Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › 90 year old Madoff victim back to work

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 61 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM #365697
    peterb
    Participant

    2 years at club fed. He knows too much.

    March 13, 2009 at 10:14 AM #365515
    Veritas
    Participant

    Protect certain members of Congress. It will be easier to whack him behind bars.

    March 13, 2009 at 10:14 AM #365823
    Veritas
    Participant

    Protect certain members of Congress. It will be easier to whack him behind bars.

    March 13, 2009 at 10:14 AM #365226
    Veritas
    Participant

    Protect certain members of Congress. It will be easier to whack him behind bars.

    March 13, 2009 at 10:14 AM #365676
    Veritas
    Participant

    Protect certain members of Congress. It will be easier to whack him behind bars.

    March 13, 2009 at 10:14 AM #365712
    Veritas
    Participant

    Protect certain members of Congress. It will be easier to whack him behind bars.

    March 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM #365838
    Diego Mamani
    Participant

    I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.

    March 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM #365948
    Diego Mamani
    Participant

    I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.

    March 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM #365801
    Diego Mamani
    Participant

    I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.

    March 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM #365639
    Diego Mamani
    Participant

    I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.

    March 13, 2009 at 1:47 PM #365351
    Diego Mamani
    Participant

    I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.

    March 13, 2009 at 2:39 PM #365689
    sunny88
    Participant

    [quote=Diego Mamani]I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.[/quote]

    I absolutely agree. There is no incentive for him to be forthcoming with the required information to track the money. I just wonder if they ever will be able to find additional accomplices.

    March 13, 2009 at 2:39 PM #365400
    sunny88
    Participant

    [quote=Diego Mamani]I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.[/quote]

    I absolutely agree. There is no incentive for him to be forthcoming with the required information to track the money. I just wonder if they ever will be able to find additional accomplices.

    March 13, 2009 at 2:39 PM #365851
    sunny88
    Participant

    [quote=Diego Mamani]I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.[/quote]

    I absolutely agree. There is no incentive for him to be forthcoming with the required information to track the money. I just wonder if they ever will be able to find additional accomplices.

    March 13, 2009 at 2:39 PM #365888
    sunny88
    Participant

    [quote=Diego Mamani]I think it’s his children, wife, and some other close associates that he’s trying to protect. He’s pleading guilty to all charges, but at the same time he’s lying to the judge when he says that he acted alone.

    There were tons of account statements, forged trade confirmations, etc., going back years. It is impossible for him to have “worked” alone in this Ponzi scheme.[/quote]

    I absolutely agree. There is no incentive for him to be forthcoming with the required information to track the money. I just wonder if they ever will be able to find additional accomplices.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 61 total)
1 2 3 4 5
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.