[quote=FlyerInHi]That’s analysis paralysis that the fossil fuel industry wants.
We just need to take reasonable steps while we bank fossil fuels for future generations. You wouldn’t want to use your grandkids’ fossil fuels now, would you?[/quote]No it’s not. I just want to make sure the steps we’re taking actually make a meaningful change. How do we know it’s a meaningful change unless we thoroughly analyze it? Without proper analyzing the solution, how do you know it’s even going to make a difference or take you in the wrong direction? Since none of the solution is absence of side effect, wouldn’t it be smart to analyze the side effect and let the people decide whether a particular solution is worthwhile w/ a particular set of side effect? I mean, we all can go back to 1900 without cars, planes, and kill off 1/2 of the world population. This whole CO2 problem would be solved 100%. But would people be OK w/ the side effect?
I believe in technology and believe that by my grandkids’ time, they’ll have fusion all figured out and they’ll have infinite renewable energy.
