- This topic has 9 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 4 months ago by flyer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 20, 2015 at 1:05 PM #21611July 20, 2015 at 1:24 PM #788071spdrunParticipant
Live and let live. You weren’t guaranteed a view when you bought the place.
July 20, 2015 at 5:40 PM #788081kcal09ParticipantNot true, when I bought the place the trees were much smaller and I paid for the view.
July 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM #788082bobbyParticipantthere’s precedence for this in recent news
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303654804576343763766328484
another vote for live and let live
a distant second is offer to pay them money and cover the cost of trimming the tree yourself
July 20, 2015 at 7:41 PM #788083HatfieldParticipantAnother vote for live and let live.
[quote=kcal09]Not true, when I bought the place the trees were much smaller and I paid for the view.[/quote]
That doesn’t constitute an agreement with the other homeowner. I’m sorry that you feel the world owes you things.
July 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM #788085flyerParticipantMy parents have a spectacular ocean view from their home in Sunset Cliffs. A few years ago, a neighbor did a teardown and built a home that blocks some of the other neighbors view of the ocean. Several residents tried to block the construction with no luck.
You can try contacting the city about it to see if you have any rights, or, possibly, contact your neighbors directly. Both may be worth a try.
July 21, 2015 at 11:39 AM #788093poorgradstudentParticipantYup, these are tales as old as time. There are some darkly hilarious tales of rich rivals intentionally building tall structures to block their neighbor’s views, especially from the wild past in New York City.
Your only legitimate hope is a kindness campaign where you try to befriend the neighbor and figure out how attached they are to the trees. Tree trimming is expensive, and trees have a way of continually growing. The neighbor may not necessarily care about keeping the trees, but they also may not want to invest any sort of money to trim or remove them.
So yeah, if you can afford it and it’s worth it to you, you could offer to pay for trimming or removal. Otherwise you’re out of luck.
July 21, 2015 at 8:46 PM #788098svelteParticipantThere are small pockets of California that have ordinances dealing with protecting views. Mostly in high-dollar areas.
But for the most part, views aren’t protected. I would guess PB falls into the latter category.
July 21, 2015 at 10:33 PM #788101HatfieldParticipantCity of San Diego has zoning rules about protecting public views but not private ones. So if somebody’s trees were blocking the view from Kate Session Park, it’d probably be a different story.
July 21, 2015 at 10:41 PM #788102flyerParticipantAlthough written in 2010, I think this article pretty much answers the question:
http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2010/01/26/oh-say-can-you-see-view-protection-in-california/
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.