Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Anyone considering Buying FNM now?
- This topic has 160 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 14, 2008 at 10:29 AM #13591August 14, 2008 at 12:18 PM #256882urbanrealtorParticipant
Just trying to keep this thread high up.
August 14, 2008 at 12:18 PM #257062urbanrealtorParticipantJust trying to keep this thread high up.
August 14, 2008 at 12:18 PM #257064urbanrealtorParticipantJust trying to keep this thread high up.
August 14, 2008 at 12:18 PM #257123urbanrealtorParticipantJust trying to keep this thread high up.
August 14, 2008 at 12:18 PM #257171urbanrealtorParticipantJust trying to keep this thread high up.
August 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM #256905(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantToo risky for my blood. Unlike other company stocks the problem with evaluating Fannie Mae is that the ultimate fate of it will likely be dictated by Government intervention, not necessarily fundamentals.
Recently the Gov’t is backstopping and potentially buying the stock providing support. But who knows what happens 6 months or a year from now, with a new Administration.
August 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM #257087(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantToo risky for my blood. Unlike other company stocks the problem with evaluating Fannie Mae is that the ultimate fate of it will likely be dictated by Government intervention, not necessarily fundamentals.
Recently the Gov’t is backstopping and potentially buying the stock providing support. But who knows what happens 6 months or a year from now, with a new Administration.
August 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM #257089(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantToo risky for my blood. Unlike other company stocks the problem with evaluating Fannie Mae is that the ultimate fate of it will likely be dictated by Government intervention, not necessarily fundamentals.
Recently the Gov’t is backstopping and potentially buying the stock providing support. But who knows what happens 6 months or a year from now, with a new Administration.
August 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM #257148(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantToo risky for my blood. Unlike other company stocks the problem with evaluating Fannie Mae is that the ultimate fate of it will likely be dictated by Government intervention, not necessarily fundamentals.
Recently the Gov’t is backstopping and potentially buying the stock providing support. But who knows what happens 6 months or a year from now, with a new Administration.
August 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM #257196(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantToo risky for my blood. Unlike other company stocks the problem with evaluating Fannie Mae is that the ultimate fate of it will likely be dictated by Government intervention, not necessarily fundamentals.
Recently the Gov’t is backstopping and potentially buying the stock providing support. But who knows what happens 6 months or a year from now, with a new Administration.
August 14, 2008 at 2:01 PM #256917(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor example, instead of backstopping the GSE’s here’s what some folks think should be the solution:
“They should have wiped out the shareholders, nationalized the institutions with legislation that they are to be reconstituted — with necessary taxpayer support to make them financially viable — as five or 10 individual privately held units,” which the government would eventually auction off to private investors, he said.
August 14, 2008 at 2:01 PM #257097(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor example, instead of backstopping the GSE’s here’s what some folks think should be the solution:
“They should have wiped out the shareholders, nationalized the institutions with legislation that they are to be reconstituted — with necessary taxpayer support to make them financially viable — as five or 10 individual privately held units,” which the government would eventually auction off to private investors, he said.
August 14, 2008 at 2:01 PM #257099(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor example, instead of backstopping the GSE’s here’s what some folks think should be the solution:
“They should have wiped out the shareholders, nationalized the institutions with legislation that they are to be reconstituted — with necessary taxpayer support to make them financially viable — as five or 10 individual privately held units,” which the government would eventually auction off to private investors, he said.
August 14, 2008 at 2:01 PM #257158(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor example, instead of backstopping the GSE’s here’s what some folks think should be the solution:
“They should have wiped out the shareholders, nationalized the institutions with legislation that they are to be reconstituted — with necessary taxpayer support to make them financially viable — as five or 10 individual privately held units,” which the government would eventually auction off to private investors, he said.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.