- This topic has 52 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 2 months ago by
rbeast.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 26, 2007 at 11:10 AM #10043August 26, 2007 at 2:23 PM #81222
SD Realtor
ParticipantCurrently active at 2.5M and on the market for 152 days. Not sure where you saw the 4.5M but the original list price when it came on the market was 3.9M and it was listed on 3/27/07. Perhaps it was listed before that at 4.5M but I didn’t find it in my search. I typed Old Winery in the street name and searched from there. So maybe I missed it.
They bought the home for 1.65M in July of 04. I don’t know the original financing on it but they have a recording on 10/05 for 170k, then another for 360k on 11/05 then another for 1.8M on 11/05 and then another for 990k on 11/30. The timing of the refinances appears to indicate that they were pulling some hanky panky on the lenders.
These people will easily loose their home and the lenders will have seen a million bucks evaporate.
SD Realtor
August 26, 2007 at 2:23 PM #81353SD Realtor
ParticipantCurrently active at 2.5M and on the market for 152 days. Not sure where you saw the 4.5M but the original list price when it came on the market was 3.9M and it was listed on 3/27/07. Perhaps it was listed before that at 4.5M but I didn’t find it in my search. I typed Old Winery in the street name and searched from there. So maybe I missed it.
They bought the home for 1.65M in July of 04. I don’t know the original financing on it but they have a recording on 10/05 for 170k, then another for 360k on 11/05 then another for 1.8M on 11/05 and then another for 990k on 11/30. The timing of the refinances appears to indicate that they were pulling some hanky panky on the lenders.
These people will easily loose their home and the lenders will have seen a million bucks evaporate.
SD Realtor
August 26, 2007 at 2:23 PM #81375SD Realtor
ParticipantCurrently active at 2.5M and on the market for 152 days. Not sure where you saw the 4.5M but the original list price when it came on the market was 3.9M and it was listed on 3/27/07. Perhaps it was listed before that at 4.5M but I didn’t find it in my search. I typed Old Winery in the street name and searched from there. So maybe I missed it.
They bought the home for 1.65M in July of 04. I don’t know the original financing on it but they have a recording on 10/05 for 170k, then another for 360k on 11/05 then another for 1.8M on 11/05 and then another for 990k on 11/30. The timing of the refinances appears to indicate that they were pulling some hanky panky on the lenders.
These people will easily loose their home and the lenders will have seen a million bucks evaporate.
SD Realtor
August 26, 2007 at 2:53 PM #81237bsrsharma
ParticipantThey bought the home for 1.65M in July of 04. ………
10/05 for 170k, then another for 360k on 11/05 then another for 1.8M on 11/05 and then another for 990k on 11/30 ………
they were pulling some hanky panky on the lenders.
All this in 16 months. Hard to believe lenders were innocent. Can you tell who the lenders are?
August 26, 2007 at 2:53 PM #81367bsrsharma
ParticipantThey bought the home for 1.65M in July of 04. ………
10/05 for 170k, then another for 360k on 11/05 then another for 1.8M on 11/05 and then another for 990k on 11/30 ………
they were pulling some hanky panky on the lenders.
All this in 16 months. Hard to believe lenders were innocent. Can you tell who the lenders are?
August 26, 2007 at 2:53 PM #81389bsrsharma
ParticipantThey bought the home for 1.65M in July of 04. ………
10/05 for 170k, then another for 360k on 11/05 then another for 1.8M on 11/05 and then another for 990k on 11/30 ………
they were pulling some hanky panky on the lenders.
All this in 16 months. Hard to believe lenders were innocent. Can you tell who the lenders are?
August 26, 2007 at 2:59 PM #81396rbeast
ParticipantI often walk past this house & was always amazed that occupants were on the sunny side of 30 with multiple high- end autos (all with Alaska plates) and constant in-progress renovations! The past few weekends, occupants were loading massive move-it-yourself trailers with their possessions.
Perhaps I’m wrong but I thought initial flyer had price range listed from 3.5 to 4.5.
Thanks for your time on this, SD Realtor – be interesting to see where this lands.
August 26, 2007 at 2:59 PM #81374rbeast
ParticipantI often walk past this house & was always amazed that occupants were on the sunny side of 30 with multiple high- end autos (all with Alaska plates) and constant in-progress renovations! The past few weekends, occupants were loading massive move-it-yourself trailers with their possessions.
Perhaps I’m wrong but I thought initial flyer had price range listed from 3.5 to 4.5.
Thanks for your time on this, SD Realtor – be interesting to see where this lands.
August 26, 2007 at 2:59 PM #81243rbeast
ParticipantI often walk past this house & was always amazed that occupants were on the sunny side of 30 with multiple high- end autos (all with Alaska plates) and constant in-progress renovations! The past few weekends, occupants were loading massive move-it-yourself trailers with their possessions.
Perhaps I’m wrong but I thought initial flyer had price range listed from 3.5 to 4.5.
Thanks for your time on this, SD Realtor – be interesting to see where this lands.
August 26, 2007 at 9:58 PM #81373sdrealtor
ParticipantPrevious owner listed as JJ Moores. Could it be?
August 26, 2007 at 9:58 PM #81505sdrealtor
ParticipantPrevious owner listed as JJ Moores. Could it be?
August 26, 2007 at 9:58 PM #81526sdrealtor
ParticipantPrevious owner listed as JJ Moores. Could it be?
January 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM #144201fencesitter123
ParticipantI have watched this house sit on the market since it was first described on this forum ( I live in the area). I was wondering if someone could explain the following:
SDLookup stated NOD was filed 10/12/07. I kept watching to see how long it would take to go into foreclosure but now the date of NOD has changed to January 16 2008. Can anyone explain this?January 28, 2008 at 5:44 PM #144541fencesitter123
ParticipantI have watched this house sit on the market since it was first described on this forum ( I live in the area). I was wondering if someone could explain the following:
SDLookup stated NOD was filed 10/12/07. I kept watching to see how long it would take to go into foreclosure but now the date of NOD has changed to January 16 2008. Can anyone explain this? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.