- This topic has 220 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 20, 2010 at 9:35 AM #18097October 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM #620493briansd1Guest
To me, it all about the love of your fellow humans.
Love is a actually too strong of a word because I certainly don’t love strangers that I don’t know.
For me, it’s a all about social equity and inclusion.
For example, I support including unauthorized immigrants who have been here for years or decades into our society. They are already here.
The alternatives of keeping on excluding them (as in apartheid) or deporting them are inhumane.
October 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM #620574briansd1GuestTo me, it all about the love of your fellow humans.
Love is a actually too strong of a word because I certainly don’t love strangers that I don’t know.
For me, it’s a all about social equity and inclusion.
For example, I support including unauthorized immigrants who have been here for years or decades into our society. They are already here.
The alternatives of keeping on excluding them (as in apartheid) or deporting them are inhumane.
October 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM #621131briansd1GuestTo me, it all about the love of your fellow humans.
Love is a actually too strong of a word because I certainly don’t love strangers that I don’t know.
For me, it’s a all about social equity and inclusion.
For example, I support including unauthorized immigrants who have been here for years or decades into our society. They are already here.
The alternatives of keeping on excluding them (as in apartheid) or deporting them are inhumane.
October 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM #621251briansd1GuestTo me, it all about the love of your fellow humans.
Love is a actually too strong of a word because I certainly don’t love strangers that I don’t know.
For me, it’s a all about social equity and inclusion.
For example, I support including unauthorized immigrants who have been here for years or decades into our society. They are already here.
The alternatives of keeping on excluding them (as in apartheid) or deporting them are inhumane.
October 20, 2010 at 10:24 AM #621570briansd1GuestTo me, it all about the love of your fellow humans.
Love is a actually too strong of a word because I certainly don’t love strangers that I don’t know.
For me, it’s a all about social equity and inclusion.
For example, I support including unauthorized immigrants who have been here for years or decades into our society. They are already here.
The alternatives of keeping on excluding them (as in apartheid) or deporting them are inhumane.
October 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM #620533UCGalParticipantI vote, every election, for a few reasons:
– There’s usually a lesser of evils choice… While I might not like either candidate – typically one is significantly worse, in my view.
– I want to cancel out the vote of one specific coworker who is just wrong on most everything. He votes – so I have to vote to cancel his vote. This is a surprisingly strong motivation. Petty? Probably. But it gets me to the polls.
– I feel like if I don’t vote – I can’t gripe about the politicians that got into office despite my vote against them. I feel more vested in the system, and less hypocritical about griping about the idiots knowing I voted against them.
October 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM #620614UCGalParticipantI vote, every election, for a few reasons:
– There’s usually a lesser of evils choice… While I might not like either candidate – typically one is significantly worse, in my view.
– I want to cancel out the vote of one specific coworker who is just wrong on most everything. He votes – so I have to vote to cancel his vote. This is a surprisingly strong motivation. Petty? Probably. But it gets me to the polls.
– I feel like if I don’t vote – I can’t gripe about the politicians that got into office despite my vote against them. I feel more vested in the system, and less hypocritical about griping about the idiots knowing I voted against them.
October 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM #621171UCGalParticipantI vote, every election, for a few reasons:
– There’s usually a lesser of evils choice… While I might not like either candidate – typically one is significantly worse, in my view.
– I want to cancel out the vote of one specific coworker who is just wrong on most everything. He votes – so I have to vote to cancel his vote. This is a surprisingly strong motivation. Petty? Probably. But it gets me to the polls.
– I feel like if I don’t vote – I can’t gripe about the politicians that got into office despite my vote against them. I feel more vested in the system, and less hypocritical about griping about the idiots knowing I voted against them.
October 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM #621292UCGalParticipantI vote, every election, for a few reasons:
– There’s usually a lesser of evils choice… While I might not like either candidate – typically one is significantly worse, in my view.
– I want to cancel out the vote of one specific coworker who is just wrong on most everything. He votes – so I have to vote to cancel his vote. This is a surprisingly strong motivation. Petty? Probably. But it gets me to the polls.
– I feel like if I don’t vote – I can’t gripe about the politicians that got into office despite my vote against them. I feel more vested in the system, and less hypocritical about griping about the idiots knowing I voted against them.
October 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM #621610UCGalParticipantI vote, every election, for a few reasons:
– There’s usually a lesser of evils choice… While I might not like either candidate – typically one is significantly worse, in my view.
– I want to cancel out the vote of one specific coworker who is just wrong on most everything. He votes – so I have to vote to cancel his vote. This is a surprisingly strong motivation. Petty? Probably. But it gets me to the polls.
– I feel like if I don’t vote – I can’t gripe about the politicians that got into office despite my vote against them. I feel more vested in the system, and less hypocritical about griping about the idiots knowing I voted against them.
October 20, 2010 at 10:49 AM #620528enron_by_the_seaParticipantWe may not realize it but we are one of the most fortunate people living on this plant – ever!!!
Generations before us endured wars, famines, tyrants, slavary, bigotry, genocides, diasters and god knows what to bring us to this point.
In that context the system we have today works pretty well. Sure there are minor issues that we debate and don’t like. But hey, we have our life and liberty and freedoms. Our forefathers could only dream of those.
But nothing should be taken for granted. If we don’t vote and wisely choose and actively participate as much as we can in this system, then we can’t expect the system to survive.
So while I may be frustrated with both parties and politicians, I still do my best to choose lesser of the evils and make sure that there are checks and balances in the system. If we all just gave up, how long before we will descend into anarchy (historically the most common state of humanity)?
So I have decided to become a “checks and balances” voter. If Dems are capturing congress I would vote for a republican president and vice versa. The gridlock seems to serve the system well.
October 20, 2010 at 10:49 AM #620609enron_by_the_seaParticipantWe may not realize it but we are one of the most fortunate people living on this plant – ever!!!
Generations before us endured wars, famines, tyrants, slavary, bigotry, genocides, diasters and god knows what to bring us to this point.
In that context the system we have today works pretty well. Sure there are minor issues that we debate and don’t like. But hey, we have our life and liberty and freedoms. Our forefathers could only dream of those.
But nothing should be taken for granted. If we don’t vote and wisely choose and actively participate as much as we can in this system, then we can’t expect the system to survive.
So while I may be frustrated with both parties and politicians, I still do my best to choose lesser of the evils and make sure that there are checks and balances in the system. If we all just gave up, how long before we will descend into anarchy (historically the most common state of humanity)?
So I have decided to become a “checks and balances” voter. If Dems are capturing congress I would vote for a republican president and vice versa. The gridlock seems to serve the system well.
October 20, 2010 at 10:49 AM #621166enron_by_the_seaParticipantWe may not realize it but we are one of the most fortunate people living on this plant – ever!!!
Generations before us endured wars, famines, tyrants, slavary, bigotry, genocides, diasters and god knows what to bring us to this point.
In that context the system we have today works pretty well. Sure there are minor issues that we debate and don’t like. But hey, we have our life and liberty and freedoms. Our forefathers could only dream of those.
But nothing should be taken for granted. If we don’t vote and wisely choose and actively participate as much as we can in this system, then we can’t expect the system to survive.
So while I may be frustrated with both parties and politicians, I still do my best to choose lesser of the evils and make sure that there are checks and balances in the system. If we all just gave up, how long before we will descend into anarchy (historically the most common state of humanity)?
So I have decided to become a “checks and balances” voter. If Dems are capturing congress I would vote for a republican president and vice versa. The gridlock seems to serve the system well.
October 20, 2010 at 10:49 AM #621288enron_by_the_seaParticipantWe may not realize it but we are one of the most fortunate people living on this plant – ever!!!
Generations before us endured wars, famines, tyrants, slavary, bigotry, genocides, diasters and god knows what to bring us to this point.
In that context the system we have today works pretty well. Sure there are minor issues that we debate and don’t like. But hey, we have our life and liberty and freedoms. Our forefathers could only dream of those.
But nothing should be taken for granted. If we don’t vote and wisely choose and actively participate as much as we can in this system, then we can’t expect the system to survive.
So while I may be frustrated with both parties and politicians, I still do my best to choose lesser of the evils and make sure that there are checks and balances in the system. If we all just gave up, how long before we will descend into anarchy (historically the most common state of humanity)?
So I have decided to become a “checks and balances” voter. If Dems are capturing congress I would vote for a republican president and vice versa. The gridlock seems to serve the system well.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.