Skip to content
Author: SK in CV
Forum Activity by SK in CV
- FlyerInHi wrote:Thanks for
- FlyerInHi wrote:Shoveler, you
- spdrun wrote:
Edit:
- FlyerInHi wrote:
I don’t mind
- FlyerInHi wrote:Will I be
- Here’s two predictors. Rising
- FlyerInHi wrote:SK, looking
- The-Shoveler wrote:
I saw
- The-Shoveler wrote:You would
- FlyerInHi wrote:
So I stick
- EconProf wrote:More good news
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- flu wrote:futures way down
- California has a pretty
- OPM. Government builds it.
- “Beliefs have no place in the
- It exists. It’s very real.
- Yes. Many people have
- andymajumder
- FlyerInHi wrote:
So do you
- DataAgent wrote:
CNBC ran a
- FlyerInHi wrote:SK in CV
- DataAgent wrote:When CO first
- scaredyclassic wrote:Son,
- FlyerInHi wrote:
But habit
- FlyerInHi wrote:
I think a
- FlyerInHi wrote:
I think
- gzz wrote:
The question is,
- I don’t really understand
- ltsdd wrote:SK – I have yet
- plm wrote:Interest in loans
- ucodegen wrote:From
- the 10K limit doesn’t apply
- If the timing is, as you
- Give the money directly to
- If I was a state legislator,
- I think you skipped a step in
- flu wrote:It would be nice if
- henrysd wrote:Isn’t property
- henrysd wrote:Thus, under the
- flu wrote:
Most “tax reform”
- flu wrote:
I’m not so
- flu wrote:
For rental
- scaredyclassic wrote:flu
- Neither house nor senate bill
- scaredyclassic wrote:all
- I’m with you.
No god, except
- scaredyclassic wrote:with
- scaredyclassic wrote:with
- FlyerInHi wrote:I love Bill
- Ribbles wrote:I’m beginning
- No 179 on rental property.
- harvey wrote:
Still not
- flu wrote:
Well, I am happy
- harvey wrote:
Maybe I’m
- harvey wrote:
Pass-through
- svelte wrote:FlyerInHi
- svelte wrote:
Kelly is now
- Either it was done by a
- We are always in a business
- dup. weird.
- Huge tax cuts for the very
- Yeah, it’s a gopher snake.
- The-Shoveler wrote:LOL
- ucodegen wrote: I assumed all
- poorgradstudent wrote:Since
- I’m baffled. I’m pretty sure
- zk wrote:This is the
- harvey wrote:American
- For every stupid new tweet,
- zk wrote:You lost me. The way
- zk wrote:”The president’s
- flu wrote:
Ok, I’ll try
- flu wrote:You cannot pay off
- phaster wrote:SK in CV
- More people of non-working
- harvey wrote:svelte
- kev374 wrote:The 21% jump in
- Mello Roos is a method of
- There was an additional and
- Who will work for Trump?
- Who will work for Trump?
- no_such_reality wrote:SK, let
- ucodegen wrote:Then you are
- ucodegen wrote:Oh yes, a nit
- ucodegen wrote:
The
- ucodegen wrote:The problem is
- flu wrote:
The only reason
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- Oy. Don’t follow advice from
- ucodegen wrote:Train:
TMPG:
- dumbrenter wrote:
Smart
- ucodegen wrote:Really? I
- ucodegen wrote: BTW where is
- ucodegen wrote:
Sorry
- ucodegen wrote:
You have
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:2) Find it or
- ucodegen wrote:1) Most of the
- Yeah, Gowdy is a former
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote: That
- phaster wrote:
PS just an
- phaster wrote:
given bold
- harvey wrote:
Residential
- harvey wrote:Lol, you guys
- no_such_reality wrote:
It
- no_such_reality wrote:
For
- ocrenter wrote:Kinda
- livinincali wrote:
What are
- ocrenter wrote:FlyerInHi
- Harvey wrote:The argument
- harvey wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- phaster
- Hire a civil engineer and
- spdrun wrote:
It doesn’t
- Reality wrote:SK in CV
- ocrenter wrote:
True. Except
- Reality wrote:
Health systems
- ocrenter wrote:Interesting
- livinincali wrote:
That’s
- Rich Toscano wrote:I don’t
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:These
- phaster wrote:
as I posted
- scaredyclassic
- flu wrote:
Yes, rent in that
- Escoguy wrote:Go to Balboa
- harvey wrote:kev374
- harvey wrote:Didn’t you know?
- kev374 wrote:
What is not
- zk wrote:SK in CV wrote:
No.
- zk wrote:SK in CV wrote:zk
- zk wrote:FlyerInHi wrote:
- .
- Issue is hard-to-detect EDs
- It’s not just right wing
- FlyerInHi wrote:SK. for what
- harvey wrote:It’s already
- harvey wrote:
The “simplify
- Confirmed today by WH, 401k
- ltsdd wrote:Good info on what
- flu wrote:But in all
- flu wrote:People who upper
- I admit I haven’t read a lot
- FlyerInHi wrote:
We should
- “Partners” implies a
- moneymaker wrote:If Trump is
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- all wrote:harvey wrote:
But
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- Blogstar wrote:SK in CV
- Blogstar wrote:I get it.
- njtosd wrote:FlyerInHi
- bearishgurl wrote:JAFO
- harvey wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- meadandale wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:What amuses me
- bearishgurl wrote:Agree.
- FlyerInHi wrote:CAr, the
- guitar187 wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:It appears
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- mixxalot wrote:Hillary will
- njtosd wrote:
I said
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, you
- bearishgurl wrote:njtosd
- njtosd wrote:harvey wrote:
- no_such_reality wrote:Can you
- ucodegen wrote:
An individual
- bearishgurl wrote:ltsdd
- livinincali wrote:
Here’s the
- no_such_reality
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:Why
- AN wrote:no_such_reality
- AN wrote:Does it really
- zk wrote:FlyerInHi wrote:Some
- BG, if you’re talking about
- scaredyclassic wrote:SK in CV
- scaredyclassic wrote:im with
- In other words, but what
- svelte wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- SK in CV wrote:
Trump said he
- zk wrote:flu wrote:Zk,
Trump
- outtamojo wrote:FlyerInHi
- Makes me sad. I went to the
- The fact that he still has
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- Hypocrite. You know what that
- zk wrote:njtosd wrote:
Both
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- njtosd wrote:
She’s not
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:The
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- The undecided voter:
Imagine
- flu wrote:no_such_reality
- Rich Toscano
- dup.
- no_such_reality wrote:Capital
- no_such_reality wrote:It’s
- cvmom wrote:Unfortunately, I
- La Jolla Renter wrote:What if
- Nicely done. Your survival is
- bearishgurl wrote:
The
- bearishgurl wrote:
One of my
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, you
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- JFC. Trump has never denied
- cvmom wrote:Unfortunately, I
- Well, well, well……what’s
- bearishgurl wrote:
Machado
- bearishgurl wrote:
Machado is
- bearishgurl wrote:I don’t
- bearishgurl wrote:FlyerInHi
- FlyerInHi wrote:SK in CV
- svelte wrote:I always figured
- bearishgurl wrote:The
- bearishgurl wrote:You’re
- bearishgurl wrote:
Certainly,
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, correct
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- FlyerInHi wrote:La Jolla
- FlyerInHi wrote:BG, Alicia
- La Jolla Renter wrote:SK in
- S&P futures up $16 on Trump’s
- flu wrote:Quote:
First,
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:flu
- flu wrote:So question…
- tnuomarap wrote:SK in CV
- Lower of the two.
- spdrun wrote:
It was pretty
- flu wrote:Side note… Trump
- bullishgurl wrote:Yes, if you
- bearishgurl wrote:You seem to
- flu wrote:Damn those pesky
- bearishgurl wrote:spdrun
- spdrun wrote:
eVerify takes
- bearishgurl wrote:Oh yeah, I
- bearishgurl wrote:I have
- bearishgurl wrote: I see
- Hobie wrote:His meeting with
- Hobie wrote:Now add in the
- harvey wrote:You do
- AN wrote:Who voted for the
- moneymaker wrote:Yes, retail
- Nothing happened. A petulant
- harvey wrote:AN
- joec wrote:I disagree with
- joec wrote:
This election as
- Barn doors are August, 2014.
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- FlyerInHi wrote:SK in CV
- mixxalot wrote:If you call
- How much do pilots make from
- Hopefully they’re ashamed.
- HLS wrote:Refinancing doesn’t
- harvey wrote:Well I did
- Yes to living trust. No to
- Forget about what the seller
- njtosd wrote:No – it’s worse
- svelte wrote:harvey
- Earnest money doesn’t make a
- [email protected]
- Hobie wrote:SK in CV
- flyer wrote:Since I don’t see
- flyer wrote:On that note,
- flu wrote:So I’m not sure
- La Jolla Renter wrote:I
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, that’s
- bearishgurl wrote:Where did I
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, you
- bearishgurl wrote:But you
- phaster wrote:SK in CV
- So you’ve redefined bubble to
- La Jolla Renter wrote:IMO
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- PCinSD wrote:
But it’s more
- harvey wrote:
Cops who choose
- harvey wrote:creechrr
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:So
- creechrr wrote:
I also think
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:Why
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:poorgradstudent
- phaster wrote:
looking at
- poorgradstudent wrote:I’m
- Do you think it’s a dangerous
- flu wrote:So which is it?
If
- moneymaker wrote:Yes 2PM west
- moneymaker wrote:Yep that is
- moneymaker wrote:Bloomberg
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- FlyerInHi wrote:
NSR, I do
- livinincali wrote:I’d like to
- What I’ve been reading lately
- flu wrote:Platinum at
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, the
- So still no? Still nothing
- So I guess that’s a no? No
- But still no evidence to
- According to someone I know,
- no_such_reality wrote:How
- flu wrote:Just curious, do
- flu wrote:SK. Is the purpose
- flu wrote:
Sorry, I’m not
- flu wrote:
Dumb question. If
- flu wrote:SK, forgot to ask
- flu wrote:SK, if you don’t
- flu wrote:Back on topic…So
- bearishgurl wrote:Is there
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- The-Shoveler wrote:”British
- carlsbadworker wrote:It
- spdrun wrote:Realistically,
- I don’t do anything with the
- Irrespective of BrExit, today
- flu wrote:…and if trump
- I think it will bounce back
- Dow futures were down almost
- It was good timing. Gold
- S&P futures down $52
Make
- FlyerInHi wrote:livinincali
- PCinSD wrote:
That’s cute
- I’m done. Seriously. Drop it.
- PCinSD wrote:So there was no
- PCinSD wrote:You’ve never
- PCinSD wrote:
Nice dodge. So
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote: We’re
- PCinSD wrote:flu wrote:Trump
- PCinSD wrote:
He repeatedly
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:
How are
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:However, I
- flu wrote:I am still waiting
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- PCinSD wrote:LOL, you are
- PCinSD wrote:Again, there’s
- PCinSD wrote:
What was the
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- PCinSD wrote:Just so there’s
- PCinSD wrote:SK in CV
- spdrun wrote:Wasn’t everyone
- PCinSD wrote:
I’m glad you
- The problem isn’t short term
- flu wrote:Gold just broke
- mixxalot wrote:I am not anti
- flu wrote:
I am finding its
- mixxalot wrote:Yes, San Diego
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- joec wrote:
It sounds like
- bearishgurl wrote:”All Trump
- bearishgurl wrote:This
- bearishgurl wrote:
Your whole
- livinincali wrote:The 2 major
- FlyerInHi wrote:Isn’t Trump
- svelte wrote:This is an
- FlyerInHi wrote:As I
- joec wrote:Now, on both
- FlyerInHi wrote:The Clinton
- FlyerInHi wrote:
I was always
- bearishgurl wrote:
When
- FlyerInHi wrote:
Haha, I’ll
- FlyerInHi wrote:
Btw, another
- bearishgurl wrote:deadzone
- AN and Flu and others….I
- deadzone wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:OK, I’m
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- FlyerInHi wrote:Of course,
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:
I haven’t
- bearishgurl wrote:I’d love to
- bearishgurl wrote:
Wow, SK,
- Ali was arguably the greatest
- harvey wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- FlyerInHi wrote:
I love the
- FlyerInHi wrote:Sk, If I
- PCinSD wrote:FlyerInHi
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:
flu, by
- flu wrote:
In the end, Trump
- bearishgurl wrote:
If Trump
- bearishgurl wrote:
I haven’t
- bearishgurl wrote:If, as you
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:
Roe v Wade
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- It’s so easy to be judgmental
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:zk
- Rich Toscano wrote:This is a
- harvey wrote:She doesn’t
- spdrun wrote:Self-driving
- moneymaker wrote:Think we
- FlyerInHi wrote:
Or maybe
- I suspect they’ll be either
- scaredyclassic wrote:speaking
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote: The costs are
- ucodegen wrote:
SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- mixxalot wrote:LOL I’ve
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, why
- bearishgurl wrote:The vast
- bearishgurl wrote:
This
- ucodegen wrote: This whole
- ucodegen wrote:BTW: Name
- bearishgurl wrote:You don’t
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:Why do Peds
- SK in CV wrote:bearishgurl
- bearishgurl wrote:”We, the
- No. I didn’t forget to
- bobby wrote:big cities?
- scaredyclassic wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- no_such_reality wrote:Being
- Not really. At least in big
- livinincali wrote:
That’s
- This discussion has been a
- two words:
minimum essential
- Blogstar wrote:Sorry, it
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- AN wrote:Although economist
- bearishgurl wrote:flyer
- BG, you act as though I don’t
- bearishgurl wrote:
Oh, and
- bearishgurl wrote:I’m simply
- bearishgurl wrote:Okay, SK.
- bearishgurl wrote:Once again,
- bearishgurl wrote:Of course,
- bearishgurl wrote:As usual,
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:The problem
- I appreciate your words
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:
Ditto for
- bearishgurl wrote: The dirty
- bearishgurl wrote:In reality,
- bearishgurl wrote:They have
- bearishgurl wrote:
I feel
- I really didn’t think these
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:As I see it
- flyer wrote:I realize others
- AN wrote:Although Hillary is
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- AN wrote:I view Bernie as
- AN wrote: I would hope the
- flyer wrote:
Not at all. I’m
- njtosd wrote:Why doesn’t
- bearishgurl wrote:Again, SK,
- bearishgurl wrote: I’ve
- bearishgurl wrote:My point,
- bearishgurl wrote:FlyerInHi
- La Jolla Renter wrote:For the
- moneymaker wrote:Could Hilary
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- enron_by_the_sea
- [quote=bearishgurl
It’s that
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:The only
- bearishgurl wrote:
In short,
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- La Jolla Renter wrote:
What
- bearishgurl wrote: And I’d
- bearishgurl wrote:
I’m not
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:I don’t
- njtosd][quote=FlyerInHi
- scaredyclassic wrote:Did u
- poorgradstudent wrote:
I
- kev374 wrote:Hobie wrote:Ok.
- Hobie wrote:NSR: Doesn’t
- CA renter wrote:
One thing
- mixxalot wrote:Actually they
- This could never have
- deadzone wrote:SK in CV
- FlyerInHi wrote:Trump is
- 111 where I am right now.
- paramount wrote:Maybe Trump
- paramount wrote:SK in CV
- urbanrealtor wrote:La Jolla
- Whatever the market will
- DavidSD wrote:I’m sorry, this
- You have a contract. Do what
- dumbrenter wrote:
By EPM, do
- Everyone else that’s
- AN wrote:
Hillary said
- AN wrote:Blogstar wrote:These
- ltsdd wrote:
So it was some
- bearishgurl wrote: You are
- BG, you are aware that there
- Hobie wrote:
The point still
- Hobie wrote:Now spending for
- Hobie wrote:
Gay folks are
- livinincali wrote:States and
- because some people believe
- There is virtually no
- flu wrote:Now that’s an
- FlyerInHi wrote:rockingtime
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- Well that wins the award for
- Transfers between spouses
- Tax on capital gains = 0
- I would totally tear out
- spdrun wrote:
I don’t think
- flu wrote:what about all that
- I’m always surprised when one
- BG, this sounds like horrible
- No. He left SD almost 40
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:It’s
- It’s a great idea. Almost no
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:Well, then,
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, are
- bearishgurl wrote:Flyer, it
- The property (or properties)
- harvey wrote:
Speaking of the
- poorgradstudent wrote:Looks
- utcsox wrote:
State-mandated
- poorgradstudent
- zk wrote:
Those Obama and
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- flu wrote:It’s more about the
- AN wrote: But its good to see
- flu wrote:
I think the
- AN wrote:
Just because it
- AN wrote:FlyerInHi wrote:AN,
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- UCGal wrote:The idea of
- AN wrote:W2 earner can’t
- AN wrote:Poorgradstudent, I’m
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:That
- AN wrote:The more I see these
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- AN wrote:does this touch the
- flu wrote:Ever wonder when
- Long past due. There may have
- utcsox wrote:The supply curve
- spdrun wrote:A slowdown
- CA renter wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:CA renter
- svelte wrote:SK in CV
- FlyerInHi wrote:Seems pretty
- svelte wrote:It is terrible
- Maybe because some of us are
- terracap wrote:The key is how
- Assuming we’re talking about
- spdrun wrote:As far as 50+
- spdrun wrote:
What we’ve had
- spdrun wrote:
BTW, the upward
- spdrun wrote:See
- spdrun wrote:
Interestingly,
- spdrun wrote:New home
- spdrun wrote:
We’re already
- no_such_reality wrote:The
- all wrote:
This could be
- The-Shoveler wrote:If you
- Interesting topic, and I have
- scaredyclassic wrote:i think
- paramount wrote:
Your problem
- I vaguely know the mother of
- paramount wrote:SK in CV
- paramount wrote:Bottomline
- bearishgurl wrote:I
- bearishgurl wrote:
And Poway
- bearishgurl wrote:
You can
- CA renter wrote:Don’t forget
- you didn’t mention your price
- njtosd wrote:
Just curious,
- Seen somewhere on the
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:
I
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- The S&P just finished 6
- EconProf wrote:I am not sure
- CA renter wrote:
Really? You
- CA renter wrote:
There are
- CA renter wrote:
As for
- no_such_reality wrote:That’s
- UCGal wrote:
I think the
- joec wrote:I was just
- joec wrote:Yes, you are very
- joec wrote:
Not sure if
- FlyerInHi wrote:
I’ve
- scaredyclassic wrote:
In this
- CDMA ENG wrote:
Let me give
- bearishgurl wrote:
I’ve been
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:Oh, and a
- scaredyclassic wrote:
no.
- Obama is going to speak on
- Great recommendations, top to
- HLS wrote:The biggest threat
- moneymaker wrote:Has anyone
- joec wrote:
Taking a step
- mike92104 wrote:I’m sorry,
- mike92104 wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:spdrun
- scaredyclassic wrote:google
- spdrun wrote:I don’t think
- mike92104 wrote:
Thanks for
- paramount wrote:
In the 50’s
- ocrenter wrote:
People turn
- paramount wrote:joec wrote:
- paramount wrote:The Tea Party
- CA renter wrote:
FWIW, the
- Couldn’t possibly be that one
- FlyerInHi wrote:I have no
- Blogstar wrote:scaredyclassic
- Tltsdd wrote:
I think if you
- ltsdd wrote:I bought UVXY and
- CA renter wrote:
You’re
- CA renter wrote:
And how can
- CA renter wrote:
You didn’t
- CA renter wrote:Yes, millions
- Jazzman wrote:It is getting
- EconProf wrote:FlyerInHi
- moneymaker wrote:Companies
- Blogstar wrote:The guy had a
- livinincali wrote:The gun
- spdrun wrote:
iin his mind,
- Blogstar wrote:If the father
- Blogstar wrote:
I guess you
- Blogstar wrote:The statement
- Blogstar wrote:SK in CV
- He didn’t have a screwed up
- urbanrealtor wrote:
The sheer
- by way of comparison, the S&P
- EconProf wrote:SK and CAR:
If
- EconProf wrote:Thank you SK
- CA renter wrote:EconProf
- EconProf wrote:SK in CV
- EconProf wrote:We economists
- Hobie wrote:Don’t be too sure
- I’m reasonably sure that
- rcfe wrote:actually not. we
- spdrun wrote:Why pick on
- The-Shoveler wrote:
Just
- paramount wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- CA renter wrote:
Is he a
- CA renter wrote:
Whatever you
- CA renter wrote:
Whatever you
- CA renter wrote:
IMO, he said
- paramount wrote:
Is there any
- paramount wrote:
Oprah – who
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- spdrun wrote:It was a PRIVATE
- CA renter wrote:I don’t think
- paramount
- livinincali wrote:
What if it
- paramount wrote:SK – the only
- paramount wrote:Gimme a Break
- paramount wrote:I don’t agree
- livinincali wrote:This guy is
- Someone is gonna throw away
- He wasn’t exactly stripped of
- zk wrote:
And if the revenge
- There have been a number of
- It is taxed. Depending on the
- flyer wrote: Nothing will
- scaredyclassic wrote:and if
- spdrun wrote:Maybe they
- Blogstar wrote:The atheists,
- flu wrote:FLU’s new rule for
- scaredyclassic wrote:
it’s
- flu wrote:
2. Even if they
- Hatfield wrote:I always liked
- CA renter wrote:
Agree with
- scaredyclassic wrote:perhaps
- I think there’s some broad
- flu wrote:
I’ve changed my
- livinincali wrote:If anybody
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:flu
- flu wrote:
I’m getting killed
- flu wrote:52 week high…
- moneymaker wrote:If looking
- scaredyclassic wrote:I used
- svelte wrote:scaredyclassic
- spdrun wrote:Hey, what’s
- ltsdd wrote:
Don’t know
- ltsdd wrote:BTW., if you’re a
- As a non-Asian that had 2
- patb wrote:
Hobie is
- There is a link between
- Here’s the deal on rental
- spdrun wrote:^^^
It’s not all
- CA renter wrote:paramount
- backintown wrote:Whereas most
- With the exception of the
- Not exactly. That’s happened,
- livinincali wrote:
I not a
- livinincali wrote:Everybody
- Seems like you found the
- Might take a look at some
- 6packscaredy wrote:
Because
- 6packscaredy wrote:People are
- CA renter wrote:
While I
- FlyerInHi wrote:I don’t find
- 6packscaredy wrote:Family
- joec wrote:I think you’re
- spdrun wrote:Quibble:
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:Hate
- AN wrote:Take $3.5M, then
- Here’s how the vast majority
- I don’t think so. The NYPD
- spdrun wrote:0.5% of a given
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:
Social
- CA renter wrote:paramount
- 6packscaredy wrote:The
- 6packscaredy wrote:I am not
- The original lease term
- I really don’t know much
- livinincali wrote:
They
- flu wrote:
If at all, it
- paramount wrote:svelte
- Just a reminder spdrun, we
- flu wrote:SK in CV
- The-Shoveler wrote:SK in CV
- The-Shoveler wrote:I am still
- spdrun wrote:If you read
- Pretty much. Do you think it
- harvey wrote:
Any ruling that
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:I don’t see
- I’m not sure where it says
- I think this is a long way
- paramount wrote:
I’m not
- flu wrote:The-Shoveler
- flu wrote:QCOM being at a 52
- paramount wrote:Wow. These
- spdrun wrote:You can still
- SD Realtor wrote:Except I
- flu wrote:
It depends on the
- paramount wrote:SK in CV
- ctr70 wrote:
How about
- 6packscaredy wrote:age of
- paramount wrote:6packscaredy
- 6packscaredy wrote:SK in CV
- paramount wrote:SK in CV
- paramount wrote:
So you don’t
- paramount wrote:
It just goes
- paramount wrote:Rich Toscano
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- I couldn’t listen to it all.
- flu wrote:
Don’t you think
- livinincali wrote:
Why not
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:flu
- flu wrote:No I was referring
- flu wrote:But I just thought
- Absent other context, this is
- mike92104 wrote:
Bullshit!
- SD Realtor wrote:If they did
- joec wrote:Long term, like
- SD Realtor wrote: The
- spdrun wrote:No, I actually
- SD Realtor wrote:
The fact
- flu wrote:spdrun wrote:Taken
- spdrun wrote:
And again: If
- CA renter wrote:While SK is
- The-Shoveler wrote:
Yea I
- My first thought was that it
- How you fill out this form
- spdrun wrote:For one thing,
- spdrun wrote:And what makes
- CDMA ENG wrote:
You kidding
- spdrun wrote:I’m assuming the
- CDMA ENG wrote:That being
- Dougie944 wrote:Let me be
- Essbee wrote:
Actually, it is
- It’s all treated the same
- What do you mean by a “post
- SD Realtor wrote:you forgot
- Essbee wrote:
Sabre Springs,
- AN wrote: All of this is
- spdrun wrote:
Also, keep in
- bearishgurl wrote:
Am I
- harvey wrote:What about the
- The-Shoveler wrote:States
- I don’t think it would work
- Yes it does Jeff, but if I
- livinincali wrote:I’m not
- UCGal wrote:
Florida doesn’t
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- flyer wrote:spdrun
- So without any legal basis,
- FlyerInHi wrote:There will be
- FlyerInHi wrote:I think the
- I think by law, they’re
- Ispdrun wrote:I’m not
- all wrote:joec wrote:
I
- paramount wrote:What about
- spdrun wrote:Thinking about
- CA renter wrote:
Thanks for
- bearishgurl wrote:
I stand by
- CA renter wrote:
Interesting,
- livinincali wrote:
Why does
- SD Realtor wrote:Really so
- livinincali wrote:
One of the
- livinincali wrote:FlyerInHi
- spdrun wrote:
do people lose
- SD Realtor wrote:Nice try to
- SD Realtor wrote:So let’s
- SD Realtor wrote:Ummm…..
- paramount wrote:Obama closed
- no_such_reality wrote:
You
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:”We
- no_such_reality wrote:White
- no_such_reality][quote=zk
- livinincali wrote:Well
- paramount wrote:I read in the
- no_such_reality wrote:Because
- 6packscaredy wrote:Why not
- no_such_reality
- bearishgurl wrote:
You’re
- I think you’re wrong flu. I
- There’s no reason to argue
- BG, sometimes I think you
- bearishgurl wrote:My
- paramount wrote:No, they’re
- FlyerInHi wrote:The guy who
- FlyerInHi wrote:Republicans
- ucodegen wrote:
I didn’t see
- spdrun wrote:
As to the biker
- bearishgurl wrote:
You’re
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:flu
- flu wrote:
( BTW: that Mayor
- flu wrote:
Are you fvcking
- flu wrote:Yes, because
- CA renter wrote:
No matter
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- backintown wrote:For those
- livinincali wrote:
So let’s
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- no_such_reality wrote:
“But
- no_such_reality wrote:So far,
- no_such_reality wrote:So
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- The-Shoveler wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:
The bottom
- no_such_reality wrote:No SK,
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- no_such_reality wrote:
The
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- 6packscaredy wrote:the fact
- livinincali wrote:
The
- no_such_reality
- The-Shoveler wrote:Section 4
- The-Shoveler wrote:From what
- raty4R wrote:It’s named
- Does the REIT have a name?
- ocrenter wrote:What do all
- ocrenter wrote:
I do agree
- backintown wrote:I couldn’t
- ocrenter wrote:
The only
- ocrenter wrote:
That peaked
- livinincali wrote:
The S&P
- CA renter wrote:Yes, I’m
- CA renter wrote:FlyerInHi
- Shit, nice catch dude. I was
- dumbrenter wrote:
SK, that
- At least limits my downside
- I measured my garage and
- barnaby33 wrote:First of all,
- CA renter wrote:
I know you
- CA renter wrote:
Again, the
- I think you’re right about
- FlyerInHi wrote:This is
- I paid just under $1000 for
- spdrun wrote:^^^
Boutique
- spdrun wrote:
Apparently,
- spdrun wrote:
Overbuilding
- bearishgurl wrote:This just
- Jazzman wrote:I’m confused
- spdrun wrote:
Cash is
- CA renter wrote:
Like spdrun
- That’s exactly what I was
- I’m a little bit confused
- CA renter wrote:
That’s not
- CA renter wrote:It wasn’t the
- CA renter wrote:
Agree with
- spdrun wrote:I have seen many
- livinincali wrote:FlyerInHi
- spdrun wrote:In case you
- Just for a different
- Good choice on his part. He
- bearishgurl wrote: Perhaps
- livinincali wrote:
How do
- livinincali wrote:
What makes
- FlyerInHi wrote:Doesn’t
- livinincali wrote:FlyerInHi
- no_such_reality wrote:
Not
- spdrun wrote:The real
- no_such_reality wrote:
Too
- no_such_reality wrote:I also
- flu wrote:
Oh please. It’s
- Your implication in your lead
- 6packscaredy wrote:in the
- all wrote:bearishgurl
- CA renter wrote:
I don’t
- bearishgurl wrote:
Now, all
- Blogstar wrote:
If you don’t
- CA renter wrote:Thanks for
- livinincali wrote:
I tend to
- Want_to_Retire wrote:Well,
- FlyerInHi wrote:Sdr, I think
- FlyerInHi wrote:I singled out
- FlyerInHi wrote:SD Realtor
- Blogstar wrote:I feel
- CDMA ENG wrote:
Sounds like
- SD Realtor wrote:So SK sounds
- CDMA ENG wrote:SD Realtor
- FlyerInHi wrote:This is about
- SD Realtor wrote:Better to
- 6packscaredy wrote:Ultimately
- no_such_reality wrote:
Unlike
- bearishgurl wrote:
In any
- bearishgurl wrote:
Okay, then
- bearishgurl wrote:
Okay, is
- bearishgurl wrote:
I’m not
- bearishgurl wrote:
Okay, SK,
- bearishgurl wrote:
I
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, if you
- bearishgurl wrote:
If you
- bearishgurl wrote:Again,
- SD Realtor wrote:Well AN I
- dumbrenter wrote:
I find that
- ucodegen wrote:
Cute.. taking
- That was fun! I’m really
- SD Realtor wrote:
Now TAKEN
- Cube wrote:
Ok, I’ll bite. I
- ucodegen wrote:I think you
- SD Realtor wrote:Like I said,
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- Jazzman wrote:Just read this
- livinincali wrote: You worry
- No SDR, I wasn’t the least
- SD Realtor wrote:Nobody is
- SD Realtor wrote:No I am not
- SD Realtor wrote:
Employees
- dumbrenter wrote:Maybe if
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, if you
- bearishgurl wrote:
For every
- no_such_reality wrote:
Yes,
- bearishgurl wrote:
I
- paramount wrote:Did Dianna’s
- I’ve only seen the national
- moneymaker wrote:Why limit a
- paramount wrote:Well, at
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, are you
- CA renter wrote:
You don’t
- Rhett wrote:SDHopes
- njtosd wrote:all wrote:
Get
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:
There’s NO
- As I said BG, they’re
- BG, none of these programs
- BG, do you have any evidence
- njtosd wrote:
Let’s not be
- Like I said BG, I don’t have
- bearishgurl wrote:
This is
- all wrote:A recent study
- livinincali wrote:
That’s
- As you know probably know
- njtosd wrote:
SK – you are
- SD Realtor wrote:Sounds like
- SD Realtor wrote:Except that
- SD Realtor wrote:I think
- SD Realtor wrote:SK I think
- livinincali wrote:CA renter
- no_such_reality wrote:
Not
- spdrun wrote:Really, the
- When were sellers in hiding?
- CDMA ENG wrote:CA renter
- The-Shoveler wrote:In the end
- spdrun wrote:^^^
(Good. If
- Interesting development
- FlyerInHi wrote:The governor
- zk wrote:
SK, let’s say you
- CardiffBaseball wrote:
As far
- CA renter wrote:+1, spdrun
+2
- UCGal wrote:mike92104 wrote:i
- Hobie wrote:
My largest
- spdrun wrote:You didn’t hear
- spdrun wrote:I’m not saying
- spdrun wrote:
How the FUCK
- squat300 wrote:What if the
- SD Realtor wrote:I can cherry
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- maybe the most ironic series
- Hobie wrote:..and the
- CardiffBaseball
- no_such_reality wrote:
As
- Yeah, he made the mistake of
- spdrun wrote:Not a single
- ocrenter wrote:
ok, forever
- spdrun wrote:”Conventional
- CA renter wrote:
It is not
- CA renter wrote:Now, in
- spdrun wrote:Why the blue
- spdrun wrote:You’d be
- spdrun wrote:Uh, what? It’s
- CA renter wrote:
The problem
- SD Realtor wrote:I have
- CA renter
- HLS wrote:SK,
I’m sure that
- CA renter wrote:Jumping in
- HLS wrote:
Statistics are
- HLS wrote: I totally disagree
- Article seems a bit
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Are you looking for it purely
- spdrun wrote:
Lastly, why are
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, this
- bearishgurl wrote:I lost an
- The-Shoveler wrote:Last
- TS…when did they take their
- The-Shoveler wrote:Yea OK but
- I’m not missing the point
- Leorocky wrote:Somewhere in
- SD Realtor wrote:People that
- FlyerInHi wrote:
I read
- moneymaker wrote:10 year T
- Pretty nice call on the tbx.
- China makes a lot more sense,
- The-Shoveler wrote:Why I
- FlyerInHi wrote:SK, let me
- The-Shoveler wrote:
Los
- The-Shoveler wrote:OK I will
- moneymaker wrote:I agree that
- FlyerInHi wrote:CAR, I keep
- no_such_reality
- no_such_reality wrote:
No SK,
- No. This is the petulant
- no_such_reality wrote:Budget
- bearishgurl wrote:
Perhaps
- The-Shoveler wrote:SK in CV
- FlyerInHi wrote:So far, it’s
- FlyerInHi wrote:CAR, for
- bearishgurl wrote:
In your
- bearishgurl wrote:
We can’t
- spdrun wrote:And why exactly
- FlyerInHi wrote:Another point
- CA renter wrote:I see your
- dumbrenter wrote:CA renter
- SD Realtor wrote:
Hiding
- SD Realtor wrote:Ummm aren’t
- dumbrenter wrote:SK in CV
- SD Realtor wrote:I don’t see
- dumbrenter wrote:SK in CV
- dumbrenter wrote:Your fix
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- livinincali wrote:spdrun
- spdrun wrote:
Interesting
- The-Shoveler wrote:Assuming
- The-Shoveler wrote:Wow that
- KIBU wrote:Allan from
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- spdrun wrote:
If you
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:
What would
- spdrun wrote:Public exposure
- livinincali wrote:ocrenter
- dumbrenter wrote:
But CA
- CA renter wrote:
Your
- CA renter wrote:According to
- CA renter wrote:FlyerInHi
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- dumbrenter wrote:
While at
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SD
- CA renter wrote:
This wasn’t
- dumbrenter wrote:
It is a
- dumbrenter wrote:
Context,
- dumbrenter wrote:SK in CV
- dumbrenter wrote:That said,
- dumbrenter wrote:
Looking for
- The-Shoveler wrote:Not saying
- dumbrenter wrote:SK in CV
- I get that CAR. Everything
- CA renter wrote:
We do not
- xgliu128 wrote:found an
- DaCounselor wrote:
Keeping
- SD Realtor wrote:Sure
- If you can afford a $1.2
- spdrun wrote:I meant > 8%
- CA renter wrote:desmond
- bearishgurl wrote:t36tran
- BG, It’s unclear to me
- Sorry to hear this. I was
- Allan from Fallbrook
- CA renter wrote:SK,
That’s
- CA renter wrote:The govt
- bearishgurl
- bearishgurl wrote:I’d be
- bearishgurl wrote:
No, the US
- Aecetia wrote:”These have
- SD Realtor wrote:I would be
- moneymaker wrote:More than 90
- all wrote:Giant wave kills
- paramount wrote:This is
- Want_to_Retire wrote:The
- BG, I think you’re making
- Jazzman wrote:I don’t think
- You know kev, we’ve been
- I have no way to access
- bearishgurl wrote:Oh, I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I also
- dumbrenter wrote:SK, I don’t
- CA renter wrote:
I would
- dumbrenter wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:
That’s
- BG, I just helped a friend
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- BG, what would be the
- CAR…what I questioned was
- Other than a reference to the
- Never heard of it, though it
- What waiting period?
- no_such_reality wrote:Adame,
- CA renter wrote:
Stay strong,
- You can quit picking on him.
- kev374 wrote:You should
- bearishgurl wrote: At those
- no_such_reality wrote:Really?
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:
This
- Right, and unless I missed
- no_such_reality wrote:
Why,
- Adame99 wrote:That’s a really
- Right, they were talking
- SD Realtor wrote:Trying to
- Blogstar wrote:So, is it
- CA renter wrote:
There is
- I’ll go with two reason.
The
- CA renter wrote:
SK,
I’m
- Allen, I didn’t rebut my own
- Allen, in this particular
- CA renter wrote:
I’ve made
- Ok, so I just got around to
- desmond wrote:SK it sounds
- ltsdd wrote:SK in CV
- ltsdd wrote:
That’s fair
- ltsdd wrote:Maybe I read too
- ltsdd wrote:SK in CV wrote:Do
- Do you mean that prospective
- ltsdd wrote:How and why did
- bearishgurl wrote:
I suppose
- False flag. Those amputees
- no_such_reality wrote:
GMO
- desmond wrote:
The reason the
- SD Realtor wrote:The new
- moneymaker wrote: Today just
- dumbrenter wrote:Isn’t the
- Great points CAR. I’ve often
- I left Carmel Valley in June
- bearishgurl wrote:
At
- spdrun wrote:
On the topic of
- And….
livinincali wrote:
- livinincali wrote:
I don’t
- SD Realtor wrote:I am not
- livinincali
- Essbee wrote:Alvarado Estates
- moneymaker wrote:Interesting
- To answer a couple of your
- joec wrote:SK in CV
- joec wrote:
We all know rents
- It was always deductible. The
- moneymaker wrote:Ok now 30
- The-Shoveler wrote:Interest
- The-Shoveler wrote:I also
- Want_to_Retire wrote:You
- This isn’t another one.
- Jazzman wrote:I thought you
- moneymaker wrote:I’m not
- Its a little unclear to me
- spdrun wrote:njtosd — you’re
- Men would be so much better
- njtosd wrote:SK in CV
- njtosd wrote:
You’re entitled
- njtosd wrote:bearishgurl
- bearishgurl wrote:It’s funny
- dumbrenter wrote:
I do not
- Agree with all of this BG,
- spdrun wrote:I was thinking
- spdrun wrote:There were
- SD Realtor wrote:SK you need
- spdrun wrote:^^^
This makes
- Question for you, if you
- livinincali wrote:
The Fed Z1
- livinincali…we must have
- Exactly the same thing could
- livinincali wrote:
Was there
- spdrun wrote:SK in CV
- spdrun wrote:”Most Americans”
- livinincali wrote:
Japan has
- paramount wrote:So this is
- Update from the WSJ:
The
- paramount wrote:
I agree,
- paramount wrote:Are we really
- spdrun wrote:Since the seller
- spdrun wrote:It’s a farkin’
- paramount wrote:As bad as San
- Welcome James.
- bearishgurl wrote:Besides,
- livinincali wrote:How do you
- bearishgurl wrote:
Ren, I
- sdduuuude wrote:Another
- spdrun wrote:Well, here’s
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, if you
- desmond wrote: I can’t see
- JFC. The Protocols survive.
- CA renter wrote:livinincali
- bearishgurl wrote:
I’m
- BG, It was the older
- In 1960, National City and
- It’s possible now. You’re a
- spdrun wrote:
Some may even
- bearishgurl wrote:
CA coastal
- bearishgurl
- spdrun wrote:People were
- SD Realtor wrote:
Second, the
- spdrun, are you arguing that
- barnaby33 wrote:
I don’t
- Great comments by both Rich
- Phx has the same inventory
- The-Shoveler wrote:Inflation
- The-Shoveler wrote:You can
- bearishgurl wrote:
By chance,
- earlyretirement wrote:SK in
- spdrun wrote:Horseshit — the
- spdrun wrote:
Actually, the
- Horrible and downright stupid
- no_such_reality wrote:What’s
- No, it’s been significantly
- After the explosion it was
- EconProf wrote:We are seeing
- SD Realtor wrote:It will not
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:flu
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:flu
- flu wrote:
The only time
- The secret to their success
- UCGal wrote:Not only do
- It won’t be trivial to the
- I have to agree with you BG.
- flu wrote:yes folks, buy more
- Great comment joe. I could
- no_such_reality wrote:
Then
- EconProf wrote:Of course
- I used to follow listings in
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:flu
- flu wrote:
And as ER pointed
- SD Realtor wrote:Cash flow
- Let’s look at some real
- paramount wrote:According to
- earlyretirement wrote: NO,
- earlyretirement wrote:spdrun
- sdduuuude wrote:I dunno. This
- sdduuuude
- bearishgurl wrote:
This is
- AN wrote:I see life saving
- AN wrote:BG, you really don’t
- bearishgurl wrote:
sdduuuude,
- bearishgurl wrote:
sdduuuude,
- bearishgurl wrote:
Can you
- spdrun wrote:SKANKSDALE! I
- sdduuuude wrote:In my
- David, I just made the move
- sdduuuude wrote:
Been in this
- AN wrote:spdrun wrote:Looks
- spdrun wrote:Even if utility
- I hope no one is using helocs
- flu wrote:”What
- sdduuuude wrote:Also consider
- UCGal wrote:Diego Mamani
- flu wrote:I surrender… No
- craptcha wrote:
Also, often
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, if
- bearishgurl wrote:sdduuuude,
- Hobie wrote:Thx Sk. I find
- meadandale wrote:SK in CV
- Hobie wrote:Do these
- UCGal wrote:Scrapbooking
- He’s overstated his tax rate
- no_such_reality wrote:flu
- flu wrote:Well I’ve “earned
- SD Realtor wrote:Here you go.
- SD Realtor wrote:
You show me
- SD Realtor wrote:You don’t
- flu wrote:
Wait until you
- SD Realtor wrote:
No these
- SD Realtor wrote:I believe
- livinincali wrote:Our
- joec wrote:Was wondering
- I think you misunderstood BG.
- SD Realtor wrote:My god! How
- earlyretirement
- sjk wrote:
SK,you are unable
- paramount wrote:
When will
- earlyretirement
- I have no idea why I should
- If you don’t mind my asking,
- Arraya wrote:SK in CV
- bearishgurl wrote:gzz, this
- bearishgurl wrote:
Is that
- bearishgurl wrote:(emphasis
- yes.
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- Note the date of that article
- I’m not sure what this has to
- barnaby33 wrote:
How far can
- EconProf wrote:The chart you
- EconProf wrote:Yes, if you
- I’m very proud of you too.
- EconProf wrote:As we debate
- no_such_reality wrote:BG, I
- no_such_reality
- no_such_reality
- asegal wrote:Don’t get
- no_such_reality wrote:The
- no_such_reality wrote:
That’s
- Are there still a lot of MM
- no_such_reality wrote:So
- ucodegen wrote:
You also have
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:Do
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:I
- EconProf wrote:You and a lot
- AN wrote:
I thought you’re
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:The
- flu wrote:EconProf
- AN wrote:With regards to your
- AN wrote:I guess I wasn’t
- AN wrote:This isn’t
- AN wrote:Uh, unless math
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:You
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:That
- bearishgurl wrote:
Actually,
- AN wrote:BG, what you say
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- livinincali wrote:
How far
- moneymaker wrote:Interest
- AN wrote:So, what you’re
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:As I
- AN wrote:
Ok, so 10% of
- AN wrote:enron_by_the_sea
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:Interesting, I
- AN wrote:BG, I had HMO before
- SD Realtor wrote:Well SK you
- SD Realtor wrote:Of course it
- SD Realtor wrote:Yes SK we
- The-Shoveler wrote:
So you
- AN wrote:budget schmudget…
- I agree with most of your
- carlsbadworker wrote:flu
- zk wrote:SK in CV wrote:zk
- zk wrote:
The 2nd amendment
- flu wrote:indexes turned
- The-Shoveler wrote:OK so now
- livinincali wrote:
Honestly
- livinincali wrote:flu
- carlsbadworker wrote:I am
- carlsbadworker wrote:Future
- UCGal wrote:We hear,often
- CA renter wrote:SK in CV
- CA renter wrote:While I
- CA renter wrote:How much of
- harvey wrote:BTW, Morgan
- no_such_reality
- moneymaker wrote:SK in CV
- no_such_reality wrote:Just
- Allan from Fallbrook
- AN wrote:
First, what you’re
- AN wrote:Nationally, price
- AN wrote:Are you talking
- FormerSanDiegan
- As Clare Boothe Luce
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Aecetia wrote:Regarding gun
- FormerSanDiegan
- My condolences desmond. I
- livinincali wrote:
Ok, let’s
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- paramount wrote:Of this I am
- I doubt those spending
- flu wrote:
My point is that
- flu wrote:
Just look at how
- Already happened. Unlikely
- I remember the Brenda Spencer
- flu wrote:squat300
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- mike92104 wrote:The problem
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Wouldn’t it be nice if there
- Rich Toscano
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- Not exactly the rich, but
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:flu
- flu wrote:
Buffett, Soros
- SD Realtor wrote:Obviously
- paramount wrote:SK in CV
- paramount wrote:The only way
- SD Squatter wrote:CALPERS
- UCGal wrote:AN wrote:UCGal,
- flu wrote:Well Goldman has
- I read about that today at a
- bearishgurl wrote:CA renter
- UCGal wrote:
Lots of costco
- UCGal wrote:I have a
- flu wrote:
What would be a
- meadandale wrote:flu
- meadandale wrote:SK in CV
- meadandale wrote:CA renter
- ocrenter wrote:The bottom
- All discussions are related
- EconProf wrote:Historically,
- joec wrote:We may go off the
- Sadly, for those who watched
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:SD
- SD Realtor wrote:What is the
- no_such_reality wrote:I vote
- Allan from Fallbrook
- flu wrote:
Thanks SK for your
- First, with that kind of
- flu wrote:SK in CV wrote:Not
- Not terribly difficult, and
- Veritas wrote:”Nothing
- no_such_reality
- dumbrenter wrote:
I get what
- no_such_reality wrote:No, I’m
- bobby wrote:he is saying that
- no_such_reality wrote:
People
- flu wrote:Wow… 170 total
- Costco is paying a $7
- zk wrote:I don’t find this
- ctr70 wrote:Another thing for
- Investing in real estate
- CA renter wrote:
We’re in
- SK in CV wrote:paramount
- paramount wrote:
I was also
- flu wrote:
And yes, SAP
- no_such_reality wrote:
We
- Allan from Fallbrook
- SD Realtor wrote:Your entire
- SD Realtor wrote:No I don’t
- SD Realtor wrote:I hope that
- SD Realtor wrote:It wouldn’t
- So far, they’re only “on the
- bearishgurl wrote:
barnaby,
- CA renter wrote:
SK,
I
- flu wrote:
Shit. I did not
- No, I only mentioned one
- Generally, the interest paid
- Me thinks the question is
- Allan from Fallbrook
- UCGal wrote:my understanding
- flu wrote:Oh
- Diego Mamani wrote:Our friend
- squat250 wrote:i buy from
- flu wrote:What a
- Hobie wrote:On paper it looks
- no_such_reality wrote:Got
- flu wrote:
The problem is
- KSMountain wrote:Just had 2
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- desmond wrote:I thought
- flu wrote:There’s also a
- If I matched up my states
- AN wrote:Why did you buy the
- Given the recent election
- AN wrote:bearishgurl wrote:AN
- no_such_reality
- Yes, there is a reason to not
- flu wrote:
I agree. I don’t
- no_such_reality wrote:It’s
- dumbrenter wrote:This is
- I think it is good news. I’m
- CA renter wrote:I think the
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:So
- flu wrote:depends on
*do you
- livinincali wrote:
Think
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:The difference
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- CAwireman wrote:Interesting
- ucodegen wrote:craptcha
- CA renter wrote:
What I’d
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- So we have “an astonishing
- Zeitgeist wrote:More truth,
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- spdrun wrote:Everyone? Not
- CA renter wrote:The-Shoveler
- CAwireman wrote:Couple of
- bearishgurl wrote:
I don’t
- Might try Del Cerro too. Much
- enron_by_the_sea
- SD Realtor wrote:
Also how do
- SD Realtor wrote:Actually the
- SD Realtor wrote:So that is
- There was a report of
- XBoxBoy wrote:
While I threw
- Navydoc wrote:My brother
- flu wrote:What am I going to
- UCGal wrote:Here are my
- spdrun wrote:If he lives at
- Blogstar wrote:I relocate
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:Allan
- squat250 wrote:im not sure if
- flu wrote:
“It’s the economy,
- SD Realtor wrote:I also like
- Aecetia wrote:”When I use a
- Aecetia wrote:It is not the
- Ren wrote:This is a little
- Zeitgeist wrote:What is
- Veritas wrote:”The mother of
- Allan from Fallbrook
- The additional security was
- ucodegen wrote:SK in CV
- Veritas wrote:definition of
- Veritas wrote: SK you know
- Veritas wrote:I don’t know
- Veritas wrote:SK- Right you
- no_such_reality wrote:You may
- squat250 wrote:ok then , what
- squat250 wrote:im wondering?
- Blogstar wrote:Given that it
- Veritas wrote:He lied about
- Veritas wrote:Obama lied- the
- Veritas wrote:Obama lied- the
- Veritas wrote:SK- That is
- Veritas wrote:Obama is a
- Fearful wrote:SK in CV
- lookingagain wrote:SK,
Please
- Quote:
Don’t quote me, but I
- Veritas wrote:Obama =
- no_such_reality wrote:I
- Check your policy carefully.
- None of the above. Usually
- “Sasquatch might as well have
- SD Realtor wrote:I honestly
- zk wrote:I think a consortium
- Yes. Lots of profit in the
- Brutus wrote:
We need to
- livinincali wrote:The problem
- ocrenter wrote:Brutus
- ucodegen wrote:Don’t forget
- Little people don’t need
- moneymaker wrote:The
- How old is he?
Teeth cleaning
- zk wrote:
Brutus
- I just can’t tell you how
- Paul0373 wrote:Yeah, not into
- Paul0373 wrote:Obama has had
- Paul0373 wrote:Very
- livinincali wrote:
I can’t
- urbanrealtor wrote:Brutus
- briansd1 wrote:I know, sk.
- briansd1 wrote:”Private
- Brutus wrote:Corporate profit
- briansd1 wrote:
Nowadays,
- Don’t sign the documents
- spdrun wrote:Voltage is the
- flu wrote:
These things are
- I haven’t looked at them for
- mike92104 wrote:
Ideological
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV
- Thanks BG, that all makes
- desmond wrote:flu,
saw this
- What is the motivation for
- This has been a pretty
- AN wrote:Anyways, like I told
- AN wrote:dumbrenter, to make
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:It’s
- CA renter wrote:AN,
Think of
- AN wrote:
Also, keep in mind
- AN wrote:
Thanks for
- AN wrote:
You cautioning me
- AN wrote:
To your point
- AN wrote:So, while we all can
- AN wrote:
As you can see,
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- Brutus wrote:We should tax
- mike92104 wrote:
I think you
- We have been and will
- squat250 wrote:davelj, i
- AN wrote:I never said they
- AN wrote:What about two
- AN wrote:I see you’re leaving
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:AN
- AN wrote:Me all over the
- AN wrote:
So, you must live a
- AN wrote:So which is it?
SK
- AN wrote: I want to simplify
- AN wrote:
Exactly, $250k a
- AN wrote:briansd1 wrote:It’s
- AN wrote:This is exactly what
- AN wrote:Who said anything
- flu wrote:
These new web 2.0
- Allan from Fallbrook
- joec wrote:
What I find
- patb wrote:
perhaps but you
- patb wrote:funny it went from
- DataAgent wrote:”There is no
- The-Shoveler wrote:Well
- spdrun wrote:I’m not
- CDMA ENG wrote:spdrun
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- desmond wrote:What is NBC
- briansd1 wrote:SK in CV
- Nice work bg.
- Aecetia wrote:So Brian, what
- flu wrote:Lol…Netflix.
I
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:SK in
- A little perspective is
- Allan from Fallbrook
- spdrun wrote:The only people
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Allan from Fallbrook
- AN wrote:With that said, I
- cvmom wrote:SK in CV wrote:
I
- cvmom wrote:It’s really tough
- I’m going in a few hours,
- AN wrote:It wouldn’t be
- squat250 wrote:I find the
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- livinincali wrote:
The point
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:
- livinincali wrote:
All
- Arraya wrote:There is very
- livinincali wrote:SK in CV
- henrysd wrote:I just read a
- Hobie wrote:Still related.
- Hobie wrote:Sure it does. It
- livinincali wrote:
I’ve yet
- Destroyed? I guess it depends
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- Allan from Fallbrook
- mike92104 wrote:SK in CV
- mike92104 wrote:
You mean
- mike92104 wrote:
No, if you
- mike92104 wrote:
Maybe this
- ocrenter wrote:
That gets a
- flu wrote:Personally, I think
- Allan from Fallbrook
- AN wrote:mike92104 wrote:SK
- mike92104 wrote:
Do you have
- mike92104 wrote:Add to that
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- briansd1 wrote:Allan, my AP
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Aecetia wrote:”The Supreme
- Veritas
- briansd1 wrote:Allan from
- bearishgurl wrote:I agree,
- briansd1 wrote:Now we all
- livinincali wrote:I just wish
- SD Realtor wrote:
However
- deadzone wrote:How about some
- SD Realtor wrote:Once
- deadzone wrote:That is a
- deadzone wrote: You are
- flu wrote:What is there to do
- spdrun wrote:That’s what I
- spdrun wrote:^^^
Not
- streak wrote:
Thanks SK. I am
- UCGal wrote:SK in CV
- Debt incurred within 90 days
- moneymaker wrote: Come to
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- CA renter wrote:
The attack
- harvey wrote:SK in CV wrote:A
- Buying and selling real
- harvey wrote:
The use of the
- harvey wrote:Nice vino!
The
- bearishgurl wrote:
I’m
- bearishgurl wrote:harvey
- sdrealtor wrote:
SK
I’m
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- sdrealtor wrote:SK in CV
- sdrealtor wrote:
You
- harvey wrote:Material dude,
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:sdr is spot on:
- sdrealtor wrote:The 17% of
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:I was playing a
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:
Really? Because
- harvey wrote:
Material. I
- harvey wrote:
You think you
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:Bring on the
- harvey wrote:Shareholders
- harvey wrote:Now that you
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:sdrealtor
- sdrealtor wrote:Huh? I asked
- sdrealtor wrote:SK in CV
- sdrealtor wrote:That couldn’t
- sdrealtor wrote:What is a
- CA renter wrote:
One huge
- harvey wrote:
I’m not really
- flu wrote:Whoohoo… Page
- harvey wrote:Ok, so SK has
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- One thing that hasn’t been
- briansd1 wrote:Not a big loss
- flyer wrote:
IMHO, helping
- harvey wrote:You responded
- harvey
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:The solution
- CA renter wrote:paramount
- AN wrote:CA renter wrote:
The
- no_such_reality wrote:
In
- harvey wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:
The
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:AN
- sdrealtor wrote: When you are
- harvey wrote:
The issue is:
- harvey wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:So
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- harvey wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- harvey wrote:SK in CV wrote:I
- no_such_reality wrote:The
- SD Realtor wrote:I agree
- bearishgurl wrote:AN wrote:SK
- Why should they work in 911
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:
The
- Rich Toscano wrote:
Wow,
- Before you buy, make sure to
- markmax33 wrote: Heck I can
- flu wrote:
One question
- pri_dk wrote:
“argue with a
- markmax33 wrote:
LOL…
- They might be excellent
- markmax33 wrote:
You did
- flu wrote:
I have a dumb
- markmax33 wrote:
You really
- captcha wrote:If home office
- bearishgurl wrote:
So, SK,
- markmax33 wrote:
Auditing the
- markmax33 wrote:
Winning 10
- markmax33 wrote:
I’m sorry
- markmax33 wrote:
You make no
- Just to clarify. What he won
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:
Projected
- markmax33][quote=SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:The Republian
- markmax33 wrote:
I don’t know
- Don’t take amature advice.
- markmax33 wrote:
I’ll go
- flu wrote:
Anyway, for the
- UCGal wrote:markmax33
- no_such_reality wrote:Fire
- Bring back Ron Paul! He can
- flu wrote:You’re missing the
- Sounds like his timing was
- After a recount, and
- How long ago? How’d it work
- sdrealtor wrote:Agreed but
- sdrealtor wrote:None of those
- AN wrote:I wasn’t referring
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:We’re
- CONCHO wrote:dumbrenter
- markmax33 wrote:
No but if he
- markmax33 wrote:
The 8 vote
- pri_dk wrote:Is this an
- markmax33 wrote:
I guess
- Rich Toscano wrote:The cost
- I have a question. Your
- I think this is a great idea.
- I don’t know if this could
- markmax33 wrote:
The other
- markmax33 wrote:Again the
- markmax33 wrote:
He’s right
- markmax33 wrote:
Lol, it’s
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:
With all the
- markmax33 wrote:
How do you
- markmax33 wrote:
How is an
- markmax33 wrote:UCGal
- briansd1 wrote:
I don’t see
- no_such_reality wrote:
And as
- no_such_reality wrote:”Obama
- poorgradstudent
- sdrealtor wrote:
Given my
- Build a wall. With barbed
- Housing starts have been at
- pri_dk wrote:One of the
- bpnbpn wrote:The topic
- markmax33 wrote:
Security
- Allan from Fallbrook
- I can’t tell from that map,
- markmax33 wrote:
I gaurentee
- markmax33 wrote:
I’d like to
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- markmax33 wrote:I want to
- John Ogre wrote:SK in CV
- John Ogre wrote:
The Social
- Here’s what the polls look
- markmax33 wrote:
SK,
An
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- UCGal wrote:I jumped to the
- UCGal wrote:It sounds like
- markmax33 wrote:
SK – LOL!
- markmax33 wrote:
Just
- CONCHO wrote:
Not taking
- I gotta take this bit by
- markmax33 wrote:
I know you
- I’ve been a bit mystified by
- markmax33 wrote:
You have a
- markmax33 wrote:
I don’t read
- markmax33 wrote: I think
- walterwhite wrote:I doubt it
- markmax33 wrote: There’s
- I’m not a wine connoisseur by
- markmax33 wrote:
I’m glad I
- markmax33 wrote:Today’s media
- markmax33 wrote:
So you are
- markmax33 wrote:
The only
- markmax33 wrote:
The only
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:
SK you’re
- markmax33 wrote:Sorry but
- markmax33 wrote:Huntsman
- So you’re saying that because
- markmax33 wrote:
I’m sorry
- markmax33 wrote:
Obama has no
- aldante wrote:Pray tell SK,
- aldante wrote:
IMHO, the
- TemekuT wrote:
I swore I
- I don’t know if I should be
- SD Realtor wrote:It doesn’t
- Allan from Fallbrook
- AN wrote:SK in CV wrote:Oh
- dup
- markmax33 wrote:zk wrote:I’d
- pri_dk wrote:SK in CV
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:
I
- I don’t know AN. It just
- I think it’s pretty much dumb
- How come nobody responds to
- svelte wrote:I’ve only talked
- sdduuuude wrote:I leave you
- SD Realtor wrote:Very well
- Arraya wrote:Why can’t people
- markmax33 wrote:I do know the
- markmax33 wrote:walterwhite
- flu wrote:
asshat wrote:
This
- pri_dk wrote:SK in CV
- pri_dk wrote:I generally
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- urbanrealtor wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:
Am I
- Arraya wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:Again it’s a
- Arraya wrote:We don’t tell
- sdrealtor wrote:Last week I
- markmax33 wrote:We don’t have
- markmax33 wrote:How many
- markmax33 wrote:We have
- Oh dear markmax, I’ve failed.
- Great comment EconProf.
- markmax33 wrote:Yes every
- walterwhite wrote:Luckily I
- markmax33 wrote:
You don’t
- I posted the graph I intended
- markmax33 wrote:I show you
- markmax33 wrote:
If you read
- sdduuuude wrote:The graph
- Can I borrow your printer? I
- I guess it’s possible for a
- pri_dk wrote:UCGal wrote:SS
- My office uses Mozy for our
- Arraya wrote:Maybe some of
- sdrealtor wrote:I couldnt
- sdduuuude wrote:For the state
- urbanrealtor
- bearishgurl wrote:
Overall
- Rich Toscano wrote:But this
- sdduuuude wrote:
Also, we are
- eavesdropper wrote:
2. or if
- wow eaves, beautiful.
- pri_dk wrote:Quote:No
- sdduuuude wrote:
Was just
- sdduuuude wrote:Nobody is
- pri_dk wrote:gandalf
- urbanrealtor wrote:So let’s
- walterwhite wrote:I think my
- markmax33 wrote:Alright since
- sdrealtor wrote:
Does anyone
- bearishgurl wrote:
I, too am
- markmax33 wrote:
It CREATED a
- markmax33 wrote:
Go read
- markmax33 wrote:
You read
- markmax33 wrote:ROE VS WADE
- markmax33 wrote:
svelte
- KSMountain wrote:
I haven’t
- markmax33 wrote:
STFU.
- markmax33 wrote:You obviously
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- sdduuuude wrote:
I hope you
- markmax33 wrote:”Ron Paul
- markmax33 wrote:
I have a
- sdduuuude wrote:
Stop
- sdduuuude wrote:
Just becuase
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:”In fact,
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote: The problem
- markmax33 wrote: I was also
- markmax33 wrote:
It’s not
- markmax33 wrote:Obviously you
- markmax33 wrote:
Another SK
- patientrenter wrote:SK in CV
- GH wrote:Not true. My last
- threadkiller wrote:Yes what I
- markmax33 wrote:
NOT!
- patientrenter wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:If my company
- Madmaxx, you don’t pay 3% of
- You really think unemployed
- There are probably some
- Isn’t a boxee box an old
- markmax33 wrote:
Ron Paul was
- markmax33 wrote:So in other
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:The $250,000
- markmax33 wrote:
Fine explain
- For one aldante, my comment
- aldante
- markmax33 wrote:
No you are
- aldante wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:
The
- markmax33 wrote:
Dude,
There
- aldante wrote:SK,
I notice
- Dude, seriously. More than 30
- markmax33 wrote:
How about
- It is pure shit. Or at least
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV
- markmax33 wrote:You could fix
- markmax33 wrote:
He has said
- walterwhite
- markmax33 wrote:
NO! Ron
- briansd1 wrote: He’s not just
- markmax33 wrote:
You seem to
- markmax33 wrote:
I’ve donated
- markmax33 wrote:Ask a
- bearishgurl wrote:hslinger
- [quote=markmax33
Well then
- markmax33 wrote:
Unequal
- markmax33 wrote:
NO! Boom
- walterwhite wrote:4th am. No
- eavesdropper wrote:
However,
- pri_dk wrote:I’ve seen a few
- walterwhite wrote:I think Ron
- markmax33 wrote:I’m pretty
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV,
- markmax33 wrote:
He was in
- The current RCP numbers were
- markmax33 wrote:
Well Ron
- markmax33 wrote:
Are you
- AN wrote:If the market didn’t
- bearishgurl wrote:
Also, I
- pri_dk wrote:
The only point
- walterwhite wrote:What’s up w
- walterwhite wrote:Is Ron Paul
- markmax33 wrote:
You can not
- markmax33 wrote:
He very
- markmax33 wrote:
Here is why
- aldante wrote:[And Paul was
- markmax33 wrote:
SK in
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV,
The
- markmax33 wrote:SK in CV,
- markmax33 wrote:
SK in CV,
- markmax33 wrote:Since it has
- markmax33 wrote:pri_dk
- Short answer: find a
- Zeitgeist wrote:”Premiums for
- Aecetia wrote:pri-
Excellent
- bearishgurl wrote:
If you’ve
- pri_dk wrote:Aecetia, your
- Aecetia wrote:Just one of the
- bearishgurl wrote:SK, my
- Aecetia wrote:
The whole
- bearishgurl wrote:
Aecetia, I
- Aecetia wrote:I will take at
- Veritas wrote:”The U.S.
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:I
- walterwhite wrote:i think
- Arraya wrote:Hello rock, meet
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Yes.
- Veritas wrote:
SK and Econ.
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- I won’t (and can’t
- EconProf wrote: But the top
- EconProf wrote:
You are kind
- Allan, in order:
Agree. He’s
- UCGal wrote:Allan, even
- EconProf wrote:You are making
- Happs wrote:I mentioned this
- EconProf wrote:Actually you
- EconProf wrote: In contrast,
- I haven’t commented on this
- Veritas wrote:Awesome post
- Veritas wrote:
Brian,
What in
- sdrealtor wrote:BY saying it
- profhoff wrote:They also
- EconProf wrote:CAR, not sure
- It’s not a cancellation. It’s
- I have to apologize for that
- sdrealtor wrote:The answer is
- UCGal wrote:The guy who’s
- briansd1 wrote:I heard that’s
- bake wrote:That should not be
- bake wrote:That should not be
- bake wrote:That should not be
- bake wrote:That should not be
- bake wrote:That should not be
- Poltergeist.
Seriously, at 2
- Poltergeist.
Seriously, at 2
- Poltergeist.
Seriously, at 2
- Poltergeist.
Seriously, at 2
- Poltergeist.
Seriously, at 2
- AN wrote:jpinpb wrote:AN
- AN wrote:jpinpb wrote:AN
- AN wrote:jpinpb wrote:AN
- AN wrote:jpinpb wrote:AN
- AN wrote:jpinpb wrote:AN
- walterwhite wrote:henry ford
- walterwhite wrote:henry ford
- walterwhite wrote:henry ford
- walterwhite wrote:henry ford
- walterwhite wrote:henry ford
- AN wrote:Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- AN wrote:Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- AN wrote:Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- AN wrote:Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- AN wrote:Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- briansd1 wrote:Mark Holmes
- briansd1 wrote:Mark Holmes
- briansd1 wrote:Mark Holmes
- briansd1 wrote:Mark Holmes
- briansd1 wrote:Mark Holmes
- aldante wrote:
Explain how he
- aldante wrote:
Explain how he
- aldante wrote:
Explain how he
- aldante wrote:
Explain how he
- aldante wrote:
Explain how he
- curiousmind wrote:Plus he
- curiousmind wrote:Plus he
- curiousmind wrote:Plus he
- curiousmind wrote:Plus he
- curiousmind wrote:Plus he
- pri_dk wrote:
BG’s points are
- pri_dk wrote:
BG’s points are
- pri_dk wrote:
BG’s points are
- pri_dk wrote:
BG’s points are
- pri_dk wrote:
BG’s points are
- davelj wrote:There is a
- davelj wrote:There is a
- davelj wrote:There is a
- davelj wrote:There is a
- davelj wrote:There is a
- walterwhite wrote:Let’s say
- walterwhite wrote:Let’s say
- walterwhite wrote:Let’s say
- walterwhite wrote:Let’s say
- walterwhite wrote:Let’s say
- The incentive to hold off so
- The incentive to hold off so
- The incentive to hold off so
- The incentive to hold off so
- The incentive to hold off so
- bearishgurl wrote: She
- bearishgurl wrote: She
- bearishgurl wrote: She
- bearishgurl wrote: She
- bearishgurl wrote: She
- bearishgurl wrote:I would bet
- bearishgurl wrote:I would bet
- bearishgurl wrote:I would bet
- bearishgurl wrote:I would bet
- bearishgurl wrote:I would bet
- Arraya wrote:
So, everybody
- Arraya wrote:
So, everybody
- Arraya wrote:
So, everybody
- Arraya wrote:
So, everybody
- Arraya wrote:
So, everybody
- walterwhite wrote:what’s the
- walterwhite wrote:what’s the
- walterwhite wrote:what’s the
- walterwhite wrote:what’s the
- walterwhite wrote:what’s the
- aldante wrote:
From the
- aldante wrote:
From the
- aldante wrote:
From the
- aldante wrote:
From the
- aldante wrote:
From the
- captcha wrote:SK in CV
- captcha wrote:SK in CV
- captcha wrote:SK in CV
- captcha wrote:SK in CV
- captcha wrote:SK in CV
- captcha wrote:
That hurts
- captcha wrote:
That hurts
- captcha wrote:
That hurts
- captcha wrote:
That hurts
- captcha wrote:
That hurts
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2 wrote:It’s not
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2 wrote:It’s not
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2 wrote:It’s not
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2 wrote:It’s not
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2 wrote:It’s not
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:captcha
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:captcha
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:captcha
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:captcha
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:captcha
- Arraya wrote:So your thesis
- Arraya wrote:So your thesis
- Arraya wrote:So your thesis
- Arraya wrote:So your thesis
- Arraya wrote:So your thesis
- Arraya wrote:
Come on Sk – he
- Arraya wrote:
Come on Sk – he
- Arraya wrote:
Come on Sk – he
- Arraya wrote:
Come on Sk – he
- Arraya wrote:
Come on Sk – he
- aldante wrote:Almost nothing
- aldante wrote:Almost nothing
- aldante wrote:Almost nothing
- aldante wrote:Almost nothing
- aldante wrote:Almost nothing
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, I am
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, I am
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, I am
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, I am
- bearishgurl wrote:
SK, I am
- bearishgurl wrote:GH
- bearishgurl wrote:GH
- bearishgurl wrote:GH
- bearishgurl wrote:GH
- bearishgurl wrote:GH
- bearishgurl wrote:
flu, I
- bearishgurl wrote:
flu, I
- bearishgurl wrote:
flu, I
- bearishgurl wrote:
flu, I
- bearishgurl wrote:
flu, I
- jpinpb wrote:IMO, government
- jpinpb wrote:IMO, government
- jpinpb wrote:IMO, government
- jpinpb wrote:IMO, government
- jpinpb wrote:IMO, government
- GH wrote:
IMO – None of these
- GH wrote:
IMO – None of these
- GH wrote:
IMO – None of these
- GH wrote:
IMO – None of these
- GH wrote:
IMO – None of these
- UCGal wrote:I view it in the
- UCGal wrote:I view it in the
- UCGal wrote:I view it in the
- UCGal wrote:I view it in the
- UCGal wrote:I view it in the
- EconProf wrote:The bill that
- EconProf wrote:The bill that
- EconProf wrote:The bill that
- EconProf wrote:The bill that
- EconProf wrote:The bill that
- flu wrote:Ok folks,
For folks
- flu wrote:Ok folks,
For folks
- flu wrote:Ok folks,
For folks
- flu wrote:Ok folks,
For folks
- flu wrote:Ok folks,
For folks
- SD Realtor wrote:The point is
- SD Realtor wrote:The point is
- SD Realtor wrote:The point is
- SD Realtor wrote:The point is
- SD Realtor wrote:The point is
- AN wrote:Do you think
- AN wrote:Do you think
- AN wrote:Do you think
- AN wrote:Do you think
- AN wrote:Do you think
- cvmom wrote:SK–this is the
- cvmom wrote:SK–this is the
- cvmom wrote:SK–this is the
- cvmom wrote:SK–this is the
- cvmom wrote:SK–this is the
- CA renter
- CA renter
- CA renter
- CA renter
- CA renter
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- Nor-LA-SD-GUY2
- CA renter wrote:
I’ve often
- CA renter wrote:
I’ve often
- CA renter wrote:
I’ve often
- CA renter wrote:
I’ve often
- CA renter wrote:
I’ve often
- I don’t know what the
- I don’t know what the
- I don’t know what the
- I don’t know what the
- I don’t know what the
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- patb wrote:
what it means is
- I’d agree with DataAgent,
- I’d agree with DataAgent,
- I’d agree with DataAgent,
- I’d agree with DataAgent,
- I’d agree with DataAgent,
- UCGal wrote:Ok… I think
- UCGal wrote:Ok… I think
- UCGal wrote:Ok… I think
- UCGal wrote:Ok… I think
- UCGal wrote:Ok… I think
- SD Realtor wrote:Sk clearly
- SD Realtor wrote:Sk clearly
- SD Realtor wrote:Sk clearly
- SD Realtor wrote:Sk clearly
- SD Realtor wrote:Sk clearly
- SD Realtor wrote:You have not
- SD Realtor wrote:You have not
- SD Realtor wrote:You have not
- SD Realtor wrote:You have not
- SD Realtor wrote:You have not
- pri_dk wrote:This is an
- pri_dk wrote:This is an
- pri_dk wrote:This is an
- pri_dk wrote:This is an
- pri_dk wrote:This is an
- jstoesz wrote:Your statement
- jstoesz wrote:Your statement
- jstoesz wrote:Your statement
- jstoesz wrote:Your statement
- jstoesz wrote:Your statement
- AN wrote:AN wrote:So those
- AN wrote:AN wrote:So those
- AN wrote:AN wrote:So those
- AN wrote:AN wrote:So those
- AN wrote:AN wrote:So those
- jstoesz wrote:Quote: little
- jstoesz wrote:Quote: little
- jstoesz wrote:Quote: little
- jstoesz wrote:Quote: little
- jstoesz wrote:Quote: little
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:So those who prefer
- AN wrote:So those who prefer
- AN wrote:So those who prefer
- AN wrote:So those who prefer
- AN wrote:So those who prefer
- jstoesz wrote:
So yes when
- jstoesz wrote:
So yes when
- jstoesz wrote:
So yes when
- jstoesz wrote:
So yes when
- jstoesz wrote:
So yes when
- jstoesz wrote:
You do realize
- jstoesz wrote:
You do realize
- jstoesz wrote:
You do realize
- jstoesz wrote:
You do realize
- jstoesz wrote:
You do realize
- Lots of broken campaign
- Lots of broken campaign
- Lots of broken campaign
- Lots of broken campaign
- Lots of broken campaign
- threadkiller wrote:Just had
- threadkiller wrote:Just had
- threadkiller wrote:Just had
- threadkiller wrote:Just had
- threadkiller wrote:Just had
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- earlyretirement
- Fearful wrote:
– Finally, I
- Fearful wrote:
– Finally, I
- Fearful wrote:
– Finally, I
- Fearful wrote:
– Finally, I
- Fearful wrote:
– Finally, I
- earlyretirement wrote:Hi SK
- earlyretirement wrote:Hi SK
- earlyretirement wrote:Hi SK
- earlyretirement wrote:Hi SK
- earlyretirement wrote:Hi SK
- It seems kind of obvious to
- It seems kind of obvious to
- It seems kind of obvious to
- It seems kind of obvious to
- It seems kind of obvious to
- Jazzman wrote:This is a
- Jazzman wrote:This is a
- Jazzman wrote:This is a
- Jazzman wrote:This is a
- Jazzman wrote:This is a
- teacherSD wrote:
I recently
- teacherSD wrote:
I recently
- teacherSD wrote:
I recently
- teacherSD wrote:
I recently
- teacherSD wrote:
I recently
- True on the weather. Just
- True on the weather. Just
- True on the weather. Just
- True on the weather. Just
- True on the weather. Just
- wanttobuy wrote:Anyone knows
- wanttobuy wrote:Anyone knows
- wanttobuy wrote:Anyone knows
- wanttobuy wrote:Anyone knows
- wanttobuy wrote:Anyone knows
- carlsbadworker wrote: In
- carlsbadworker wrote: In
- carlsbadworker wrote: In
- carlsbadworker wrote: In
- carlsbadworker wrote: In
- It could be worth it to
- It could be worth it to
- It could be worth it to
- It could be worth it to
- It could be worth it to
- walterwhite wrote:People tend
- walterwhite wrote:People tend
- walterwhite wrote:People tend
- walterwhite wrote:People tend
- walterwhite wrote:People tend
- Kobe isn’t the Kobe he used
- Kobe isn’t the Kobe he used
- Kobe isn’t the Kobe he used
- Kobe isn’t the Kobe he used
- Kobe isn’t the Kobe he used
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s
- bearishgurl wrote:
I still
- bearishgurl wrote:
I still
- bearishgurl wrote:
I still
- bearishgurl wrote:
I still
- bearishgurl wrote:
I still
- Scarlett wrote:totally true.
- Scarlett wrote:totally true.
- Scarlett wrote:totally true.
- Scarlett wrote:totally true.
- Scarlett wrote:totally true.
- Congratulations. I hope you
- Congratulations. I hope you
- Congratulations. I hope you
- Congratulations. I hope you
- Congratulations. I hope you
- Scarlett wrote:
This part
- Scarlett wrote:
This part
- Scarlett wrote:
This part
- Scarlett wrote:
This part
- Scarlett wrote:
This part
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- Scarlett wrote:Anybody thinks
- Scarlett wrote:Anybody thinks
- Scarlett wrote:Anybody thinks
- Scarlett wrote:Anybody thinks
- Scarlett wrote:Anybody thinks
- Zeitgeist wrote:
I wonder
- Zeitgeist wrote:
I wonder
- Zeitgeist wrote:
I wonder
- Zeitgeist wrote:
I wonder
- Zeitgeist wrote:
I wonder
- ocrenter wrote:
per the UT,
- ocrenter wrote:
per the UT,
- ocrenter wrote:
per the UT,
- ocrenter wrote:
per the UT,
- ocrenter wrote:
per the UT,
- I’m a bit confused. How did
- I’m a bit confused. How did
- I’m a bit confused. How did
- I’m a bit confused. How did
- I’m a bit confused. How did
- In general, I agree with most
- In general, I agree with most
- In general, I agree with most
- In general, I agree with most
- In general, I agree with most
- briansd1 wrote:
If you want
- briansd1 wrote:
If you want
- briansd1 wrote:
If you want
- briansd1 wrote:
If you want
- briansd1 wrote:
If you want
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Obama green
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Obama green
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Obama green
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Obama green
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Obama green
- Eugene wrote:
I can probably
- Eugene wrote:
I can probably
- Eugene wrote:
I can probably
- Eugene wrote:
I can probably
- Eugene wrote:
I can probably
- teaboy wrote:I would guess
- teaboy wrote:I would guess
- teaboy wrote:I would guess
- teaboy wrote:I would guess
- teaboy wrote:I would guess
- UCGal wrote: My sister just
- UCGal wrote: My sister just
- UCGal wrote: My sister just
- UCGal wrote: My sister just
- UCGal wrote: My sister just
- After that, we can combine
- After that, we can combine
- After that, we can combine
- After that, we can combine
- After that, we can combine
- Rustico wrote:Relishing in
- Rustico wrote:Relishing in
- Rustico wrote:Relishing in
- Rustico wrote:Relishing in
- Rustico wrote:Relishing in
- Ren wrote:CDMA ENG wrote:
So
- Ren wrote:CDMA ENG wrote:
So
- Ren wrote:CDMA ENG wrote:
So
- Ren wrote:CDMA ENG wrote:
So
- Ren wrote:CDMA ENG wrote:
So
- briansd1 wrote:I wanted an
- briansd1 wrote:I wanted an
- briansd1 wrote:I wanted an
- briansd1 wrote:I wanted an
- briansd1 wrote:I wanted an
- Thanks for the tip. Obama
- Thanks for the tip. Obama
- Thanks for the tip. Obama
- Thanks for the tip. Obama
- Thanks for the tip. Obama
- Yiffing Santorums.
I think I
- Yiffing Santorums.
I think I
- Yiffing Santorums.
I think I
- Yiffing Santorums.
I think I
- Yiffing Santorums.
I think I
- Rustico wrote:
Just
- Rustico wrote:
Just
- Rustico wrote:
Just
- Rustico wrote:
Just
- Rustico wrote:
Just
- jstoesz wrote:
You should do
- jstoesz wrote:
You should do
- jstoesz wrote:
You should do
- jstoesz wrote:
You should do
- jstoesz wrote:
You should do
- jstoesz wrote:There goes that
- jstoesz wrote:There goes that
- jstoesz wrote:There goes that
- jstoesz wrote:There goes that
- jstoesz wrote:There goes that
- swdad wrote: It would be fair
- swdad wrote: It would be fair
- swdad wrote: It would be fair
- swdad wrote: It would be fair
- swdad wrote: It would be fair
- jstoesz wrote:you guys are
- jstoesz wrote:you guys are
- jstoesz wrote:you guys are
- jstoesz wrote:you guys are
- jstoesz wrote:you guys are
- And in related news.
Donald
- And in related news.
Donald
- And in related news.
Donald
- And in related news.
Donald
- And in related news.
Donald
- paramount wrote:
Sounds like
- paramount wrote:
Sounds like
- paramount wrote:
Sounds like
- paramount wrote:
Sounds like
- paramount wrote:
Sounds like
- paramount wrote:Teaching
- paramount wrote:Teaching
- paramount wrote:Teaching
- paramount wrote:Teaching
- paramount wrote:Teaching
- Raybyrnes wrote:171000 was
- Raybyrnes wrote:171000 was
- Raybyrnes wrote:171000 was
- Raybyrnes wrote:171000 was
- Raybyrnes wrote:171000 was
- GH wrote:
Pension managers DO
- GH wrote:
Pension managers DO
- GH wrote:
Pension managers DO
- GH wrote:
Pension managers DO
- GH wrote:
Pension managers DO
- GH wrote:Every time I post
- GH wrote:Every time I post
- GH wrote:Every time I post
- GH wrote:Every time I post
- GH wrote:Every time I post
- paramount wrote:Eugene
- paramount wrote:Eugene
- paramount wrote:Eugene
- paramount wrote:Eugene
- paramount wrote:Eugene
- Eugene wrote:
Romney is quite
- Eugene wrote:
Romney is quite
- Eugene wrote:
Romney is quite
- Eugene wrote:
Romney is quite
- Eugene wrote:
Romney is quite
- Aecetia wrote:Concho, you are
- Aecetia wrote:Concho, you are
- Aecetia wrote:Concho, you are
- Aecetia wrote:Concho, you are
- Aecetia wrote:Concho, you are
- You’re right that he would be
- You’re right that he would be
- You’re right that he would be
- You’re right that he would be
- You’re right that he would be
- farbet wrote:Thanks. I
- farbet wrote:Thanks. I
- farbet wrote:Thanks. I
- farbet wrote:Thanks. I
- farbet wrote:Thanks. I
- All by itself, no. A lis
- All by itself, no. A lis
- All by itself, no. A lis
- All by itself, no. A lis
- All by itself, no. A lis
- CA renter wrote:
But we’ve
- CA renter wrote:
But we’ve
- CA renter wrote:
But we’ve
- CA renter wrote:
But we’ve
- CA renter wrote:
But we’ve
- CA renter wrote:This is very
- CA renter wrote:This is very
- CA renter wrote:This is very
- CA renter wrote:This is very
- CA renter wrote:This is very
- sdmove wrote:Afraid not, but
- sdmove wrote:Afraid not, but
- sdmove wrote:Afraid not, but
- sdmove wrote:Afraid not, but
- sdmove wrote:Afraid not, but
- davelj wrote:
I think you’re
- davelj wrote:
I think you’re
- davelj wrote:
I think you’re
- davelj wrote:
I think you’re
- davelj wrote:
I think you’re
- davelj wrote: In-state
- davelj wrote: In-state
- davelj wrote: In-state
- davelj wrote: In-state
- davelj wrote: In-state
- Yes it does make sense.
And I
- Yes it does make sense.
And I
- Yes it does make sense.
And I
- Yes it does make sense.
And I
- Yes it does make sense.
And I
- The current discussion is 20
- The current discussion is 20
- The current discussion is 20
- The current discussion is 20
- The current discussion is 20
- The homeowner does have the
- The homeowner does have the
- The homeowner does have the
- The homeowner does have the
- The homeowner does have the
- carli wrote:Any homeowner who
- carli wrote:Any homeowner who
- carli wrote:Any homeowner who
- carli wrote:Any homeowner who
- carli wrote:Any homeowner who
- urbanrealtor wrote:SK in CV
- urbanrealtor wrote:SK in CV
- urbanrealtor wrote:SK in CV
- urbanrealtor wrote:SK in CV
- urbanrealtor wrote:SK in CV
- Oh it was wonderful. My first
- Oh it was wonderful. My first
- Oh it was wonderful. My first
- Oh it was wonderful. My first
- Oh it was wonderful. My first
- And one more thing. I agree
- And one more thing. I agree
- And one more thing. I agree
- And one more thing. I agree
- And one more thing. I agree
- SD Realtor wrote:Well CV, I
- SD Realtor wrote:Well CV, I
- SD Realtor wrote:Well CV, I
- SD Realtor wrote:Well CV, I
- SD Realtor wrote:Well CV, I
- SD Realtor wrote:I think it
- SD Realtor wrote:I think it
- SD Realtor wrote:I think it
- SD Realtor wrote:I think it
- SD Realtor wrote:I think it
- Ren wrote:
My boy is 3, and
- Ren wrote:
My boy is 3, and
- Ren wrote:
My boy is 3, and
- Ren wrote:
My boy is 3, and
- Ren wrote:
My boy is 3, and
- I haven’t seen the movie, but
- I haven’t seen the movie, but
- I haven’t seen the movie, but
- I haven’t seen the movie, but
- I haven’t seen the movie, but
- sdrealtor wrote:
BTW, in the
- sdrealtor wrote:
BTW, in the
- sdrealtor wrote:
BTW, in the
- sdrealtor wrote:
BTW, in the
- sdrealtor wrote:
BTW, in the
- briansd1 wrote:We need to
- briansd1 wrote:We need to
- briansd1 wrote:We need to
- briansd1 wrote:We need to
- briansd1 wrote:We need to
- briansd1 wrote:Of course,
- briansd1 wrote:Of course,
- briansd1 wrote:Of course,
- briansd1 wrote:Of course,
- briansd1 wrote:Of course,
- We’re going all different
- We’re going all different
- We’re going all different
- We’re going all different
- We’re going all different
- briansd1 wrote:
If not for
- briansd1 wrote:
If not for
- briansd1 wrote:
If not for
- briansd1 wrote:
If not for
- briansd1 wrote:
If not for
- SK in CV wrote: And what is a
- SK in CV wrote: And what is a
- SK in CV wrote: And what is a
- SK in CV wrote: And what is a
- SK in CV wrote: And what is a
- Agree. That property is
- Agree. That property is
- Agree. That property is
- Agree. That property is
- Agree. That property is
- Brian, you’re arguing a claim
- Brian, you’re arguing a claim
- Brian, you’re arguing a claim
- Brian, you’re arguing a claim
- Brian, you’re arguing a claim
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:I got
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:I got
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:I got
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:I got
- enron_by_the_sea wrote:I got
- bearishgurl wrote:
I think I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I think I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I think I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I think I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I think I
- As long as they like the new
- As long as they like the new
- As long as they like the new
- As long as they like the new
- As long as they like the new
- sdrealtor wrote:Rollie
- sdrealtor wrote:Rollie
- sdrealtor wrote:Rollie
- sdrealtor wrote:Rollie
- sdrealtor wrote:Rollie
- sdrealtor wrote:If it is not
- sdrealtor wrote:If it is not
- sdrealtor wrote:If it is not
- sdrealtor wrote:If it is not
- sdrealtor wrote:If it is not
- temeculaguy wrote: It’s like
- temeculaguy wrote: It’s like
- temeculaguy wrote: It’s like
- temeculaguy wrote: It’s like
- temeculaguy wrote: It’s like
- Opinions on torn meniscus
- Opinions on torn meniscus
- Opinions on torn meniscus
- Opinions on torn meniscus
- Opinions on torn meniscus
- “They didn’t do the deep
- “They didn’t do the deep
- “They didn’t do the deep
- “They didn’t do the deep
- “They didn’t do the deep
- My observations have been
- My observations have been
- My observations have been
- My observations have been
- My observations have been
- I have no idea whether
- I have no idea whether
- I have no idea whether
- I have no idea whether
- I have no idea whether
- UCGal wrote:That graph is
- UCGal wrote:That graph is
- UCGal wrote:That graph is
- UCGal wrote:That graph is
- UCGal wrote:That graph is
- flu wrote:SD Realtor wrote:No
- flu wrote:SD Realtor wrote:No
- flu wrote:SD Realtor wrote:No
- flu wrote:SD Realtor wrote:No
- flu wrote:SD Realtor wrote:No
- 1. Maybe the amount due,
- 1. Maybe the amount due,
- 1. Maybe the amount due,
- 1. Maybe the amount due,
- 1. Maybe the amount due,
- Learn open water sailing. And
- Learn open water sailing. And
- Learn open water sailing. And
- Learn open water sailing. And
- Learn open water sailing. And
- briansd1 wrote:As the economy
- briansd1 wrote:As the economy
- briansd1 wrote:As the economy
- briansd1 wrote:As the economy
- briansd1 wrote:As the economy
- I believe the California law,
- I believe the California law,
- I believe the California law,
- I believe the California law,
- I believe the California law,
- surveyor wrote:
I, and
- surveyor wrote:
I, and
- surveyor wrote:
I, and
- surveyor wrote:
I, and
- surveyor wrote:
I, and
- bearishgurl wrote:I read the
- bearishgurl wrote:I read the
- bearishgurl wrote:I read the
- bearishgurl wrote:I read the
- bearishgurl wrote:I read the
- California Court Upholds MERS Standing to Foreclose
- CA renter wrote:
Who says a
- CA renter wrote:
Who says a
- CA renter wrote:
Who says a
- CA renter wrote:
Who says a
- CA renter wrote:
Who says a
- socrattt wrote:Both sides
- socrattt wrote:Both sides
- socrattt wrote:Both sides
- socrattt wrote:Both sides
- socrattt wrote:Both sides
- Rich Toscano wrote:I have
- Rich Toscano wrote:I have
- Rich Toscano wrote:I have
- Rich Toscano wrote:I have
- Rich Toscano wrote:I have
- For a guy who is corrupt and
- For a guy who is corrupt and
- For a guy who is corrupt and
- For a guy who is corrupt and
- For a guy who is corrupt and
- svelte wrote:duncbdunc
- svelte wrote:duncbdunc
- svelte wrote:duncbdunc
- svelte wrote:duncbdunc
- svelte wrote:duncbdunc
- Ok on the herding. I thought
- Ok on the herding. I thought
- Ok on the herding. I thought
- Ok on the herding. I thought
- Ok on the herding. I thought
- CA renter wrote:
Humans have
- CA renter wrote:
Humans have
- CA renter wrote:
Humans have
- CA renter wrote:
Humans have
- CA renter wrote:
Humans have
- Djshakes wrote:Rustico
- Djshakes wrote:Rustico
- Djshakes wrote:Rustico
- Djshakes wrote:Rustico
- Djshakes wrote:Rustico
- ninaprincess wrote:OK, I
- ninaprincess wrote:OK, I
- ninaprincess wrote:OK, I
- ninaprincess wrote:OK, I
- ninaprincess wrote:OK, I
- I’m not sure what you think
- I’m not sure what you think
- I’m not sure what you think
- I’m not sure what you think
- I’m not sure what you think
- EconProf wrote:Brutus, I’m
- EconProf wrote:Brutus, I’m
- EconProf wrote:Brutus, I’m
- EconProf wrote:Brutus, I’m
- EconProf wrote:Brutus, I’m
- Djshakes wrote:
Buddy, I’m a
- Djshakes wrote:
Buddy, I’m a
- Djshakes wrote:
Buddy, I’m a
- Djshakes wrote:
Buddy, I’m a
- Djshakes wrote:
Buddy, I’m a
- Craigslist has some banking
- Craigslist has some banking
- Craigslist has some banking
- Craigslist has some banking
- Craigslist has some banking
- briansd1 wrote:Conservative
- briansd1 wrote:Conservative
- briansd1 wrote:Conservative
- briansd1 wrote:Conservative
- briansd1 wrote:Conservative
- bubba99 wrote:
And this
- bubba99 wrote:
And this
- bubba99 wrote:
And this
- bubba99 wrote:
And this
- bubba99 wrote:
And this
- The area is nice. Medium
- The area is nice. Medium
- The area is nice. Medium
- The area is nice. Medium
- The area is nice. Medium
- bubba99 wrote:
I read your
- bubba99 wrote:
I read your
- bubba99 wrote:
I read your
- bubba99 wrote:
I read your
- bubba99 wrote:
I read your
- bubba99 wrote:Health
- bubba99 wrote:Health
- bubba99 wrote:Health
- bubba99 wrote:Health
- bubba99 wrote:Health
- faterikcartman wrote:Rustico
- faterikcartman wrote:Rustico
- faterikcartman wrote:Rustico
- faterikcartman wrote:Rustico
- faterikcartman wrote:Rustico
- pri_dk wrote:briansd1
- pri_dk wrote:briansd1
- pri_dk wrote:briansd1
- pri_dk wrote:briansd1
- pri_dk wrote:briansd1
- I didn’t have much of a
- I didn’t have much of a
- I didn’t have much of a
- I didn’t have much of a
- I didn’t have much of a
- The beginning of a snow
- The beginning of a snow
- The beginning of a snow
- The beginning of a snow
- The beginning of a snow
- no_such_reality wrote:
Oh,
- no_such_reality wrote:
Oh,
- no_such_reality wrote:
Oh,
- no_such_reality wrote:
Oh,
- no_such_reality wrote:
Oh,
- And one more
- And one more
- And one more
- And one more
- And one more
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- UCGal wrote:Djshakes wrote:I
- UCGal wrote:Djshakes wrote:I
- UCGal wrote:Djshakes wrote:I
- UCGal wrote:Djshakes wrote:I
- UCGal wrote:Djshakes wrote:I
- Djshakes wrote:
I never
- Djshakes wrote:
I never
- Djshakes wrote:
I never
- Djshakes wrote:
I never
- Djshakes wrote:
I never
- UCGal wrote:SK in CV
- UCGal wrote:SK in CV
- UCGal wrote:SK in CV
- UCGal wrote:SK in CV
- UCGal wrote:SK in CV
- SD Realtor wrote:UCGAL
- SD Realtor wrote:UCGAL
- SD Realtor wrote:UCGAL
- SD Realtor wrote:UCGAL
- SD Realtor wrote:UCGAL
- Hobie wrote:It was suggested
- Hobie wrote:It was suggested
- Hobie wrote:It was suggested
- Hobie wrote:It was suggested
- Hobie wrote:It was suggested
- faterikcartman wrote:SK in CV
- faterikcartman wrote:SK in CV
- faterikcartman wrote:SK in CV
- faterikcartman wrote:SK in CV
- faterikcartman wrote:SK in CV
- SD Realtor wrote:I am not
- SD Realtor wrote:I am not
- SD Realtor wrote:I am not
- SD Realtor wrote:I am not
- SD Realtor wrote:I am not
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- no_such_reality wrote:SK in
- faterikcartman wrote:It’s
- faterikcartman wrote:It’s
- faterikcartman wrote:It’s
- faterikcartman wrote:It’s
- faterikcartman wrote:It’s
- bearishgurl wrote:Cuts need
- bearishgurl wrote:Cuts need
- bearishgurl wrote:Cuts need
- bearishgurl wrote:Cuts need
- bearishgurl wrote:Cuts need
- pri_dk wrote:
Any plan that
- pri_dk wrote:
Any plan that
- pri_dk wrote:
Any plan that
- pri_dk wrote:
Any plan that
- pri_dk wrote:
Any plan that
- CardiffBaseball wrote: Was
- CardiffBaseball wrote: Was
- CardiffBaseball wrote: Was
- CardiffBaseball wrote: Was
- CardiffBaseball wrote: Was
- SD Realtor wrote:
Steve
- SD Realtor wrote:
Steve
- SD Realtor wrote:
Steve
- SD Realtor wrote:
Steve
- SD Realtor wrote:
Steve
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV
- Hobie wrote:I understand the
- Hobie wrote:I understand the
- Hobie wrote:I understand the
- Hobie wrote:I understand the
- Hobie wrote:I understand the
- Hobie wrote:I know I colluded
- Hobie wrote:I know I colluded
- Hobie wrote:I know I colluded
- Hobie wrote:I know I colluded
- Hobie wrote:I know I colluded
- jpinpb wrote:
This is crazy.
- jpinpb wrote:
This is crazy.
- jpinpb wrote:
This is crazy.
- jpinpb wrote:
This is crazy.
- jpinpb wrote:
This is crazy.
- Hobie wrote:It is not limited
- Hobie wrote:It is not limited
- Hobie wrote:It is not limited
- Hobie wrote:It is not limited
- Hobie wrote:It is not limited
- Raybyrnes wrote:SK in CV.
- Raybyrnes wrote:SK in CV.
- Raybyrnes wrote:SK in CV.
- Raybyrnes wrote:SK in CV.
- Raybyrnes wrote:SK in CV.
- Did the broker happen to
- Did the broker happen to
- Did the broker happen to
- Did the broker happen to
- Did the broker happen to
- I think we’ve beaten this
- I think we’ve beaten this
- I think we’ve beaten this
- I think we’ve beaten this
- I think we’ve beaten this
- ltokuda wrote:The article
- ltokuda wrote:The article
- ltokuda wrote:The article
- ltokuda wrote:The article
- ltokuda wrote:The article
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Eugene wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Eugene wrote:
MERS is “a
- Eugene wrote:
MERS is “a
- Eugene wrote:
MERS is “a
- Eugene wrote:
MERS is “a
- Eugene wrote:
MERS is “a
- Eugene wrote:This seems to be
- Eugene wrote:This seems to be
- Eugene wrote:This seems to be
- Eugene wrote:This seems to be
- Eugene wrote:This seems to be
- I have advice. Send me a
- I have advice. Send me a
- I have advice. Send me a
- I have advice. Send me a
- I have advice. Send me a
- Doooh wrote:Mish is a staunch
- Doooh wrote:Mish is a staunch
- Doooh wrote:Mish is a staunch
- Doooh wrote:Mish is a staunch
- Doooh wrote:Mish is a staunch
- LarryTheRenter wrote:Is
- LarryTheRenter wrote:Is
- LarryTheRenter wrote:Is
- LarryTheRenter wrote:Is
- LarryTheRenter wrote:Is
- I was just about to post
- I was just about to post
- I was just about to post
- I was just about to post
- I was just about to post
- flu wrote:
Simple. I would
- flu wrote:
Simple. I would
- flu wrote:
Simple. I would
- flu wrote:
Simple. I would
- flu wrote:
Simple. I would
- A question for you flu.
Based
- A question for you flu.
Based
- A question for you flu.
Based
- A question for you flu.
Based
- A question for you flu.
Based
- Yves Smith at naked
- Yves Smith at naked
- Yves Smith at naked
- Yves Smith at naked
- Yves Smith at naked
- Diego Mamani wrote:
Take out
- Diego Mamani wrote:
Take out
- Diego Mamani wrote:
Take out
- Diego Mamani wrote:
Take out
- Diego Mamani wrote:
Take out
- Here’s the deal. Most states
- Here’s the deal. Most states
- Here’s the deal. Most states
- Here’s the deal. Most states
- Here’s the deal. Most states
- CA renter wrote:
Just because
- CA renter wrote:
Just because
- CA renter wrote:
Just because
- CA renter wrote:
Just because
- CA renter wrote:
Just because
- jpinpb wrote:Technically,
- jpinpb wrote:Technically,
- jpinpb wrote:Technically,
- jpinpb wrote:Technically,
- jpinpb wrote:Technically,
- Diego Mamani wrote:SK in CV
- Diego Mamani wrote:SK in CV
- Diego Mamani wrote:SK in CV
- Diego Mamani wrote:SK in CV
- Diego Mamani wrote:SK in CV
- and you know you’re an old
- and you know you’re an old
- and you know you’re an old
- and you know you’re an old
- and you know you’re an old
- Diego Mamani wrote:
I’m not
- Diego Mamani wrote:
I’m not
- Diego Mamani wrote:
I’m not
- Diego Mamani wrote:
I’m not
- Diego Mamani wrote:
I’m not
- CA renter wrote:
What seems
- CA renter wrote:
What seems
- CA renter wrote:
What seems
- CA renter wrote:
What seems
- CA renter wrote:
What seems
- Diego Mamani wrote:This is
- Diego Mamani wrote:This is
- Diego Mamani wrote:This is
- Diego Mamani wrote:This is
- Diego Mamani wrote:This is
- SD Realtor wrote:
What I fear
- SD Realtor wrote:
What I fear
- SD Realtor wrote:
What I fear
- SD Realtor wrote:
What I fear
- SD Realtor wrote:
What I fear
- This is one little piece in a
- This is one little piece in a
- This is one little piece in a
- This is one little piece in a
- This is one little piece in a
- Precisely what is the
- Precisely what is the
- Precisely what is the
- Precisely what is the
- Precisely what is the
- deadzone wrote:
Regarding
- deadzone wrote:
Regarding
- deadzone wrote:
Regarding
- deadzone wrote:
Regarding
- deadzone wrote:
Regarding
- Hobie wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Hobie wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Hobie wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Hobie wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Hobie wrote:SK in CV wrote:
- Hobie wrote:
It is really
- Hobie wrote:
It is really
- Hobie wrote:
It is really
- Hobie wrote:
It is really
- Hobie wrote:
It is really
- Hobie wrote:
Suppose you are
- Hobie wrote:
Suppose you are
- Hobie wrote:
Suppose you are
- Hobie wrote:
Suppose you are
- Hobie wrote:
Suppose you are
- meadandale wrote:deadzone
- meadandale wrote:deadzone
- meadandale wrote:deadzone
- meadandale wrote:deadzone
- meadandale wrote:deadzone
- flu wrote:Diego Mamani
- flu wrote:Diego Mamani
- flu wrote:Diego Mamani
- flu wrote:Diego Mamani
- flu wrote:Diego Mamani
- PatentGuy wrote:
Do any of
- PatentGuy wrote:
Do any of
- PatentGuy wrote:
Do any of
- PatentGuy wrote:
Do any of
- PatentGuy wrote:
Do any of
- sreeb wrote:
1) If interest
- sreeb wrote:
1) If interest
- sreeb wrote:
1) If interest
- sreeb wrote:
1) If interest
- sreeb wrote:
1) If interest
- CA renter wrote:jeeman
- CA renter wrote:jeeman
- CA renter wrote:jeeman
- CA renter wrote:jeeman
- CA renter wrote:jeeman
- Ren wrote:
SK in CV
- Ren wrote:
SK in CV
- Ren wrote:
SK in CV
- Ren wrote:
SK in CV
- Ren wrote:
SK in CV
- Ren wrote: In general, they
- Ren wrote: In general, they
- Ren wrote: In general, they
- Ren wrote: In general, they
- Ren wrote: In general, they
- jficquette wrote:BOA is my
- jficquette wrote:BOA is my
- jficquette wrote:BOA is my
- jficquette wrote:BOA is my
- jficquette wrote:BOA is my
- dogonit wrote:(troubled
- dogonit wrote:(troubled
- dogonit wrote:(troubled
- dogonit wrote:(troubled
- dogonit wrote:(troubled
- martink110 wrote: I got my
- martink110 wrote: I got my
- martink110 wrote: I got my
- martink110 wrote: I got my
- martink110 wrote: I got my
- With most breeds, if done
- With most breeds, if done
- With most breeds, if done
- With most breeds, if done
- With most breeds, if done
- Over/under for Assange’s life
- Over/under for Assange’s life
- Over/under for Assange’s life
- Over/under for Assange’s life
- Over/under for Assange’s life
- bearishgurl wrote:
I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I
- bearishgurl wrote:
I
- bearishgurl wrote:
The only
- bearishgurl wrote:
The only
- bearishgurl wrote:
The only
- bearishgurl wrote:
The only
- bearishgurl wrote:
The only
- LuckyInOC wrote:A little more
- LuckyInOC wrote:A little more
- LuckyInOC wrote:A little more
- LuckyInOC wrote:A little more
- LuckyInOC wrote:A little more
- UCGal wrote:
What I didn’t
- UCGal wrote:
What I didn’t
- UCGal wrote:
What I didn’t
- UCGal wrote:
What I didn’t
- UCGal wrote:
What I didn’t
- flu wrote:No worries..Just
- flu wrote:No worries..Just
- flu wrote:No worries..Just
- flu wrote:No worries..Just
- flu wrote:No worries..Just
- Kingside wrote:This strikes
- Kingside wrote:This strikes
- Kingside wrote:This strikes
- Kingside wrote:This strikes
- Kingside wrote:This strikes
- patb wrote:does anyone see
- patb wrote:does anyone see
- patb wrote:does anyone see
- patb wrote:does anyone see
- patb wrote:does anyone see
- Mooki wrote:OK, my mom is not
- Mooki wrote:OK, my mom is not
- Mooki wrote:OK, my mom is not
- Mooki wrote:OK, my mom is not
- Mooki wrote:OK, my mom is not
- Good catch flu.
flu
- Good catch flu.
flu
- Good catch flu.
flu
- Good catch flu.
flu
- Good catch flu.
flu
- I think she over-simplifies
- I think she over-simplifies
- I think she over-simplifies
- I think she over-simplifies
- I think she over-simplifies
- jstoesz wrote: Quote:It isn’t
- jstoesz wrote: Quote:It isn’t
- jstoesz wrote: Quote:It isn’t
- jstoesz wrote: Quote:It isn’t
- jstoesz wrote: Quote:It isn’t
- UCGal wrote:If anyone is
- UCGal wrote:If anyone is
- UCGal wrote:If anyone is
- UCGal wrote:If anyone is
- UCGal wrote:If anyone is
- jstoesz wrote:
I find that
- jstoesz wrote:
I find that
- jstoesz wrote:
I find that
- jstoesz wrote:
I find that
- jstoesz wrote:
I find that
- jficquette wrote:SK in CV
- jficquette wrote:SK in CV
- jficquette wrote:SK in CV
- jficquette wrote:SK in CV
- jficquette wrote:SK in CV
- jstoesz wrote:Quote:Keep
- jstoesz wrote:Quote:Keep
- jstoesz wrote:Quote:Keep
- jstoesz wrote:Quote:Keep
- jstoesz wrote:Quote:Keep
- jstoesz wrote:But I repeat,
- jstoesz wrote:But I repeat,
- jstoesz wrote:But I repeat,
- jstoesz wrote:But I repeat,
- jstoesz wrote:But I repeat,
- jficquette wrote:ocrenter
- jficquette wrote:ocrenter
- jficquette wrote:ocrenter
- jficquette wrote:ocrenter
- jficquette wrote:ocrenter
- Arraya wrote:See, I consider
- Arraya wrote:See, I consider
- Arraya wrote:See, I consider
- Arraya wrote:See, I consider
- Arraya wrote:See, I consider
- bearishgurl wrote:
Well,
- bearishgurl wrote:
Well,
- bearishgurl wrote:
Well,
- bearishgurl wrote:
Well,
- bearishgurl wrote:
Well,
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- The changes to the OTC rules
- The changes to the OTC rules
- The changes to the OTC rules
- The changes to the OTC rules
- The changes to the OTC rules
- jstoesz wrote:
So the state
- jstoesz wrote:
So the state
- jstoesz wrote:
So the state
- jstoesz wrote:
So the state
- jstoesz wrote:
So the state
- jstoesz wrote:All of this
- jstoesz wrote:All of this
- jstoesz wrote:All of this
- jstoesz wrote:All of this
- jstoesz wrote:All of this
- BKlawyer wrote:You HAVE to be
- BKlawyer wrote:You HAVE to be
- BKlawyer wrote:You HAVE to be
- BKlawyer wrote:You HAVE to be
- BKlawyer wrote:You HAVE to be
- urbanrealtor
- urbanrealtor
- urbanrealtor
- urbanrealtor
- urbanrealtor
- I can’t believe i missed the
- I can’t believe i missed the
- I can’t believe i missed the
- I can’t believe i missed the
- I can’t believe i missed the
- pri_dk wrote:SK in CV
- pri_dk wrote:SK in CV
- pri_dk wrote:SK in CV
- pri_dk wrote:SK in CV
- pri_dk wrote:SK in CV
- investor wrote:Cute. Answer
- investor wrote:Cute. Answer
- investor wrote:Cute. Answer
- investor wrote:Cute. Answer
- investor wrote:Cute. Answer
- dup.
- dup.
- dup.
- dup.
- dup.
- jpinpb wrote:
Which states
- jpinpb wrote:
Which states
- jpinpb wrote:
Which states
- jpinpb wrote:
Which states
- jpinpb wrote:
Which states
- Dodd’s comments were
- Dodd’s comments were
- Dodd’s comments were
- Dodd’s comments were
- Dodd’s comments were
- pri_dk wrote:Quote:Flat tax
- pri_dk wrote:Quote:Flat tax
- pri_dk wrote:Quote:Flat tax
- pri_dk wrote:Quote:Flat tax
- pri_dk wrote:Quote:Flat tax
- Hobie wrote:As discussed
- Hobie wrote:As discussed
- Hobie wrote:As discussed
- Hobie wrote:As discussed
- Hobie wrote:As discussed
- jstoesz wrote:
Tax breaks,
- jstoesz wrote:
Tax breaks,
- jstoesz wrote:
Tax breaks,
- jstoesz wrote:
Tax breaks,
- jstoesz wrote:
Tax breaks,
- Hobie wrote:
The tax code is
- Hobie wrote:
The tax code is
- Hobie wrote:
The tax code is
- Hobie wrote:
The tax code is
- Hobie wrote:
The tax code is
- davelj wrote:
Your argument
- davelj wrote:
Your argument
- davelj wrote:
Your argument
- davelj wrote:
Your argument
- davelj wrote:
Your argument
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- This really should be all but
- This really should be all but
- This really should be all but
- This really should be all but
- This really should be all but
- SD Realtor wrote:
SK as a
- SD Realtor wrote:
SK as a
- SD Realtor wrote:
SK as a
- SD Realtor wrote:
SK as a
- SD Realtor wrote:
SK as a
- SD Realtor wrote:I can
- SD Realtor wrote:I can
- SD Realtor wrote:I can
- SD Realtor wrote:I can
- SD Realtor wrote:I can
- pri_dk wrote:
Is it the
- pri_dk wrote:
Is it the
- pri_dk wrote:
Is it the
- pri_dk wrote:
Is it the
- pri_dk wrote:
Is it the
- flu wrote:
SK,
What are the
- flu wrote:
SK,
What are the
- flu wrote:
SK,
What are the
- flu wrote:
SK,
What are the
- flu wrote:
SK,
What are the
- Probably getting a bit off
- Probably getting a bit off
- Probably getting a bit off
- Probably getting a bit off
- Probably getting a bit off
- Hatfield wrote:Let’s assume
- Hatfield wrote:Let’s assume
- Hatfield wrote:Let’s assume
- Hatfield wrote:Let’s assume
- Hatfield wrote:Let’s assume
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV, I
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV, I
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV, I
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV, I
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV, I
- bearishgurl wrote:
The second
- bearishgurl wrote:
The second
- bearishgurl wrote:
The second
- bearishgurl wrote:
The second
- bearishgurl wrote:
The second
- Great comment eavesdropper.
I
- Great comment eavesdropper.
I
- Great comment eavesdropper.
I
- Great comment eavesdropper.
I
- Great comment eavesdropper.
I
- flu wrote:Also, I wasn’t
- flu wrote:Also, I wasn’t
- flu wrote:Also, I wasn’t
- flu wrote:Also, I wasn’t
- flu wrote:Also, I wasn’t
- flu wrote:
I look at it
- flu wrote:
I look at it
- flu wrote:
I look at it
- flu wrote:
I look at it
- flu wrote:
I look at it
- investor wrote:Good question.
- investor wrote:Good question.
- investor wrote:Good question.
- investor wrote:Good question.
- investor wrote:Good question.
- UCGal wrote:Don’t most 4 year
- UCGal wrote:Don’t most 4 year
- UCGal wrote:Don’t most 4 year
- UCGal wrote:Don’t most 4 year
- UCGal wrote:Don’t most 4 year
- Was not through craigslist.
- Was not through craigslist.
- Was not through craigslist.
- Was not through craigslist.
- Was not through craigslist.
- I don’t recall the price or
- I don’t recall the price or
- I don’t recall the price or
- I don’t recall the price or
- I don’t recall the price or
- This is not a scam. I know
- This is not a scam. I know
- This is not a scam. I know
- This is not a scam. I know
- This is not a scam. I know
- martink110 wrote:Well myth
- martink110 wrote:Well myth
- martink110 wrote:Well myth
- martink110 wrote:Well myth
- martink110 wrote:Well myth
- martink110 wrote:SK in CV
- martink110 wrote:SK in CV
- martink110 wrote:SK in CV
- martink110 wrote:SK in CV
- martink110 wrote:SK in CV
- patb wrote:
Now Michael Moore
- patb wrote:
Now Michael Moore
- patb wrote:
Now Michael Moore
- patb wrote:
Now Michael Moore
- patb wrote:
Now Michael Moore
- SD Realtor wrote:That is the
- SD Realtor wrote:That is the
- SD Realtor wrote:That is the
- SD Realtor wrote:That is the
- SD Realtor wrote:That is the
- SD Realtor wrote:You know
- SD Realtor wrote:You know
- SD Realtor wrote:You know
- SD Realtor wrote:You know
- SD Realtor wrote:You know
- SD Realtor wrote:Oh SK this
- SD Realtor wrote:Oh SK this
- SD Realtor wrote:Oh SK this
- SD Realtor wrote:Oh SK this
- SD Realtor wrote:Oh SK this
- SD Realtor wrote:SK I do not
- SD Realtor wrote:SK I do not
- SD Realtor wrote:SK I do not
- SD Realtor wrote:SK I do not
- SD Realtor wrote:SK I do not
- A pdf creator that I really
- A pdf creator that I really
- A pdf creator that I really
- A pdf creator that I really
- A pdf creator that I really
- Having been in that position
- Having been in that position
- Having been in that position
- Having been in that position
- Having been in that position
- SD Realtor wrote:
Anyone who
- SD Realtor wrote:
Anyone who
- SD Realtor wrote:
Anyone who
- SD Realtor wrote:
Anyone who
- SD Realtor wrote:
Anyone who
- A bit off-topic, since the
- A bit off-topic, since the
- A bit off-topic, since the
- A bit off-topic, since the
- A bit off-topic, since the
- Kingside wrote:
The one
- Kingside wrote:
The one
- Kingside wrote:
The one
- Kingside wrote:
The one
- Kingside wrote:
The one
- ???
Kingside wrote:investor
- ???
Kingside wrote:investor
- ???
Kingside wrote:investor
- ???
Kingside wrote:investor
- ???
Kingside wrote:investor
- jficquette wrote:The dead
- jficquette wrote:The dead
- jficquette wrote:The dead
- jficquette wrote:The dead
- jficquette wrote:The dead
- bearishgurl wrote:This is a
- bearishgurl wrote:This is a
- bearishgurl wrote:This is a
- bearishgurl wrote:This is a
- bearishgurl wrote:This is a
- bearishgurl wrote:
In a
- bearishgurl wrote:
In a
- bearishgurl wrote:
In a
- bearishgurl wrote:
In a
- bearishgurl wrote:
In a
- UCGal wrote:What? No
- UCGal wrote:What? No
- UCGal wrote:What? No
- UCGal wrote:What? No
- UCGal wrote:What? No
- flu wrote:
SK, yes. Your BB
- flu wrote:
SK, yes. Your BB
- flu wrote:
SK, yes. Your BB
- flu wrote:
SK, yes. Your BB
- flu wrote:
SK, yes. Your BB
- I don’t really know how
- I don’t really know how
- I don’t really know how
- I don’t really know how
- I don’t really know how
- patb wrote:won’t happen.
If
- patb wrote:won’t happen.
If
- patb wrote:won’t happen.
If
- patb wrote:won’t happen.
If
- patb wrote:won’t happen.
If
- I don’t know if it’s going to
- I don’t know if it’s going to
- I don’t know if it’s going to
- I don’t know if it’s going to
- I don’t know if it’s going to
- davelj wrote:
And yet the age
- davelj wrote:
And yet the age
- davelj wrote:
And yet the age
- davelj wrote:
And yet the age
- davelj wrote:
And yet the age
- davelj wrote:90% of this
- davelj wrote:90% of this
- davelj wrote:90% of this
- davelj wrote:90% of this
- davelj wrote:90% of this
- Sale of a personal residence
- Sale of a personal residence
- Sale of a personal residence
- Sale of a personal residence
- Sale of a personal residence
- Hobie wrote:Guess I fell for
- Hobie wrote:Guess I fell for
- Hobie wrote:Guess I fell for
- Hobie wrote:Guess I fell for
- Hobie wrote:Guess I fell for
- This is just bs. It’s only a
- This is just bs. It’s only a
- This is just bs. It’s only a
- This is just bs. It’s only a
- This is just bs. It’s only a
- davelj wrote:Explain
- davelj wrote:Explain
- davelj wrote:Explain
- davelj wrote:Explain
- davelj wrote:Explain
- I agree with your
- I agree with your
- I agree with your
- I agree with your
- I agree with your
- sdrealtor wrote:brian
i
- sdrealtor wrote:brian
i
- sdrealtor wrote:brian
i
- sdrealtor wrote:brian
i
- sdrealtor wrote:brian
i
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:So SK is
- sdrealtor wrote:
I ask the
- sdrealtor wrote:
I ask the
- sdrealtor wrote:
I ask the
- sdrealtor wrote:
I ask the
- sdrealtor wrote:
I ask the
- Great comment Arraya. I wish
- Great comment Arraya. I wish
- Great comment Arraya. I wish
- Great comment Arraya. I wish
- Great comment Arraya. I wish
- I think the diagnosis is
- I think the diagnosis is
- I think the diagnosis is
- I think the diagnosis is
- I think the diagnosis is
- DWCAP wrote:
Id like to see
- DWCAP wrote:
Id like to see
- DWCAP wrote:
Id like to see
- DWCAP wrote:
Id like to see
- DWCAP wrote:
Id like to see
- XBoxBoy wrote:
I’m no expert
- XBoxBoy wrote:
I’m no expert
- XBoxBoy wrote:
I’m no expert
- XBoxBoy wrote:
I’m no expert
- XBoxBoy wrote:
I’m no expert
- sreeb wrote:I have also found
- sreeb wrote:I have also found
- sreeb wrote:I have also found
- sreeb wrote:I have also found
- sreeb wrote:I have also found
- sdrealtor wrote:You should
- sdrealtor wrote:You should
- sdrealtor wrote:You should
- sdrealtor wrote:You should
- sdrealtor wrote:You should
- captcha wrote:
I’m not
- captcha wrote:
I’m not
- captcha wrote:
I’m not
- captcha wrote:
I’m not
- captcha wrote:
I’m not
- captcha wrote:
A guy I know
- captcha wrote:
A guy I know
- captcha wrote:
A guy I know
- captcha wrote:
A guy I know
- captcha wrote:
A guy I know
- Why don’t you just tell them
- Why don’t you just tell them
- Why don’t you just tell them
- Why don’t you just tell them
- Why don’t you just tell them
- sd_matt wrote:
But really, do
- sd_matt wrote:
But really, do
- sd_matt wrote:
But really, do
- sd_matt wrote:
But really, do
- sd_matt wrote:
But really, do
- sd_matt wrote:…..or how
- sd_matt wrote:…..or how
- sd_matt wrote:…..or how
- sd_matt wrote:…..or how
- sd_matt wrote:…..or how
- I love this paragraph
UCGal
- I love this paragraph
UCGal
- I love this paragraph
UCGal
- I love this paragraph
UCGal
- I love this paragraph
UCGal
- sobmaz wrote:
“Gold pays no
- sobmaz wrote:
“Gold pays no
- sobmaz wrote:
“Gold pays no
- sobmaz wrote:
“Gold pays no
- sobmaz wrote:
“Gold pays no
- I just bought 4 Magellan
- I just bought 4 Magellan
- I just bought 4 Magellan
- I just bought 4 Magellan
- I just bought 4 Magellan
- Interesting that you should
- Interesting that you should
- Interesting that you should
- Interesting that you should
- Interesting that you should
- outtamojo wrote:
I shoulda
- outtamojo wrote:
I shoulda
- outtamojo wrote:
I shoulda
- outtamojo wrote:
I shoulda
- outtamojo wrote:
I shoulda
- DWCAP wrote:
What he means is
- DWCAP wrote:
What he means is
- DWCAP wrote:
What he means is
- DWCAP wrote:
What he means is
- DWCAP wrote:
What he means is
- outtamojo wrote:Arraya
- outtamojo wrote:Arraya
- outtamojo wrote:Arraya
- outtamojo wrote:Arraya
- outtamojo wrote:Arraya
- outtamojo wrote:
Imo it
- outtamojo wrote:
Imo it
- outtamojo wrote:
Imo it
- outtamojo wrote:
Imo it
- outtamojo wrote:
Imo it
- flu wrote:I never thought
- flu wrote:I never thought
- flu wrote:I never thought
- flu wrote:I never thought
- flu wrote:I never thought
- svelte wrote:Yeah, that
- svelte wrote:Yeah, that
- svelte wrote:Yeah, that
- svelte wrote:Yeah, that
- svelte wrote:Yeah, that
- Arraya wrote:Well, I guess
- Arraya wrote:Well, I guess
- Arraya wrote:Well, I guess
- Arraya wrote:Well, I guess
- Arraya wrote:Well, I guess
- afx114 wrote:Also, Rachel
- afx114 wrote:Also, Rachel
- afx114 wrote:Also, Rachel
- afx114 wrote:Also, Rachel
- afx114 wrote:Also, Rachel
- walterwhite wrote:i wonder if
- walterwhite wrote:i wonder if
- walterwhite wrote:i wonder if
- walterwhite wrote:i wonder if
- walterwhite wrote:i wonder if
- CONCHO wrote:There are
- CONCHO wrote:There are
- CONCHO wrote:There are
- CONCHO wrote:There are
- CONCHO wrote:There are
- CA renter wrote:
Agree with
- CA renter wrote:
Agree with
- CA renter wrote:
Agree with
- CA renter wrote:
Agree with
- CA renter wrote:
Agree with
- CA renter wrote:
Perhaps it’s
- CA renter wrote:
Perhaps it’s
- CA renter wrote:
Perhaps it’s
- CA renter wrote:
Perhaps it’s
- CA renter wrote:
Perhaps it’s
- bearishgurl wrote:XBoxBoy
- bearishgurl wrote:XBoxBoy
- bearishgurl wrote:XBoxBoy
- bearishgurl wrote:XBoxBoy
- bearishgurl wrote:XBoxBoy
- Great catch on this.
XBoxBoy
- Great catch on this.
XBoxBoy
- Great catch on this.
XBoxBoy
- Great catch on this.
XBoxBoy
- Great catch on this.
XBoxBoy
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:
The
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:
The
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:
The
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:
The
- FormerSanDiegan wrote:
The
- Insightful comment.
- Insightful comment.
- Insightful comment.
- Insightful comment.
- Insightful comment.
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV,
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV,
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV,
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV,
- bearishgurl wrote:SK in CV,
- bearishgurl wrote:
I guess
- bearishgurl wrote:
I guess
- bearishgurl wrote:
I guess
- bearishgurl wrote:
I guess
- bearishgurl wrote:
I guess
- Veritas wrote:IOUSA How’s
- Veritas wrote:IOUSA How’s
- Veritas wrote:IOUSA How’s
- Veritas wrote:IOUSA How’s
- Veritas wrote:IOUSA How’s
- I’m going to focus on just
- I’m going to focus on just
- I’m going to focus on just
- I’m going to focus on just
- I’m going to focus on just
- scaredycat wrote:in our
- scaredycat wrote:in our
- scaredycat wrote:in our
- scaredycat wrote:in our
- scaredycat wrote:in our
- sdduuuude wrote:
You are
- sdduuuude wrote:
You are
- sdduuuude wrote:
You are
- sdduuuude wrote:
You are
- sdduuuude wrote:
You are
- I don’t even know where to
- I don’t even know where to
- I don’t even know where to
- I don’t even know where to
- I don’t even know where to
- captcha wrote:Eugene wrote:
- captcha wrote:Eugene wrote:
- captcha wrote:Eugene wrote:
- captcha wrote:Eugene wrote:
- captcha wrote:Eugene wrote:
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- mike92104 wrote:
Eugene
- mike92104 wrote:
Eugene
- mike92104 wrote:
Eugene
- mike92104 wrote:
Eugene
- mike92104 wrote:
Eugene
- And one more thing.
- And one more thing.
- And one more thing.
- And one more thing.
- And one more thing.
- greekfire wrote:
You can’t
- greekfire wrote:
You can’t
- greekfire wrote:
You can’t
- greekfire wrote:
You can’t
- greekfire wrote:
You can’t
- Brian, I’m gonna add just a
- Brian, I’m gonna add just a
- Brian, I’m gonna add just a
- Brian, I’m gonna add just a
- Brian, I’m gonna add just a
- Natty, I don’t disagree with
- Natty, I don’t disagree with
- Natty, I don’t disagree with
- Natty, I don’t disagree with
- Natty, I don’t disagree with
- briansd1 wrote:The dog should
- briansd1 wrote:The dog should
- briansd1 wrote:The dog should
- briansd1 wrote:The dog should
- briansd1 wrote:The dog should
- outtamojo wrote:”No human or
- outtamojo wrote:”No human or
- outtamojo wrote:”No human or
- outtamojo wrote:”No human or
- outtamojo wrote:”No human or
- Both plans, BofA’s and the
- Both plans, BofA’s and the
- Both plans, BofA’s and the
- Both plans, BofA’s and the
- Both plans, BofA’s and the
- Pemeliza, it appears to me
- Pemeliza, it appears to me
- Pemeliza, it appears to me
- Pemeliza, it appears to me
- Pemeliza, it appears to me
- bearishgurl wrote:
In
- bearishgurl wrote:
In
- bearishgurl wrote:
In
- bearishgurl wrote:
In
- bearishgurl wrote:
In
- Trend has been up for 6
- Trend has been up for 6
- Trend has been up for 6
- Trend has been up for 6
- Trend has been up for 6
- investor wrote: Barney frank
- investor wrote: Barney frank
- investor wrote: Barney frank
- investor wrote: Barney frank
- investor wrote: Barney frank
- Insightful comment.
Specially
- Insightful comment.
Specially
- Insightful comment.
Specially
- Insightful comment.
Specially
- Insightful comment.
Specially
- investor wrote: Someone
- investor wrote: Someone
- investor wrote: Someone
- investor wrote: Someone
- investor wrote: Someone
- I walk that bridge probably 5
- I walk that bridge probably 5
- I walk that bridge probably 5
- I walk that bridge probably 5
- I walk that bridge probably 5
- flu wrote:
So at the risk of
- flu wrote:
So at the risk of
- flu wrote:
So at the risk of
- flu wrote:
So at the risk of
- flu wrote:
So at the risk of
- surveyor wrote:anecdotal
- surveyor wrote:anecdotal
- surveyor wrote:anecdotal
- surveyor wrote:anecdotal
- surveyor wrote:anecdotal
- Nice comment surveyor. Mostly
- Nice comment surveyor. Mostly
- Nice comment surveyor. Mostly
- Nice comment surveyor. Mostly
- Nice comment surveyor. Mostly
- Keep your eye on the ball.
- Keep your eye on the ball.
- Keep your eye on the ball.
- Keep your eye on the ball.
- Keep your eye on the ball.
- investor wrote:To SK in
- investor wrote:To SK in
- investor wrote:To SK in
- investor wrote:To SK in
- investor wrote:To SK in
- When you say commercial real
- When you say commercial real
- When you say commercial real
- When you say commercial real
- When you say commercial real
- aldante wrote:SV,
I think
- aldante wrote:SV,
I think
- aldante wrote:SV,
I think
- aldante wrote:SV,
I think
- aldante wrote:SV,
I think
- I’m impressed. Really. That’s
- I’m impressed. Really. That’s
- I’m impressed. Really. That’s
- I’m impressed. Really. That’s
- I’m impressed. Really. That’s
- aldante wrote:SK,
You are
- aldante wrote:SK,
You are
- aldante wrote:SK,
You are
- aldante wrote:SK,
You are
- aldante wrote:SK,
You are
- aldante wrote:SK in CV
- aldante wrote:SK in CV
- aldante wrote:SK in CV
- aldante wrote:SK in CV
- aldante wrote:SK in CV
- investor wrote:
The fed was
- investor wrote:
The fed was
- investor wrote:
The fed was
- investor wrote:
The fed was
- investor wrote:
The fed was
- investor wrote:
Sorry I
- investor wrote:
Sorry I
- investor wrote:
Sorry I
- investor wrote:
Sorry I
- investor wrote:
Sorry I
- investor wrote:
The loss of
- investor wrote:
The loss of
- investor wrote:
The loss of
- investor wrote:
The loss of
- investor wrote:
The loss of
- poorgradstudent wrote:Wasn’t
- poorgradstudent wrote:Wasn’t
- poorgradstudent wrote:Wasn’t
- poorgradstudent wrote:Wasn’t
- poorgradstudent wrote:Wasn’t
- jpinpb wrote:
Regardless of
- jpinpb wrote:
Regardless of
- jpinpb wrote:
Regardless of
- jpinpb wrote:
Regardless of
- jpinpb wrote:
Regardless of
- investor wrote:
The creature
- investor wrote:
The creature
- investor wrote:
The creature
- investor wrote:
The creature
- investor wrote:
The creature
- aldante wrote:Davelj,
Wow so
- aldante wrote:Davelj,
Wow so
- aldante wrote:Davelj,
Wow so
- aldante wrote:Davelj,
Wow so
- aldante wrote:Davelj,
Wow so
- investor wrote:Good
- investor wrote:Good
- investor wrote:Good
- investor wrote:Good
- investor wrote:Good
- Investor, is it your
- Investor, is it your
- Investor, is it your
- Investor, is it your
- Investor, is it your
- Thanks for posting that
- Thanks for posting that
- Thanks for posting that
- Thanks for posting that
- Thanks for posting that
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Binding contract entered into
- Binding contract entered into
- Binding contract entered into
- Binding contract entered into
- Binding contract entered into
- evsdca wrote:Currently, if
- evsdca wrote:Currently, if
- evsdca wrote:Currently, if
- evsdca wrote:Currently, if
- evsdca wrote:Currently, if
- According to Citibank:
When
- According to Citibank:
When
- According to Citibank:
When
- According to Citibank:
When
- According to Citibank:
When
- pri_dk wrote:Sk,
I must be
- pri_dk wrote:Sk,
I must be
- pri_dk wrote:Sk,
I must be
- pri_dk wrote:Sk,
I must be
- pri_dk wrote:Sk,
I must be
- You know surveyor, I agree
- You know surveyor, I agree
- You know surveyor, I agree
- You know surveyor, I agree
- You know surveyor, I agree
- pri_dk wrote:Buying a stock,
- pri_dk wrote:Buying a stock,
- pri_dk wrote:Buying a stock,
- pri_dk wrote:Buying a stock,
- pri_dk wrote:Buying a stock,
- Aecetia wrote:Sk-
What if the
- Aecetia wrote:Sk-
What if the
- Aecetia wrote:Sk-
What if the
- Aecetia wrote:Sk-
What if the
- Aecetia wrote:Sk-
What if the
- surveyor wrote:
The people
- surveyor wrote:
The people
- surveyor wrote:
The people
- surveyor wrote:
The people
- surveyor wrote:
The people
- Aecetia wrote:I am not a
- Aecetia wrote:I am not a
- Aecetia wrote:I am not a
- Aecetia wrote:I am not a
- Aecetia wrote:I am not a
- captcha wrote:
That’s
- captcha wrote:
That’s
- captcha wrote:
That’s
- captcha wrote:
That’s
- captcha wrote:
That’s
- Aecetia wrote:I think it is
- Aecetia wrote:I think it is
- Aecetia wrote:I think it is
- Aecetia wrote:I think it is
- Aecetia wrote:I think it is
- captcha wrote:
As someone
- captcha wrote:
As someone
- captcha wrote:
As someone
- captcha wrote:
As someone
- captcha wrote:
As someone
- meadandale wrote:My combined
- meadandale wrote:My combined
- meadandale wrote:My combined
- meadandale wrote:My combined
- meadandale wrote:My combined
- meadandale wrote:Yeah but
- meadandale wrote:Yeah but
- meadandale wrote:Yeah but
- meadandale wrote:Yeah but
- meadandale wrote:Yeah but
- meadandale wrote:So you can
- meadandale wrote:So you can
- meadandale wrote:So you can
- meadandale wrote:So you can
- meadandale wrote:So you can
- gandalf wrote:
Regressive is
- gandalf wrote:
Regressive is
- gandalf wrote:
Regressive is
- gandalf wrote:
Regressive is
- gandalf wrote:
Regressive is
- meadandale wrote: When the
- meadandale wrote: When the
- meadandale wrote: When the
- meadandale wrote: When the
- meadandale wrote: When the
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from
- Allan from
- Allan from
- Allan from
- Allan from
- Right Allen, they had a very
- Right Allen, they had a very
- Right Allen, they had a very
- Right Allen, they had a very
- Right Allen, they had a very
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Too early to tell.
Certainly
- Too early to tell.
Certainly
- Too early to tell.
Certainly
- Too early to tell.
Certainly
- Too early to tell.
Certainly
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Hobie wrote:
Then why did
- Hobie wrote:
Then why did
- Hobie wrote:
Then why did
- Hobie wrote:
Then why did
- Hobie wrote:
Then why did
- Hobie wrote:Hold on guys.
- Hobie wrote:Hold on guys.
- Hobie wrote:Hold on guys.
- Hobie wrote:Hold on guys.
- Hobie wrote:Hold on guys.
- Hobie wrote:Don’t forget
- Hobie wrote:Don’t forget
- Hobie wrote:Don’t forget
- Hobie wrote:Don’t forget
- Hobie wrote:Don’t forget
- I have to agree with many of
- I have to agree with many of
- I have to agree with many of
- I have to agree with many of
- I have to agree with many of
- afx114 wrote:
Damn. Once
- afx114 wrote:
Damn. Once
- afx114 wrote:
Damn. Once
- afx114 wrote:
Damn. Once
- afx114 wrote:
Damn. Once
- Hobie wrote:And don’t forget
- Hobie wrote:And don’t forget
- Hobie wrote:And don’t forget
- Hobie wrote:And don’t forget
- Hobie wrote:And don’t forget
- flu wrote:
You think $8500/yr
- flu wrote:
You think $8500/yr
- flu wrote:
You think $8500/yr
- flu wrote:
You think $8500/yr
- flu wrote:
You think $8500/yr
- Hobie wrote:
Lower taxes?
- Hobie wrote:
Lower taxes?
- Hobie wrote:
Lower taxes?
- Hobie wrote:
Lower taxes?
- Hobie wrote:
Lower taxes?
- Hobie wrote:
Just to remove
- Hobie wrote:
Just to remove
- Hobie wrote:
Just to remove
- Hobie wrote:
Just to remove
- Hobie wrote:
Just to remove
- CardiffBaseball wrote:I would
- CardiffBaseball wrote:I would
- CardiffBaseball wrote:I would
- CardiffBaseball wrote:I would
- CardiffBaseball wrote:I would
- Hobie wrote:Then Brian you
- Hobie wrote:Then Brian you
- Hobie wrote:Then Brian you
- Hobie wrote:Then Brian you
- Hobie wrote:Then Brian you
- briansd1 wrote:Company A
- briansd1 wrote:Company A
- briansd1 wrote:Company A
- briansd1 wrote:Company A
- briansd1 wrote:Company A
- afx114 wrote:Why is insurance
- afx114 wrote:Why is insurance
- afx114 wrote:Why is insurance
- afx114 wrote:Why is insurance
- afx114 wrote:Why is insurance
- briansd1 wrote:
Government
- briansd1 wrote:
Government
- briansd1 wrote:
Government
- briansd1 wrote:
Government
- briansd1 wrote:
Government
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s PR to
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s PR to
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s PR to
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s PR to
- briansd1 wrote:
It’s PR to
- AN wrote:If this one won’t
- AN wrote:If this one won’t
- AN wrote:If this one won’t
- AN wrote:If this one won’t
- AN wrote:If this one won’t
- Just to clarify, HAMP is not
- Just to clarify, HAMP is not
- Just to clarify, HAMP is not
- Just to clarify, HAMP is not
- Just to clarify, HAMP is not
- IForget wrote:
I think this
- IForget wrote:
I think this
- IForget wrote:
I think this
- IForget wrote:
I think this
- IForget wrote:
I think this
- If this is what you’ve been
- If this is what you’ve been
- If this is what you’ve been
- If this is what you’ve been
- If this is what you’ve been
- Aecetia wrote:Everyone should
- Aecetia wrote:Everyone should
- Aecetia wrote:Everyone should
- Aecetia wrote:Everyone should
- Aecetia wrote:Everyone should
- Hobie wrote: Less
- Hobie wrote: Less
- Hobie wrote: Less
- Hobie wrote: Less
- Hobie wrote: Less
- meadandale wrote:Another take
- meadandale wrote:Another take
- meadandale wrote:Another take
- meadandale wrote:Another take
- meadandale wrote:Another take
- captcha wrote:Are the limits
- captcha wrote:Are the limits
- captcha wrote:Are the limits
- captcha wrote:Are the limits
- captcha wrote:Are the limits
- CONCHO wrote:Thanks for the
- CONCHO wrote:Thanks for the
- CONCHO wrote:Thanks for the
- CONCHO wrote:Thanks for the
- CONCHO wrote:Thanks for the
- Sloppy reporting
CONCHO
- Sloppy reporting
CONCHO
- Sloppy reporting
CONCHO
- Sloppy reporting
CONCHO
- Sloppy reporting
CONCHO
- Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
- Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
- Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
- Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
- Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
- Zeitgeist wrote:I guarantee
- Zeitgeist wrote:I guarantee
- Zeitgeist wrote:I guarantee
- Zeitgeist wrote:I guarantee
- Zeitgeist wrote:I guarantee
- dbapig wrote:
Why did ALL of
- dbapig wrote:
Why did ALL of
- dbapig wrote:
Why did ALL of
- dbapig wrote:
Why did ALL of
- dbapig wrote:
Why did ALL of
- jpinpb wrote:While ideally
- jpinpb wrote:While ideally
- jpinpb wrote:While ideally
- jpinpb wrote:While ideally
- jpinpb wrote:While ideally
- Irish wrote:Like so many have
- Irish wrote:Like so many have
- Irish wrote:Like so many have
- Irish wrote:Like so many have
- Irish wrote:Like so many have
- Perfect indeed.
Arraya
- Perfect indeed.
Arraya
- Perfect indeed.
Arraya
- Perfect indeed.
Arraya
- Perfect indeed.
Arraya
- captcha wrote:NewtoSanDiego
- captcha wrote:NewtoSanDiego
- captcha wrote:NewtoSanDiego
- captcha wrote:NewtoSanDiego
- captcha wrote:NewtoSanDiego
- NewtoSanDiego wrote:With
- NewtoSanDiego wrote:With
- NewtoSanDiego wrote:With
- NewtoSanDiego wrote:With
- NewtoSanDiego wrote:With
- svelte wrote:A few points are
- svelte wrote:A few points are
- svelte wrote:A few points are
- svelte wrote:A few points are
- svelte wrote:A few points are
- Doctors whine about not being
- Doctors whine about not being
- Doctors whine about not being
- Doctors whine about not being
- Doctors whine about not being
- Here’s what you can
- Here’s what you can
- Here’s what you can
- Here’s what you can
- Here’s what you can
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:I think you
- itsj0nathan wrote:When we
- itsj0nathan wrote:When we
- itsj0nathan wrote:When we
- itsj0nathan wrote:When we
- itsj0nathan wrote:When we
- The $8K you each got was an
- The $8K you each got was an
- The $8K you each got was an
- The $8K you each got was an
- The $8K you each got was an
- The mistake that I think you
- The mistake that I think you
- The mistake that I think you
- The mistake that I think you
- The mistake that I think you
- davelj wrote:
As I understand
- davelj wrote:
As I understand
- davelj wrote:
As I understand
- davelj wrote:
As I understand
- davelj wrote:
As I understand
- I’m a bit more than hesitant
- I’m a bit more than hesitant
- I’m a bit more than hesitant
- I’m a bit more than hesitant
- I’m a bit more than hesitant
- clearfund wrote:SK – There is
- clearfund wrote:SK – There is
- clearfund wrote:SK – There is
- clearfund wrote:SK – There is
- clearfund wrote:SK – There is
- There have been a few
- There have been a few
- There have been a few
- There have been a few
- There have been a few
- SD Realtor is right on the
- SD Realtor is right on the
- SD Realtor is right on the
- SD Realtor is right on the
- SD Realtor is right on the
- Yes, you are missing
- Yes, you are missing
- Yes, you are missing
- Yes, you are missing
- Yes, you are missing
- ucodegen wrote:
Looks like
- ucodegen wrote:
Looks like
- ucodegen wrote:
Looks like
- ucodegen wrote:
Looks like
- ucodegen wrote:
Looks like
- davelj wrote:The sad part is
- davelj wrote:The sad part is
- davelj wrote:The sad part is
- davelj wrote:The sad part is
- davelj wrote:The sad part is
- teatsonabull wrote:Hey,
- teatsonabull wrote:Hey,
- teatsonabull wrote:Hey,
- teatsonabull wrote:Hey,
- teatsonabull wrote:Hey,
- clearfund wrote:
Yes, from
- clearfund wrote:
Yes, from
- clearfund wrote:
Yes, from
- clearfund wrote:
Yes, from
- clearfund wrote:
Yes, from
- A few comments about Del
- A few comments about Del
- A few comments about Del
- A few comments about Del
- A few comments about Del
- scaredycat wrote:
SO IS THE
- scaredycat wrote:
SO IS THE
- scaredycat wrote:
SO IS THE
- scaredycat wrote:
SO IS THE
- scaredycat wrote:
SO IS THE
- Eugene wrote:
The treasurer
- Eugene wrote:
The treasurer
- Eugene wrote:
The treasurer
- Eugene wrote:
The treasurer
- Eugene wrote:
The treasurer
- I have to disagree with SD
- I have to disagree with SD
- I have to disagree with SD
- I have to disagree with SD
- I have to disagree with SD
- I appreciate the
- I appreciate the
- I appreciate the
- I appreciate the
- I appreciate the
- GH wrote:My income last year
- GH wrote:My income last year
- GH wrote:My income last year
- GH wrote:My income last year
- GH wrote:My income last year
- CA renter wrote:SK in CV
- CA renter wrote:SK in CV
- CA renter wrote:SK in CV
- CA renter wrote:SK in CV
- CA renter wrote:SK in CV
- They don’t know the property
- They don’t know the property
- They don’t know the property
- They don’t know the property
- They don’t know the property
- Funny you should choose
- Funny you should choose
- Funny you should choose
- Funny you should choose
- Funny you should choose
- rnen wrote:
I do not think
- rnen wrote:
I do not think
- rnen wrote:
I do not think
- rnen wrote:
I do not think
- rnen wrote:
I do not think
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- ucodegen wrote:
But if you
- ucodegen wrote:
But if you
- ucodegen wrote:
But if you
- ucodegen wrote:
But if you
- ucodegen wrote:
But if you
- ucodegen wrote:
, I am simply
- ucodegen wrote:
, I am simply
- ucodegen wrote:
, I am simply
- ucodegen wrote:
, I am simply
- ucodegen wrote:
, I am simply
- I’ll just respond to this one
- I’ll just respond to this one
- I’ll just respond to this one
- I’ll just respond to this one
- I’ll just respond to this one
- ucodegen wrote:
In the old
- ucodegen wrote:
In the old
- ucodegen wrote:
In the old
- ucodegen wrote:
In the old
- ucodegen wrote:
In the old
- ucodegen wrote:
Joe Legal
- ucodegen wrote:
Joe Legal
- ucodegen wrote:
Joe Legal
- ucodegen wrote:
Joe Legal
- ucodegen wrote:
Joe Legal
- ucodegen wrote:
There’s
- ucodegen wrote:
There’s
- ucodegen wrote:
There’s
- ucodegen wrote:
There’s
- ucodegen wrote:
There’s
- Very good point Eugene
Eugene
- Very good point Eugene
Eugene
- Very good point Eugene
Eugene
- Very good point Eugene
Eugene
- Very good point Eugene
Eugene
- patientrenter wrote:SK in CV
- patientrenter wrote:SK in CV
- patientrenter wrote:SK in CV
- patientrenter wrote:SK in CV
- patientrenter wrote:SK in CV
- patientrenter wrote:[
Why
- patientrenter wrote:[
Why
- patientrenter wrote:[
Why
- patientrenter wrote:[
Why
- patientrenter wrote:[
Why
- DWCAP wrote:
Why? Why should
- DWCAP wrote:
Why? Why should
- DWCAP wrote:
Why? Why should
- DWCAP wrote:
Why? Why should
- DWCAP wrote:
Why? Why should
- Another way to look at
- Another way to look at
- Another way to look at
- Another way to look at
- Another way to look at
- scaredycat wrote:but how does
- scaredycat wrote:but how does
- scaredycat wrote:but how does
- scaredycat wrote:but how does
- scaredycat wrote:but how does
- Usually the lender will
- Usually the lender will
- Usually the lender will
- Usually the lender will
- Usually the lender will
- ariffe22 wrote:briansd1
- ariffe22 wrote:briansd1
- ariffe22 wrote:briansd1
- ariffe22 wrote:briansd1
- ariffe22 wrote:briansd1
- Mark Holmes wrote:Well, I
- Mark Holmes wrote:Well, I
- Mark Holmes wrote:Well, I
- Mark Holmes wrote:Well, I
- Mark Holmes wrote:Well, I
- KSMountain wrote:I thought I
- KSMountain wrote:I thought I
- KSMountain wrote:I thought I
- KSMountain wrote:I thought I
- KSMountain wrote:I thought I
- KSMountain wrote:
Really? No
- KSMountain wrote:
Really? No
- KSMountain wrote:
Really? No
- KSMountain wrote:
Really? No
- KSMountain wrote:
Really? No
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- KSMountain wrote:SK in CV
- Carl Veritas wrote:SK in
- Carl Veritas wrote:SK in
- Carl Veritas wrote:SK in
- Carl Veritas wrote:SK in
- Carl Veritas wrote:SK in
- Carl Veritas wrote:NeetaT,
At
- Carl Veritas wrote:NeetaT,
At
- Carl Veritas wrote:NeetaT,
At
- Carl Veritas wrote:NeetaT,
At
- Carl Veritas wrote:NeetaT,
At
- NeetaT wrote:
I can now
- NeetaT wrote:
I can now
- NeetaT wrote:
I can now
- NeetaT wrote:
I can now
- NeetaT wrote:
I can now
- bubba99 wrote:It pains me
- bubba99 wrote:It pains me
- bubba99 wrote:It pains me
- bubba99 wrote:It pains me
- bubba99 wrote:It pains me
- UCGal wrote:I understand how
- UCGal wrote:I understand how
- UCGal wrote:I understand how
- UCGal wrote:I understand how
- UCGal wrote:I understand how
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- meadandale wrote:briansd1
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- Allan from Fallbrook wrote:SK
- NeetaT wrote: Those who
- NeetaT wrote: Those who
- NeetaT wrote: Those who
- NeetaT wrote: Those who
- NeetaT wrote: Those who
- Who is John Galt?
Great first
- Who is John Galt?
Great first
- Who is John Galt?
Great first
- Who is John Galt?
Great first
- Who is John Galt?
Great first
- If the short sale was your
- If the short sale was your
- If the short sale was your
- If the short sale was your
- If the short sale was your
- Right, urbanrealtor.
Current
- Right, urbanrealtor.
Current
- Right, urbanrealtor.
Current
- Right, urbanrealtor.
Current
- Right, urbanrealtor.
Current
- urbanrealtor wrote:THe email
- urbanrealtor wrote:THe email
- urbanrealtor wrote:THe email
- urbanrealtor wrote:THe email
- urbanrealtor wrote:THe email
- I’m not a real estate
- I’m not a real estate
- I’m not a real estate
- I’m not a real estate
- I’m not a real estate
- I suspect it depends on both
- I suspect it depends on both
- I suspect it depends on both
- I suspect it depends on both
- I suspect it depends on both
- Things haven’t changed.
- Things haven’t changed.
- Things haven’t changed.
- Things haven’t changed.
- Things haven’t changed.
- jficquette wrote:
History
- jficquette wrote:
History
- jficquette wrote:
History
- jficquette wrote:
History
- jficquette wrote:
History
- jficquette wrote:
The only
- jficquette wrote:
The only
- jficquette wrote:
The only
- jficquette wrote:
The only
- jficquette wrote:
The only
- If you ignore the present
- If you ignore the present
- If you ignore the present
- If you ignore the present
- If you ignore the present
- You’re exactly right
- You’re exactly right
- You’re exactly right
- You’re exactly right
- You’re exactly right
- jpinpb wrote:
That’s what I
- jpinpb wrote:
That’s what I
- jpinpb wrote:
That’s what I
- jpinpb wrote:
That’s what I
- jpinpb wrote:
That’s what I
- mike92104 wrote:
Please tell
- mike92104 wrote:
Please tell
- mike92104 wrote:
Please tell
- mike92104 wrote:
Please tell
- mike92104 wrote:
Please tell
- PlnrBoy wrote: I am not
- PlnrBoy wrote: I am not
- PlnrBoy wrote: I am not
- PlnrBoy wrote: I am not
- PlnrBoy wrote: I am not
- Huckleberry wrote:This puts a
- Huckleberry wrote:This puts a
- Huckleberry wrote:This puts a
- Huckleberry wrote:This puts a
- Huckleberry wrote:This puts a
- Rockemsock wrote:
Is it just
- Rockemsock wrote:
Is it just
- Rockemsock wrote:
Is it just
- Rockemsock wrote:
Is it just
- Rockemsock wrote:
Is it just
- I just have to laugh at this
- I just have to laugh at this
- I just have to laugh at this
- I just have to laugh at this
- I just have to laugh at this
- Slight correction needed.
The
- Slight correction needed.
The
- Slight correction needed.
The
- Slight correction needed.
The
- Slight correction needed.
The
- Ucodegan, it appears you’re
- Ucodegan, it appears you’re
- Ucodegan, it appears you’re
- Ucodegan, it appears you’re
- Ucodegan, it appears you’re
- ucodegen wrote:
The degree of
- ucodegen wrote:
The degree of
- ucodegen wrote:
The degree of
- ucodegen wrote:
The degree of
- ucodegen wrote:
The degree of
- ucodegen wrote:
No its not. I
- ucodegen wrote:
No its not. I
- ucodegen wrote:
No its not. I
- ucodegen wrote:
No its not. I
- ucodegen wrote:
No its not. I
- ucodegen wrote:
Recent
- ucodegen wrote:
Recent
- ucodegen wrote:
Recent
- ucodegen wrote:
Recent
- ucodegen wrote:
Recent
- sd_matt wrote:”….70% of
- sd_matt wrote:”….70% of
- sd_matt wrote:”….70% of
- sd_matt wrote:”….70% of
- sd_matt wrote:”….70% of
- Hobie wrote:I dunno. May not
- Hobie wrote:I dunno. May not
- Hobie wrote:I dunno. May not
- Hobie wrote:I dunno. May not
- Hobie wrote:I dunno. May not
- Recent polling shows that
- Recent polling shows that
- Recent polling shows that
- Recent polling shows that
- Recent polling shows that
- Just because some homes in a
- Just because some homes in a
- Just because some homes in a
- Just because some homes in a
- Just because some homes in a
- What is the context of your
- What is the context of your
- What is the context of your
- What is the context of your
- What is the context of your
- CONCHO wrote:
What would
- CONCHO wrote:
What would
- CONCHO wrote:
What would
- CONCHO wrote:
What would
- CONCHO wrote:
What would
- This is mostly true.
CONCHO
- This is mostly true.
CONCHO
- This is mostly true.
CONCHO
- This is mostly true.
CONCHO
- This is mostly true.
CONCHO
- That’s two good questions!!
- That’s two good questions!!
- That’s two good questions!!
- That’s two good questions!!
- That’s two good questions!!
- infoseeker wrote:Hi SK,
- infoseeker wrote:Hi SK,
- infoseeker wrote:Hi SK,
- infoseeker wrote:Hi SK,
- infoseeker wrote:Hi SK,
- Technically, it was not a
- Technically, it was not a
- Technically, it was not a
- Technically, it was not a
- Technically, it was not a
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:
Yes it
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:
Yes it
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:
Yes it
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:
Yes it
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:
Yes it
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:All this
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:All this
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:All this
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:All this
- Nor-LA-SD-guy wrote:All this
- Pretty impressive move today.
- Pretty impressive move today.
- Pretty impressive move today.
- Pretty impressive move today.
- Pretty impressive move today.
- I’m a bit confused by your
- I’m a bit confused by your
- I’m a bit confused by your
- I’m a bit confused by your
- I’m a bit confused by your
- SD Realtor wrote:I agree with
- SD Realtor wrote:I agree with
- SD Realtor wrote:I agree with
- SD Realtor wrote:I agree with
- SD Realtor wrote:I agree with
- No, I’m not particularly
- No, I’m not particularly
- No, I’m not particularly
- No, I’m not particularly
- No, I’m not particularly
- Zeitgeist wrote:No doubt.
- Zeitgeist wrote:No doubt.
- Zeitgeist wrote:No doubt.
- Zeitgeist wrote:No doubt.
- Zeitgeist wrote:No doubt.
- Zeitgeist wrote:Keep posting.
- Zeitgeist wrote:Keep posting.
- Zeitgeist wrote:Keep posting.
- Zeitgeist wrote:Keep posting.
- Zeitgeist wrote:Keep posting.
- Zeitgeist wrote:Thank you for
- Zeitgeist wrote:Thank you for
- Zeitgeist wrote:Thank you for
- Zeitgeist wrote:Thank you for
- Zeitgeist wrote:Thank you for
- Butleroftwo wrote:SK in CV
- Butleroftwo wrote:SK in CV
- Butleroftwo wrote:SK in CV
- Butleroftwo wrote:SK in CV
- Butleroftwo wrote:SK in CV
- Zeitgeist wrote:Sec. 3111,
- Zeitgeist wrote:Sec. 3111,
- Zeitgeist wrote:Sec. 3111,
- Zeitgeist wrote:Sec. 3111,
- Zeitgeist wrote:Sec. 3111,
- Zeitgeist wrote:”Conversely,
- Zeitgeist wrote:”Conversely,
- Zeitgeist wrote:”Conversely,
- Zeitgeist wrote:”Conversely,
- Zeitgeist wrote:”Conversely,
- Zeitgeist wrote:Oregon Offers
- Zeitgeist wrote:Oregon Offers
- Zeitgeist wrote:Oregon Offers
- Zeitgeist wrote:Oregon Offers
- Zeitgeist wrote:Oregon Offers
- Zeitgeist wrote:“On May 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:“On May 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:“On May 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:“On May 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:“On May 21,
- afx114 wrote:
It’s no
- afx114 wrote:
It’s no
- afx114 wrote:
It’s no
- afx114 wrote:
It’s no
- afx114 wrote:
It’s no
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- [quote=Allan from
- [quote=Allan from
- [quote=Allan from
- [quote=Allan from
- [quote=Allan from
- I could be wrong, but I can
- I could be wrong, but I can
- I could be wrong, but I can
- I could be wrong, but I can
- I could be wrong, but I can
- The headline is more than a
- The headline is more than a
- The headline is more than a
- The headline is more than a
- The headline is more than a
- Somebody does.
afx114
- Somebody does.
afx114
- Somebody does.
afx114
- Somebody does.
afx114
- Somebody does.
afx114
- AN wrote:dbapig wrote:
Yes
- AN wrote:dbapig wrote:
Yes
- AN wrote:dbapig wrote:
Yes
- AN wrote:dbapig wrote:
Yes
- AN wrote:dbapig wrote:
Yes
- Veritas wrote:Obama Care, The
- Veritas wrote:Obama Care, The
- Veritas wrote:Obama Care, The
- Veritas wrote:Obama Care, The
- Veritas wrote:Obama Care, The
- pepsi wrote:That is not true
- pepsi wrote:That is not true
- pepsi wrote:That is not true
- pepsi wrote:That is not true
- pepsi wrote:That is not true
- pepsi wrote:socrattt
- pepsi wrote:socrattt
- pepsi wrote:socrattt
- pepsi wrote:socrattt
- pepsi wrote:socrattt
- To elaborate on what
- To elaborate on what
- To elaborate on what
- To elaborate on what
- To elaborate on what
- Was it purchased at a
- Was it purchased at a
- Was it purchased at a
- Was it purchased at a
- Was it purchased at a
- Zeitgeist wrote:OK
- Zeitgeist wrote:OK
- Zeitgeist wrote:OK
- Zeitgeist wrote:OK
- Zeitgeist wrote:OK
- Zeitgeist wrote:July 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:July 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:July 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:July 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:July 21,
- Zeitgeist wrote:I am
- Zeitgeist wrote:I am
- Zeitgeist wrote:I am
- Zeitgeist wrote:I am
- Zeitgeist wrote:I am
- Overall, it would greatly
- Overall, it would greatly
- Overall, it would greatly
- Overall, it would greatly
- Overall, it would greatly
- The “essential, enhanced and
- The “essential, enhanced and
- The “essential, enhanced and
- The “essential, enhanced and
- The “essential, enhanced and
- AN wrote:
Please see
- AN wrote:
Please see
- AN wrote:
Please see
- AN wrote:
Please see
- AN wrote:
Please see
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:SK in CV
- AN wrote:
The link I posted
- AN wrote:
The link I posted
- AN wrote:
The link I posted
- AN wrote:
The link I posted
- AN wrote:
The link I posted
- There are some agents that
- There are some agents that
- There are some agents that
- There are some agents that
- There are some agents that
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- flu][quote=sobmaz
- flu][quote=sobmaz
- flu][quote=sobmaz
- flu][quote=sobmaz
- flu][quote=sobmaz
- Dukehorn wrote:COBRA is very
- Dukehorn wrote:COBRA is very
- Dukehorn wrote:COBRA is very
- Dukehorn wrote:COBRA is very
- Dukehorn wrote:COBRA is very
- It shows up on google as
- It shows up on google as
- It shows up on google as
- It shows up on google as
- It shows up on google as
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Zeitgeist wrote:Rudy
- Zeitgeist wrote:Rudy
- Zeitgeist wrote:Rudy
- Zeitgeist wrote:Rudy
- Zeitgeist wrote:Rudy
- “Passive income” has a very
- “Passive income” has a very
- “Passive income” has a very
- “Passive income” has a very
- “Passive income” has a very
- AN wrote:As you stated, most
- AN wrote:As you stated, most
- AN wrote:As you stated, most
- AN wrote:As you stated, most
- AN wrote:As you stated, most
- Karl Rove is a liar.
- Karl Rove is a liar.
- Karl Rove is a liar.
- Karl Rove is a liar.
- Karl Rove is a liar.
- GH wrote:The most likely
- GH wrote:The most likely
- GH wrote:The most likely
- GH wrote:The most likely
- GH wrote:The most likely
- I know what to do!!
Since
- I know what to do!!
Since
- I know what to do!!
Since
- I know what to do!!
Since
- I know what to do!!
Since
- Zeitgeist wrote:”There you go
- Zeitgeist wrote:”There you go
- Zeitgeist wrote:”There you go
- Zeitgeist wrote:”There you go
- Zeitgeist wrote:”There you go
- No he’s not right. And
- No he’s not right. And
- No he’s not right. And
- No he’s not right. And
- No he’s not right. And
- I think you miss an important
- I think you miss an important
- I think you miss an important
- I think you miss an important
- I think you miss an important
- UCGal wrote:
I would argue
- UCGal wrote:
I would argue
- UCGal wrote:
I would argue
- UCGal wrote:
I would argue
- UCGal wrote:
I would argue
- EconProf wrote:SK: When tax
- EconProf wrote:SK: When tax
- EconProf wrote:SK: When tax
- EconProf wrote:SK: When tax
- EconProf wrote:SK: When tax
- AN wrote:Really? 56%? You
- AN wrote:Really? 56%? You
- AN wrote:Really? 56%? You
- AN wrote:Really? 56%? You
- AN wrote:Really? 56%? You
- Great post analyst.
When
- Great post analyst.
When
- Great post analyst.
When
- Great post analyst.
When
- Great post analyst.
When
- EconProf wrote:
The clear
- EconProf wrote:
The clear
- EconProf wrote:
The clear
- EconProf wrote:
The clear
- EconProf wrote:
The clear
- luchabee wrote:
We simply
- luchabee wrote:
We simply
- luchabee wrote:
We simply
- luchabee wrote:
We simply
- luchabee wrote:
We simply
- luchabee wrote:
You can’t be
- luchabee wrote:
You can’t be
- luchabee wrote:
You can’t be
- luchabee wrote:
You can’t be
- luchabee wrote:
You can’t be
- luchabee wrote:
I think your
- luchabee wrote:
I think your
- luchabee wrote:
I think your
- luchabee wrote:
I think your
- luchabee wrote:
I think your
- GH wrote:SK,
Some of my best
- GH wrote:SK,
Some of my best
- GH wrote:SK,
Some of my best
- GH wrote:SK,
Some of my best
- GH wrote:SK,
Some of my best
- Nothing much will
- Nothing much will
- Nothing much will
- Nothing much will
- Nothing much will
- I do believe we
- I do believe we
- I do believe we
- I do believe we
- I do believe we
- Zeitgeist wrote: Your
- Zeitgeist wrote: Your
- Zeitgeist wrote: Your
- Zeitgeist wrote: Your
- Zeitgeist wrote: Your
- The origin of that quote is
- The origin of that quote is
- The origin of that quote is
- The origin of that quote is
- The origin of that quote is
- That quote is
- That quote is
- That quote is
- That quote is
- That quote is
- Just as I thought
- Just as I thought
- Just as I thought
- Just as I thought
- Just as I thought
- Zeitgeist wrote: I consider
- Zeitgeist wrote: I consider
- Zeitgeist wrote: I consider
- Zeitgeist wrote: I consider
- Zeitgeist wrote: I consider
- Asset managers is stupid.
It
- Asset managers is stupid.
It
- Asset managers is stupid.
It
- Asset managers is stupid.
It
- Asset managers is stupid.
It
- Nobody wants it both
- Nobody wants it both
- Nobody wants it both
- Nobody wants it both
- Nobody wants it both
- GH wrote:I am pretty certain
- GH wrote:I am pretty certain
- GH wrote:I am pretty certain
- GH wrote:I am pretty certain
- GH wrote:I am pretty certain
- Aecetia wrote:Allan,
Good
- Aecetia wrote:Allan,
Good
- Aecetia wrote:Allan,
Good
- Aecetia wrote:Allan,
Good
- Aecetia wrote:Allan,
Good
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Sk,
Your
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Sk,
Your
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Sk,
Your
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Sk,
Your
- Zeitgeist wrote:
Sk,
Your
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Allan from Fallbrook
- Zeitgeist wrote:SK Try
- Zeitgeist wrote:SK Try
- Zeitgeist wrote:SK Try
- Zeitgeist wrote:SK Try
- Zeitgeist wrote:SK Try
- Zeitgeist wrote:I think a
- Zeitgeist wrote:I think a
- Zeitgeist wrote:I think a
- Zeitgeist wrote:I think a
- Zeitgeist wrote:I think a
- Zeitgeist wrote:It will just
- Zeitgeist wrote:It will just
- Zeitgeist wrote:It will just
- Zeitgeist wrote:It will just
- Zeitgeist wrote:It will just
- Jefferson Beauregard Sessions
- Jefferson Beauregard Sessions
- Jefferson Beauregard Sessions
- Jefferson Beauregard Sessions
- Jefferson Beauregard Sessions
- briansd1 wrote: Kids will
- briansd1 wrote: Kids will
- briansd1 wrote: Kids will
- briansd1 wrote: Kids will
- briansd1 wrote: Kids will
- Have a problem with
- Have a problem with
- Have a problem with
- Have a problem with
- Have a problem with
- And one more thing
- And one more thing
- And one more thing
- And one more thing
- And one more thing
- socrattt wrote:
Your last
- socrattt wrote:
Your last
- socrattt wrote:
Your last
- socrattt wrote:
Your last
- socrattt wrote:
Your last
- Quote: socrattt said:
As to
- Quote: socrattt said:
As to
- Quote: socrattt said:
As to
- Quote: socrattt said:
As to
- Quote: socrattt said:
As to
- For socrattt:
I’m quite sure
- For socrattt:
I’m quite sure
- For socrattt:
I’m quite sure
- For socrattt:
I’m quite sure
- For socrattt:
I’m quite sure
- socrattt wrote:
SK, I am very
- socrattt wrote:
SK, I am very
- socrattt wrote:
SK, I am very
- socrattt wrote:
SK, I am very
- socrattt wrote:
SK, I am very
- LOL Socratt
It seems you are
- LOL Socratt
It seems you are
- LOL Socratt
It seems you are
- LOL Socratt
It seems you are
- LOL Socratt
It seems you are
- Quote:Blah, blah, blah
Let’s
- Quote:Blah, blah, blah
Let’s
- Quote:Blah, blah, blah
Let’s
- Quote:Blah, blah, blah
Let’s
- Quote:Blah, blah, blah
Let’s
- Socratt wrote:
SK, it’s
- Socratt wrote:
SK, it’s
- Socratt wrote:
SK, it’s
- Socratt wrote:
SK, it’s
- Socratt wrote:
SK, it’s
- Your explanation of the bill
- Your explanation of the bill
- Your explanation of the bill
- Your explanation of the bill
- Your explanation of the bill
- I’m a liberal, and I’m hoping
- I’m a liberal, and I’m hoping
- I’m a liberal, and I’m hoping
- I’m a liberal, and I’m hoping
- I’m a liberal, and I’m hoping
- They are not wrong. They’re
- They are not wrong. They’re
- They are not wrong. They’re
- They are not wrong. They’re
- They are not wrong. They’re
- I agree with this.
But keep
- I agree with this.
But keep
- I agree with this.
But keep
- I agree with this.
But keep
- I agree with this.
But keep
- DataAgent wrote:>>>
- DataAgent wrote:>>>
- DataAgent wrote:>>>
- DataAgent wrote:>>>
- DataAgent wrote:>>>
- BS
There may be some
- BS
There may be some
- BS
There may be some
- BS
There may be some
- BS
There may be some
- The home office thing is a
- The home office thing is a
- The home office thing is a
- The home office thing is a
- The home office thing is a
- Those three choices aren’t
- Those three choices aren’t
- Those three choices aren’t
- Those three choices aren’t
- Those three choices aren’t
- Perspective and
- Perspective and
- Perspective and
- Perspective and
- Perspective and
- It has to be the former.
The
- It has to be the former.
The
- It has to be the former.
The
- It has to be the former.
The
- It has to be the former.
The
- Exactly.
Sample is just too
- Exactly.
Sample is just too
- Exactly.
Sample is just too
- Exactly.
Sample is just too
- Exactly.
Sample is just too
- This is a good thing for all
- This is a good thing for all
- This is a good thing for all
- This is a good thing for all
- This is a good thing for all
- At almost $370 per square
- At almost $370 per square
- At almost $370 per square
- At almost $370 per square
- At almost $370 per square
- A couple of ideas for you.
- A couple of ideas for you.
- A couple of ideas for you.
- A couple of ideas for you.
- A couple of ideas for you.
- Discharge of HELOC debt in
- Discharge of HELOC debt in
- Discharge of HELOC debt in
- Discharge of HELOC debt in
- Discharge of HELOC debt in
- To answer your questions, in
- To answer your questions, in
- To answer your questions, in
- To answer your questions, in
- To answer your questions, in
- I’m not underestimating the
- I’m not underestimating the
- I’m not underestimating the
- I’m not underestimating the
- I’m not underestimating the
- You have a few things
- You have a few things
- You have a few things
- You have a few things
- You have a few things
- It is actually 85%. The new
- It is actually 85%. The new
- It is actually 85%. The new
- It is actually 85%. The new
- It is actually 85%. The new
- Ask for amateur advice
- Ask for amateur advice
- Ask for amateur advice
- Ask for amateur advice
- Ask for amateur advice
- Marriage is a state
- Marriage is a state
- Marriage is a state
- Marriage is a state
- Marriage is a state
- The cost of student housing
- The cost of student housing
- The cost of student housing
- The cost of student housing
- The cost of student housing
- If the FHA is providing
- If the FHA is providing
- If the FHA is providing
- If the FHA is providing
- If the FHA is providing
- The debt to income ratio of
- The debt to income ratio of
- The debt to income ratio of
- The debt to income ratio of
- The debt to income ratio of
