- This topic has 88 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 4, 2007 at 6:32 PM #10811November 4, 2007 at 6:39 PM #95446blackboxParticipant
Tell Them to read this on the union tribune
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/calbreath/20071104-9999-1b4dean.html
November 4, 2007 at 6:39 PM #95504blackboxParticipantTell Them to read this on the union tribune
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/calbreath/20071104-9999-1b4dean.html
November 4, 2007 at 6:39 PM #95511blackboxParticipantTell Them to read this on the union tribune
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/calbreath/20071104-9999-1b4dean.html
November 4, 2007 at 6:39 PM #95519blackboxParticipantTell Them to read this on the union tribune
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/calbreath/20071104-9999-1b4dean.html
November 4, 2007 at 6:45 PM #95453The OC ScamParticipantTell them next to read : “Our house price model indicates that Californian homes are 35-40% above
the price range implied by current and forecast economic conditions
(compared to 13-14% over-valuation nationally). As of August the median
house price in California was $589K, but economic conditions support
prices between $350-380K; material price declines are likely, in our view.”http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/california-valuations.pdf
November 4, 2007 at 6:45 PM #95512The OC ScamParticipantTell them next to read : “Our house price model indicates that Californian homes are 35-40% above
the price range implied by current and forecast economic conditions
(compared to 13-14% over-valuation nationally). As of August the median
house price in California was $589K, but economic conditions support
prices between $350-380K; material price declines are likely, in our view.”http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/california-valuations.pdf
November 4, 2007 at 6:45 PM #95517The OC ScamParticipantTell them next to read : “Our house price model indicates that Californian homes are 35-40% above
the price range implied by current and forecast economic conditions
(compared to 13-14% over-valuation nationally). As of August the median
house price in California was $589K, but economic conditions support
prices between $350-380K; material price declines are likely, in our view.”http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/california-valuations.pdf
November 4, 2007 at 6:45 PM #95527The OC ScamParticipantTell them next to read : “Our house price model indicates that Californian homes are 35-40% above
the price range implied by current and forecast economic conditions
(compared to 13-14% over-valuation nationally). As of August the median
house price in California was $589K, but economic conditions support
prices between $350-380K; material price declines are likely, in our view.”http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/california-valuations.pdf
November 4, 2007 at 6:52 PM #95520kewpParticipantWhen the line starts going up again the bottom just passed.
I don’t think its possible to call a bottom except via hindsight. Which is kind of ironic given that everyone claims that about bubbles as well, which obviously isn’t true.
November 4, 2007 at 6:52 PM #95535kewpParticipantWhen the line starts going up again the bottom just passed.
I don’t think its possible to call a bottom except via hindsight. Which is kind of ironic given that everyone claims that about bubbles as well, which obviously isn’t true.
November 4, 2007 at 6:52 PM #95525kewpParticipantWhen the line starts going up again the bottom just passed.
I don’t think its possible to call a bottom except via hindsight. Which is kind of ironic given that everyone claims that about bubbles as well, which obviously isn’t true.
November 4, 2007 at 6:52 PM #95461kewpParticipantWhen the line starts going up again the bottom just passed.
I don’t think its possible to call a bottom except via hindsight. Which is kind of ironic given that everyone claims that about bubbles as well, which obviously isn’t true.
November 4, 2007 at 7:02 PM #95528bsrsharmaParticipantSince they are probably unsophisticated folks, you can just suggest a simplistic formula for upper and lower bounds for price. For El Cajon, a price of $100/Sqft or less is a DEAL and $150/Sqft or more is NO DEAL. Any thing in between, let them use their discretion. While obviously trivial in complexity to track market bottom, this should at least save them from getting utterly destroyed.
November 4, 2007 at 7:02 PM #95534bsrsharmaParticipantSince they are probably unsophisticated folks, you can just suggest a simplistic formula for upper and lower bounds for price. For El Cajon, a price of $100/Sqft or less is a DEAL and $150/Sqft or more is NO DEAL. Any thing in between, let them use their discretion. While obviously trivial in complexity to track market bottom, this should at least save them from getting utterly destroyed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.