- This topic has 140 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by Ash Housewares.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 3, 2009 at 6:07 PM #477915November 3, 2009 at 10:01 PM #477140scaredyclassicParticipant
on the good side, this would lower real estate prices, right?
November 3, 2009 at 10:01 PM #477309scaredyclassicParticipanton the good side, this would lower real estate prices, right?
November 3, 2009 at 10:01 PM #477674scaredyclassicParticipanton the good side, this would lower real estate prices, right?
November 3, 2009 at 10:01 PM #477756scaredyclassicParticipanton the good side, this would lower real estate prices, right?
November 3, 2009 at 10:01 PM #477975scaredyclassicParticipanton the good side, this would lower real estate prices, right?
November 3, 2009 at 10:07 PM #477145AecetiaParticipantBrian-
Here is the impact of the non residents on the State budget: taken from an article in the Sunday’s San Diego Union “even a modest “10% false registration rate, … would be 4,200 students at a $10,800 average cost per student, or more than $45 million per year.”They are not illegals. They live in Mexico and get driven up here to attend school for free. It all adds up and costs the California tax payers, causes increases in work load for teachers and increased class size, etc. It is a problem because the school officials refuse to enforce residence requirements. More waste, fraud and abuse.
November 3, 2009 at 10:07 PM #477314AecetiaParticipantBrian-
Here is the impact of the non residents on the State budget: taken from an article in the Sunday’s San Diego Union “even a modest “10% false registration rate, … would be 4,200 students at a $10,800 average cost per student, or more than $45 million per year.”They are not illegals. They live in Mexico and get driven up here to attend school for free. It all adds up and costs the California tax payers, causes increases in work load for teachers and increased class size, etc. It is a problem because the school officials refuse to enforce residence requirements. More waste, fraud and abuse.
November 3, 2009 at 10:07 PM #477679AecetiaParticipantBrian-
Here is the impact of the non residents on the State budget: taken from an article in the Sunday’s San Diego Union “even a modest “10% false registration rate, … would be 4,200 students at a $10,800 average cost per student, or more than $45 million per year.”They are not illegals. They live in Mexico and get driven up here to attend school for free. It all adds up and costs the California tax payers, causes increases in work load for teachers and increased class size, etc. It is a problem because the school officials refuse to enforce residence requirements. More waste, fraud and abuse.
November 3, 2009 at 10:07 PM #477761AecetiaParticipantBrian-
Here is the impact of the non residents on the State budget: taken from an article in the Sunday’s San Diego Union “even a modest “10% false registration rate, … would be 4,200 students at a $10,800 average cost per student, or more than $45 million per year.”They are not illegals. They live in Mexico and get driven up here to attend school for free. It all adds up and costs the California tax payers, causes increases in work load for teachers and increased class size, etc. It is a problem because the school officials refuse to enforce residence requirements. More waste, fraud and abuse.
November 3, 2009 at 10:07 PM #477980AecetiaParticipantBrian-
Here is the impact of the non residents on the State budget: taken from an article in the Sunday’s San Diego Union “even a modest “10% false registration rate, … would be 4,200 students at a $10,800 average cost per student, or more than $45 million per year.”They are not illegals. They live in Mexico and get driven up here to attend school for free. It all adds up and costs the California tax payers, causes increases in work load for teachers and increased class size, etc. It is a problem because the school officials refuse to enforce residence requirements. More waste, fraud and abuse.
November 4, 2009 at 2:57 AM #477215CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1]Aecetia, I don’t see how the legals/illegals have anything to do with the state budget.
The state has only x amount of money and can only spend x amount. The classrooms will be bigger if we cut school budgets.
The government’s budget needs to be cut to bring it back into balance first.
The other social issues come later.[/quote]
Perhaps I’m not understanding your position correctly. Do you think that illegal immigration does not affect the state’s budget? The #1 public expense in the state of california is education. When I worked in education more than a decade ago, we had estimates that 40% of the public school population consisted of illegal immigrants or children of illegal immigrants. They were not allowed to officially count or consider residency because of the potential for political backlash.
The prison system is also one of the biggest expenditures for the state. Again, I’ve seen estimates that show 40-50% of the prison population consists of illegal immigrants.
Add to these expenses the additional burdens on infrastructure, and you’re talking about big numbers.
Want to eliminate a huge chunk of the state’s employees? Fix the illegal immigration problem, and the schools, prisons, etc. will have to cut staff. Voila! The budget is fixed!
November 4, 2009 at 2:57 AM #477383CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1]Aecetia, I don’t see how the legals/illegals have anything to do with the state budget.
The state has only x amount of money and can only spend x amount. The classrooms will be bigger if we cut school budgets.
The government’s budget needs to be cut to bring it back into balance first.
The other social issues come later.[/quote]
Perhaps I’m not understanding your position correctly. Do you think that illegal immigration does not affect the state’s budget? The #1 public expense in the state of california is education. When I worked in education more than a decade ago, we had estimates that 40% of the public school population consisted of illegal immigrants or children of illegal immigrants. They were not allowed to officially count or consider residency because of the potential for political backlash.
The prison system is also one of the biggest expenditures for the state. Again, I’ve seen estimates that show 40-50% of the prison population consists of illegal immigrants.
Add to these expenses the additional burdens on infrastructure, and you’re talking about big numbers.
Want to eliminate a huge chunk of the state’s employees? Fix the illegal immigration problem, and the schools, prisons, etc. will have to cut staff. Voila! The budget is fixed!
November 4, 2009 at 2:57 AM #477750CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1]Aecetia, I don’t see how the legals/illegals have anything to do with the state budget.
The state has only x amount of money and can only spend x amount. The classrooms will be bigger if we cut school budgets.
The government’s budget needs to be cut to bring it back into balance first.
The other social issues come later.[/quote]
Perhaps I’m not understanding your position correctly. Do you think that illegal immigration does not affect the state’s budget? The #1 public expense in the state of california is education. When I worked in education more than a decade ago, we had estimates that 40% of the public school population consisted of illegal immigrants or children of illegal immigrants. They were not allowed to officially count or consider residency because of the potential for political backlash.
The prison system is also one of the biggest expenditures for the state. Again, I’ve seen estimates that show 40-50% of the prison population consists of illegal immigrants.
Add to these expenses the additional burdens on infrastructure, and you’re talking about big numbers.
Want to eliminate a huge chunk of the state’s employees? Fix the illegal immigration problem, and the schools, prisons, etc. will have to cut staff. Voila! The budget is fixed!
November 4, 2009 at 2:57 AM #477830CA renterParticipant[quote=briansd1]Aecetia, I don’t see how the legals/illegals have anything to do with the state budget.
The state has only x amount of money and can only spend x amount. The classrooms will be bigger if we cut school budgets.
The government’s budget needs to be cut to bring it back into balance first.
The other social issues come later.[/quote]
Perhaps I’m not understanding your position correctly. Do you think that illegal immigration does not affect the state’s budget? The #1 public expense in the state of california is education. When I worked in education more than a decade ago, we had estimates that 40% of the public school population consisted of illegal immigrants or children of illegal immigrants. They were not allowed to officially count or consider residency because of the potential for political backlash.
The prison system is also one of the biggest expenditures for the state. Again, I’ve seen estimates that show 40-50% of the prison population consists of illegal immigrants.
Add to these expenses the additional burdens on infrastructure, and you’re talking about big numbers.
Want to eliminate a huge chunk of the state’s employees? Fix the illegal immigration problem, and the schools, prisons, etc. will have to cut staff. Voila! The budget is fixed!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.