the Che flag is a real turn-off and ticks me off. I was leaning towards none of the above, but something tells me every freak crack-pot out there who’s had to sit out most national elections, has finally found a nice smile, and smooth talker to “represent”. At least Bill Clinton could bring back Reagan Democrats.
I would totally support Obama if the GOP had held the white house, but I am a little queasy about the central planners running amok.
The che flag is a turn-off in general for you or the fact that a few Obama supporters have che flags bothers you? Does it change your opinion of Obama? If so, why? If not, why are you concerned with it?
You were leaning towards none of the above. Has that changed? If so, why? Is it because “something,” which you apparently can’t name or even identify is telling you something about a candidate’s supporters, not even about the candidate himself?
June 5, 2008 at 8:04 AM #217308zkParticipantYou know the Che flag is a real turn-off and ticks me off. I was leaning towards none of the above, but something tells me every freak crack-pot out there who’s had to sit out most national elections, has finally found a nice smile, and smooth talker to “represent”. At least Bill Clinton could bring back Reagan Democrats.
I would totally support Obama if the GOP had held the white house, but I am a little queasy about the central planners running amok.
The che flag is a turn-off in general for you or the fact that a few Obama supporters have che flags bothers you? Does it change your opinion of Obama? If so, why? If not, why are you concerned with it?
You were leaning towards none of the above. Has that changed? If so, why? Is it because “something,” which you apparently can’t name or even identify is telling you something about a candidate’s supporters, not even about the candidate himself?
June 5, 2008 at 8:04 AM #217337zkParticipantYou know the Che flag is a real turn-off and ticks me off. I was leaning towards none of the above, but something tells me every freak crack-pot out there who’s had to sit out most national elections, has finally found a nice smile, and smooth talker to “represent”. At least Bill Clinton could bring back Reagan Democrats.
I would totally support Obama if the GOP had held the white house, but I am a little queasy about the central planners running amok.
The che flag is a turn-off in general for you or the fact that a few Obama supporters have che flags bothers you? Does it change your opinion of Obama? If so, why? If not, why are you concerned with it?
You were leaning towards none of the above. Has that changed? If so, why? Is it because “something,” which you apparently can’t name or even identify is telling you something about a candidate’s supporters, not even about the candidate himself?
June 5, 2008 at 8:04 AM #217360zkParticipantYou know the Che flag is a real turn-off and ticks me off. I was leaning towards none of the above, but something tells me every freak crack-pot out there who’s had to sit out most national elections, has finally found a nice smile, and smooth talker to “represent”. At least Bill Clinton could bring back Reagan Democrats.
I would totally support Obama if the GOP had held the white house, but I am a little queasy about the central planners running amok.
The che flag is a turn-off in general for you or the fact that a few Obama supporters have che flags bothers you? Does it change your opinion of Obama? If so, why? If not, why are you concerned with it?
You were leaning towards none of the above. Has that changed? If so, why? Is it because “something,” which you apparently can’t name or even identify is telling you something about a candidate’s supporters, not even about the candidate himself?
June 5, 2008 at 10:44 AM #217349rnenParticipantTwo things…
1 Bush was a complete disaster as a President and McCain IS NOT Bush despite what the MSM would have you believe. He would not be my first choice but is the lesser of two evils.2 Obama is a glorified con artist and has managed to convince a crap load of Dems that he is some how different and better than a typical politician. He is cut from the same cloth.
Those Obama supporters will discover the truth if we are unfortunate enough to have him as President. He is way too far left for the vast majority of regular folk.
To those that say the majority of people will not vote for Obama because he is black and therefor are racisit, does the fact that Obama pulls in 70-90% of the black voters in most of the primaries make those voters racist? Is voting for a candidate because of his skin color somehow less racist that not voting for someone because of his color?
June 5, 2008 at 10:44 AM #217437rnenParticipantTwo things…
1 Bush was a complete disaster as a President and McCain IS NOT Bush despite what the MSM would have you believe. He would not be my first choice but is the lesser of two evils.2 Obama is a glorified con artist and has managed to convince a crap load of Dems that he is some how different and better than a typical politician. He is cut from the same cloth.
Those Obama supporters will discover the truth if we are unfortunate enough to have him as President. He is way too far left for the vast majority of regular folk.
To those that say the majority of people will not vote for Obama because he is black and therefor are racisit, does the fact that Obama pulls in 70-90% of the black voters in most of the primaries make those voters racist? Is voting for a candidate because of his skin color somehow less racist that not voting for someone because of his color?
June 5, 2008 at 10:44 AM #217459rnenParticipantTwo things…
1 Bush was a complete disaster as a President and McCain IS NOT Bush despite what the MSM would have you believe. He would not be my first choice but is the lesser of two evils.2 Obama is a glorified con artist and has managed to convince a crap load of Dems that he is some how different and better than a typical politician. He is cut from the same cloth.
Those Obama supporters will discover the truth if we are unfortunate enough to have him as President. He is way too far left for the vast majority of regular folk.
To those that say the majority of people will not vote for Obama because he is black and therefor are racisit, does the fact that Obama pulls in 70-90% of the black voters in most of the primaries make those voters racist? Is voting for a candidate because of his skin color somehow less racist that not voting for someone because of his color?
June 5, 2008 at 10:44 AM #217486rnenParticipantTwo things…
1 Bush was a complete disaster as a President and McCain IS NOT Bush despite what the MSM would have you believe. He would not be my first choice but is the lesser of two evils.2 Obama is a glorified con artist and has managed to convince a crap load of Dems that he is some how different and better than a typical politician. He is cut from the same cloth.
Those Obama supporters will discover the truth if we are unfortunate enough to have him as President. He is way too far left for the vast majority of regular folk.
To those that say the majority of people will not vote for Obama because he is black and therefor are racisit, does the fact that Obama pulls in 70-90% of the black voters in most of the primaries make those voters racist? Is voting for a candidate because of his skin color somehow less racist that not voting for someone because of his color?
June 5, 2008 at 10:44 AM #217510rnenParticipantTwo things…
1 Bush was a complete disaster as a President and McCain IS NOT Bush despite what the MSM would have you believe. He would not be my first choice but is the lesser of two evils.2 Obama is a glorified con artist and has managed to convince a crap load of Dems that he is some how different and better than a typical politician. He is cut from the same cloth.
Those Obama supporters will discover the truth if we are unfortunate enough to have him as President. He is way too far left for the vast majority of regular folk.
To those that say the majority of people will not vote for Obama because he is black and therefor are racisit, does the fact that Obama pulls in 70-90% of the black voters in most of the primaries make those voters racist? Is voting for a candidate because of his skin color somehow less racist that not voting for someone because of his color?
June 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM #217359afx114ParticipantHalf the people with Che posters/teeshirts don’t even know who Che was.
June 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM #217447afx114ParticipantHalf the people with Che posters/teeshirts don’t even know who Che was.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.