- This topic has 20 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by
equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 17, 2008 at 1:39 PM #11844February 17, 2008 at 3:41 PM #154556
surveyor
Participant$400k properties…
I read it, I definitely thought, with all the foreclosures, that there should be something like this going on. Certainly I’ve seen it happen in the midwest.
The problem I see with their approach is that they really should try to get it at the bottom price, instead of assuming that California properties are priced appropriately at “$400k”. A streamlined condemnation method would work better and you could probably get properties in the $50k per unit.
The land banks in the midwest that they are getting advice from, they’re not paying $400k per unit, that’s for sure.
February 17, 2008 at 3:41 PM #154832Participant$400k properties…
I read it, I definitely thought, with all the foreclosures, that there should be something like this going on. Certainly I’ve seen it happen in the midwest.
The problem I see with their approach is that they really should try to get it at the bottom price, instead of assuming that California properties are priced appropriately at “$400k”. A streamlined condemnation method would work better and you could probably get properties in the $50k per unit.
The land banks in the midwest that they are getting advice from, they’re not paying $400k per unit, that’s for sure.
February 17, 2008 at 3:41 PM #154843Participant$400k properties…
I read it, I definitely thought, with all the foreclosures, that there should be something like this going on. Certainly I’ve seen it happen in the midwest.
The problem I see with their approach is that they really should try to get it at the bottom price, instead of assuming that California properties are priced appropriately at “$400k”. A streamlined condemnation method would work better and you could probably get properties in the $50k per unit.
The land banks in the midwest that they are getting advice from, they’re not paying $400k per unit, that’s for sure.
February 17, 2008 at 3:41 PM #154856Participant$400k properties…
I read it, I definitely thought, with all the foreclosures, that there should be something like this going on. Certainly I’ve seen it happen in the midwest.
The problem I see with their approach is that they really should try to get it at the bottom price, instead of assuming that California properties are priced appropriately at “$400k”. A streamlined condemnation method would work better and you could probably get properties in the $50k per unit.
The land banks in the midwest that they are getting advice from, they’re not paying $400k per unit, that’s for sure.
February 17, 2008 at 3:41 PM #154934Participant$400k properties…
I read it, I definitely thought, with all the foreclosures, that there should be something like this going on. Certainly I’ve seen it happen in the midwest.
The problem I see with their approach is that they really should try to get it at the bottom price, instead of assuming that California properties are priced appropriately at “$400k”. A streamlined condemnation method would work better and you could probably get properties in the $50k per unit.
The land banks in the midwest that they are getting advice from, they’re not paying $400k per unit, that’s for sure.
February 17, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154612Reality
ParticipantI like the quote from the longtime property owner:
“I am worried about property values.”
Something about this rubs me the wrong way. Dude probably has made a small fortune because he bought years ago and is concerned about any erosion of what he must consider his appreciation entitlement, most due to the bubble he’s probably never heard of.
February 17, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154989ParticipantI like the quote from the longtime property owner:
“I am worried about property values.”
Something about this rubs me the wrong way. Dude probably has made a small fortune because he bought years ago and is concerned about any erosion of what he must consider his appreciation entitlement, most due to the bubble he’s probably never heard of.
February 17, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154889ParticipantI like the quote from the longtime property owner:
“I am worried about property values.”
Something about this rubs me the wrong way. Dude probably has made a small fortune because he bought years ago and is concerned about any erosion of what he must consider his appreciation entitlement, most due to the bubble he’s probably never heard of.
February 17, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154897ParticipantI like the quote from the longtime property owner:
“I am worried about property values.”
Something about this rubs me the wrong way. Dude probably has made a small fortune because he bought years ago and is concerned about any erosion of what he must consider his appreciation entitlement, most due to the bubble he’s probably never heard of.
February 17, 2008 at 5:52 PM #154911ParticipantI like the quote from the longtime property owner:
“I am worried about property values.”
Something about this rubs me the wrong way. Dude probably has made a small fortune because he bought years ago and is concerned about any erosion of what he must consider his appreciation entitlement, most due to the bubble he’s probably never heard of.
February 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM #154904Noob
ParticipantYou have to love these types of quotes:
San Diego City Councilman Tony Young, co-chairman of the task force, said the full panel will “explore the concept and see if it makes sense for the city and the county.”
Foreclosed properties “are dirt cheap right now,” Young said. “You will probably never see another opportunity to buy properties at this level.”
Good Hunting,
Noob–but learning
February 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM #155004ParticipantYou have to love these types of quotes:
San Diego City Councilman Tony Young, co-chairman of the task force, said the full panel will “explore the concept and see if it makes sense for the city and the county.”
Foreclosed properties “are dirt cheap right now,” Young said. “You will probably never see another opportunity to buy properties at this level.”
Good Hunting,
Noob–but learning
February 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM #154926ParticipantYou have to love these types of quotes:
San Diego City Councilman Tony Young, co-chairman of the task force, said the full panel will “explore the concept and see if it makes sense for the city and the county.”
Foreclosed properties “are dirt cheap right now,” Young said. “You will probably never see another opportunity to buy properties at this level.”
Good Hunting,
Noob–but learning
February 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM #154913ParticipantYou have to love these types of quotes:
San Diego City Councilman Tony Young, co-chairman of the task force, said the full panel will “explore the concept and see if it makes sense for the city and the county.”
Foreclosed properties “are dirt cheap right now,” Young said. “You will probably never see another opportunity to buy properties at this level.”
Good Hunting,
Noob–but learning
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.