Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Agricultural water rate?
- This topic has 140 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by fm.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 21, 2008 at 3:57 PM #244155July 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #243946ucodegenParticipant
Just for the fun of it, here is a picture of a very old redwood aqueduct that is still in use..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aqueduct_Tokatee_Hydro_Project.jpg
found when I was trying to get pictures of Aqueduct Tunnel
July 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #244090ucodegenParticipantJust for the fun of it, here is a picture of a very old redwood aqueduct that is still in use..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aqueduct_Tokatee_Hydro_Project.jpg
found when I was trying to get pictures of Aqueduct Tunnel
July 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #244097ucodegenParticipantJust for the fun of it, here is a picture of a very old redwood aqueduct that is still in use..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aqueduct_Tokatee_Hydro_Project.jpg
found when I was trying to get pictures of Aqueduct Tunnel
July 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #244152ucodegenParticipantJust for the fun of it, here is a picture of a very old redwood aqueduct that is still in use..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aqueduct_Tokatee_Hydro_Project.jpg
found when I was trying to get pictures of Aqueduct Tunnel
July 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM #244160ucodegenParticipantJust for the fun of it, here is a picture of a very old redwood aqueduct that is still in use..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aqueduct_Tokatee_Hydro_Project.jpg
found when I was trying to get pictures of Aqueduct Tunnel
July 21, 2008 at 4:28 PM #243966DWCAPParticipantThe water going through that area is raise more than 2000 feet before going through those tunnels. You can see some of it off to your right when heading North on I5 just past Castaic lake. I am always amazed at home much water they move around there.
You are right about them using alot of energy to move water around, the SWP is the largest user of energy in the state. (It also happens to generate alot of energy too)I havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
July 21, 2008 at 4:28 PM #244110DWCAPParticipantThe water going through that area is raise more than 2000 feet before going through those tunnels. You can see some of it off to your right when heading North on I5 just past Castaic lake. I am always amazed at home much water they move around there.
You are right about them using alot of energy to move water around, the SWP is the largest user of energy in the state. (It also happens to generate alot of energy too)I havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
July 21, 2008 at 4:28 PM #244117DWCAPParticipantThe water going through that area is raise more than 2000 feet before going through those tunnels. You can see some of it off to your right when heading North on I5 just past Castaic lake. I am always amazed at home much water they move around there.
You are right about them using alot of energy to move water around, the SWP is the largest user of energy in the state. (It also happens to generate alot of energy too)I havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
July 21, 2008 at 4:28 PM #244172DWCAPParticipantThe water going through that area is raise more than 2000 feet before going through those tunnels. You can see some of it off to your right when heading North on I5 just past Castaic lake. I am always amazed at home much water they move around there.
You are right about them using alot of energy to move water around, the SWP is the largest user of energy in the state. (It also happens to generate alot of energy too)I havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
July 21, 2008 at 4:28 PM #244180DWCAPParticipantThe water going through that area is raise more than 2000 feet before going through those tunnels. You can see some of it off to your right when heading North on I5 just past Castaic lake. I am always amazed at home much water they move around there.
You are right about them using alot of energy to move water around, the SWP is the largest user of energy in the state. (It also happens to generate alot of energy too)I havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
July 21, 2008 at 5:36 PM #243996EugeneParticipantI havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
“Energy intensity” is all energy spent on that water before it’s consumed. It includes energy spent on heating water that goes into showers or dishwashers, for example. That slide basically says that it takes 2040 kwh to get an acre-foot of water to the customer, and then that customer will spend an average of 3900 kwh on that water to heat it, or do anything else he wants.
http://www.nrdc.org/water/conservation/edrain/edrain.pdf
page 33
July 21, 2008 at 5:36 PM #244139EugeneParticipantI havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
“Energy intensity” is all energy spent on that water before it’s consumed. It includes energy spent on heating water that goes into showers or dishwashers, for example. That slide basically says that it takes 2040 kwh to get an acre-foot of water to the customer, and then that customer will spend an average of 3900 kwh on that water to heat it, or do anything else he wants.
http://www.nrdc.org/water/conservation/edrain/edrain.pdf
page 33
July 21, 2008 at 5:36 PM #244148EugeneParticipantI havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
“Energy intensity” is all energy spent on that water before it’s consumed. It includes energy spent on heating water that goes into showers or dishwashers, for example. That slide basically says that it takes 2040 kwh to get an acre-foot of water to the customer, and then that customer will spend an average of 3900 kwh on that water to heat it, or do anything else he wants.
http://www.nrdc.org/water/conservation/edrain/edrain.pdf
page 33
July 21, 2008 at 5:36 PM #244202EugeneParticipantI havent quite figured it all out for myself just yet, esmith, care to help me understand the slide just after the one you reference about 3000kwh for water to LA. It says 6900kwh for San Diego, but it calls it energy intensity, which I have not had time to wrap my head around. At first glance it looks like an acre foot of water to San Diego is something more like 6000kwh/ac foot.
“Energy intensity” is all energy spent on that water before it’s consumed. It includes energy spent on heating water that goes into showers or dishwashers, for example. That slide basically says that it takes 2040 kwh to get an acre-foot of water to the customer, and then that customer will spend an average of 3900 kwh on that water to heat it, or do anything else he wants.
http://www.nrdc.org/water/conservation/edrain/edrain.pdf
page 33
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.