- This topic has 160 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
larrylujack.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 11, 2008 at 8:00 PM #303427November 11, 2008 at 11:01 PM #303041
Carl Veritas
ParticipantBecause of slacking demand and rapidly advancing technology, your dollar is actually buying more gizmo?
And do I detect a hint of satisfaction?
Why that is the unacceptable bogeyman some economists call deflation.
Nurse, inject the patient with our new liquifying elixir TARP, pronto! We must get the prices, er, patient to rise immediately.
November 11, 2008 at 11:01 PM #303403ParticipantBecause of slacking demand and rapidly advancing technology, your dollar is actually buying more gizmo?
And do I detect a hint of satisfaction?
Why that is the unacceptable bogeyman some economists call deflation.
Nurse, inject the patient with our new liquifying elixir TARP, pronto! We must get the prices, er, patient to rise immediately.
November 11, 2008 at 11:01 PM #303414ParticipantBecause of slacking demand and rapidly advancing technology, your dollar is actually buying more gizmo?
And do I detect a hint of satisfaction?
Why that is the unacceptable bogeyman some economists call deflation.
Nurse, inject the patient with our new liquifying elixir TARP, pronto! We must get the prices, er, patient to rise immediately.
November 11, 2008 at 11:01 PM #303431ParticipantBecause of slacking demand and rapidly advancing technology, your dollar is actually buying more gizmo?
And do I detect a hint of satisfaction?
Why that is the unacceptable bogeyman some economists call deflation.
Nurse, inject the patient with our new liquifying elixir TARP, pronto! We must get the prices, er, patient to rise immediately.
November 11, 2008 at 11:01 PM #303487ParticipantBecause of slacking demand and rapidly advancing technology, your dollar is actually buying more gizmo?
And do I detect a hint of satisfaction?
Why that is the unacceptable bogeyman some economists call deflation.
Nurse, inject the patient with our new liquifying elixir TARP, pronto! We must get the prices, er, patient to rise immediately.
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 AM #303071urbanrealtor
ParticipantCrap.
My eyes are hurting trying to work out dependencies on my apache installation.I think installing it on my laptop which cost 400 in 2005 is perhaps a bad idea.
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 AM #303433ParticipantCrap.
My eyes are hurting trying to work out dependencies on my apache installation.I think installing it on my laptop which cost 400 in 2005 is perhaps a bad idea.
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 AM #303444ParticipantCrap.
My eyes are hurting trying to work out dependencies on my apache installation.I think installing it on my laptop which cost 400 in 2005 is perhaps a bad idea.
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 AM #303461ParticipantCrap.
My eyes are hurting trying to work out dependencies on my apache installation.I think installing it on my laptop which cost 400 in 2005 is perhaps a bad idea.
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 AM #303517ParticipantCrap.
My eyes are hurting trying to work out dependencies on my apache installation.I think installing it on my laptop which cost 400 in 2005 is perhaps a bad idea.
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 PM #303271lonestar2000
ParticipantAs with all things, you have to match the hardware to the software. Yes, Vista is a resource hog, but so was every single prior revision of Windows when it shipped. Win95 requires 16MB RAM? WTF? Where will I ever get that much?!?
The Mac is no different, the latest and greatest features require up to date hardware to work efficiently.
I paid $1100 (plus tax) for a dual core laptop with 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD (and room for another that can be set up in a RAID configuration), a 17 inch LCD with a built-in webcam, and an Nvidia 8800 graphics card with 512MB RAM. Yeah, it is a laptop and it runs Vista 64 like a dream. Exactly what kind of Mac will I get for that price? A bottom of the line MacBook with barely a GIG of RAM, whoopie!
If you can’t afford $1100 bucks then stick with your old hardware and software, or run Linux and put up with driver incompatibilities, fiddling with repository conflicts, and shoddy support. Enjoy your user support experience there!
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 PM #303633ParticipantAs with all things, you have to match the hardware to the software. Yes, Vista is a resource hog, but so was every single prior revision of Windows when it shipped. Win95 requires 16MB RAM? WTF? Where will I ever get that much?!?
The Mac is no different, the latest and greatest features require up to date hardware to work efficiently.
I paid $1100 (plus tax) for a dual core laptop with 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD (and room for another that can be set up in a RAID configuration), a 17 inch LCD with a built-in webcam, and an Nvidia 8800 graphics card with 512MB RAM. Yeah, it is a laptop and it runs Vista 64 like a dream. Exactly what kind of Mac will I get for that price? A bottom of the line MacBook with barely a GIG of RAM, whoopie!
If you can’t afford $1100 bucks then stick with your old hardware and software, or run Linux and put up with driver incompatibilities, fiddling with repository conflicts, and shoddy support. Enjoy your user support experience there!
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 PM #303644ParticipantAs with all things, you have to match the hardware to the software. Yes, Vista is a resource hog, but so was every single prior revision of Windows when it shipped. Win95 requires 16MB RAM? WTF? Where will I ever get that much?!?
The Mac is no different, the latest and greatest features require up to date hardware to work efficiently.
I paid $1100 (plus tax) for a dual core laptop with 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD (and room for another that can be set up in a RAID configuration), a 17 inch LCD with a built-in webcam, and an Nvidia 8800 graphics card with 512MB RAM. Yeah, it is a laptop and it runs Vista 64 like a dream. Exactly what kind of Mac will I get for that price? A bottom of the line MacBook with barely a GIG of RAM, whoopie!
If you can’t afford $1100 bucks then stick with your old hardware and software, or run Linux and put up with driver incompatibilities, fiddling with repository conflicts, and shoddy support. Enjoy your user support experience there!
November 12, 2008 at 12:30 PM #303661ParticipantAs with all things, you have to match the hardware to the software. Yes, Vista is a resource hog, but so was every single prior revision of Windows when it shipped. Win95 requires 16MB RAM? WTF? Where will I ever get that much?!?
The Mac is no different, the latest and greatest features require up to date hardware to work efficiently.
I paid $1100 (plus tax) for a dual core laptop with 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD (and room for another that can be set up in a RAID configuration), a 17 inch LCD with a built-in webcam, and an Nvidia 8800 graphics card with 512MB RAM. Yeah, it is a laptop and it runs Vista 64 like a dream. Exactly what kind of Mac will I get for that price? A bottom of the line MacBook with barely a GIG of RAM, whoopie!
If you can’t afford $1100 bucks then stick with your old hardware and software, or run Linux and put up with driver incompatibilities, fiddling with repository conflicts, and shoddy support. Enjoy your user support experience there!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.