afx114, Bush won the presidency twice. He can only win if he got at least 50% of the voters. So when you say he got to his presidency twice without merit, you’re basically calling 1/2 of the voters stupid for voting for someone who have no merit. Do you understand now?
Back to your MiddleSchoolDebate 101 comment, you made a leap of faith argument, saying that Bush was a horrible president and he’s an aristocrats, therefore all aristocrats will be horrible president and should have there $ taxed more. That to me is the same as saying Bush is a horrible president and he’s a man, so all men will be horrible president and should have their $ taxed more. Get it?
My point about Bush was that he has absolutely no merit to justify his position. If you disagree, please provide me with a list of his accomplishments that make him worthy of the presidency other than his name and his money.
I don’t like Bush and didn’t vote for him, so I couldn’t tell you. But I’m sure over 1/2 of Americans voters can answer your question, since they did vote for him.
