BANK OWNED DREAM HOME! Cabinetless kitchen!

[NotCranky]

I believe I have seen in the note or trustee’s deed,note seems to make more sense, an agreement to basically take good care of the house including performing maintenance to preclude damage. Of course the criminal courts are not going to deal with stolen fixtures from ones own property, even if there was ample evidence,or at least I think they would not. As a civil matter, as is usually the case,pusruing it is too expensive. It is really hard to get into trouble in this country. Evidence of that seems to abound.
I’d be surprised if even an arson incident would be pursued. Pitiful. I think they would only do it if the criminal person had the means to pay the insurer ,which of course these people don’t.

Can’t we at least bring back Tar’n’featherin? You’d probably go to jail for that and be sued to death.

[temeculaguy]

Actually arson would be pursued and flooding may, arson endangers the neighbors and the environment, then incurs firefighting costs which can also be pursued. Flooding ends up in stormwater and environmental violations as well as possibly damaging neigbors property (getting into that “other people’s property” area again). It’s not that it’s hard to get in trouble, it’s quite easy. It is the fact that this country was founded on individual property rights and it’s laws reflect that. Do what you like to yourself or your own stuff, stay away from others and their stuff. (actually the drug laws contradict that, but that is another argument).

The whole point is risk, those lenders gave their money away. If they stopped storing their cash in locked vaults and left piles of cash in the parking lot overnight would you feel the same pity if the homeless guys had the party of their life with the cash. That is a terrible analogy because misappropriation of found property is a crime (over $400 is a felony) but you get the point. See, pre-law wasn’t a complete waste of time after all.

[temeculaguy]

Actually arson would be pursued and flooding may, arson endangers the neighbors and the environment, then incurs firefighting costs which can also be pursued. Flooding ends up in stormwater and environmental violations as well as possibly damaging neigbors property (getting into that “other people’s property” area again). It’s not that it’s hard to get in trouble, it’s quite easy. It is the fact that this country was founded on individual property rights and it’s laws reflect that. Do what you like to yourself or your own stuff, stay away from others and their stuff. (actually the drug laws contradict that, but that is another argument).

The whole point is risk, those lenders gave their money away. If they stopped storing their cash in locked vaults and left piles of cash in the parking lot overnight would you feel the same pity if the homeless guys had the party of their life with the cash. That is a terrible analogy because misappropriation of found property is a crime (over $400 is a felony) but you get the point. See, pre-law wasn’t a complete waste of time after all.

[temeculaguy]

Actually arson would be pursued and flooding may, arson endangers the neighbors and the environment, then incurs firefighting costs which can also be pursued. Flooding ends up in stormwater and environmental violations as well as possibly damaging neigbors property (getting into that “other people’s property” area again). It’s not that it’s hard to get in trouble, it’s quite easy. It is the fact that this country was founded on individual property rights and it’s laws reflect that. Do what you like to yourself or your own stuff, stay away from others and their stuff. (actually the drug laws contradict that, but that is another argument).

The whole point is risk, those lenders gave their money away. If they stopped storing their cash in locked vaults and left piles of cash in the parking lot overnight would you feel the same pity if the homeless guys had the party of their life with the cash. That is a terrible analogy because misappropriation of found property is a crime (over $400 is a felony) but you get the point. See, pre-law wasn’t a complete waste of time after all.

[temeculaguy]

Actually arson would be pursued and flooding may, arson endangers the neighbors and the environment, then incurs firefighting costs which can also be pursued. Flooding ends up in stormwater and environmental violations as well as possibly damaging neigbors property (getting into that “other people’s property” area again). It’s not that it’s hard to get in trouble, it’s quite easy. It is the fact that this country was founded on individual property rights and it’s laws reflect that. Do what you like to yourself or your own stuff, stay away from others and their stuff. (actually the drug laws contradict that, but that is another argument).

The whole point is risk, those lenders gave their money away. If they stopped storing their cash in locked vaults and left piles of cash in the parking lot overnight would you feel the same pity if the homeless guys had the party of their life with the cash. That is a terrible analogy because misappropriation of found property is a crime (over $400 is a felony) but you get the point. See, pre-law wasn’t a complete waste of time after all.

[temeculaguy]

Actually arson would be pursued and flooding may, arson endangers the neighbors and the environment, then incurs firefighting costs which can also be pursued. Flooding ends up in stormwater and environmental violations as well as possibly damaging neigbors property (getting into that “other people’s property” area again). It’s not that it’s hard to get in trouble, it’s quite easy. It is the fact that this country was founded on individual property rights and it’s laws reflect that. Do what you like to yourself or your own stuff, stay away from others and their stuff. (actually the drug laws contradict that, but that is another argument).

The whole point is risk, those lenders gave their money away. If they stopped storing their cash in locked vaults and left piles of cash in the parking lot overnight would you feel the same pity if the homeless guys had the party of their life with the cash. That is a terrible analogy because misappropriation of found property is a crime (over $400 is a felony) but you get the point. See, pre-law wasn’t a complete waste of time after all.

[jpinpb]

I remember seeing a news clip somewhere on one of the r.e. blogs of some lady burning her house and being prosecuted. Might have even been a thread on here.

[jpinpb]

I remember seeing a news clip somewhere on one of the r.e. blogs of some lady burning her house and being prosecuted. Might have even been a thread on here.

[jpinpb]

I remember seeing a news clip somewhere on one of the r.e. blogs of some lady burning her house and being prosecuted. Might have even been a thread on here.

[jpinpb]

I remember seeing a news clip somewhere on one of the r.e. blogs of some lady burning her house and being prosecuted. Might have even been a thread on here.

[jpinpb]

I remember seeing a news clip somewhere on one of the r.e. blogs of some lady burning her house and being prosecuted. Might have even been a thread on here.

[robyns_song]

They do it all the time…a lot of borrowers burn their house down twice. But it’s not the bank that goes after the borrower, it’s the insurance carrier. The bank will file an insurance claim once they are aware of the damage, the carrier will investigate, pay the bank’s claim, and go after the borrower.

[robyns_song]

They do it all the time…a lot of borrowers burn their house down twice. But it’s not the bank that goes after the borrower, it’s the insurance carrier. The bank will file an insurance claim once they are aware of the damage, the carrier will investigate, pay the bank’s claim, and go after the borrower.

[robyns_song]

They do it all the time…a lot of borrowers burn their house down twice. But it’s not the bank that goes after the borrower, it’s the insurance carrier. The bank will file an insurance claim once they are aware of the damage, the carrier will investigate, pay the bank’s claim, and go after the borrower.

[robyns_song]

They do it all the time…a lot of borrowers burn their house down twice. But it’s not the bank that goes after the borrower, it’s the insurance carrier. The bank will file an insurance claim once they are aware of the damage, the carrier will investigate, pay the bank’s claim, and go after the borrower.

[Author]

Posts