Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Average SD family 2000 vs 2010
- This topic has 630 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by sobmaz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 2, 2011 at 10:38 AM #662696February 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM #661572jstoeszParticipant
As I say that though, I wonder if more poor people have moved in too. Who knows…
February 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM #661634jstoeszParticipantAs I say that though, I wonder if more poor people have moved in too. Who knows…
February 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM #662237jstoeszParticipantAs I say that though, I wonder if more poor people have moved in too. Who knows…
February 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM #662373jstoeszParticipantAs I say that though, I wonder if more poor people have moved in too. Who knows…
February 2, 2011 at 10:40 AM #662706jstoeszParticipantAs I say that though, I wonder if more poor people have moved in too. Who knows…
February 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM #661582UCGalParticipantthought I’d toss a chart into the mix.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
I realize CPI is not specifically being discussed here – but this is another data point… CPI and alternate CPI (as it was calculated before 1990.)
On an anectdotal basis – my base salary (same employer) has gone up 20%… the bulk of that in two moves: one when I transfered to CA (fortunately, before the eliminated the pay differential) and one when I got a promotion. Those big jumps were offset with 3 years of NO increase (zero, zip, nada). That’s just base salary. Bonuses, 401k match, etc have also had negative and positive impacts on my real earnings.
Any increase I got was offset by my husband’s underemployment. We’re definitely pulling in less now than in 2006.
February 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM #661644UCGalParticipantthought I’d toss a chart into the mix.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
I realize CPI is not specifically being discussed here – but this is another data point… CPI and alternate CPI (as it was calculated before 1990.)
On an anectdotal basis – my base salary (same employer) has gone up 20%… the bulk of that in two moves: one when I transfered to CA (fortunately, before the eliminated the pay differential) and one when I got a promotion. Those big jumps were offset with 3 years of NO increase (zero, zip, nada). That’s just base salary. Bonuses, 401k match, etc have also had negative and positive impacts on my real earnings.
Any increase I got was offset by my husband’s underemployment. We’re definitely pulling in less now than in 2006.
February 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM #662247UCGalParticipantthought I’d toss a chart into the mix.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
I realize CPI is not specifically being discussed here – but this is another data point… CPI and alternate CPI (as it was calculated before 1990.)
On an anectdotal basis – my base salary (same employer) has gone up 20%… the bulk of that in two moves: one when I transfered to CA (fortunately, before the eliminated the pay differential) and one when I got a promotion. Those big jumps were offset with 3 years of NO increase (zero, zip, nada). That’s just base salary. Bonuses, 401k match, etc have also had negative and positive impacts on my real earnings.
Any increase I got was offset by my husband’s underemployment. We’re definitely pulling in less now than in 2006.
February 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM #662383UCGalParticipantthought I’d toss a chart into the mix.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
I realize CPI is not specifically being discussed here – but this is another data point… CPI and alternate CPI (as it was calculated before 1990.)
On an anectdotal basis – my base salary (same employer) has gone up 20%… the bulk of that in two moves: one when I transfered to CA (fortunately, before the eliminated the pay differential) and one when I got a promotion. Those big jumps were offset with 3 years of NO increase (zero, zip, nada). That’s just base salary. Bonuses, 401k match, etc have also had negative and positive impacts on my real earnings.
Any increase I got was offset by my husband’s underemployment. We’re definitely pulling in less now than in 2006.
February 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM #662716UCGalParticipantthought I’d toss a chart into the mix.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
I realize CPI is not specifically being discussed here – but this is another data point… CPI and alternate CPI (as it was calculated before 1990.)
On an anectdotal basis – my base salary (same employer) has gone up 20%… the bulk of that in two moves: one when I transfered to CA (fortunately, before the eliminated the pay differential) and one when I got a promotion. Those big jumps were offset with 3 years of NO increase (zero, zip, nada). That’s just base salary. Bonuses, 401k match, etc have also had negative and positive impacts on my real earnings.
Any increase I got was offset by my husband’s underemployment. We’re definitely pulling in less now than in 2006.
February 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM #661637protorioParticipant[quote=jstoesz] population of people with poor fiscal values. [/quote]
Well, its more than that, and perhaps speaks to Scarlett’s mention of professionals. Markets are shaped not just by economics, but by culture and ideology. No one disputes that the ideology of home ownership in the U.S. is very strong (if sometimes illogical). But people who earn a certain income often want to stretch that income to the limit in order to achieve homogeneity within a particular taste culture – aesthetic, social, economic. So many “professionals” (I suppose I’m one) seem to have driven up prices by going “all in” with stretching dual incomes, rather than live rather modestly in more diverse neighborhoods.
Of course, I’m not drawing from any data – purely anecdotal and general observations.
February 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM #661699protorioParticipant[quote=jstoesz] population of people with poor fiscal values. [/quote]
Well, its more than that, and perhaps speaks to Scarlett’s mention of professionals. Markets are shaped not just by economics, but by culture and ideology. No one disputes that the ideology of home ownership in the U.S. is very strong (if sometimes illogical). But people who earn a certain income often want to stretch that income to the limit in order to achieve homogeneity within a particular taste culture – aesthetic, social, economic. So many “professionals” (I suppose I’m one) seem to have driven up prices by going “all in” with stretching dual incomes, rather than live rather modestly in more diverse neighborhoods.
Of course, I’m not drawing from any data – purely anecdotal and general observations.
February 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM #662302protorioParticipant[quote=jstoesz] population of people with poor fiscal values. [/quote]
Well, its more than that, and perhaps speaks to Scarlett’s mention of professionals. Markets are shaped not just by economics, but by culture and ideology. No one disputes that the ideology of home ownership in the U.S. is very strong (if sometimes illogical). But people who earn a certain income often want to stretch that income to the limit in order to achieve homogeneity within a particular taste culture – aesthetic, social, economic. So many “professionals” (I suppose I’m one) seem to have driven up prices by going “all in” with stretching dual incomes, rather than live rather modestly in more diverse neighborhoods.
Of course, I’m not drawing from any data – purely anecdotal and general observations.
February 2, 2011 at 11:42 AM #662438protorioParticipant[quote=jstoesz] population of people with poor fiscal values. [/quote]
Well, its more than that, and perhaps speaks to Scarlett’s mention of professionals. Markets are shaped not just by economics, but by culture and ideology. No one disputes that the ideology of home ownership in the U.S. is very strong (if sometimes illogical). But people who earn a certain income often want to stretch that income to the limit in order to achieve homogeneity within a particular taste culture – aesthetic, social, economic. So many “professionals” (I suppose I’m one) seem to have driven up prices by going “all in” with stretching dual incomes, rather than live rather modestly in more diverse neighborhoods.
Of course, I’m not drawing from any data – purely anecdotal and general observations.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.