- This topic has 60 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by HereWeGo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 17, 2008 at 5:41 PM #11846February 17, 2008 at 6:17 PM #154621equalizerParticipant
Never underestimate the central banks, the sovereign funds, pension funds in tiny Finnish towns, etc that will do something crazy like buy 10 year with the dollar in free fall. Logic dictates that the 10 year should stay put or move up slightly with inflation, but the markets are so cooked that 10 year has better chance of going to 3.25.
I tried the rising rate fund in 2003 and got burned. Bought RRPIX when 10 year was at 3.6 and sold few years later when 10 year was at 4.5 and I lost 10%!!!!! I was right on the direction, but the damn Phds couldn’t manage the futures properly to keep exact -100% correlation.February 17, 2008 at 6:17 PM #154999equalizerParticipantNever underestimate the central banks, the sovereign funds, pension funds in tiny Finnish towns, etc that will do something crazy like buy 10 year with the dollar in free fall. Logic dictates that the 10 year should stay put or move up slightly with inflation, but the markets are so cooked that 10 year has better chance of going to 3.25.
I tried the rising rate fund in 2003 and got burned. Bought RRPIX when 10 year was at 3.6 and sold few years later when 10 year was at 4.5 and I lost 10%!!!!! I was right on the direction, but the damn Phds couldn’t manage the futures properly to keep exact -100% correlation.February 17, 2008 at 6:17 PM #154899equalizerParticipantNever underestimate the central banks, the sovereign funds, pension funds in tiny Finnish towns, etc that will do something crazy like buy 10 year with the dollar in free fall. Logic dictates that the 10 year should stay put or move up slightly with inflation, but the markets are so cooked that 10 year has better chance of going to 3.25.
I tried the rising rate fund in 2003 and got burned. Bought RRPIX when 10 year was at 3.6 and sold few years later when 10 year was at 4.5 and I lost 10%!!!!! I was right on the direction, but the damn Phds couldn’t manage the futures properly to keep exact -100% correlation.February 17, 2008 at 6:17 PM #154908equalizerParticipantNever underestimate the central banks, the sovereign funds, pension funds in tiny Finnish towns, etc that will do something crazy like buy 10 year with the dollar in free fall. Logic dictates that the 10 year should stay put or move up slightly with inflation, but the markets are so cooked that 10 year has better chance of going to 3.25.
I tried the rising rate fund in 2003 and got burned. Bought RRPIX when 10 year was at 3.6 and sold few years later when 10 year was at 4.5 and I lost 10%!!!!! I was right on the direction, but the damn Phds couldn’t manage the futures properly to keep exact -100% correlation.February 17, 2008 at 6:17 PM #154921equalizerParticipantNever underestimate the central banks, the sovereign funds, pension funds in tiny Finnish towns, etc that will do something crazy like buy 10 year with the dollar in free fall. Logic dictates that the 10 year should stay put or move up slightly with inflation, but the markets are so cooked that 10 year has better chance of going to 3.25.
I tried the rising rate fund in 2003 and got burned. Bought RRPIX when 10 year was at 3.6 and sold few years later when 10 year was at 4.5 and I lost 10%!!!!! I was right on the direction, but the damn Phds couldn’t manage the futures properly to keep exact -100% correlation.February 17, 2008 at 6:46 PM #154641SD RealtorParticipantEqualizer I will be damned!!! I bought rrpix a few years ago and got sizzled as well. You would think the shmucks running it could simply correlate of the inverse… Agreed with what you said… I am a boob when it comes to predicting the bond market.
SD Realtor
February 17, 2008 at 6:46 PM #155019SD RealtorParticipantEqualizer I will be damned!!! I bought rrpix a few years ago and got sizzled as well. You would think the shmucks running it could simply correlate of the inverse… Agreed with what you said… I am a boob when it comes to predicting the bond market.
SD Realtor
February 17, 2008 at 6:46 PM #154941SD RealtorParticipantEqualizer I will be damned!!! I bought rrpix a few years ago and got sizzled as well. You would think the shmucks running it could simply correlate of the inverse… Agreed with what you said… I am a boob when it comes to predicting the bond market.
SD Realtor
February 17, 2008 at 6:46 PM #154918SD RealtorParticipantEqualizer I will be damned!!! I bought rrpix a few years ago and got sizzled as well. You would think the shmucks running it could simply correlate of the inverse… Agreed with what you said… I am a boob when it comes to predicting the bond market.
SD Realtor
February 17, 2008 at 6:46 PM #154927SD RealtorParticipantEqualizer I will be damned!!! I bought rrpix a few years ago and got sizzled as well. You would think the shmucks running it could simply correlate of the inverse… Agreed with what you said… I am a boob when it comes to predicting the bond market.
SD Realtor
February 17, 2008 at 7:01 PM #154937EugeneParticipantLow 10-year is the best cure we have for the housing recession. Everything is possible but it’s common sense for the Fed to try to keep it low.
There are two components of low 10-year: low inflation expectations and depressed stock market.
If you think 3.78 is seriously low, consider that 90’s Japan started higher than we did and they ended up with 10-year treasury rates in 1-2% for a decade.
February 17, 2008 at 7:01 PM #155029EugeneParticipantLow 10-year is the best cure we have for the housing recession. Everything is possible but it’s common sense for the Fed to try to keep it low.
There are two components of low 10-year: low inflation expectations and depressed stock market.
If you think 3.78 is seriously low, consider that 90’s Japan started higher than we did and they ended up with 10-year treasury rates in 1-2% for a decade.
February 17, 2008 at 7:01 PM #154951EugeneParticipantLow 10-year is the best cure we have for the housing recession. Everything is possible but it’s common sense for the Fed to try to keep it low.
There are two components of low 10-year: low inflation expectations and depressed stock market.
If you think 3.78 is seriously low, consider that 90’s Japan started higher than we did and they ended up with 10-year treasury rates in 1-2% for a decade.
February 17, 2008 at 7:01 PM #154929EugeneParticipantLow 10-year is the best cure we have for the housing recession. Everything is possible but it’s common sense for the Fed to try to keep it low.
There are two components of low 10-year: low inflation expectations and depressed stock market.
If you think 3.78 is seriously low, consider that 90’s Japan started higher than we did and they ended up with 10-year treasury rates in 1-2% for a decade.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.