Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › AIG Downgraded! Terrible news
- This topic has 150 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
Bubblesitter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 15, 2008 at 10:20 PM #271078September 15, 2008 at 10:49 PM #270782
Anonymous
GuestArmageddon is when the rest of the world feels that the US tax payer cant afford to pay for this mess.
September 15, 2008 at 10:49 PM #271019Anonymous
GuestArmageddon is when the rest of the world feels that the US tax payer cant afford to pay for this mess.
September 15, 2008 at 10:49 PM #271033Anonymous
GuestArmageddon is when the rest of the world feels that the US tax payer cant afford to pay for this mess.
September 15, 2008 at 10:49 PM #271072Anonymous
GuestArmageddon is when the rest of the world feels that the US tax payer cant afford to pay for this mess.
September 15, 2008 at 10:49 PM #271099Anonymous
GuestArmageddon is when the rest of the world feels that the US tax payer cant afford to pay for this mess.
September 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM #270787davelj
Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=davelj]As much as I think the Establishment will try to move heaven and earth to make sure AIG doesn’t fail, I just don’t see how it all comes together without help from the visible hand of the government.
The problem is simple: Due Diligence. There’s no way in hell that anyone, without a backstop from the government, will provide AIG with capital without spending serious time on due diligence given the complexity of its business. I just can’t see it happening. This process would take at LEAST a month involving well over 100 professionals under normal circumstances. I realize that these aren’t normal circumstances, but how can a company put up capital in good faith without knowing what they’re signing up for? Without the government I just don’t see how AIG is saved.[/quote]
I agree however they did do the Bear Sterns deal over a 3 day weekend.
John[/quote]
True, but Jamie Dimon has admitted publicly since the Bear Stearns deal that he wouldn’t have done the deal if offered another chance to turn it down. I think proper due diligence would have revealed the folly of the transaction. Now folks know how ugly the innards of these companies are. Now they either want time to perform proper due diligence or a government backstop – which are completely rational desires. On a related topic, I believe that Ken Lewis (sorry, make that Ken Lewis’s shareholders) will rue the day he agreed to acquire Merrill on such short notice.
September 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM #271025davelj
Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=davelj]As much as I think the Establishment will try to move heaven and earth to make sure AIG doesn’t fail, I just don’t see how it all comes together without help from the visible hand of the government.
The problem is simple: Due Diligence. There’s no way in hell that anyone, without a backstop from the government, will provide AIG with capital without spending serious time on due diligence given the complexity of its business. I just can’t see it happening. This process would take at LEAST a month involving well over 100 professionals under normal circumstances. I realize that these aren’t normal circumstances, but how can a company put up capital in good faith without knowing what they’re signing up for? Without the government I just don’t see how AIG is saved.[/quote]
I agree however they did do the Bear Sterns deal over a 3 day weekend.
John[/quote]
True, but Jamie Dimon has admitted publicly since the Bear Stearns deal that he wouldn’t have done the deal if offered another chance to turn it down. I think proper due diligence would have revealed the folly of the transaction. Now folks know how ugly the innards of these companies are. Now they either want time to perform proper due diligence or a government backstop – which are completely rational desires. On a related topic, I believe that Ken Lewis (sorry, make that Ken Lewis’s shareholders) will rue the day he agreed to acquire Merrill on such short notice.
September 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM #271038davelj
Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=davelj]As much as I think the Establishment will try to move heaven and earth to make sure AIG doesn’t fail, I just don’t see how it all comes together without help from the visible hand of the government.
The problem is simple: Due Diligence. There’s no way in hell that anyone, without a backstop from the government, will provide AIG with capital without spending serious time on due diligence given the complexity of its business. I just can’t see it happening. This process would take at LEAST a month involving well over 100 professionals under normal circumstances. I realize that these aren’t normal circumstances, but how can a company put up capital in good faith without knowing what they’re signing up for? Without the government I just don’t see how AIG is saved.[/quote]
I agree however they did do the Bear Sterns deal over a 3 day weekend.
John[/quote]
True, but Jamie Dimon has admitted publicly since the Bear Stearns deal that he wouldn’t have done the deal if offered another chance to turn it down. I think proper due diligence would have revealed the folly of the transaction. Now folks know how ugly the innards of these companies are. Now they either want time to perform proper due diligence or a government backstop – which are completely rational desires. On a related topic, I believe that Ken Lewis (sorry, make that Ken Lewis’s shareholders) will rue the day he agreed to acquire Merrill on such short notice.
September 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM #271077davelj
Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=davelj]As much as I think the Establishment will try to move heaven and earth to make sure AIG doesn’t fail, I just don’t see how it all comes together without help from the visible hand of the government.
The problem is simple: Due Diligence. There’s no way in hell that anyone, without a backstop from the government, will provide AIG with capital without spending serious time on due diligence given the complexity of its business. I just can’t see it happening. This process would take at LEAST a month involving well over 100 professionals under normal circumstances. I realize that these aren’t normal circumstances, but how can a company put up capital in good faith without knowing what they’re signing up for? Without the government I just don’t see how AIG is saved.[/quote]
I agree however they did do the Bear Sterns deal over a 3 day weekend.
John[/quote]
True, but Jamie Dimon has admitted publicly since the Bear Stearns deal that he wouldn’t have done the deal if offered another chance to turn it down. I think proper due diligence would have revealed the folly of the transaction. Now folks know how ugly the innards of these companies are. Now they either want time to perform proper due diligence or a government backstop – which are completely rational desires. On a related topic, I believe that Ken Lewis (sorry, make that Ken Lewis’s shareholders) will rue the day he agreed to acquire Merrill on such short notice.
September 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM #271104davelj
Participant[quote=jficquette][quote=davelj]As much as I think the Establishment will try to move heaven and earth to make sure AIG doesn’t fail, I just don’t see how it all comes together without help from the visible hand of the government.
The problem is simple: Due Diligence. There’s no way in hell that anyone, without a backstop from the government, will provide AIG with capital without spending serious time on due diligence given the complexity of its business. I just can’t see it happening. This process would take at LEAST a month involving well over 100 professionals under normal circumstances. I realize that these aren’t normal circumstances, but how can a company put up capital in good faith without knowing what they’re signing up for? Without the government I just don’t see how AIG is saved.[/quote]
I agree however they did do the Bear Sterns deal over a 3 day weekend.
John[/quote]
True, but Jamie Dimon has admitted publicly since the Bear Stearns deal that he wouldn’t have done the deal if offered another chance to turn it down. I think proper due diligence would have revealed the folly of the transaction. Now folks know how ugly the innards of these companies are. Now they either want time to perform proper due diligence or a government backstop – which are completely rational desires. On a related topic, I believe that Ken Lewis (sorry, make that Ken Lewis’s shareholders) will rue the day he agreed to acquire Merrill on such short notice.
September 15, 2008 at 11:22 PM #270797cashflow
ParticipantWe don’t really actively trade in the markets…new to this stuff…but thanks to you guys here, I was able to give my husband the heads up on what was happening Sunday night. He sold what we had at a small profit in the morning…I’m thinking with the news tonight that I’m really glad he did…what are people’s predictions about the market tomorrow?
I’m wondering how this is going to play out in the housing market down the road? How is this going to affect the lenders? Are they going to have to tighten (finally). I know they already have tightened, but I still don’t feel like the rules have completely gotten back to where we were 10 years ago in lending standards.
September 15, 2008 at 11:22 PM #271035cashflow
ParticipantWe don’t really actively trade in the markets…new to this stuff…but thanks to you guys here, I was able to give my husband the heads up on what was happening Sunday night. He sold what we had at a small profit in the morning…I’m thinking with the news tonight that I’m really glad he did…what are people’s predictions about the market tomorrow?
I’m wondering how this is going to play out in the housing market down the road? How is this going to affect the lenders? Are they going to have to tighten (finally). I know they already have tightened, but I still don’t feel like the rules have completely gotten back to where we were 10 years ago in lending standards.
September 15, 2008 at 11:22 PM #271049cashflow
ParticipantWe don’t really actively trade in the markets…new to this stuff…but thanks to you guys here, I was able to give my husband the heads up on what was happening Sunday night. He sold what we had at a small profit in the morning…I’m thinking with the news tonight that I’m really glad he did…what are people’s predictions about the market tomorrow?
I’m wondering how this is going to play out in the housing market down the road? How is this going to affect the lenders? Are they going to have to tighten (finally). I know they already have tightened, but I still don’t feel like the rules have completely gotten back to where we were 10 years ago in lending standards.
September 15, 2008 at 11:22 PM #271087cashflow
ParticipantWe don’t really actively trade in the markets…new to this stuff…but thanks to you guys here, I was able to give my husband the heads up on what was happening Sunday night. He sold what we had at a small profit in the morning…I’m thinking with the news tonight that I’m really glad he did…what are people’s predictions about the market tomorrow?
I’m wondering how this is going to play out in the housing market down the road? How is this going to affect the lenders? Are they going to have to tighten (finally). I know they already have tightened, but I still don’t feel like the rules have completely gotten back to where we were 10 years ago in lending standards.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.