Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Agricultural water rate?
- This topic has 140 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by fm.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM #243985July 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM #243811peterbParticipant
Water is life. Having lived where there was no water except for what could be captured during a rain, very few things survived. Just about every living thing is a consumer of water in some way. The trick is to figure out our priorities in order to best allocate it. With approx 40M people in CA, I would think that residential water use would take a priority over certain crops. Keep in mind, though, that up until 10 or 20 years ago, agriculture was the number one revenue generator in the state of CA. Amazing when you consider all that comes from CA. I’m pretty sure that the lobbying power from this group pulls some weight in sacto.
July 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM #243955peterbParticipantWater is life. Having lived where there was no water except for what could be captured during a rain, very few things survived. Just about every living thing is a consumer of water in some way. The trick is to figure out our priorities in order to best allocate it. With approx 40M people in CA, I would think that residential water use would take a priority over certain crops. Keep in mind, though, that up until 10 or 20 years ago, agriculture was the number one revenue generator in the state of CA. Amazing when you consider all that comes from CA. I’m pretty sure that the lobbying power from this group pulls some weight in sacto.
July 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM #243962peterbParticipantWater is life. Having lived where there was no water except for what could be captured during a rain, very few things survived. Just about every living thing is a consumer of water in some way. The trick is to figure out our priorities in order to best allocate it. With approx 40M people in CA, I would think that residential water use would take a priority over certain crops. Keep in mind, though, that up until 10 or 20 years ago, agriculture was the number one revenue generator in the state of CA. Amazing when you consider all that comes from CA. I’m pretty sure that the lobbying power from this group pulls some weight in sacto.
July 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM #244018peterbParticipantWater is life. Having lived where there was no water except for what could be captured during a rain, very few things survived. Just about every living thing is a consumer of water in some way. The trick is to figure out our priorities in order to best allocate it. With approx 40M people in CA, I would think that residential water use would take a priority over certain crops. Keep in mind, though, that up until 10 or 20 years ago, agriculture was the number one revenue generator in the state of CA. Amazing when you consider all that comes from CA. I’m pretty sure that the lobbying power from this group pulls some weight in sacto.
July 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM #244024peterbParticipantWater is life. Having lived where there was no water except for what could be captured during a rain, very few things survived. Just about every living thing is a consumer of water in some way. The trick is to figure out our priorities in order to best allocate it. With approx 40M people in CA, I would think that residential water use would take a priority over certain crops. Keep in mind, though, that up until 10 or 20 years ago, agriculture was the number one revenue generator in the state of CA. Amazing when you consider all that comes from CA. I’m pretty sure that the lobbying power from this group pulls some weight in sacto.
July 21, 2008 at 1:34 PM #243826DWCAPParticipant[quote=esmith]
What does my showering or using TP do for the state? Grass lawn is a necessity, it does not need to be justified. Besides we don’t live in a socialist country, it shouldn’t be up to the government to decide whether they should allocate more water to rice growers at the expense of my lawn. I will pay the market rate and they will pay the market rate, and if there’s not enough water, just raise the rate. The problem is, they are probably NOT paying the market rate, I don’t see how they could profitably grow rice (which basically has to be submerged in water for most of its growing period) if they were paying for water as much as I do.BTW my grass lawn creates more oxygen than needed by my entire family. I could say that you’re breathing my oxygen :)[/quote]
Thank you, now you have answered my question.
(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
July 21, 2008 at 1:34 PM #243970DWCAPParticipant[quote=esmith]
What does my showering or using TP do for the state? Grass lawn is a necessity, it does not need to be justified. Besides we don’t live in a socialist country, it shouldn’t be up to the government to decide whether they should allocate more water to rice growers at the expense of my lawn. I will pay the market rate and they will pay the market rate, and if there’s not enough water, just raise the rate. The problem is, they are probably NOT paying the market rate, I don’t see how they could profitably grow rice (which basically has to be submerged in water for most of its growing period) if they were paying for water as much as I do.BTW my grass lawn creates more oxygen than needed by my entire family. I could say that you’re breathing my oxygen :)[/quote]
Thank you, now you have answered my question.
(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
July 21, 2008 at 1:34 PM #243977DWCAPParticipant[quote=esmith]
What does my showering or using TP do for the state? Grass lawn is a necessity, it does not need to be justified. Besides we don’t live in a socialist country, it shouldn’t be up to the government to decide whether they should allocate more water to rice growers at the expense of my lawn. I will pay the market rate and they will pay the market rate, and if there’s not enough water, just raise the rate. The problem is, they are probably NOT paying the market rate, I don’t see how they could profitably grow rice (which basically has to be submerged in water for most of its growing period) if they were paying for water as much as I do.BTW my grass lawn creates more oxygen than needed by my entire family. I could say that you’re breathing my oxygen :)[/quote]
Thank you, now you have answered my question.
(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
July 21, 2008 at 1:34 PM #244033DWCAPParticipant[quote=esmith]
What does my showering or using TP do for the state? Grass lawn is a necessity, it does not need to be justified. Besides we don’t live in a socialist country, it shouldn’t be up to the government to decide whether they should allocate more water to rice growers at the expense of my lawn. I will pay the market rate and they will pay the market rate, and if there’s not enough water, just raise the rate. The problem is, they are probably NOT paying the market rate, I don’t see how they could profitably grow rice (which basically has to be submerged in water for most of its growing period) if they were paying for water as much as I do.BTW my grass lawn creates more oxygen than needed by my entire family. I could say that you’re breathing my oxygen :)[/quote]
Thank you, now you have answered my question.
(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
July 21, 2008 at 1:34 PM #244039DWCAPParticipant[quote=esmith]
What does my showering or using TP do for the state? Grass lawn is a necessity, it does not need to be justified. Besides we don’t live in a socialist country, it shouldn’t be up to the government to decide whether they should allocate more water to rice growers at the expense of my lawn. I will pay the market rate and they will pay the market rate, and if there’s not enough water, just raise the rate. The problem is, they are probably NOT paying the market rate, I don’t see how they could profitably grow rice (which basically has to be submerged in water for most of its growing period) if they were paying for water as much as I do.BTW my grass lawn creates more oxygen than needed by my entire family. I could say that you’re breathing my oxygen :)[/quote]
Thank you, now you have answered my question.
(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
July 21, 2008 at 2:11 PM #243846EugeneParticipant(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
Actually that’s not the case. Here are some numbers.
Cost to pump fresh water to LA through California State Water Project: 3000 kwh/acre-foot or 9 wh/gallon
Carbon dioxide consumed by 1000 sf of grass: around 500-600 kg/year (hard to find good numbers)
Water spent to grow grass: let’s say 40″/year in addition to rainfall = 25,000 gallon/year = 225 kwh
worst-case scenario (100% coal-powered electricity): 1 kwh of electricity = 1 kg of emissions, 225 kwh = 225 kg
So, even in the worst-case scenario, my lawn would be net oxygen-positive. And California has fairly clean electricity.
July 21, 2008 at 2:11 PM #243990EugeneParticipant(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
Actually that’s not the case. Here are some numbers.
Cost to pump fresh water to LA through California State Water Project: 3000 kwh/acre-foot or 9 wh/gallon
Carbon dioxide consumed by 1000 sf of grass: around 500-600 kg/year (hard to find good numbers)
Water spent to grow grass: let’s say 40″/year in addition to rainfall = 25,000 gallon/year = 225 kwh
worst-case scenario (100% coal-powered electricity): 1 kwh of electricity = 1 kg of emissions, 225 kwh = 225 kg
So, even in the worst-case scenario, my lawn would be net oxygen-positive. And California has fairly clean electricity.
July 21, 2008 at 2:11 PM #243998EugeneParticipant(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
Actually that’s not the case. Here are some numbers.
Cost to pump fresh water to LA through California State Water Project: 3000 kwh/acre-foot or 9 wh/gallon
Carbon dioxide consumed by 1000 sf of grass: around 500-600 kg/year (hard to find good numbers)
Water spent to grow grass: let’s say 40″/year in addition to rainfall = 25,000 gallon/year = 225 kwh
worst-case scenario (100% coal-powered electricity): 1 kwh of electricity = 1 kg of emissions, 225 kwh = 225 kg
So, even in the worst-case scenario, my lawn would be net oxygen-positive. And California has fairly clean electricity.
July 21, 2008 at 2:11 PM #244053EugeneParticipant(and considering the enormous amount of energy needed to pump that water from either the Colorado river, or from the Delta and over the grapevine, I doubt your grass is oxygen positive. Therefore, I think you are using MY oxygen. π )
Actually that’s not the case. Here are some numbers.
Cost to pump fresh water to LA through California State Water Project: 3000 kwh/acre-foot or 9 wh/gallon
Carbon dioxide consumed by 1000 sf of grass: around 500-600 kg/year (hard to find good numbers)
Water spent to grow grass: let’s say 40″/year in addition to rainfall = 25,000 gallon/year = 225 kwh
worst-case scenario (100% coal-powered electricity): 1 kwh of electricity = 1 kg of emissions, 225 kwh = 225 kg
So, even in the worst-case scenario, my lawn would be net oxygen-positive. And California has fairly clean electricity.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.