- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by highpacific.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 17, 2008 at 10:05 PM #271850September 18, 2008 at 3:19 AM #271920CA renterParticipant
The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.
September 18, 2008 at 3:19 AM #272159CA renterParticipantThe coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.
September 18, 2008 at 3:19 AM #272166CA renterParticipantThe coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.
September 18, 2008 at 3:19 AM #272208CA renterParticipantThe coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.
September 18, 2008 at 3:19 AM #272231CA renterParticipantThe coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.
————————I can show you many parts of SD and LA that have already seen 50%+ declines. What we are seeing is the result of the credit bubble collapsing (as it should). If prices went up as a result of the credit bubble, they will fall just the same. The only difference is the timing.
September 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM #272065crParticipantLA has dropped 20%. People say the “industry” here isolates it, but it’s simply not true.
Chris Thornberg:
“…the problem we have out there is that prices in much of California tripled over the course of the last 10-12 years – tripled – and then when you look at incomes that went up by 30% well that doesn’t make any sense. You cannot have home prices go up by 300% and incomes go up by 30&, that makes no sense, and we’re seeing the back end of that.”
The Housing Market’s Falling Prices – KQED Public Radio, Forum 2008-06-30
This of course varies by location, but the point stands.
September 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM #272376crParticipantLA has dropped 20%. People say the “industry” here isolates it, but it’s simply not true.
Chris Thornberg:
“…the problem we have out there is that prices in much of California tripled over the course of the last 10-12 years – tripled – and then when you look at incomes that went up by 30% well that doesn’t make any sense. You cannot have home prices go up by 300% and incomes go up by 30&, that makes no sense, and we’re seeing the back end of that.”
The Housing Market’s Falling Prices – KQED Public Radio, Forum 2008-06-30
This of course varies by location, but the point stands.
September 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM #272353crParticipantLA has dropped 20%. People say the “industry” here isolates it, but it’s simply not true.
Chris Thornberg:
“…the problem we have out there is that prices in much of California tripled over the course of the last 10-12 years – tripled – and then when you look at incomes that went up by 30% well that doesn’t make any sense. You cannot have home prices go up by 300% and incomes go up by 30&, that makes no sense, and we’re seeing the back end of that.”
The Housing Market’s Falling Prices – KQED Public Radio, Forum 2008-06-30
This of course varies by location, but the point stands.
September 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM #272312crParticipantLA has dropped 20%. People say the “industry” here isolates it, but it’s simply not true.
Chris Thornberg:
“…the problem we have out there is that prices in much of California tripled over the course of the last 10-12 years – tripled – and then when you look at incomes that went up by 30% well that doesn’t make any sense. You cannot have home prices go up by 300% and incomes go up by 30&, that makes no sense, and we’re seeing the back end of that.”
The Housing Market’s Falling Prices – KQED Public Radio, Forum 2008-06-30
This of course varies by location, but the point stands.
September 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM #272305crParticipantLA has dropped 20%. People say the “industry” here isolates it, but it’s simply not true.
Chris Thornberg:
“…the problem we have out there is that prices in much of California tripled over the course of the last 10-12 years – tripled – and then when you look at incomes that went up by 30% well that doesn’t make any sense. You cannot have home prices go up by 300% and incomes go up by 30&, that makes no sense, and we’re seeing the back end of that.”
The Housing Market’s Falling Prices – KQED Public Radio, Forum 2008-06-30
This of course varies by location, but the point stands.
September 18, 2008 at 7:24 PM #272329highpacificParticipantLA, SD, SF has not declined!
> Submitted by wannabe2077 on September 17, 2008 – 9:05pm.
>California has two parts – Inland Empire, Central Valley that has collapsed.
>The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.“Denial (also called abnegation) is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.”>
September 18, 2008 at 7:24 PM #272570highpacificParticipantLA, SD, SF has not declined!
> Submitted by wannabe2077 on September 17, 2008 – 9:05pm.
>California has two parts – Inland Empire, Central Valley that has collapsed.
>The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.“Denial (also called abnegation) is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.”>
September 18, 2008 at 7:24 PM #272576highpacificParticipantLA, SD, SF has not declined!
> Submitted by wannabe2077 on September 17, 2008 – 9:05pm.
>California has two parts – Inland Empire, Central Valley that has collapsed.
>The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.“Denial (also called abnegation) is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.”>
September 18, 2008 at 7:24 PM #272619highpacificParticipantLA, SD, SF has not declined!
> Submitted by wannabe2077 on September 17, 2008 – 9:05pm.
>California has two parts – Inland Empire, Central Valley that has collapsed.
>The coastal California – LA, SD, SF has not declined too much.“Denial (also called abnegation) is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.”>
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.