- This topic has 1,201 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
HarryBosch.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 9, 2008 at 5:44 PM #183992April 9, 2008 at 5:56 PM #183939
davelj
ParticipantLet me be clear: The choices MOST PEOPLE (including women, of course) make have no value to me.
But specific to women, a girlfriend is very different from a wife. I would never ask a girlfriend to “breed,” do housework, or otherwise do any of the other unpleasant things that most wives get themselves into. It would never occur to me to be that injurious. Perhaps you have no such objections.
Wife? With few exceptions, a woman would have to be certifiably insane to marry me. And yet there’s no shortage who vie for the position despite my protestations to the contrary. Believe me, it’s a paradox that I’ve never been able to reconcile.
April 9, 2008 at 5:56 PM #183957davelj
ParticipantLet me be clear: The choices MOST PEOPLE (including women, of course) make have no value to me.
But specific to women, a girlfriend is very different from a wife. I would never ask a girlfriend to “breed,” do housework, or otherwise do any of the other unpleasant things that most wives get themselves into. It would never occur to me to be that injurious. Perhaps you have no such objections.
Wife? With few exceptions, a woman would have to be certifiably insane to marry me. And yet there’s no shortage who vie for the position despite my protestations to the contrary. Believe me, it’s a paradox that I’ve never been able to reconcile.
April 9, 2008 at 5:56 PM #183983davelj
ParticipantLet me be clear: The choices MOST PEOPLE (including women, of course) make have no value to me.
But specific to women, a girlfriend is very different from a wife. I would never ask a girlfriend to “breed,” do housework, or otherwise do any of the other unpleasant things that most wives get themselves into. It would never occur to me to be that injurious. Perhaps you have no such objections.
Wife? With few exceptions, a woman would have to be certifiably insane to marry me. And yet there’s no shortage who vie for the position despite my protestations to the contrary. Believe me, it’s a paradox that I’ve never been able to reconcile.
April 9, 2008 at 5:56 PM #183990davelj
ParticipantLet me be clear: The choices MOST PEOPLE (including women, of course) make have no value to me.
But specific to women, a girlfriend is very different from a wife. I would never ask a girlfriend to “breed,” do housework, or otherwise do any of the other unpleasant things that most wives get themselves into. It would never occur to me to be that injurious. Perhaps you have no such objections.
Wife? With few exceptions, a woman would have to be certifiably insane to marry me. And yet there’s no shortage who vie for the position despite my protestations to the contrary. Believe me, it’s a paradox that I’ve never been able to reconcile.
April 9, 2008 at 5:56 PM #183997davelj
ParticipantLet me be clear: The choices MOST PEOPLE (including women, of course) make have no value to me.
But specific to women, a girlfriend is very different from a wife. I would never ask a girlfriend to “breed,” do housework, or otherwise do any of the other unpleasant things that most wives get themselves into. It would never occur to me to be that injurious. Perhaps you have no such objections.
Wife? With few exceptions, a woman would have to be certifiably insane to marry me. And yet there’s no shortage who vie for the position despite my protestations to the contrary. Believe me, it’s a paradox that I’ve never been able to reconcile.
April 9, 2008 at 6:02 PM #183955NotCranky
ParticipantJP,
I am not picking on you, just playing “The world according to Rustico” and I agree people should see their responsibilities for what they are. If am man or woman establishes a child rearing situation where one person is dependent there are some pretty deep responsibilities to go with it based on those choices. This is to love and care for those children no matter what and to facilitate the other parent doing that as well. Unfortuantely apparently it turns into a fight over support or avoiding it pretty often.Yes marion, I find no value in that particular post by davelj. Maybe someone finds entertainment in it? Not my thing.
April 9, 2008 at 6:02 PM #183971NotCranky
ParticipantJP,
I am not picking on you, just playing “The world according to Rustico” and I agree people should see their responsibilities for what they are. If am man or woman establishes a child rearing situation where one person is dependent there are some pretty deep responsibilities to go with it based on those choices. This is to love and care for those children no matter what and to facilitate the other parent doing that as well. Unfortuantely apparently it turns into a fight over support or avoiding it pretty often.Yes marion, I find no value in that particular post by davelj. Maybe someone finds entertainment in it? Not my thing.
April 9, 2008 at 6:02 PM #183998NotCranky
ParticipantJP,
I am not picking on you, just playing “The world according to Rustico” and I agree people should see their responsibilities for what they are. If am man or woman establishes a child rearing situation where one person is dependent there are some pretty deep responsibilities to go with it based on those choices. This is to love and care for those children no matter what and to facilitate the other parent doing that as well. Unfortuantely apparently it turns into a fight over support or avoiding it pretty often.Yes marion, I find no value in that particular post by davelj. Maybe someone finds entertainment in it? Not my thing.
April 9, 2008 at 6:02 PM #184004NotCranky
ParticipantJP,
I am not picking on you, just playing “The world according to Rustico” and I agree people should see their responsibilities for what they are. If am man or woman establishes a child rearing situation where one person is dependent there are some pretty deep responsibilities to go with it based on those choices. This is to love and care for those children no matter what and to facilitate the other parent doing that as well. Unfortuantely apparently it turns into a fight over support or avoiding it pretty often.Yes marion, I find no value in that particular post by davelj. Maybe someone finds entertainment in it? Not my thing.
April 9, 2008 at 6:02 PM #184012NotCranky
ParticipantJP,
I am not picking on you, just playing “The world according to Rustico” and I agree people should see their responsibilities for what they are. If am man or woman establishes a child rearing situation where one person is dependent there are some pretty deep responsibilities to go with it based on those choices. This is to love and care for those children no matter what and to facilitate the other parent doing that as well. Unfortuantely apparently it turns into a fight over support or avoiding it pretty often.Yes marion, I find no value in that particular post by davelj. Maybe someone finds entertainment in it? Not my thing.
April 9, 2008 at 6:03 PM #183951Anonymous
Guestjpinpb, again, I agree with everything you said. Dave has shown himself to be ridiculous again. He insults me because obviously my analysis of his character hit home. Besides being a Tom Leykis fan, he doesn’t like children either…
I’m not sure if you’re aware, but Leykis is so disturbed he coaches men to place hot sauce in their condoms to kill the sperm after they have sex with a woman. Now, what does that say about a man who’s a fan of Leykis.
I also agree with your pity of Dave’s girlfriend/wife.
April 9, 2008 at 6:03 PM #183966Anonymous
Guestjpinpb, again, I agree with everything you said. Dave has shown himself to be ridiculous again. He insults me because obviously my analysis of his character hit home. Besides being a Tom Leykis fan, he doesn’t like children either…
I’m not sure if you’re aware, but Leykis is so disturbed he coaches men to place hot sauce in their condoms to kill the sperm after they have sex with a woman. Now, what does that say about a man who’s a fan of Leykis.
I also agree with your pity of Dave’s girlfriend/wife.
April 9, 2008 at 6:03 PM #183993Anonymous
Guestjpinpb, again, I agree with everything you said. Dave has shown himself to be ridiculous again. He insults me because obviously my analysis of his character hit home. Besides being a Tom Leykis fan, he doesn’t like children either…
I’m not sure if you’re aware, but Leykis is so disturbed he coaches men to place hot sauce in their condoms to kill the sperm after they have sex with a woman. Now, what does that say about a man who’s a fan of Leykis.
I also agree with your pity of Dave’s girlfriend/wife.
April 9, 2008 at 6:03 PM #184000Anonymous
Guestjpinpb, again, I agree with everything you said. Dave has shown himself to be ridiculous again. He insults me because obviously my analysis of his character hit home. Besides being a Tom Leykis fan, he doesn’t like children either…
I’m not sure if you’re aware, but Leykis is so disturbed he coaches men to place hot sauce in their condoms to kill the sperm after they have sex with a woman. Now, what does that say about a man who’s a fan of Leykis.
I also agree with your pity of Dave’s girlfriend/wife.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.