Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Apparently SD is UNDERvalued right now, by alot

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 76 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 4, 2009 at 12:20 PM #411157
    4plexowner
    Participant

    “The median price for a single-family home was $327,300 in the first quarter, the company said. Based on historic trends for household income, affordability and appreciation, the “normal” value should have been $415,300.”

    the methodology is based on median prices – enough time wasted here – the article is garbage

    June 4, 2009 at 12:36 PM #411162
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    If you torture the statistics long enough, they’ll confess to whatever you want them to.

    June 4, 2009 at 12:36 PM #411009
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    If you torture the statistics long enough, they’ll confess to whatever you want them to.

    June 4, 2009 at 12:36 PM #410457
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    If you torture the statistics long enough, they’ll confess to whatever you want them to.

    June 4, 2009 at 12:36 PM #410697
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    If you torture the statistics long enough, they’ll confess to whatever you want them to.

    June 4, 2009 at 12:36 PM #410945
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    If you torture the statistics long enough, they’ll confess to whatever you want them to.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM #411039
    RB132
    Participant

    A garbage article trying to manupulate the information to pump the real estate market.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM #410728
    RB132
    Participant

    A garbage article trying to manupulate the information to pump the real estate market.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM #411192
    RB132
    Participant

    A garbage article trying to manupulate the information to pump the real estate market.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM #410488
    RB132
    Participant

    A garbage article trying to manupulate the information to pump the real estate market.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM #410975
    RB132
    Participant

    A garbage article trying to manupulate the information to pump the real estate market.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM #410980
    denverite
    Participant

    1985 was the first year considered. It was coincidentally a year in which housing started a bull run. Going back to 1976 and eliminating most of the latest bubble years would show a different story. How can historically unprecedented RE bubble data be used in determining normal valuations? That’s crazy. The article was a simplistic attempt to rationalize high valuations.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM #411044
    denverite
    Participant

    1985 was the first year considered. It was coincidentally a year in which housing started a bull run. Going back to 1976 and eliminating most of the latest bubble years would show a different story. How can historically unprecedented RE bubble data be used in determining normal valuations? That’s crazy. The article was a simplistic attempt to rationalize high valuations.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM #410733
    denverite
    Participant

    1985 was the first year considered. It was coincidentally a year in which housing started a bull run. Going back to 1976 and eliminating most of the latest bubble years would show a different story. How can historically unprecedented RE bubble data be used in determining normal valuations? That’s crazy. The article was a simplistic attempt to rationalize high valuations.

    June 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM #411197
    denverite
    Participant

    1985 was the first year considered. It was coincidentally a year in which housing started a bull run. Going back to 1976 and eliminating most of the latest bubble years would show a different story. How can historically unprecedented RE bubble data be used in determining normal valuations? That’s crazy. The article was a simplistic attempt to rationalize high valuations.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 76 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.