Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › $755k to $447k in MM
- This topic has 85 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
Wah-Wah.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 6, 2011 at 11:13 AM #684089April 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM #685276
jpinpb
ParticipantIf you look at the CPI Inflation calculator it should be 356k.
I think that w/rates still so low, 447k for a canyon 1/3 acre lot for that area (Sorrento Valley) is a very good price. I’m not an expert in MM, but that seems pretty good. I remember Waterbridge townhomes selling for that price.
April 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM #684925ParticipantIf you look at the CPI Inflation calculator it should be 356k.
I think that w/rates still so low, 447k for a canyon 1/3 acre lot for that area (Sorrento Valley) is a very good price. I’m not an expert in MM, but that seems pretty good. I remember Waterbridge townhomes selling for that price.
April 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM #684153ParticipantIf you look at the CPI Inflation calculator it should be 356k.
I think that w/rates still so low, 447k for a canyon 1/3 acre lot for that area (Sorrento Valley) is a very good price. I’m not an expert in MM, but that seems pretty good. I remember Waterbridge townhomes selling for that price.
April 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM #684103ParticipantIf you look at the CPI Inflation calculator it should be 356k.
I think that w/rates still so low, 447k for a canyon 1/3 acre lot for that area (Sorrento Valley) is a very good price. I’m not an expert in MM, but that seems pretty good. I remember Waterbridge townhomes selling for that price.
April 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM #684784ParticipantIf you look at the CPI Inflation calculator it should be 356k.
I think that w/rates still so low, 447k for a canyon 1/3 acre lot for that area (Sorrento Valley) is a very good price. I’m not an expert in MM, but that seems pretty good. I remember Waterbridge townhomes selling for that price.
April 6, 2011 at 2:18 PM #685316an
ParticipantThis is Mira Mesa, not Sorrento Valley. Sorrento Mesa if you want to get specific. If you look at its history, $755k is definitely out of the norm. Even bigger houses on bigger lots with canyon view north Calle Cristobal would have been happy to have it sold for $755k.
BTW, most of that 1/3 acre is the slope, so they’re not very usable. The backyard in that development is very small and they’re very squished together.
April 6, 2011 at 2:18 PM #684193ParticipantThis is Mira Mesa, not Sorrento Valley. Sorrento Mesa if you want to get specific. If you look at its history, $755k is definitely out of the norm. Even bigger houses on bigger lots with canyon view north Calle Cristobal would have been happy to have it sold for $755k.
BTW, most of that 1/3 acre is the slope, so they’re not very usable. The backyard in that development is very small and they’re very squished together.
April 6, 2011 at 2:18 PM #684965ParticipantThis is Mira Mesa, not Sorrento Valley. Sorrento Mesa if you want to get specific. If you look at its history, $755k is definitely out of the norm. Even bigger houses on bigger lots with canyon view north Calle Cristobal would have been happy to have it sold for $755k.
BTW, most of that 1/3 acre is the slope, so they’re not very usable. The backyard in that development is very small and they’re very squished together.
April 6, 2011 at 2:18 PM #684144ParticipantThis is Mira Mesa, not Sorrento Valley. Sorrento Mesa if you want to get specific. If you look at its history, $755k is definitely out of the norm. Even bigger houses on bigger lots with canyon view north Calle Cristobal would have been happy to have it sold for $755k.
BTW, most of that 1/3 acre is the slope, so they’re not very usable. The backyard in that development is very small and they’re very squished together.
April 6, 2011 at 2:18 PM #684824ParticipantThis is Mira Mesa, not Sorrento Valley. Sorrento Mesa if you want to get specific. If you look at its history, $755k is definitely out of the norm. Even bigger houses on bigger lots with canyon view north Calle Cristobal would have been happy to have it sold for $755k.
BTW, most of that 1/3 acre is the slope, so they’re not very usable. The backyard in that development is very small and they’re very squished together.
April 6, 2011 at 3:47 PM #684889jameswenn
Participant[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]
you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉
Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]
360K
April 6, 2011 at 3:47 PM #685030Participant[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]
you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉
Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]
360K
April 6, 2011 at 3:47 PM #685381Participant[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]
you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉
Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]
360K
April 6, 2011 at 3:47 PM #684258Participant[quote=Wah-Wah][quote=taz]What’s crazy is that it ever sold for $755,000 in the first place…[/quote]
you got to look at the sale history to appreciate the madness 😉
Apr 04, 2011 Listed $446,900
Dec 13, 2010 reo $508,000
Jun 23, 2005 Sold $755,000
Feb 27, 1998 Sold $262,000
Aug 14, 1992 Sold $223,000question to all Piggs… what do you think the fair market price should be?[/quote]
360K
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.