- This topic has 355 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 15, 2010 at 10:54 AM #18290December 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM #639732
an
ParticipantYou won’t hear me complaining. $ in my pocket is better than $ in their pockets. Especially if I earn that money and not them.
December 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM #639803ParticipantYou won’t hear me complaining. $ in my pocket is better than $ in their pockets. Especially if I earn that money and not them.
December 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM #640384ParticipantYou won’t hear me complaining. $ in my pocket is better than $ in their pockets. Especially if I earn that money and not them.
December 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM #640520ParticipantYou won’t hear me complaining. $ in my pocket is better than $ in their pockets. Especially if I earn that money and not them.
December 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM #640837ParticipantYou won’t hear me complaining. $ in my pocket is better than $ in their pockets. Especially if I earn that money and not them.
December 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM #639757PatentGuy
ParticipantEveryone who thinks higher taxes should be paid, you are welcome to set an example and pay higher taxes. Otherwise, STFU.
If you just think someone else should pay more, but not you, then STFU.
If you are rich (income over $200K single/$250K married) and you voted for Obama, then STFU unless you pay federal taxes at the 2000 Clinton rates, including the Schedule A phase outs. No write-offs for you.
And, please don’t whine about how someone else should be paying higher taxes unless you pay the “use” tax you owe to California when you buy stuff from Amazon without paying CA sales tax. You know who you are.
December 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM #639828ParticipantEveryone who thinks higher taxes should be paid, you are welcome to set an example and pay higher taxes. Otherwise, STFU.
If you just think someone else should pay more, but not you, then STFU.
If you are rich (income over $200K single/$250K married) and you voted for Obama, then STFU unless you pay federal taxes at the 2000 Clinton rates, including the Schedule A phase outs. No write-offs for you.
And, please don’t whine about how someone else should be paying higher taxes unless you pay the “use” tax you owe to California when you buy stuff from Amazon without paying CA sales tax. You know who you are.
December 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM #640409ParticipantEveryone who thinks higher taxes should be paid, you are welcome to set an example and pay higher taxes. Otherwise, STFU.
If you just think someone else should pay more, but not you, then STFU.
If you are rich (income over $200K single/$250K married) and you voted for Obama, then STFU unless you pay federal taxes at the 2000 Clinton rates, including the Schedule A phase outs. No write-offs for you.
And, please don’t whine about how someone else should be paying higher taxes unless you pay the “use” tax you owe to California when you buy stuff from Amazon without paying CA sales tax. You know who you are.
December 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM #640545ParticipantEveryone who thinks higher taxes should be paid, you are welcome to set an example and pay higher taxes. Otherwise, STFU.
If you just think someone else should pay more, but not you, then STFU.
If you are rich (income over $200K single/$250K married) and you voted for Obama, then STFU unless you pay federal taxes at the 2000 Clinton rates, including the Schedule A phase outs. No write-offs for you.
And, please don’t whine about how someone else should be paying higher taxes unless you pay the “use” tax you owe to California when you buy stuff from Amazon without paying CA sales tax. You know who you are.
December 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM #640862ParticipantEveryone who thinks higher taxes should be paid, you are welcome to set an example and pay higher taxes. Otherwise, STFU.
If you just think someone else should pay more, but not you, then STFU.
If you are rich (income over $200K single/$250K married) and you voted for Obama, then STFU unless you pay federal taxes at the 2000 Clinton rates, including the Schedule A phase outs. No write-offs for you.
And, please don’t whine about how someone else should be paying higher taxes unless you pay the “use” tax you owe to California when you buy stuff from Amazon without paying CA sales tax. You know who you are.
December 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM #639762briansd1
GuestI’m not setting the example. It should be a national effort.
You don’t see Warren Buffet and Bill Gates paying higher taxes on their own, do you? They did support Obama.
December 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM #639833GuestI’m not setting the example. It should be a national effort.
You don’t see Warren Buffet and Bill Gates paying higher taxes on their own, do you? They did support Obama.
December 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM #640414GuestI’m not setting the example. It should be a national effort.
You don’t see Warren Buffet and Bill Gates paying higher taxes on their own, do you? They did support Obama.
December 15, 2010 at 12:39 PM #640550GuestI’m not setting the example. It should be a national effort.
You don’t see Warren Buffet and Bill Gates paying higher taxes on their own, do you? They did support Obama.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.