- This topic has 280 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 20, 2009 at 8:04 PM #404122May 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM #403543
SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay CAR –
4/15/08 – 5/15/08 compared to 4/15/09 – 5/15/09 for detached homes only. 08 is on top and 09 is on the bottom.
Zip Code #Solds LP SP DOM
92009 27 928k 881k 71
92009 43 815k 773k 4992008 15 742k 716k 41
92008 15 531k 512k 6292054 25 447k 433k 56
92054 18 339k 320k 7792056 26 425k 413k 58
92056 44 330k 324k 5092024 33 946k 886k 88
92024 24 895k 858k 3892129 29 594k 570k 52
92129 22 587k 575k 4792131 29 768k 734k 54
92131 24 736k 696k 5192126 57 427k 414k 58
92126 38 353k 353k 6092127 29 1.08M 1.02M 74
92127 20 966k 888k 6292117 35 489k 467k 64
92117 32 422k 416k 4091913 42 446k 431k 65
91913 44 363k 372k 5892104 17 450k 435k 27
92104 18 523k 511k 7092071 30 402k 377k 71
92071 26 338k 336k 8692037 20 3.345M 3M 57
92037 11 3.59M 2.8M 10192130 36 1.15M 1.092M 41
92130 25 981k 928k 57Notes and observations. Because the time period was only 5 days ago, expect 2009 sales to grow due to agent tardiness.
92127 was further filtered with homes built after 1998 to get a focus on more 4S timeframes of being buit.
I was actually surprised at the results at first but then it hit me that sales volume does not have to be up given that we have a substantial reduction in inventory.
Have at it guys
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM #403796SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay CAR –
4/15/08 – 5/15/08 compared to 4/15/09 – 5/15/09 for detached homes only. 08 is on top and 09 is on the bottom.
Zip Code #Solds LP SP DOM
92009 27 928k 881k 71
92009 43 815k 773k 4992008 15 742k 716k 41
92008 15 531k 512k 6292054 25 447k 433k 56
92054 18 339k 320k 7792056 26 425k 413k 58
92056 44 330k 324k 5092024 33 946k 886k 88
92024 24 895k 858k 3892129 29 594k 570k 52
92129 22 587k 575k 4792131 29 768k 734k 54
92131 24 736k 696k 5192126 57 427k 414k 58
92126 38 353k 353k 6092127 29 1.08M 1.02M 74
92127 20 966k 888k 6292117 35 489k 467k 64
92117 32 422k 416k 4091913 42 446k 431k 65
91913 44 363k 372k 5892104 17 450k 435k 27
92104 18 523k 511k 7092071 30 402k 377k 71
92071 26 338k 336k 8692037 20 3.345M 3M 57
92037 11 3.59M 2.8M 10192130 36 1.15M 1.092M 41
92130 25 981k 928k 57Notes and observations. Because the time period was only 5 days ago, expect 2009 sales to grow due to agent tardiness.
92127 was further filtered with homes built after 1998 to get a focus on more 4S timeframes of being buit.
I was actually surprised at the results at first but then it hit me that sales volume does not have to be up given that we have a substantial reduction in inventory.
Have at it guys
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM #404033SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay CAR –
4/15/08 – 5/15/08 compared to 4/15/09 – 5/15/09 for detached homes only. 08 is on top and 09 is on the bottom.
Zip Code #Solds LP SP DOM
92009 27 928k 881k 71
92009 43 815k 773k 4992008 15 742k 716k 41
92008 15 531k 512k 6292054 25 447k 433k 56
92054 18 339k 320k 7792056 26 425k 413k 58
92056 44 330k 324k 5092024 33 946k 886k 88
92024 24 895k 858k 3892129 29 594k 570k 52
92129 22 587k 575k 4792131 29 768k 734k 54
92131 24 736k 696k 5192126 57 427k 414k 58
92126 38 353k 353k 6092127 29 1.08M 1.02M 74
92127 20 966k 888k 6292117 35 489k 467k 64
92117 32 422k 416k 4091913 42 446k 431k 65
91913 44 363k 372k 5892104 17 450k 435k 27
92104 18 523k 511k 7092071 30 402k 377k 71
92071 26 338k 336k 8692037 20 3.345M 3M 57
92037 11 3.59M 2.8M 10192130 36 1.15M 1.092M 41
92130 25 981k 928k 57Notes and observations. Because the time period was only 5 days ago, expect 2009 sales to grow due to agent tardiness.
92127 was further filtered with homes built after 1998 to get a focus on more 4S timeframes of being buit.
I was actually surprised at the results at first but then it hit me that sales volume does not have to be up given that we have a substantial reduction in inventory.
Have at it guys
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM #404095SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay CAR –
4/15/08 – 5/15/08 compared to 4/15/09 – 5/15/09 for detached homes only. 08 is on top and 09 is on the bottom.
Zip Code #Solds LP SP DOM
92009 27 928k 881k 71
92009 43 815k 773k 4992008 15 742k 716k 41
92008 15 531k 512k 6292054 25 447k 433k 56
92054 18 339k 320k 7792056 26 425k 413k 58
92056 44 330k 324k 5092024 33 946k 886k 88
92024 24 895k 858k 3892129 29 594k 570k 52
92129 22 587k 575k 4792131 29 768k 734k 54
92131 24 736k 696k 5192126 57 427k 414k 58
92126 38 353k 353k 6092127 29 1.08M 1.02M 74
92127 20 966k 888k 6292117 35 489k 467k 64
92117 32 422k 416k 4091913 42 446k 431k 65
91913 44 363k 372k 5892104 17 450k 435k 27
92104 18 523k 511k 7092071 30 402k 377k 71
92071 26 338k 336k 8692037 20 3.345M 3M 57
92037 11 3.59M 2.8M 10192130 36 1.15M 1.092M 41
92130 25 981k 928k 57Notes and observations. Because the time period was only 5 days ago, expect 2009 sales to grow due to agent tardiness.
92127 was further filtered with homes built after 1998 to get a focus on more 4S timeframes of being buit.
I was actually surprised at the results at first but then it hit me that sales volume does not have to be up given that we have a substantial reduction in inventory.
Have at it guys
May 20, 2009 at 11:45 PM #404242SD Realtor
ParticipantOkay CAR –
4/15/08 – 5/15/08 compared to 4/15/09 – 5/15/09 for detached homes only. 08 is on top and 09 is on the bottom.
Zip Code #Solds LP SP DOM
92009 27 928k 881k 71
92009 43 815k 773k 4992008 15 742k 716k 41
92008 15 531k 512k 6292054 25 447k 433k 56
92054 18 339k 320k 7792056 26 425k 413k 58
92056 44 330k 324k 5092024 33 946k 886k 88
92024 24 895k 858k 3892129 29 594k 570k 52
92129 22 587k 575k 4792131 29 768k 734k 54
92131 24 736k 696k 5192126 57 427k 414k 58
92126 38 353k 353k 6092127 29 1.08M 1.02M 74
92127 20 966k 888k 6292117 35 489k 467k 64
92117 32 422k 416k 4091913 42 446k 431k 65
91913 44 363k 372k 5892104 17 450k 435k 27
92104 18 523k 511k 7092071 30 402k 377k 71
92071 26 338k 336k 8692037 20 3.345M 3M 57
92037 11 3.59M 2.8M 10192130 36 1.15M 1.092M 41
92130 25 981k 928k 57Notes and observations. Because the time period was only 5 days ago, expect 2009 sales to grow due to agent tardiness.
92127 was further filtered with homes built after 1998 to get a focus on more 4S timeframes of being buit.
I was actually surprised at the results at first but then it hit me that sales volume does not have to be up given that we have a substantial reduction in inventory.
Have at it guys
May 21, 2009 at 12:55 AM #403588an
ParticipantSales of SFR in 92126 took a huge dive huh? From 57 to 38. Right now, there’s 44 SFR for sale in 92126, so I guess that’s ~1.2 months supply. Very interesting stats SD R.
May 21, 2009 at 12:55 AM #403842an
ParticipantSales of SFR in 92126 took a huge dive huh? From 57 to 38. Right now, there’s 44 SFR for sale in 92126, so I guess that’s ~1.2 months supply. Very interesting stats SD R.
May 21, 2009 at 12:55 AM #404080an
ParticipantSales of SFR in 92126 took a huge dive huh? From 57 to 38. Right now, there’s 44 SFR for sale in 92126, so I guess that’s ~1.2 months supply. Very interesting stats SD R.
May 21, 2009 at 12:55 AM #404139an
ParticipantSales of SFR in 92126 took a huge dive huh? From 57 to 38. Right now, there’s 44 SFR for sale in 92126, so I guess that’s ~1.2 months supply. Very interesting stats SD R.
May 21, 2009 at 12:55 AM #404288an
ParticipantSales of SFR in 92126 took a huge dive huh? From 57 to 38. Right now, there’s 44 SFR for sale in 92126, so I guess that’s ~1.2 months supply. Very interesting stats SD R.
May 21, 2009 at 1:17 AM #403583CA renter
ParticipantThanks so much for your work, SDR! 🙂
Yes, I’m sure the sales volume will go up as time wears on. Still, those are interesting numbers, and show that some areas are on fire, while others are much slower than last year.
FWIW, I got the following sales numbers, if my addition is correct:
2008: 450
2009: 404I’m guessing more sales will come in and they should be fairly even. Still, with all the hoopla about the selling season this year, I would have thought 2009 would have come in much higher, comparatively.
Yes, inventory is down, but I’m in the camp that believes it’s being artificially suppressed and these are not “real” market inventory numbers we are seeing now.
Again, this story is definitely not over, and it will be fasciniating to watch it unfold.
Thank you! Beer’s on me at the next meet-up. 🙂
May 21, 2009 at 1:17 AM #403837CA renter
ParticipantThanks so much for your work, SDR! 🙂
Yes, I’m sure the sales volume will go up as time wears on. Still, those are interesting numbers, and show that some areas are on fire, while others are much slower than last year.
FWIW, I got the following sales numbers, if my addition is correct:
2008: 450
2009: 404I’m guessing more sales will come in and they should be fairly even. Still, with all the hoopla about the selling season this year, I would have thought 2009 would have come in much higher, comparatively.
Yes, inventory is down, but I’m in the camp that believes it’s being artificially suppressed and these are not “real” market inventory numbers we are seeing now.
Again, this story is definitely not over, and it will be fasciniating to watch it unfold.
Thank you! Beer’s on me at the next meet-up. 🙂
May 21, 2009 at 1:17 AM #404075CA renter
ParticipantThanks so much for your work, SDR! 🙂
Yes, I’m sure the sales volume will go up as time wears on. Still, those are interesting numbers, and show that some areas are on fire, while others are much slower than last year.
FWIW, I got the following sales numbers, if my addition is correct:
2008: 450
2009: 404I’m guessing more sales will come in and they should be fairly even. Still, with all the hoopla about the selling season this year, I would have thought 2009 would have come in much higher, comparatively.
Yes, inventory is down, but I’m in the camp that believes it’s being artificially suppressed and these are not “real” market inventory numbers we are seeing now.
Again, this story is definitely not over, and it will be fasciniating to watch it unfold.
Thank you! Beer’s on me at the next meet-up. 🙂
May 21, 2009 at 1:17 AM #404134CA renter
ParticipantThanks so much for your work, SDR! 🙂
Yes, I’m sure the sales volume will go up as time wears on. Still, those are interesting numbers, and show that some areas are on fire, while others are much slower than last year.
FWIW, I got the following sales numbers, if my addition is correct:
2008: 450
2009: 404I’m guessing more sales will come in and they should be fairly even. Still, with all the hoopla about the selling season this year, I would have thought 2009 would have come in much higher, comparatively.
Yes, inventory is down, but I’m in the camp that believes it’s being artificially suppressed and these are not “real” market inventory numbers we are seeing now.
Again, this story is definitely not over, and it will be fasciniating to watch it unfold.
Thank you! Beer’s on me at the next meet-up. 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.