Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Backdoor to socialized medicine?
- This topic has 625 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 26, 2010 at 4:28 PM #532780March 26, 2010 at 6:55 PM #531877VeritasParticipant
“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1
March 26, 2010 at 6:55 PM #532006VeritasParticipant“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1
March 26, 2010 at 6:55 PM #532457VeritasParticipant“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1
March 26, 2010 at 6:55 PM #532554VeritasParticipant“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1
March 26, 2010 at 6:55 PM #532815VeritasParticipant“Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage. Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.”
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1
March 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #531912briansd1GuestI don’t see the Republicans scrambling to offer legislation to close that gap in coverage for children.
Instead Republicans are scrambling to destroy rather than build upon what was achieved.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hours after President Barack Obama signed historic health care legislation, a potential problem emerged. Administration officials are now scrambling to fix a gap in highly touted benefits for children.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1March 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #532040briansd1GuestI don’t see the Republicans scrambling to offer legislation to close that gap in coverage for children.
Instead Republicans are scrambling to destroy rather than build upon what was achieved.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hours after President Barack Obama signed historic health care legislation, a potential problem emerged. Administration officials are now scrambling to fix a gap in highly touted benefits for children.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1March 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #532492briansd1GuestI don’t see the Republicans scrambling to offer legislation to close that gap in coverage for children.
Instead Republicans are scrambling to destroy rather than build upon what was achieved.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hours after President Barack Obama signed historic health care legislation, a potential problem emerged. Administration officials are now scrambling to fix a gap in highly touted benefits for children.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1March 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #532589briansd1GuestI don’t see the Republicans scrambling to offer legislation to close that gap in coverage for children.
Instead Republicans are scrambling to destroy rather than build upon what was achieved.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hours after President Barack Obama signed historic health care legislation, a potential problem emerged. Administration officials are now scrambling to fix a gap in highly touted benefits for children.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1March 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM #532850briansd1GuestI don’t see the Republicans scrambling to offer legislation to close that gap in coverage for children.
Instead Republicans are scrambling to destroy rather than build upon what was achieved.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hours after President Barack Obama signed historic health care legislation, a potential problem emerged. Administration officials are now scrambling to fix a gap in highly touted benefits for children.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Gap-in-health-care-laws-apf-4272209396.html?x=0&.v=1March 26, 2010 at 8:10 PM #531927CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, if Taiwan can do it, why can’t we?
In 1949 when the KMT fled to Taiwan, that island was an economy backwater.
I don’t think that businesses are too worried about the new health care bill. The stock market moved up in response to the passage of the bill.
I understand that small businesses are having a hard time because of lack of sales. But it’s not because of health care reform that’s not been implemented yet.[/quote]
What part of “The U.S. government is fiscally broke (IE have no money) versus the Chinese and Taiwanese government have huge surpluses” do you not understand. Let’s do some investigation, but I’m willing to bet money that the Chinese and Taiwanese government do not nearly pass these “costs” along to businesses.
BTW: most tech companies in asia I work with are on 6 day to 7 day work weeks, if you want to talk about productivity. Also, I think most americans would probably object to a 6-7 work weeks.
That’s what we’re facing in the U.S in terms of cost structures. You add that up, maybe you can start to understand why while this bill isn’t the only issue driving up cost, anything that is driving up cost doesn’t help us to be more competitive.March 26, 2010 at 8:10 PM #532055CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, if Taiwan can do it, why can’t we?
In 1949 when the KMT fled to Taiwan, that island was an economy backwater.
I don’t think that businesses are too worried about the new health care bill. The stock market moved up in response to the passage of the bill.
I understand that small businesses are having a hard time because of lack of sales. But it’s not because of health care reform that’s not been implemented yet.[/quote]
What part of “The U.S. government is fiscally broke (IE have no money) versus the Chinese and Taiwanese government have huge surpluses” do you not understand. Let’s do some investigation, but I’m willing to bet money that the Chinese and Taiwanese government do not nearly pass these “costs” along to businesses.
BTW: most tech companies in asia I work with are on 6 day to 7 day work weeks, if you want to talk about productivity. Also, I think most americans would probably object to a 6-7 work weeks.
That’s what we’re facing in the U.S in terms of cost structures. You add that up, maybe you can start to understand why while this bill isn’t the only issue driving up cost, anything that is driving up cost doesn’t help us to be more competitive.March 26, 2010 at 8:10 PM #532507CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, if Taiwan can do it, why can’t we?
In 1949 when the KMT fled to Taiwan, that island was an economy backwater.
I don’t think that businesses are too worried about the new health care bill. The stock market moved up in response to the passage of the bill.
I understand that small businesses are having a hard time because of lack of sales. But it’s not because of health care reform that’s not been implemented yet.[/quote]
What part of “The U.S. government is fiscally broke (IE have no money) versus the Chinese and Taiwanese government have huge surpluses” do you not understand. Let’s do some investigation, but I’m willing to bet money that the Chinese and Taiwanese government do not nearly pass these “costs” along to businesses.
BTW: most tech companies in asia I work with are on 6 day to 7 day work weeks, if you want to talk about productivity. Also, I think most americans would probably object to a 6-7 work weeks.
That’s what we’re facing in the U.S in terms of cost structures. You add that up, maybe you can start to understand why while this bill isn’t the only issue driving up cost, anything that is driving up cost doesn’t help us to be more competitive.March 26, 2010 at 8:10 PM #532604CoronitaParticipant[quote=briansd1]flu, if Taiwan can do it, why can’t we?
In 1949 when the KMT fled to Taiwan, that island was an economy backwater.
I don’t think that businesses are too worried about the new health care bill. The stock market moved up in response to the passage of the bill.
I understand that small businesses are having a hard time because of lack of sales. But it’s not because of health care reform that’s not been implemented yet.[/quote]
What part of “The U.S. government is fiscally broke (IE have no money) versus the Chinese and Taiwanese government have huge surpluses” do you not understand. Let’s do some investigation, but I’m willing to bet money that the Chinese and Taiwanese government do not nearly pass these “costs” along to businesses.
BTW: most tech companies in asia I work with are on 6 day to 7 day work weeks, if you want to talk about productivity. Also, I think most americans would probably object to a 6-7 work weeks.
That’s what we’re facing in the U.S in terms of cost structures. You add that up, maybe you can start to understand why while this bill isn’t the only issue driving up cost, anything that is driving up cost doesn’t help us to be more competitive. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.