Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Backdoor to socialized medicine?
- This topic has 625 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 26, 2010 at 11:31 AM #532566March 26, 2010 at 11:41 AM #531655CoronitaParticipant
And so…The circus begins…
Your iphone service will get a lot worse…lol…
I don’t think most people realize how much is at stake here. Anyone want to guess how many employees ATT employees and how many they are still on a retiree plan/etc?AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in first quarter related to the health care bill
NEW YORK (AP) — AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in the first quarter related to the health care overhaul.
AT&T Inc. said Friday that the charge is to reflect the change of the tax treatment of Medicare subsidies. Companies say the health care overhaul, which President Barack Obama signed Tuesday, will make a subsidy that companies receive for retiree drug coverage taxable in 2011.
AT&T also says it is looking into changing the health care benefits it offers to active and retired workers because of the legislation.
On Thursday, Deere & Co. and Caterpillar Inc. announced similar charges. Both say the health care law will raise their related expenses.
Like I said, I hope I’m wrong, me thinks it’s going to get a lot worse for the unemployment scene.
March 26, 2010 at 11:41 AM #531784CoronitaParticipantAnd so…The circus begins…
Your iphone service will get a lot worse…lol…
I don’t think most people realize how much is at stake here. Anyone want to guess how many employees ATT employees and how many they are still on a retiree plan/etc?AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in first quarter related to the health care bill
NEW YORK (AP) — AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in the first quarter related to the health care overhaul.
AT&T Inc. said Friday that the charge is to reflect the change of the tax treatment of Medicare subsidies. Companies say the health care overhaul, which President Barack Obama signed Tuesday, will make a subsidy that companies receive for retiree drug coverage taxable in 2011.
AT&T also says it is looking into changing the health care benefits it offers to active and retired workers because of the legislation.
On Thursday, Deere & Co. and Caterpillar Inc. announced similar charges. Both say the health care law will raise their related expenses.
Like I said, I hope I’m wrong, me thinks it’s going to get a lot worse for the unemployment scene.
March 26, 2010 at 11:41 AM #532234CoronitaParticipantAnd so…The circus begins…
Your iphone service will get a lot worse…lol…
I don’t think most people realize how much is at stake here. Anyone want to guess how many employees ATT employees and how many they are still on a retiree plan/etc?AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in first quarter related to the health care bill
NEW YORK (AP) — AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in the first quarter related to the health care overhaul.
AT&T Inc. said Friday that the charge is to reflect the change of the tax treatment of Medicare subsidies. Companies say the health care overhaul, which President Barack Obama signed Tuesday, will make a subsidy that companies receive for retiree drug coverage taxable in 2011.
AT&T also says it is looking into changing the health care benefits it offers to active and retired workers because of the legislation.
On Thursday, Deere & Co. and Caterpillar Inc. announced similar charges. Both say the health care law will raise their related expenses.
Like I said, I hope I’m wrong, me thinks it’s going to get a lot worse for the unemployment scene.
March 26, 2010 at 11:41 AM #532332CoronitaParticipantAnd so…The circus begins…
Your iphone service will get a lot worse…lol…
I don’t think most people realize how much is at stake here. Anyone want to guess how many employees ATT employees and how many they are still on a retiree plan/etc?AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in first quarter related to the health care bill
NEW YORK (AP) — AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in the first quarter related to the health care overhaul.
AT&T Inc. said Friday that the charge is to reflect the change of the tax treatment of Medicare subsidies. Companies say the health care overhaul, which President Barack Obama signed Tuesday, will make a subsidy that companies receive for retiree drug coverage taxable in 2011.
AT&T also says it is looking into changing the health care benefits it offers to active and retired workers because of the legislation.
On Thursday, Deere & Co. and Caterpillar Inc. announced similar charges. Both say the health care law will raise their related expenses.
Like I said, I hope I’m wrong, me thinks it’s going to get a lot worse for the unemployment scene.
March 26, 2010 at 11:41 AM #532591CoronitaParticipantAnd so…The circus begins…
Your iphone service will get a lot worse…lol…
I don’t think most people realize how much is at stake here. Anyone want to guess how many employees ATT employees and how many they are still on a retiree plan/etc?AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in first quarter related to the health care bill
NEW YORK (AP) — AT&T will take a $1 billion non-cash charge in the first quarter related to the health care overhaul.
AT&T Inc. said Friday that the charge is to reflect the change of the tax treatment of Medicare subsidies. Companies say the health care overhaul, which President Barack Obama signed Tuesday, will make a subsidy that companies receive for retiree drug coverage taxable in 2011.
AT&T also says it is looking into changing the health care benefits it offers to active and retired workers because of the legislation.
On Thursday, Deere & Co. and Caterpillar Inc. announced similar charges. Both say the health care law will raise their related expenses.
Like I said, I hope I’m wrong, me thinks it’s going to get a lot worse for the unemployment scene.
March 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM #531703briansd1Guestflu, the bill is going to cost $1 trillion over 10 years or $100 billion per year. But anticipated revenue will cover the cost and lower the deficit by over $100 billion that same period.
Large companies are sitting on a trillion is cash, righ now.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110505221.htmlThat AT&T write-down is nothing compared to what they make. That non-cash write down is a book entry that will allow them to immediately save, in real cash, $300 million in taxes (whatever their tax rate is).
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ATT-to-Release-FirstQuarter-bw-3815054365.html?x=0
I think that universal health care is a worthy cause. If the Republicans want to make the hard choice and cut spending, I’m all ears.
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.
March 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM #531831briansd1Guestflu, the bill is going to cost $1 trillion over 10 years or $100 billion per year. But anticipated revenue will cover the cost and lower the deficit by over $100 billion that same period.
Large companies are sitting on a trillion is cash, righ now.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110505221.htmlThat AT&T write-down is nothing compared to what they make. That non-cash write down is a book entry that will allow them to immediately save, in real cash, $300 million in taxes (whatever their tax rate is).
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ATT-to-Release-FirstQuarter-bw-3815054365.html?x=0
I think that universal health care is a worthy cause. If the Republicans want to make the hard choice and cut spending, I’m all ears.
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.
March 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM #532282briansd1Guestflu, the bill is going to cost $1 trillion over 10 years or $100 billion per year. But anticipated revenue will cover the cost and lower the deficit by over $100 billion that same period.
Large companies are sitting on a trillion is cash, righ now.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110505221.htmlThat AT&T write-down is nothing compared to what they make. That non-cash write down is a book entry that will allow them to immediately save, in real cash, $300 million in taxes (whatever their tax rate is).
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ATT-to-Release-FirstQuarter-bw-3815054365.html?x=0
I think that universal health care is a worthy cause. If the Republicans want to make the hard choice and cut spending, I’m all ears.
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.
March 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM #532380briansd1Guestflu, the bill is going to cost $1 trillion over 10 years or $100 billion per year. But anticipated revenue will cover the cost and lower the deficit by over $100 billion that same period.
Large companies are sitting on a trillion is cash, righ now.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110505221.htmlThat AT&T write-down is nothing compared to what they make. That non-cash write down is a book entry that will allow them to immediately save, in real cash, $300 million in taxes (whatever their tax rate is).
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ATT-to-Release-FirstQuarter-bw-3815054365.html?x=0
I think that universal health care is a worthy cause. If the Republicans want to make the hard choice and cut spending, I’m all ears.
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.
March 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM #532639briansd1Guestflu, the bill is going to cost $1 trillion over 10 years or $100 billion per year. But anticipated revenue will cover the cost and lower the deficit by over $100 billion that same period.
Large companies are sitting on a trillion is cash, righ now.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110505221.htmlThat AT&T write-down is nothing compared to what they make. That non-cash write down is a book entry that will allow them to immediately save, in real cash, $300 million in taxes (whatever their tax rate is).
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ATT-to-Release-FirstQuarter-bw-3815054365.html?x=0
I think that universal health care is a worthy cause. If the Republicans want to make the hard choice and cut spending, I’m all ears.
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.
March 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM #531713meadandaleParticipant[quote=briansd1]
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.[/quote]How about the democrats, who control congress, or the white house end the wars? They are, after all, the ones in power? Didn’t they all run on a platform of ending the wars?
March 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM #531841meadandaleParticipant[quote=briansd1]
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.[/quote]How about the democrats, who control congress, or the white house end the wars? They are, after all, the ones in power? Didn’t they all run on a platform of ending the wars?
March 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM #532292meadandaleParticipant[quote=briansd1]
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.[/quote]How about the democrats, who control congress, or the white house end the wars? They are, after all, the ones in power? Didn’t they all run on a platform of ending the wars?
March 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM #532389meadandaleParticipant[quote=briansd1]
How about the Republicans propose ending the wars rather than that using defense as a political weapon? Ending the wars would free up plenty of money.[/quote]How about the democrats, who control congress, or the white house end the wars? They are, after all, the ones in power? Didn’t they all run on a platform of ending the wars?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.