- This topic has 60 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 19, 2007 at 8:13 AM #10940November 19, 2007 at 8:56 AM #101104no_such_realityParticipant
Let’s say you are a bank, back in late 2004, you loaned $500,000 to someone. They paid up until about June this year, then fell behind. As a bank which would you prefer?
a) Rework the loan for $550,000 for the next thirty years at 5%, which the bag-holders appear to have the capability of paying.
b) foreclose, liquidate the property for probably $400,000?
November 19, 2007 at 8:56 AM #101190no_such_realityParticipantLet’s say you are a bank, back in late 2004, you loaned $500,000 to someone. They paid up until about June this year, then fell behind. As a bank which would you prefer?
a) Rework the loan for $550,000 for the next thirty years at 5%, which the bag-holders appear to have the capability of paying.
b) foreclose, liquidate the property for probably $400,000?
November 19, 2007 at 8:56 AM #101202no_such_realityParticipantLet’s say you are a bank, back in late 2004, you loaned $500,000 to someone. They paid up until about June this year, then fell behind. As a bank which would you prefer?
a) Rework the loan for $550,000 for the next thirty years at 5%, which the bag-holders appear to have the capability of paying.
b) foreclose, liquidate the property for probably $400,000?
November 19, 2007 at 8:56 AM #101217no_such_realityParticipantLet’s say you are a bank, back in late 2004, you loaned $500,000 to someone. They paid up until about June this year, then fell behind. As a bank which would you prefer?
a) Rework the loan for $550,000 for the next thirty years at 5%, which the bag-holders appear to have the capability of paying.
b) foreclose, liquidate the property for probably $400,000?
November 19, 2007 at 8:56 AM #101220no_such_realityParticipantLet’s say you are a bank, back in late 2004, you loaned $500,000 to someone. They paid up until about June this year, then fell behind. As a bank which would you prefer?
a) Rework the loan for $550,000 for the next thirty years at 5%, which the bag-holders appear to have the capability of paying.
b) foreclose, liquidate the property for probably $400,000?
November 19, 2007 at 9:28 AM #101118kev374Participantyeah, I got that point but what is the impact of this on the decline. If banks adjust loans then the foreclosure situation will be controlled, will it not? If foreclosures are controlled then the impact of the ARM resets will be negligible right? If so, people will not lose their homes and prices will stay put or not decline by much. Am I missing something??
November 19, 2007 at 9:28 AM #101205kev374Participantyeah, I got that point but what is the impact of this on the decline. If banks adjust loans then the foreclosure situation will be controlled, will it not? If foreclosures are controlled then the impact of the ARM resets will be negligible right? If so, people will not lose their homes and prices will stay put or not decline by much. Am I missing something??
November 19, 2007 at 9:28 AM #101216kev374Participantyeah, I got that point but what is the impact of this on the decline. If banks adjust loans then the foreclosure situation will be controlled, will it not? If foreclosures are controlled then the impact of the ARM resets will be negligible right? If so, people will not lose their homes and prices will stay put or not decline by much. Am I missing something??
November 19, 2007 at 9:28 AM #101232kev374Participantyeah, I got that point but what is the impact of this on the decline. If banks adjust loans then the foreclosure situation will be controlled, will it not? If foreclosures are controlled then the impact of the ARM resets will be negligible right? If so, people will not lose their homes and prices will stay put or not decline by much. Am I missing something??
November 19, 2007 at 9:28 AM #101235kev374Participantyeah, I got that point but what is the impact of this on the decline. If banks adjust loans then the foreclosure situation will be controlled, will it not? If foreclosures are controlled then the impact of the ARM resets will be negligible right? If so, people will not lose their homes and prices will stay put or not decline by much. Am I missing something??
November 19, 2007 at 11:00 AM #101245CoronitaParticipantIf that's the case, i'm wondering if it make sense to intentionally fall back on a few loan payments. I wouldn't mind having them adjust my loan to sub 5%.
November 19, 2007 at 11:00 AM #101274CoronitaParticipantIf that's the case, i'm wondering if it make sense to intentionally fall back on a few loan payments. I wouldn't mind having them adjust my loan to sub 5%.
November 19, 2007 at 11:00 AM #101273CoronitaParticipantIf that's the case, i'm wondering if it make sense to intentionally fall back on a few loan payments. I wouldn't mind having them adjust my loan to sub 5%.
November 19, 2007 at 11:00 AM #101256CoronitaParticipantIf that's the case, i'm wondering if it make sense to intentionally fall back on a few loan payments. I wouldn't mind having them adjust my loan to sub 5%.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.