You may very well be cherry-picking sources, but what I said is that even your own source did not support your bombing tonnage claim. You then go on about how said claim is well known and that there are all kinds of sources, blah, blah.
GIVE ME SOME REAL SOURCES, WITH A LINK.
The answer is, there is no reputable source that will support your claim. You are a liar. End of story.
And, no, you cannot rewrite and twist your old statements to make them sort-of-right-bit-still-very-misleading AFTER I point out all the falsehoods. What you said was FALSE, period. It is not sophism to point out your falsehood. You are the sophist, here, and not a very sophisticated one at that.
QED? It stands for Quod erat **demonstrandum**, smart guy. You should have paid more attention in math class and perhaps learned some logic, too. I did.
