Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Prop 30: Southern California vs Texas
- This topic has 161 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 11 months ago by bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 22, 2012 at 10:39 PM #20307November 22, 2012 at 11:10 PM #755133spdrunParticipant
What about one of the non-Mass. New England states? Generally educated/civilized population, strong tradition of good/locally-based governance, beautiful towns and landscape, NH and VT both have unemployment rates lower than TX.
Also, look at TOTAL tax burden, not just income tax. Property taxes in TX are often much higher than CA.
November 22, 2012 at 11:28 PM #755134anParticipant[quote=spdrun]Also, look at TOTAL tax burden, not just income tax. Property taxes in TX are often much higher than CA.[/quote]Percentage wise, yes. But $ wise, not really. You have to account for the fact that housing is A LOT cheaper.
paramount, you’re not the only one. I know a couple of people who are currently pondering/looking into the possibility of moving to TX after the election.
November 23, 2012 at 12:03 AM #755136CA renterParticipantParamount,
The primary beneficiaries of Prop 30 are the capitalist parasites who don’t pay market rate property taxes, particularly the commercial/industrial RE owners and landlords whose profits are all heavily subsidized by taxpayers, including those dreaded public sector workers who pay every bit as much in taxes as you do, and probably more if you’re not a W-2 worker.
Time to fix Prop 13 and make it applicable to a single primary residence ONLY. Our state’s budget problems have nothing to do with unions, and everything to do with Prop 13. Do some research, paramount, and stop regurgitating the propaganda from Fox News.
BTW, you still didn’t answer my question in the other thread: are you one of those people who constantly votes for bonds without ever thinking about where the money is supposed to come from to pay them off?
There are many reasons for our financial mess, but unions are NOT the ones who bear primary responsibility.
November 23, 2012 at 12:26 AM #755138paramountParticipant[quote=CA renter]
BTW, you still didn’t answer my question in the other thread: are you one of those people who constantly votes for bonds without ever thinking about where the money is supposed to come from to pay them off?
[/quote]
If I understand your question, I campaigned strongly against Measure Y, which was a “bond measure” in the Temecula school district.
This recent election was a real wake up call in so many ways, and BTW I am not a republican at all.
November 23, 2012 at 12:58 AM #755139paramountParticipantBy the way, you have to respect a state that tried to pass a TSA anti-groping law.
November 23, 2012 at 9:38 AM #755148EconProfParticipantU haul truck prices are based on supply and demand.
It costs 983 to take a truck from San Antonio to San Francisco, and 1693 to go the other direction.November 23, 2012 at 9:47 AM #755149patbParticipantEver spend teh summer in Texas?
WIth Global warming cutting in Texas may become uninhabitable.
November 23, 2012 at 10:39 AM #755150moneymakerParticipantEast Texas around Lufkin/Nacodogches is greener,has better hunting and far enough away from Houston to be bearable. I’ve never lived there but my mom and her brother own property there, which is now paying for itself many times over with gas royalties.
November 23, 2012 at 1:10 PM #755153paramountParticipant[quote=spdrun]What about one of the non-Mass. New England states? Generally educated/civilized population, strong tradition of good/locally-based governance, beautiful towns and landscape, NH and VT both have unemployment rates lower than TX.
Also, look at TOTAL tax burden, not just income tax. Property taxes in TX are often much higher than CA.[/quote]
New England is awesome, I have family there and have spent a lot of time in Boston and even Vermont.
Here’s the thing: I want to be free, I want to live in Freedom.
That can’t be done in any state that is controlled by public employee unions, with massive gov’t regulation.
California and Vermont and New England in general are about the same in terms of the freedom deficit.
Now, I realize the federal government has rendered the constitution meaningless, so in a sense it doesn’t matter where you go in the U.S., but at least Texas does assert it’s independence.
November 23, 2012 at 1:16 PM #755154CDMA ENGParticipant[quote=EconProf]U haul truck prices are based on supply and demand.
It costs 983 to take a truck from San Antonio to San Francisco, and 1693 to go the other direction.[/quote]LOL! Excellent analysis. Goes to show big matters can be proved in simple terms.
I once investigate the same thing only it was sending a 44,000 Kg shipping containner to China. It was only 550 bucks to go to China but coming the other direction was entirely different.
CE
November 23, 2012 at 2:07 PM #755157EconProfParticipantAnd your point is…
November 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM #755159EconProfParticipantWhoops. Just retread your post. Didn’t mean to sound snarky.
November 23, 2012 at 2:14 PM #755161EconProfParticipantReread, not retread.
Too much turkey.
Zzzzzzzz…November 23, 2012 at 2:19 PM #755162paramountParticipantGeorge Carlin: You have no Rights!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.