100,000 living for free in Inland Empire

[scaredyclassic]

im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.

[scaredyclassic]

so like, if I buy a house tomorrow, and it goes down in value, im gonna get the govt to force the bank to reduce the principal?

[scaredyclassic]

so like, if I buy a house tomorrow, and it goes down in value, im gonna get the govt to force the bank to reduce the principal?

[scaredyclassic]

so like, if I buy a house tomorrow, and it goes down in value, im gonna get the govt to force the bank to reduce the principal?

[scaredyclassic]

so like, if I buy a house tomorrow, and it goes down in value, im gonna get the govt to force the bank to reduce the principal?

[scaredyclassic]

so like, if I buy a house tomorrow, and it goes down in value, im gonna get the govt to force the bank to reduce the principal?

[briansd1]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Good point and I agree with unemployment becoming welfare after a certain point.

Unemployment, however, is not means tested like welfare.

I was talking about the government spending in order inject cash into the economy on a temporary basis.

The government can create jobs but those will certainly become permanent, not be temporary

The government can bailout the banks and give $8000 to home buyers.

The government can temporarily help those who have lost their incomes. A large portion of the unemployed are homeowners also. They can’t make their mortgage payments are they losing their houses.

Remember that historically, a housing recession would follow an employment recession (not the other way around).

We had a housing crash which caused a financial/credit crash, which then caused an economic crash, which caused an employment recession, which will be followed by the usual housing recession.

[briansd1]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Good point and I agree with unemployment becoming welfare after a certain point.

Unemployment, however, is not means tested like welfare.

I was talking about the government spending in order inject cash into the economy on a temporary basis.

The government can create jobs but those will certainly become permanent, not be temporary

The government can bailout the banks and give $8000 to home buyers.

The government can temporarily help those who have lost their incomes. A large portion of the unemployed are homeowners also. They can’t make their mortgage payments are they losing their houses.

Remember that historically, a housing recession would follow an employment recession (not the other way around).

We had a housing crash which caused a financial/credit crash, which then caused an economic crash, which caused an employment recession, which will be followed by the usual housing recession.

[briansd1]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Good point and I agree with unemployment becoming welfare after a certain point.

Unemployment, however, is not means tested like welfare.

I was talking about the government spending in order inject cash into the economy on a temporary basis.

The government can create jobs but those will certainly become permanent, not be temporary

The government can bailout the banks and give $8000 to home buyers.

The government can temporarily help those who have lost their incomes. A large portion of the unemployed are homeowners also. They can’t make their mortgage payments are they losing their houses.

Remember that historically, a housing recession would follow an employment recession (not the other way around).

We had a housing crash which caused a financial/credit crash, which then caused an economic crash, which caused an employment recession, which will be followed by the usual housing recession.

[briansd1]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Good point and I agree with unemployment becoming welfare after a certain point.

Unemployment, however, is not means tested like welfare.

I was talking about the government spending in order inject cash into the economy on a temporary basis.

The government can create jobs but those will certainly become permanent, not be temporary

The government can bailout the banks and give $8000 to home buyers.

The government can temporarily help those who have lost their incomes. A large portion of the unemployed are homeowners also. They can’t make their mortgage payments are they losing their houses.

Remember that historically, a housing recession would follow an employment recession (not the other way around).

We had a housing crash which caused a financial/credit crash, which then caused an economic crash, which caused an employment recession, which will be followed by the usual housing recession.

[briansd1]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Good point and I agree with unemployment becoming welfare after a certain point.

Unemployment, however, is not means tested like welfare.

I was talking about the government spending in order inject cash into the economy on a temporary basis.

The government can create jobs but those will certainly become permanent, not be temporary

The government can bailout the banks and give $8000 to home buyers.

The government can temporarily help those who have lost their incomes. A large portion of the unemployed are homeowners also. They can’t make their mortgage payments are they losing their houses.

Remember that historically, a housing recession would follow an employment recession (not the other way around).

We had a housing crash which caused a financial/credit crash, which then caused an economic crash, which caused an employment recession, which will be followed by the usual housing recession.

[Arraya]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Consider it a private property protection program cheaper than new police or better yet, stimulus for the food industry.

[Arraya]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Consider it a private property protection program cheaper than new police or better yet, stimulus for the food industry.

[Arraya]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Consider it a private property protection program cheaper than new police or better yet, stimulus for the food industry.

[Arraya]

[quote=scaredycat]im not saying welfare is bad. just that after a certain point, it’s not unemployment. i dont see how that stimulates growth however, seems like it just provides survival.[/quote]

Consider it a private property protection program cheaper than new police or better yet, stimulus for the food industry.

[Author]

Posts