2010 November Election past….

[briansd1]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Brian talks about nuance and open-mindedness and then turns and slams anyone who doesn’t completely agree with his stance. Obama is above reproach, and has made no mistakes, rather, its the inability of those on the right to think clearly, or understand nuance or that Obama’s “cool” and “cerebral” approach will eventually win the day.
[/quote]

Allan, similarly to what you said on the other thread, my criticism of the right does not explain or excuse left-wing behavior.

You further said:
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Whether we admit it or not, we’re all partisan and we’re all tribal. You can talk about nuance and critical thinking, but the visceral is a powerful driver, too, and the radical elements in both parties know how to push that button.[/quote]

I agree with you.

[PatentGuy]

Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”

[PatentGuy]

Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”

[PatentGuy]

Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”

[PatentGuy]

Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”

[PatentGuy]

Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=PatentGuy]Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”[/quote]

PatentGuy: Great expressions, both. I was always taught the “pig to sing” versus “pig to read”, however. They both work and can be very apropos, especially given some of the overheated hyperbole that careens around here.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=PatentGuy]Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”[/quote]

PatentGuy: Great expressions, both. I was always taught the “pig to sing” versus “pig to read”, however. They both work and can be very apropos, especially given some of the overheated hyperbole that careens around here.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=PatentGuy]Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”[/quote]

PatentGuy: Great expressions, both. I was always taught the “pig to sing” versus “pig to read”, however. They both work and can be very apropos, especially given some of the overheated hyperbole that careens around here.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=PatentGuy]Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”[/quote]

PatentGuy: Great expressions, both. I was always taught the “pig to sing” versus “pig to read”, however. They both work and can be very apropos, especially given some of the overheated hyperbole that careens around here.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=PatentGuy]Allan,

You can’t teach a pig to read. It wastes your time, and annoys the pig.

That one is right up there with “a happy wife is a happy life.”[/quote]

PatentGuy: Great expressions, both. I was always taught the “pig to sing” versus “pig to read”, however. They both work and can be very apropos, especially given some of the overheated hyperbole that careens around here.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Brian: So, you remember my mentioning that I thought Hillary would begin positioning herself for a 2012 run?

Take a look at Dana Milbank’s latest column in the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/05/AR2010110505214.html

I know you believe Hillary is of unimpeachable character and all, but I believe she is just like any other politician, but with more brains, balls and savvy. She wants to be President and 2016 is too late, especially with GOPers like Marco Rubio coming on strong. I’m willing to bet good money that old Bill is starting to get the money machine going, on a backchannel basis for 2012 run.

Right now, she is a better bet for the Dems than Obama is, especially given the fact that he’ll be fighting uphill over the next two years. She can watch him beat himself bloody and then step in.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Brian: So, you remember my mentioning that I thought Hillary would begin positioning herself for a 2012 run?

Take a look at Dana Milbank’s latest column in the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/05/AR2010110505214.html

I know you believe Hillary is of unimpeachable character and all, but I believe she is just like any other politician, but with more brains, balls and savvy. She wants to be President and 2016 is too late, especially with GOPers like Marco Rubio coming on strong. I’m willing to bet good money that old Bill is starting to get the money machine going, on a backchannel basis for 2012 run.

Right now, she is a better bet for the Dems than Obama is, especially given the fact that he’ll be fighting uphill over the next two years. She can watch him beat himself bloody and then step in.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Brian: So, you remember my mentioning that I thought Hillary would begin positioning herself for a 2012 run?

Take a look at Dana Milbank’s latest column in the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/05/AR2010110505214.html

I know you believe Hillary is of unimpeachable character and all, but I believe she is just like any other politician, but with more brains, balls and savvy. She wants to be President and 2016 is too late, especially with GOPers like Marco Rubio coming on strong. I’m willing to bet good money that old Bill is starting to get the money machine going, on a backchannel basis for 2012 run.

Right now, she is a better bet for the Dems than Obama is, especially given the fact that he’ll be fighting uphill over the next two years. She can watch him beat himself bloody and then step in.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

Brian: So, you remember my mentioning that I thought Hillary would begin positioning herself for a 2012 run?

Take a look at Dana Milbank’s latest column in the Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/05/AR2010110505214.html

I know you believe Hillary is of unimpeachable character and all, but I believe she is just like any other politician, but with more brains, balls and savvy. She wants to be President and 2016 is too late, especially with GOPers like Marco Rubio coming on strong. I’m willing to bet good money that old Bill is starting to get the money machine going, on a backchannel basis for 2012 run.

Right now, she is a better bet for the Dems than Obama is, especially given the fact that he’ll be fighting uphill over the next two years. She can watch him beat himself bloody and then step in.

[Author]

Posts