Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Ban on Short Selling
- This topic has 40 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 2 months ago by
peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 1, 2008 at 7:14 PM #279419October 2, 2008 at 8:48 AM #279370
Anonymous
GuestThere is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
QED. There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market is open and unrestricted.
October 2, 2008 at 8:48 AM #279642Anonymous
GuestThere is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
QED. There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market is open and unrestricted.
October 2, 2008 at 8:48 AM #279649Anonymous
GuestThere is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
QED. There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market is open and unrestricted.
October 2, 2008 at 8:48 AM #279688Anonymous
GuestThere is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
QED. There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market is open and unrestricted.
October 2, 2008 at 8:48 AM #279700Anonymous
GuestThere is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
QED. There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market is open and unrestricted.
October 2, 2008 at 9:53 AM #279405
CoronitaParticipant[quote=Colombo]There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
[/quote]I suppose that’s true for the small potato stock market player (except then you have to deal with the variability of option price premiums and expiration dates.) But assuming the small potato players aren’t the market movers, is this even feasible for say a hedge fund?
In those cases, it’s not just a few hundred puts and calls. Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Just curious.
October 2, 2008 at 9:53 AM #279677
CoronitaParticipant[quote=Colombo]There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
[/quote]I suppose that’s true for the small potato stock market player (except then you have to deal with the variability of option price premiums and expiration dates.) But assuming the small potato players aren’t the market movers, is this even feasible for say a hedge fund?
In those cases, it’s not just a few hundred puts and calls. Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Just curious.
October 2, 2008 at 9:53 AM #279684
CoronitaParticipant[quote=Colombo]There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
[/quote]I suppose that’s true for the small potato stock market player (except then you have to deal with the variability of option price premiums and expiration dates.) But assuming the small potato players aren’t the market movers, is this even feasible for say a hedge fund?
In those cases, it’s not just a few hundred puts and calls. Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Just curious.
October 2, 2008 at 9:53 AM #279723
CoronitaParticipant[quote=Colombo]There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
[/quote]I suppose that’s true for the small potato stock market player (except then you have to deal with the variability of option price premiums and expiration dates.) But assuming the small potato players aren’t the market movers, is this even feasible for say a hedge fund?
In those cases, it’s not just a few hundred puts and calls. Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Just curious.
October 2, 2008 at 9:53 AM #279735
CoronitaParticipant[quote=Colombo]There is no “Ban” on short selling as long as the underlying options market remains viable.
You want proof? OK, here goes. Synthetic stock ( a position which mirrors the profit-loss curve of the underlying security) is constructed by 1] purchasing an at-the-money call and 2]selling an at-the-money put on the stock in question.
If you can create a synthetic LONG position you can just as easily create a synthetic SHORT position by reversing the above trade, i.e., 1]purchase an at-the-money put and 2]sell an at-the money call on the same security.
[/quote]I suppose that’s true for the small potato stock market player (except then you have to deal with the variability of option price premiums and expiration dates.) But assuming the small potato players aren’t the market movers, is this even feasible for say a hedge fund?
In those cases, it’s not just a few hundred puts and calls. Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Just curious.
October 7, 2008 at 2:45 PM #282709Anonymous
GuestFat Lazy Union wrote:
Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Yes, they are called market makers. I believe this is a big part of why options volume has exploded during this current period of market volatility.
As you may recall, volatility is one of the 6 inputs into the Black-Scholes theorem of options pricing.
I suspect there are options traders right now licking their chops with the combination of increased volume and increased volatility. Just as the Vegas bookmakers thrive on an increased take, so too with options traders.
October 7, 2008 at 2:45 PM #282992Anonymous
GuestFat Lazy Union wrote:
Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Yes, they are called market makers. I believe this is a big part of why options volume has exploded during this current period of market volatility.
As you may recall, volatility is one of the 6 inputs into the Black-Scholes theorem of options pricing.
I suspect there are options traders right now licking their chops with the combination of increased volume and increased volatility. Just as the Vegas bookmakers thrive on an increased take, so too with options traders.
October 7, 2008 at 2:45 PM #283019Anonymous
GuestFat Lazy Union wrote:
Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Yes, they are called market makers. I believe this is a big part of why options volume has exploded during this current period of market volatility.
As you may recall, volatility is one of the 6 inputs into the Black-Scholes theorem of options pricing.
I suspect there are options traders right now licking their chops with the combination of increased volume and increased volatility. Just as the Vegas bookmakers thrive on an increased take, so too with options traders.
October 7, 2008 at 2:45 PM #283034Anonymous
GuestFat Lazy Union wrote:
Would a hedge fund be able to find a market participant willing to reciprocate the transaction and find someone willing to sell all those puts?
Yes, they are called market makers. I believe this is a big part of why options volume has exploded during this current period of market volatility.
As you may recall, volatility is one of the 6 inputs into the Black-Scholes theorem of options pricing.
I suspect there are options traders right now licking their chops with the combination of increased volume and increased volatility. Just as the Vegas bookmakers thrive on an increased take, so too with options traders.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
