And Obama only engaged in negativism when his campaign got hammered in PA. I find it ironic that people expect Obama to not defend himself when being attacked. Still his message has been consistently more above-board (feel free to disagree and then we can pull out some stats).
So, it’s OK for Obama to engage in negative campaign when his campaign is being hammered but not Clinton? Her campaign has been hammered for a long time now.
Do you think Obama could get away telling Hillary that she won’t get elected in Nov. without the black vote? Do you see him making that condescending argument that she’s parroting?
He doesn’t need to say it. The almost unanimous support from the black community speaks much louder than what he can say. Also, in the beginning, she was splitting the black votes with him, until the black community see him as a viable candidate. I think they would much rather vote for her than McCain though.
Personally, I like a moderate much more than either a hard left or right wing candidate.
