- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 26, 2009 at 11:40 AM #473817October 26, 2009 at 5:20 PM #474341EconProfParticipant
Let’s look even further, at the broader implications of this boondogle. Is society as a whole–our welfare–helped or hurt by this program?
The government took lower mileage used cars, poured poison down their throats, then crushed them. The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule.
Our national wealth of physical assets was thus diminished accordingly. Why couldn’t we have shipped all these cars to Mexico (or, pick a country), and sold them for, say, half their retail value here.
I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.October 26, 2009 at 5:20 PM #474642EconProfParticipantLet’s look even further, at the broader implications of this boondogle. Is society as a whole–our welfare–helped or hurt by this program?
The government took lower mileage used cars, poured poison down their throats, then crushed them. The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule.
Our national wealth of physical assets was thus diminished accordingly. Why couldn’t we have shipped all these cars to Mexico (or, pick a country), and sold them for, say, half their retail value here.
I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.October 26, 2009 at 5:20 PM #473977EconProfParticipantLet’s look even further, at the broader implications of this boondogle. Is society as a whole–our welfare–helped or hurt by this program?
The government took lower mileage used cars, poured poison down their throats, then crushed them. The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule.
Our national wealth of physical assets was thus diminished accordingly. Why couldn’t we have shipped all these cars to Mexico (or, pick a country), and sold them for, say, half their retail value here.
I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.October 26, 2009 at 5:20 PM #474418EconProfParticipantLet’s look even further, at the broader implications of this boondogle. Is society as a whole–our welfare–helped or hurt by this program?
The government took lower mileage used cars, poured poison down their throats, then crushed them. The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule.
Our national wealth of physical assets was thus diminished accordingly. Why couldn’t we have shipped all these cars to Mexico (or, pick a country), and sold them for, say, half their retail value here.
I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.October 26, 2009 at 5:20 PM #473800EconProfParticipantLet’s look even further, at the broader implications of this boondogle. Is society as a whole–our welfare–helped or hurt by this program?
The government took lower mileage used cars, poured poison down their throats, then crushed them. The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule.
Our national wealth of physical assets was thus diminished accordingly. Why couldn’t we have shipped all these cars to Mexico (or, pick a country), and sold them for, say, half their retail value here.
I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.October 26, 2009 at 5:37 PM #473993jpinpbParticipantAnd in the end, what was the real outcome of this CFC program? Did it help our economy long term? Or was it just another temporary fix/band-aid? Sales were down after CFC. No surprise. Again, borrowing from the future.
October 26, 2009 at 5:37 PM #474657jpinpbParticipantAnd in the end, what was the real outcome of this CFC program? Did it help our economy long term? Or was it just another temporary fix/band-aid? Sales were down after CFC. No surprise. Again, borrowing from the future.
October 26, 2009 at 5:37 PM #474356jpinpbParticipantAnd in the end, what was the real outcome of this CFC program? Did it help our economy long term? Or was it just another temporary fix/band-aid? Sales were down after CFC. No surprise. Again, borrowing from the future.
October 26, 2009 at 5:37 PM #473815jpinpbParticipantAnd in the end, what was the real outcome of this CFC program? Did it help our economy long term? Or was it just another temporary fix/band-aid? Sales were down after CFC. No surprise. Again, borrowing from the future.
October 26, 2009 at 5:37 PM #474433jpinpbParticipantAnd in the end, what was the real outcome of this CFC program? Did it help our economy long term? Or was it just another temporary fix/band-aid? Sales were down after CFC. No surprise. Again, borrowing from the future.
October 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #474018EugeneParticipant[quote=EconProf] The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule. [/quote]
Every $10 spent on the program reduced nationwide fuel consumption by 1 gallon/year. Assuming that, absent the program, a typical clunker would’ve stayed on the road for 4 more years, the program indirectly paid for itself.
[quote]I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.[/quote]
You must be misremembering something (or maybe your news source got it wrong). 12-year old LS400’s weren’t eligible. A number of LS400’s were traded in, mostly 1990 to 1992 model years.
October 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #474682EugeneParticipant[quote=EconProf] The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule. [/quote]
Every $10 spent on the program reduced nationwide fuel consumption by 1 gallon/year. Assuming that, absent the program, a typical clunker would’ve stayed on the road for 4 more years, the program indirectly paid for itself.
[quote]I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.[/quote]
You must be misremembering something (or maybe your news source got it wrong). 12-year old LS400’s weren’t eligible. A number of LS400’s were traded in, mostly 1990 to 1992 model years.
October 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #474458EugeneParticipant[quote=EconProf] The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule. [/quote]
Every $10 spent on the program reduced nationwide fuel consumption by 1 gallon/year. Assuming that, absent the program, a typical clunker would’ve stayed on the road for 4 more years, the program indirectly paid for itself.
[quote]I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.[/quote]
You must be misremembering something (or maybe your news source got it wrong). 12-year old LS400’s weren’t eligible. A number of LS400’s were traded in, mostly 1990 to 1992 model years.
October 26, 2009 at 7:38 PM #473839EugeneParticipant[quote=EconProf] The impact on the nation’s gasoline usage and pollution emission I have read was miniscule. [/quote]
Every $10 spent on the program reduced nationwide fuel consumption by 1 gallon/year. Assuming that, absent the program, a typical clunker would’ve stayed on the road for 4 more years, the program indirectly paid for itself.
[quote]I read of one Mom who sought to help her daughter out, so gave her the family 12-year old 400LS Lexus that was “getting old”, so she could trade it in on a new little box from Japan. Almost made me cry.[/quote]
You must be misremembering something (or maybe your news source got it wrong). 12-year old LS400’s weren’t eligible. A number of LS400’s were traded in, mostly 1990 to 1992 model years.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.