salo_t, the insurance ‘argument’ would be made to work either way. If the developer got coverage, he’s the rich guy who suspiciously saves money in the attack – but if he’s denied coverage, then the insurer is the rich guy who suspiciously saves money in the attack. It’s not a falsifiable argument. It’s not science. It’s hysteria.
Show me the peer-reviewed publication that has experts questioning the collapse. Explain why there’s been no accusation against Bush from any academic journal, any mainstream media outlet, any military general, or even the Democratic party. These are all groups that have opposed Bush strongly, at times even dishonestly, but the champions of this crackpot conspiracy garbage are anonymous internet posters.
It’s no use arguing with people over their religious beliefs. For whatever reason, you think it’s important that you have access to special knowledge that lesser beings cannot accept. I’ll be sure to sacrifice a goat in your honor after the game. In the meantime, why don’t you call up this guy, I’m sure you’ll get along famously.
