Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Real Estate Contract Question
- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by
SK in CV.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 19, 2011 at 9:55 PM #18953July 20, 2011 at 5:18 PM #711206
DataAgent
ParticipantProbably not. Real estate contracts need to be in writing. An unsigned contract becomes a verbal contract which probably wouldn’t be enforceable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:18 PM #711303ParticipantProbably not. Real estate contracts need to be in writing. An unsigned contract becomes a verbal contract which probably wouldn’t be enforceable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:18 PM #712412ParticipantProbably not. Real estate contracts need to be in writing. An unsigned contract becomes a verbal contract which probably wouldn’t be enforceable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:18 PM #712052ParticipantProbably not. Real estate contracts need to be in writing. An unsigned contract becomes a verbal contract which probably wouldn’t be enforceable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:18 PM #711899ParticipantProbably not. Real estate contracts need to be in writing. An unsigned contract becomes a verbal contract which probably wouldn’t be enforceable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:59 PM #711211SK in CV
ParticipantI’d agree with DataAgent, except…the way you worded the question leaves some wiggle room. It also depends on whether both sides want there to be a contract. If they do, whatever the flaw, it can be remedied.
If the buyer (or seller for that matter) wants to void the contract, it depends on what “wasn’t fully signed off” means. If the seller never signed, it’s not a contract.
If the seller forgot to initial one page, it probably is. (I haven’t looked at a residential sales agreement for awhile, and I don’t think there’s a clause requiring initials on all pages in order for the contract to be binding. State law does not require it. Initials protect the counter-party, not the initialer.) I’m sure there are other minor flaws like that, which wouldn’t necessarily make the contract void or voidable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:59 PM #711308ParticipantI’d agree with DataAgent, except…the way you worded the question leaves some wiggle room. It also depends on whether both sides want there to be a contract. If they do, whatever the flaw, it can be remedied.
If the buyer (or seller for that matter) wants to void the contract, it depends on what “wasn’t fully signed off” means. If the seller never signed, it’s not a contract.
If the seller forgot to initial one page, it probably is. (I haven’t looked at a residential sales agreement for awhile, and I don’t think there’s a clause requiring initials on all pages in order for the contract to be binding. State law does not require it. Initials protect the counter-party, not the initialer.) I’m sure there are other minor flaws like that, which wouldn’t necessarily make the contract void or voidable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:59 PM #712417ParticipantI’d agree with DataAgent, except…the way you worded the question leaves some wiggle room. It also depends on whether both sides want there to be a contract. If they do, whatever the flaw, it can be remedied.
If the buyer (or seller for that matter) wants to void the contract, it depends on what “wasn’t fully signed off” means. If the seller never signed, it’s not a contract.
If the seller forgot to initial one page, it probably is. (I haven’t looked at a residential sales agreement for awhile, and I don’t think there’s a clause requiring initials on all pages in order for the contract to be binding. State law does not require it. Initials protect the counter-party, not the initialer.) I’m sure there are other minor flaws like that, which wouldn’t necessarily make the contract void or voidable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:59 PM #712058ParticipantI’d agree with DataAgent, except…the way you worded the question leaves some wiggle room. It also depends on whether both sides want there to be a contract. If they do, whatever the flaw, it can be remedied.
If the buyer (or seller for that matter) wants to void the contract, it depends on what “wasn’t fully signed off” means. If the seller never signed, it’s not a contract.
If the seller forgot to initial one page, it probably is. (I haven’t looked at a residential sales agreement for awhile, and I don’t think there’s a clause requiring initials on all pages in order for the contract to be binding. State law does not require it. Initials protect the counter-party, not the initialer.) I’m sure there are other minor flaws like that, which wouldn’t necessarily make the contract void or voidable.
July 20, 2011 at 5:59 PM #711904ParticipantI’d agree with DataAgent, except…the way you worded the question leaves some wiggle room. It also depends on whether both sides want there to be a contract. If they do, whatever the flaw, it can be remedied.
If the buyer (or seller for that matter) wants to void the contract, it depends on what “wasn’t fully signed off” means. If the seller never signed, it’s not a contract.
If the seller forgot to initial one page, it probably is. (I haven’t looked at a residential sales agreement for awhile, and I don’t think there’s a clause requiring initials on all pages in order for the contract to be binding. State law does not require it. Initials protect the counter-party, not the initialer.) I’m sure there are other minor flaws like that, which wouldn’t necessarily make the contract void or voidable.
July 20, 2011 at 8:18 PM #711939paramount
ParticipantThanks very much for the responses – it was as SK brought up: one page was not initialed by the seller.
July 20, 2011 at 8:18 PM #712452ParticipantThanks very much for the responses – it was as SK brought up: one page was not initialed by the seller.
July 20, 2011 at 8:18 PM #712092ParticipantThanks very much for the responses – it was as SK brought up: one page was not initialed by the seller.
July 20, 2011 at 8:18 PM #711246ParticipantThanks very much for the responses – it was as SK brought up: one page was not initialed by the seller.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.